The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages 9-12. Table of Contents Certainty p. 8-10 – Radical doubt p. 9-10 Radical doubt Relativism p. 10-11 Relativism What should.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michael Lacewing Religious belief Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

René Descartes "I am thinking therefore I exist." - Discourse on Method.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Reason and Argument Chapter 2. Critical Thinking Critical thinking involves awareness, practice, and motivation. Often, how we think and what we think.
Descartes’ rationalism
Theory of knowledge Lesson 2
Today’s Outline Hume’s Problem of Induction Two Kinds of Skepticism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Introduction to Philosophy Truth, Postmodernism & Pluralism By Professor Christopher Ullman.
Charting the Terrain of Knowledge-1
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
The Problems of Knowledge
© Cambridge University Press 2011 Chapter 1 The problem of knowledge.
1 LAS Teaching Academy Problems (and Solutions) with Problem Solving Don DeCoste University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Deeper.. last week what is christianity? what is christianity? doctrines doctrines apologetics apologetics.
LOCKE 2 An Argument that the External World [the world outside the mind] Exists.
Answers to tough questions: Applied Apologetics – Wk 1.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Persuasive Speaking Chapter 14
LEADERSHIP REFLECTION: A PERSONAL MISSION By: Rachel Barto.
Truth and Reality. Announcement: Tutorial Group 10 will meet next Wednesday at 2:00 Reminder: Your portfolio will be due on December 3 rd. Submit a hard.
© Michael Lacewing Faith without reason? Michael Lacewing
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
Module 1 Your Inner Being. Beliefs. Your Story Lesson 2
Descartes’ First Meditation
Defending The Faith Series
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
“The Problem of Knowledge” Chapter 1 – Theory of Knowledge.
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE LESSON 1 The Problem of Knowledge 1.
Truth “Truth means seeing reality as it is.” –Sheed Truth means “telling it like it is” –Kreeft “Saying of what is that it is and of what is not that it.
Bellringer: The astronomer Carl Sagan said “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” What did he mean by this? Do you agree?
The answer really annoys me for 3 reasons: 1.I think the statement is arrogant. It doesn’t take into account any definitions of God but solely focuses.
Theory of Knowledge - An introduction. Real Headlines: Elvis found working as Plumber in Poland Alien base found on dark side of Moon Alien base mysteriously.
“15 But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you.
WELCOME! Course Expectations Respect  We will argue on a daily basis  Argue: Give reasons or provide evidence for an idea or theory, usually with the.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
ToK style. Knowledge as organized common sense A mental map of reality, includes True vs false Reasonable and unreasonable Right and wrong.
{ Philosophical Methods Exploring some ways people go about “thinking about thinking”.
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
Things that go bump in the night Lecturer: 杨文良 William Young.
Reason “Crime is common, logic is rare” - Sherlock Holmes.
Millions Saw the Apple Fall: An Introduction to Philosophy Feraco-EberleSFHP 28 October 2008.
+ Ethics II The nature of moral knowledge. + Moral knowledge Do you know the difference between right and wrong? Does anybody? Is moral knowledge even.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
The Problem of Knowledge 1 Pages 3-9. Table of Contents Quotes p. 3 Quotes Introduction p. 4 Introduction Common sense p. 4-7 Common sense Certainty p.
Varieties of Scepticism. Academic Scepticism Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy Arcesilaus, 6 th scolarch of the Academy A return to the Socratic.
Can you trust your senses?. WHAT DO YOU KNOW? AN INTRODUCTION TO SCEPTICISM.
Need worksheet from yellow folder – arg from perceptual variation.
The Cosmological Argument Science can offer us explanations of things that are within the universe, but does the universe as a whole have an explanation?
And the search for truth. Knowledge. Knowing: Introduction to a classification scheme In ToK we may treat knowledge as falling into 3 categories. These.
R. Moyer Fall Justified True Belief… …but, what does that mean? R. Moyer Fall 2008.
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Apologetics WEEK 2- JANUARY 13 TH, How can you think your religion is the only true one?  Remember, we live in a world that has a Postmodern Worldview.
René Descartes Brandon Lee Block D.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Introduction  Based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions  Unlike Egoism  People should act in their own self-interest  Unlike.
Epistemology Trying to answer the question … How can I know for sure?
Critical Thinking  A key academic skill  Required for successful study.
INTRODUCTION TO REASON What is it? Truth, Relativism, & Skepticism Do we really use reason? How is ‘Reason’ different from ‘Reasons’?
1st wave: Illusion Descartes begins his method of doubt by considering that in the past he has been deceived by his senses: Things in the distance looked.
Philosophy of Truth A Mr. C Production.
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Conclusion – Truth and wisdom
Problems with IDR Before the holidays we discussed two problems with the indirect realist view. If we can’t perceive the external world directly (because.
Building an Academic Argument
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

The Problem of Knowledge 2 Pages 9-12

Table of Contents Certainty p – Radical doubt p Radical doubt Relativism p Relativism What should we believe? p What should we believe – The role of judgment p. 12 The role of judgment – The danger of gullibility p. 12 The danger of gullibility

What do we know? This is the problem of knowledge we are studying. In this presentation we continue to try and answer it.

