Assessing the benefits from improved hydromet services Orders of magnitude and future research Stéphane Hallegatte The World Bank, Sustainable Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic Impacts of Climate Change
Advertisements

The innovation challenge STAKEHOLDER CONFERENCE "Post-2012 climate policy for the EU" 22 NOVEMBER 2004 Niklas Höhne ECOFYS Cologne,
1 Socio-Economic Benefits Assessment on Weather Service in China Dr. LV Minghui Meeting of The WMO Forum: Social and Economic Applications and Benefits.
Investing in the Cascading Forecasting Process in Modernizing National Meteorological and Hydrological Services WB & WMO.
A methodological roadmap to assess the costs and benefits of adapting to climate change The case of natural risks Stéphane Hallegatte Centre International.
Climate Change and Health Dr Felicity Harvey CBE Director General Public Health Directorate Department of Health.
The Economics of Climate Change Nicholas Stern 15 November 2006 Presentation to the Convention Dialogue, Nairobi.
Trends in Infrastructure Investment Eighth ACCC Conference Sanctuary Cove, 27 July 2007 Jeff Balchin Director.
Food Security Prepared By :Rana Hassan Supervised By :Dr. Raed Alkowni
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
1 Capacity Development for Water and Food Security Dr. Jens Liebe UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC) GEOSS S+T Stakeholder Workshop.
National Disaster Risk Management Program NDRMP Belgrade, March
World Meteorological Organization Working together in weather, climate and water Addressing climate variability, extremes and natural disasters for LDC.
Input-Output Analysis of Climate Change: Case Study of Efficiency Driven Policy Choice of Indian Response Strategy Joyashree Roy Jadavpur University, Kolkata,
Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation to Climate Change Consultations on the Relationship between Climate and human rightsGeneva 22 October 2008 Festus.
Uptake of Met/Hydro Services Glen Anderson, Chief of Party, CCRD Zagreb, Croatia June
Protecting our Health from Climate Change: a Training Course for Public Health Professionals Chapter 5: Policy Responses to Address the Health Risks of.
Benchmarking Method Glen Anderson, Chief of Party Climate Change Resilient Development Project Zagreb, Croatia June 29, 2015.
Weather, Water, Climate Services Supporting Sustainable Development Jerry Lengoasa Deputy Director General Oslo, May 2014 World Meteorological.
23/08/20151 European Investment Bank EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK Urban Development Projects 29 th May 2009 Barbara Lemke Urban Planner Projects Directorate.
WATER ISSUES IN THE EASTERN EUROPE:
World Health Organization
Summary of Breakout Session 1.2 GEO Societal Benefit Areas (Chair: Antonio Bombelli) Coordinator of the GEO Task CL-02 “Global Carbon Observations and.
Extreme Value Analysis What is extreme value analysis?  Different statistical distributions that are used to more accurately describe the extremes of.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
Scenario-building as a communication tool Skryhan Hanna Krasnoyarsk, February, 15 – February, 22, 2014.
ICTs Tackling Climate Changes Dr. Amr Badawi Executive President NTRA.
Economics of Extreme Climatic Events By Adil Rasheed (EPFL-ENAC-ICARE-LESO-PB)
OCEANS, COASTS and ISLANDS Janot Mendler de Suarez Global Forum Working Group on Oceans, Climate & Security The Oceans Day at Cancún Oceans: Essential.
6. Values and externalities Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
Systematically accounting and assessing disaster losses and impacts.
Workshop on RISKS AND IMPACTS ON FLOOD FROM EXTREME EVENTS IN ASEAN COUNTRIES Bali, August 5 th 2015.
Climate Change & Agriculture in Uzbekistan Awareness Raising and Consultation Workshop May 19, 2010 Tashkent Dr. William R. Sutton Senior Agricultural.
Making development sustainable: the future of disaster risk management.
Lisa Goddard, Director Large El Nino event Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies st El Niño Forecast ‘86.
Daniel Kull Senior Disaster Risk Management Specialist Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR) World Bank Geneva, 19 November, 2012.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Vulnerability and Adaptation Kristie L. Ebi, Ph.D., MPH Executive Director, WGII TSU PAHO/WHO Workshop on Vulnerability and Adaptation Guidance 20 July.
NCAR’s Societal Impacts Program: WIST-Related Research Efforts Julie Demuth NCAR Societal Impacts Program 3 rd National Surface Transportation Weather.
Lars Peter Riishojgaard WIGOS Project Manager, WMO Chair, OPAG-IOS WMO Commission for Basic Systems 10th Symposium on Environmental Satellites 1.
Benefit Cost Analysis for Flood Hazard Mitigation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Method (selected excerpts from FEMA EMI Training Course)
Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Implications for Agriculture in the Asia-Pacific Region Andrew Ash Interim Director CSIRO Climate Adaptation.
December 2002 Section 8 Adaptation. Addressing Climate Change: Mitigation and Adaptation Climate Change including variability Impacts autonomous adaptation.
Meteorological & Hydrological data for water resources development.
Damage Overview Overall damages assessment Environment Productive Social Infrastructure Total Damage.
Disaster Risks in Central Asia Michael Thurman Regional Disaster Risk Reduction Advisor, ECIS "Improving Regional Coordination in Managing Compound Risks.
NOAA’s National Weather Service Meeting America’s Needs Brig. Gen. David L. Johnson, USAF (Ret.) NOAA Assistant Administrator for Weather Services AMS.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
© dreamstime CLIMATE CHANGE 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report.
SARDAR VALLABHBHAI PATEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,VASAD ENGINEERING ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT.
Scenario process Next steps. New scenarios (Share Socio-economic Pathways)
ESNA Economic Outlook 2016: Alberta’s Fiscal and Environmental Challenges “It could be worse…..” Mike Percy Ph.D. December 3,
NOAA’s National Weather Service Serving the Nation’s Environmental Forecasting Needs.
Is the world more hazardous now?
1 © 2007 NatCatSERVICE, Geo Risks Research, Munich Re Direct economic losses [mld. US$] economic losses (in values of 2006) insured losses (in values of.
National Plan for Food Security and Poverty Reduction A Thought Exercise.
1  Energy efficiency has led to a decoupling of economic and energy growth.  In 2013, OECD energy consumption = 2000 levels, while GDP expanded by 26%.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
Benchmarking Method Glen Anderson, Chief of Party
1. Monitoring & Early Warning System
One Belt One Road Summit 2017
One Belt One Road Summit 2017
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Presented by [Name] [Date]
Climate-Smart Agriculture in the Near East North Africa Region
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
GEO - Define an Architecture Integrated Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Assessing the benefits from improved hydromet services Orders of magnitude and future research Stéphane Hallegatte The World Bank, Sustainable Development Network

Disasters and asset losses If warning reduces losses by 10%, and only half of the floods are forecasted, 200m EUR of benefits per year in Europe If warning reduces losses by 50% and 75% of the floods can be forecasted, 1.5b EUR of benefits per year in Europe Idem with windstorm: between 460m and 2.7b in Europe Data from Day (1970) or Carsell et al (2004)

Annual asset losses that could be avoided thanks to EWS GDP (million USD) Potential (European-like) benefits Ratio of current vs potential benefits Estimation of current benefits Benefits from improved services Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low income 413, % Lower middle income 4,300, % Upper middle income 15,300, ,54250%2171, ,271 High income 43,000,0001,2177,145100%1,2177,145-- TOTAL 63,013,0001,78410,4701,4598, ,904 Potential benefits, assuming countries have the same potential (wrt GDP) than Europe

Annual asset losses that could be avoided thanks to EWS GDP (million USD) Potential (European-like) benefits Ratio of current vs potential benefits Estimation of current benefits Benefits from improved services Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low income 413, % Lower middle income 4,300, % Upper middle income 15,300, ,54250%2171, ,271 High income 43,000,0001,2177,145100%1,2177,145-- TOTAL 63,013,0001,78410,4701,4598, ,904 Broad assumptions about the share of potentials that are realized today

Annual asset losses that could be avoided thanks to EWS GDP (million USD) Potential (European-like) benefits Ratio of current vs potential benefits Estimation of current benefits Benefits from improved services Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low income 413, % Lower middle income 4,300, % Upper middle income 15,300, ,54250%2171, ,271 High income 43,000,0001,2177,145100%1,2177,145-- TOTAL 63,013,0001,78410,4701,4598, ,904 Estimates of current benefits in all countries

Annual asset losses that could be avoided thanks to EWS GDP (million USD) Potential (European-like) benefits Ratio of current vs potential benefits Estimation of current benefits Benefits from improved services Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low income 413, % Lower middle income 4,300, % Upper middle income 15,300, ,54250%2171, ,271 High income 43,000,0001,2177,145100%1,2177,145-- TOTAL 63,013,0001,78410,4701,4598, ,904 Hydromet services and early warning systems could reduce annual asset losses by between 300 million and 2 billion USD per year in developing countries

Other economic benefits from hydromet information in Europe Benefits from the optimization of economic production Weather sensitive sectors at the global level: – Agriculture, 2,000 billion USD; – Mining and energy, 7,000 billion USD; – Construction, 3,200 billion USD; – Transport, 4,300 billion USD. Total: sensitive sectors create more than 16,000 billion USD per year of added value, i.e. about 25% of world GDP.

