Program Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marylands Technology Education Voluntary State Curriculum 2007 Bob Gray Center for the Teaching of Technology & Science (ITEA-CATTS) and the University.
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
Professional Development Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany.
Elementary School Counselor
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Student Assessment Standards
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
1 ITEA Presentation of STANDARDS FOR TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY William E. Dugger Jr., DTE Pam B. Newberry September, 2000.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
What Everyone Should Know About the Successful K–12 STEM Education Report.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Striving Readers Comprehensive Literacy Program (SRCL) SRCL is a comprehensive literacy development education program to advance literacy skills for students.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers Developing Professionals: Preparing Technology Teachers ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
History and Impact of Standards for Technological Literacy Revising Standards for Technological Literacy – Content for the Study of Technology: Issues.
William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany The Complete Picture STL and AETL.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What is Technology? Broadly speaking, technology is how people modify the natural world to suit their own purposes. From the Greek word techne, meaning.
Learning4Life or Lifelong learning? Warren Goetzel, PhD GaETC – CTO Clinic Atlanta, GA 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1 Essential Components of an Effective Educational Program Overview Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Office of Service Quality
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Using Standards Aligned System to Ensure 21 st Century Teaching and Learning Institute Pennsylvania Department of Education Upper Dublin School District.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Measuring Progress and Planning Learning William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade.
Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs Realizing Excellence: Structuring Technology Programs ITEA Standards Specialist and CATTS Meeting.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Interpretation Workshop Notes
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Comprehensive Planning
Collaborative Leadership
William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade
Presentation transcript:

Program Standards William E. Dugger, Jr., DTE Shelli Meade Lisa Delany

Features of Nationally-Developed Standards Emphasize a comprehensive, focused, and coherent approach to education. Emphasize content more than curriculum. –Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL) Recognize the need to define more than what students should know and be able to do. –Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards (AETL) Summarized from Rodger Bybee, BSCS

International Technology Education Association’s Technology for All Americans Project Funded by: National Science Foundation (NSF) National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Overview of AETL Along with STL, AETL describes the attributes of the effective study of technology that lead to technological literacy. AETL provides the means for implementing Standards for Technological Literacy (STL) in K–12 laboratory-classrooms. AETL contains three separate but interrelated sets of standards –Student Assessment –Professional Development –Program

Program Everything that affects student learning, including content, professional development, curricula, instruction, student assessment, and the learning environment, implemented across grade levels.

Program Standards Criteria for use in assuring that the design and implementation of programs provides comprehensive and coordinated experiences for all students across grade levels and disciplines. Primary audience: Teachers and Administrators (including Supervisors)

Organizational Topics of Program Standards 1.Consistency with STL 2.Implementation 3.Evaluation 4.Learning Environments 5.Management

Standards and Guidelines Standards are written statements about what is valued that can be used for making a judgment of quality. Guidelines are specific requirements or enablers that identify what needs to be done in order to meet a standard. The goal is to meet all of the standards in each chapter through the guidelines.

Technology Program The technology program refers to everything that affects student attainment of technological literacy implemented across grade levels as a core subject of inherent value. Managed by teachers.

Technology Program Components

Standard P-1: Technology program development will be consistent with Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL). Guidelines for meeting Standard P-1 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently A. Align program content with STL. B. Align program content with school district, state/provincial/regional, and national/ federal standards in other academic areas.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-1 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently C. Plan and develop the program across disciplines. D. Plan and develop the program across grade levels. E. Assure that the program incorporates suitable cognitive, psychomotor, and affective learning elements. F. Promote adaptability for program enhancement. Standard P-1 Continued

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-2 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently A.Provide instruction that is consistent with research on how students learn technology. B.Provide instruction that is designed to meet curricular goals and student needs. C.Design and implement curricula that enableall students to attain technological literacy. D.Develop student leadership opportunities. Standard P-2: Technology program implementation will facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-3 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently A. Develop and utilize evaluation that is consistent with standards and guidelines in “Program Standards.” B. Implement and use systematic, continuous evaluation. C. Evaluate instruction on a regular basis. Standard P-3: Technology program evaluation will ensure and facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Standard P-3 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard P-3 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently D. Plan for program revision. E. Accommodate for student commonality and diversity. F. Utilize effective student assessment.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-4 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently A. Create and manage learning environments that are supportive of student interactions and student abilities to question, inquire, design, invent, and innovate. B. Create and manage learning environments that are up-to-date and adaptable. C. Implement a written, comprehensive safety program. Standard P-4: Technology program learning environments will facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Standard P-4 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard P-4 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the technology program(s) consistently D. Promote student development of knowledge and abilities that provides for the safe application of appropriate technological tools, machines, materials, and processes. E. Verify that the number of students in the technology laboratory-classroom does not exceed its capacity.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-5 require that the teacher(s) responsible for the management of the technology program(s) consistently A. Develop and use action plans based on STL. B. Maintain data collection for accountability. C. Market and promote the study of technology. Standard P-5: Technology program management will be provided by designated personnel at the school, school district, and state/provincial/regional levels.