Certainty – Radical doubt Rene Descartes was a famous French Mathematician and Philosopher He says that NOTHING is certain except the fact that “I exist.” Descartes is responsible for the statement “I think therefore I am.” However even this idea that “I exist” can be argued! Example 1: The movie called “The Truman Show.” Example 2: The movie called “The Matrix.” Example 3: The movie “Inception.” Example 4: The doctrine of “no-self” in the Buddhist religion.

Certainty – Radical doubt (continued) How do you know you exist? Are you 100 percent certain that you are not dreaming (asleep) right now?

Certainty – Radical doubt (continued 2) Therefore one way that some philosophers have thought about knowledge is with a sense of this radical doubt. Do you need to always have radical doubt in this class? Not really. But you do need to always remain skeptical of what I (or anyone else) teach you.

Certainty – Radical doubt (continued 2) Question knowledge! Do not accept it immediately. Use reason, logic, language, perception, and emotion to know if something is true! Do not just “believe” what anyone tells you! That is one of the main reasons you are taking TOK!

Relativism This is opposite from radical doubt It is a way of thinking where there is no absolute or universal “truth.” This means that everything is “ok” or “true.”

Relativism (continued) The main idea from relativism is that something may be true for you, but it doesn’t have to be true for me. This way of thinking is popular because it is hard for anyone to say who or what “truth” is. We have no perfect example to look at. All truths are equally valid and important in relativism.

Relativism (continued 2) It sounds easy because it is easy! But there are problems. How can everything be “true?” Certainly some things must be more true than others… For example, what do we say to a person who believes the world is flat instead of round? The world cannot be both flat and round! Example 2: How can Santa Clause both exist and not exist? One and only one possibility can be correct

Relativism (continued 3) If we say “all truth is relative” it is a contradiction.” Look at the diagram on page 11 to understand why the statement disagrees with itself. This is the main problem with relativism. All truth cannot be relative because it uses the word “all.” Remember that in relativism there are no ABSOLUTE or UNIVERSAL truths. Using the word “all” contradicts the definition of relativism itself.

What should we believe? Remember that the problem of knowledge is the question: “What do we know?” Is there a quick solution to this problem of knowledge? Common sense does not fully work Certainty does not fully work Radical doubt does not fully work Relativism does not fully work

What should we believe? (continued) Well the good news is that in TOK we care more about how you believe something. Nobody cares about what you believe. We are not trying to change your beliefs in this class. So what is one of the biggest goals in TOK?

What should we believe? (continued 2) You must learn to JUSTIFY how it is that you believe something. Always justify your beliefs with EVIDENCE in TOK and you will do very well. For a strong argument, you must ALWAYS consider criticism and respond to it before it happens.

The role of judgment Black and white certainties are rare in our world. This means it is difficult to use words like “always” and “never.” There is a big grey area in the world. This means we need to become used to using words like “sometimes,” “maybe,” “perhaps,” and “occasionally.” Some things may be true always, but this is more rare than you may think. This is why you must carefully consider things before making a decision or a judgment in TOK.

The role of judgment (continued) Judgment requires a balance somewhere between radical doubt and relativism. You should not think that there are no universal truths. However you should not think that it is easy to say that everything is simply “true” or “false” either. In TOK it is important to use judgment to determine when something is ABSOLUTELY TRUE and when something is possibly true or only true in CERTAIN SITUATIONS.

The role of judgment (continued 2) Balance open-mindedness with skepticism Don’t believe everything Don’t disbelieve everything Don’t agree with everything Don’t disagree with everything This will help you navigate the difficult path to true wisdom that you will hopefully find studying TOK.

The danger of gullibility Gullibility – easily believing things that others tell you without questioning the validity (authenticity or truth) of what they are saying. A gullible person is easily tricked. It is easy to trick a gullible person into giving you money or doing work for you that you don’t want to do. In this world there are many people who will trick you immediately if you don’t have street smarts. (Being “street smart” means you are not gullible. It means you are aware when somebody is trying to lie to you or trick you) This is another one of the HUGE REASONS why you are asked to study TOK. We do not want you to be easily tricked by others!

The danger of gullibility Examples of gullibility: – Somebody who hears an offer on the Internet which promises to make them rich. Usually these scams or offers promise the person that they will need to do no work and will become rich effortlessly. – An telling you that a rich person needs you to hold some of their money