Other economic benefits from hydromet information in Europe Examples of optimization of production processes: – Nuclear plants production levels take hours to adjust, and rely on electricity demand forecasts that are weather-dependent; – Some activities in the construction industry are temperature- dependent (e.g., concrete additional ingredients are required if temperature exceeds 32°C); – Farmers base their decisions (e.g., harvesting date, fertilizer application) on weather data and forecasts. – Air traffic and other transports can anticipate perturbations Case studies and national-scale studies in developed countries suggest value added gain from much larger than 1% of sector VA. With 0.1% or 1% gain, total gain from hydromet services in developed countries are between and % of GDP.

Annual economic benefits from hydromet information in developing countries GDP (million USD) Potential (European-like) benefits Ratio of current vs potential benefits Estimation of actual benefits Benefits from improved services Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low estimate Likely estimate Low income 413, ,03310% Lower middle income 4,300,0001,07510,75020%2152, ,600 Upper middle income 15,300,0003,82538,25050%1,91319,1251,91319,125 High income 43,000,00010,750107,500100%10,750107,500-- TOTAL63,013,00015,753157,53312,888128,8782,86528,654

Natural hazards kill on average 43,000 persons per year in developing countries Number of people reported killed by weather-related natural disasters ( ), in developing countries and at the world level. There is no significant trend in these series. Data from EM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database.

Developed vs. developing countries There is an annual death probability of 7.5 per million due to weather events in developing countries. The annual death probability is 2.2 per million inhabitants in developed countries. Using EWS, we assume that the annual death probability in developing countries could be reduced from 7.5 to 4 per million – Half the current level – Twice the level in developed countries Using Copenhagen Consensus values, it corresponds to an annual benefit of 700 million USD per year or 3.5 billion USD per year. This estimate is conservative, as we do not account for morbidity (injuries and disaster-caused illness)

How to improve hydromet services and EWS ? 1.The local observation system, based on ground, in-situ observations 2.Forecasting capacity, i.e. the translation of low-resolution model forecast into high-resolution forecast 3.Interpretation capacity, to translate model output into actual forecast and warnings 4.Communication tools, to make sure the alert reaches the individuals in charge to implementing prevention measures 5.Users’ decision-making capacities, to make sure warnings are actually used (including for evacuation). Cost (from national scale studies) in 80 developing countries, less than $1 billion per year.

Conclusions Type of benefits Annual benefits (million USD) Annual cost (million USD) Benefit-cost ratio MinimumLikelyMinimumLikely Reduced asset losses from disasters 3002,000 1, Reduced human losses from disasters 7003,500 Other economic benefits 3,00030,000 Total4,00035,500

Areas for future research

What about marginal benefits? Cumulative investment Benefits The problem is the non-convexity of benefits wrt investments To assess whether investments should be increased or decreased, what matters is the marginal benefit (i.e. benefit from one more dollar invested). Easier when assessing existing capability or instrument (example of the METOP system)

What about climate projections? Adaptation requires also anticipation, especially in sectors with long- term investments: – Water management infrastructure (lifetime: up to 200 years); – Energy production and distribution infrastructure (up to 80 years); – Transportation infrastructure (50 to 200 years) ; – Natural disaster protections (50 to 200 years); – Urbanism, housing and architecture (25 to 150 years). These infrastructures represent more than 200% of GDP in developed countries In developing countries, these infrastructures are currently being built and it is urgent to take climate change into account.

IPCC, 2007

What about national security? In the absence of national security considerations, much more cooperation and coordination would be possible.

The best is never to protect: the forecast creates too many false alarms to be useful. Its value is zero The best is to protect all the time: the forecast misses too many events to be useful. Its value is zero The ratio between protection cost and event losses (C/L) Value of the deterministic forecast of temperature anomaly above 8°C, 6 days in advance (144h) during the summer 2003 (850hPa level) FORECAST VALUE (0=climatology; 1=perfect forecast) Link with decision-making Source: ??

Link with decision-making Source: Olivier Mestre (Meteo-France)

The Northridge earthquake in 1994 The Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 in San Francisco The role of indirect losses

The Northridge earthquake in 1994 Tierney (1997) Giuliano and Golob (1998)

Kroll et al. (1991)

Employment impacts

Model-based assessment of indirect losses Katrina Results from the ARIO model in Louisiana Little or no indirect loss if direct losses are below $50 billion. Indirect losses soar when direct losses exceed $50 billion. Hallegatte(2008)

Conclusions We can claim that hydromet services benefits exceed costs in rich countries We can claim that better hydromet services in developing countries would be cost-efficient (if we can do it) We cannot conclude on the “optimal” budget in rich countries and on the cost-effectiveness of selected investments (except in some cases, see the Metop paper) We have a long way to go to assess the cost-benefit ratio