In preparing the program guidelines, the TfAAP staff noted that ensuring technological literacy for all students requires administrative support. With this in mind, two sets of guidelines were developed to provide guidance to teachers as well as administrators in facilitating technological literacy for all students.

Technology Program The technology program refers to everything that affects student attainment of technological literacy implemented across grade levels as a core subject of inherent value.

Cross-Curricular Technology Program Everything that affects student attainment of technological literacy implemented across grade levels and disciplines. Managed by administrators. –Administrators include any professional that manages any aspect of the educational system, including supervisors and teachers as appropriate.

Cross-Curricular Technology Program Components

Standard P-1: Technology program development will be consistent with Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology (STL). Guidelines for meeting Standard P-1 require that the administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently G. Stipulate that content be aligned with STL. H. Mandate instruction in the study of technology as part of the core educational experience for all students.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-1 require that the administrators responsible for establishing the cross-curricular technology program consistently I.Advocate content that complements school district, state/provincial/regional, and national/federal standards in other academic areas. J. Assure that the study of technology occurs across disciplines. K. Assure that the study of technology occurs across grade levels. L. Promote adaptability to enhance the study of technology. Standard P-1 Continued

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-2 require that administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently E.Employ licensed teachers to deliver technology content. F.Support sustained professional growth and development of all educators. G.Encourage instruction that is consistent with research on how students learn technology. Standard P-2: Technology program implementation will facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-2 require that administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently H. Advocate instruction that is designed to meet curricular goals and student needs. I.Commit to the recruitment of technologically competent teachers. J.Encourage all teachers to develop student leadership opportunities. Standard P-2 Continued

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-3 require that administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently G. Assure that evaluation is consistent with standards and guidelines in “Program Standards.” H. Employ systematic, continuous evaluation. I.Encourage evaluation of instruction on a regular basis. J.Plan for program revision. Standard P-3: Technology program evaluation will ensure and facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P-4 require that administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently F. Provide learning environments that are designed to facilitate delivery of STL and satisfy “Program Standards.” G. Provide learning environments that are safe, up-to-date, and adaptable. H. Ensure that the number of students in a dedicated technology laboratory-classroom does not exceed its capacity. Standard P-4: Technology program learning environments will facilitate technological literacy for all students.

Standard P-4 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard P-4 require that administrators responsible for establishing the cross- curricular technology program consistently I.Provide elementary school classrooms with adequate physical space for teaching technology. J. Provide dedicated technology laboratory- classrooms in middle and high schools with a minimum allotment of 100 square feet per pupil, inclusive of safe ancillary space.

Guidelines for meeting Standard P.5 require that administrators responsible for the management of the cross- curricular technology program consistently D. Develop and use action plans based on STL. E. Maintain data collection for accountability. F. Market and promote the study of technology. G. Provide funding, support, and resources to accomplish missions, goals, and curricular objectives. Standard P-5: Technology program management will be provided by designated personnel at the school, school district, and state/provincial/regional levels.

Standard P-5 Continued Guidelines for meeting Standard P-5 require that administrators responsible for the management of the cross-curricular technology program consistently H. Align technology programs with state/provincial/regional accreditation systems. I.Establish articulated and integrated technology programs district wide. J.Establish and utilize a management system. K. Support professional technology organization engagement by teachers and management personnel. L.Provide resources and opportunities to support technology teachers and other content area teachers in the teaching and learning process.

The program standards are intended to be implemented in conjunction with STL as well as with the student assessment and professional development standards included in Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy.

Program Permeability  The vision behind the program standards calls on teachers, administrators, and policymakers to perpetuate interchange between elements of the program, including content, professional development, curricula, instruction, student assessment, and the learning environment, in all areas of learning.

Significant Elements of AETL Standards Guidelines Notations Vignettes

Notations consist of definitions, tables, quotations, and correlations. Correlations identify a relationship within or between the standards in AETL and STL.

Vignettes provide detailed examples of how standards can be put into practice.

Vision of STL and AETL The vision of STL and AETL is that all students can and should become technologically literate.

“The task ahead is to build technology education into the curriculum…so that all students become well informed about the nature, powers, and limitations of technology.” (AAAS, 1993, p. 42)

ITEA Standards Specialists ITEA Standards Specialists are a cadre of professional educators available to conduct workshops and presentations on interpreting and implementing STL and AETL on a cost-recovery basis.

URL:

Thank You!