Technology assessment in math 2400 calculus 2 spring assessment day 2010 jenn berg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Self Evaluation – writing a good SEF
Advertisements

Global Learning Outcomes at Pensacola State College (GLOs)
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
Applying the Math Technology Rubric Amy Wehe, Mathematics Bruce Romano, Mathematics.
Designing Rubrics for Writing Assignments A Writing Across the Curriculum & Writing In the Disciplines Workshop Dr. Robert T. Koch Jr. Director, University.
USING BACKWARD DESIGN FOR UNIT AND LESSON PLANS * Based on the thinking that if everyone has a clear picture of where they are going before they start,
An Overview of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Practice for use with the Common Core Essential Elements The present publication was developed.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
Strengthening Mathematics Instruction Cognitive Complexity and Instructional Strategies Dr. Vicki Jim
EXPLORE Academic Results 8 th Grade EXPLORE Test Results #1.
Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Texas at El Paso 1 Program Assessment Presentation May 15, 2009 Joe Guthrie Helmut Knaust.
Scoring Rubrics Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
Education 3504 Week 3 reliability & validity observation techniques checklists and rubrics.
1 CALCULUS Even more graphing problems
Mark Dixon Page 1 13 – Coursework 2 Debrief: Spanish Words.
Mark Dixon, SoCCE SOFT 131Page 1 13 – Coursework 2 Debrief: Numbers Game.
University of Delaware Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education Courtesy of Sue Groh and Barb.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
F2F feedback. What’s the issue? At the moment… Service staff find it difficult to find useful information about student progress. Students don’t have.
Integrated Math 1. In your PLC, decide on a lesson that you will be developing The lesson must be intended for first instruction. A pre-existing lesson.
ABOVE AVERAGE: EXPLORING CENTRAL TENDANCY CTAP LESSON PLAN BY JAIME N. YEAROUS.
Louisiana Reading Association Update April 21, 2012.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Boot Camp Spring  Choose a class and complete a Context for Learning for this class. (It can be the same class as the literacy tasks, but YOU MUST.
How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning Training Conducted at Campus-Based SLO Summit Spring 2014 How to Use Data to Improve Student Learning.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
1 Preparing Students to be College and Career Ready.
21 st Century Learning Environments at All Saints. Starting steps towards Personalised Learning in the Grade 1/2 Level.
1 Sarah McManus and Hope Tesh-Blum North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section North Carolina High.
CII Council for Instructional Improvement San Mateo County Office of Education Friday, January 9, 2015.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
Understanding the Common Core Kansas Development of Common Core Standards.
NEW ASSESSMENT. NEW RESULTS SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT What do families need to know? (Insert School Name) (Insert Date) INSERT LOGO.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
The Missouri Reading Initiative Spring 2008 Annual Participant Survey Results.
Bringing Math Students into the Formative Assessment Equation: Tools and Strategies for the Middle Grades © Education Development Center, Inc. Learning.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education Next Gen Science Common Core Math and ELA Helen Quinn
School-Wide Rubrics An Overview. Our Expectations NEASC required for accreditation Developed by a 20+ member leadership team with representation of many.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
1 Reflecting on the School Improvement Plan Office of School Intervention and Support Office of Accountability, Assessment and Intervention.
CCSS Common Core State Standards Curriculum Council.
Student Growth Goals Professional Learning Jenny Ray, PGES Consultant (KDE) 1.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
SoW, VLE, ILP Or any acronym you can think of. SCAT VLE course Remember that everything you need in on the SCAT VLE course. Link to the VLE site.
Walnut Valley Unified School District “Understanding Your Child’s 2015 CAASPP Report” California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress.
Common Core State Standards in Kansas. The Common Core State Standards Initiative 2 Beginning in the spring of 2009, Governors and state commissioners.
Common Core Standards Overview. The Common Core Standards (CCS) were developed by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governor’s.
An Overview of the Communications Standard for School Mathematics? 1.
FALL 2015 MIRAMAR COLLEGE LAURA MURPHY COLLEGE- WIDE OUTCOMES AND ASSESSMENT FACILITATOR ISLO Assessment Summary.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Review of assignment #2B and rubric Instructor:teaching fellows: Sarah FiarmanAnnice Fisher Michael Figueroa HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Open-Ended Assessment Developing mathematical thinking
In your PLC, decide on a lesson that you will be developing
How would you grade the University for its contribution to your personal growth and development in each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Fail.
Designing and Using Rubrics
Welcome to the Fundamentals of Mathematics for Engineers Lab
Problem Solving Institutional Learning Outcome Assessment
Math Motivational Poster Project
PART ONE: Assessing Institutional Learning Outcomes
7th Grade.
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
Top 100 Britons! You are on a committee to choose the top 100 Britons of all time. Your job is to choose 10. They could be from any period in history,
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

technology assessment in math 2400 calculus 2 spring assessment day 2010 jenn berg

overview of project goal motivation method  integrate criteria from department level assessment into course level assessment  to effectively communicate to the students our expectations of them  use similar rubric to account for half of the students lab grade

be able to read, write, listen, and speak mathematically, as well as to be able to read and understand technically-based materials and to contribute effectively to group efforts assessment plangoal 3

connections to department level assessment  logical argumentation and organization  complete and accurate interpretation of results  english phraseology  explanation of solution strategy or the steps you are using on a problem departmentcourse

connections to department level assessment  creates graphs with appropriate scale  graphs centered on region of interest and made with an appropriate scale departmentcourse

have an understanding of the appropriate use of technology in mathematics assessment plangoal 4

connections to department level assessment  uses technology efficiently  technology used efficiently mathematically (e.g., defines useful functions, uses call lines) departmentcourse

three main criteria verbal 1 graphing 2 technology 1 explanations of solution strategy or the steps you are using on a problem graphs are centered on region of interest to problem and with an appropriate scale for the problem technology used effectively mathematically (e.g., defines useful functions, uses call lines) performance ratings: excellent - 4good - 3adequate - 2poor - 1

all students end with average performance ratings of 2 or above in these three criteria benchmark

results

students’ performance will improve over time secret naïve hope (i.e., failed benchmark)

student performance over time

lessons  more focus in lab time on effective use of technology  two presentation criteria need to be addressed  I may have become a rubric addict

questions?  mathematics department assessment committee  office of assessment many thanks to: