1 RIC 2009 MELCOR Analyses to Address Regulatory Issues: Evaluation of System Success Criteria Hossein Esmaili USNRC March 12, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

WP 5 Safety and Transient Analysis Task 5.6 Containment and source term assessment for the ETDR LEADER Lead-cooled European Advanced DEmonstration Reactor.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory SCWR Preliminary Safety Considerations Cliff Davis, Jacopo Buongiorno, INEEL Luca Oriani, Westinghouse.
Three Mile Island (TMI-2)
Slide 1 NRC Perspectives on Reactor Safety Course Special Features of BWR Severe Accident Mitigation and Progression L. J. Ott Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE George Attarian 1/21/2013. Fukushima Response Timeline: March 11: Event occurred March 18: INPO IER 11-1 issued (April 15) March 23:
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR), Boiling Water Reactor (BWR), primary loop, reactivity, reactivity control, reactivity.
Modeling boiling water reactor main steam isolation valve leakage using MELCOR Presented at the 21 st Annual Regulatory Information Conference March 10-12,
Issues Associated with the Development of Severe Accident Management Guidelines for CANDU Reactors Keith Dinnie Director, Risk Management Nuclear Safety.
Analysis Simulator for Kozloduy NPP Units 5 and 6 N.Rijova (ENPRO Consult), J.Steinborn (GRS mbH) International Nuclear Forum BULGARIAN NUCLEAR ENERGY.
Safety analysis of supercritical-pressure light-water cooled reactor with water rods Yoshiaki Oka April 2003, GIF SCWR Mtg. at Madison.
Thermal-Hydraulic Transient Analysis of the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) TRTR Annual Meeting September 17-20, 2007 Dr. Robert C. Nelson1,
CRP on Natural Circulation Phenomena, Modelling and Reliability of Passive Safety Systems that Utilize Natural Circulation September, 2007, IAEA,
MODIFICATIONS TO A PRA MODEL TO ADDRESS MULTIPLE SPURIOUS OPERATIONS (MSOs).
NRC PERSPECTIVE ON RELIEF AND SAFETY VALVES Charles G. Hammer Component Performance & Testing Branch Division of Component Integrity Office of Nuclear.
An Approach to Evaluation of Uncertainties in Level 2 PSAs
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Components, functions, operation, Auxiliary feedwater, Startup, hot standby, plant cooldown, emergency. Description Supporting.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Two Tube Failure Event for the Helium Cooled Blanket Lee Cadwallader and Brad Merrill INEEL Fusion.
Presented at the USNRC 20 th Regulatory Information Conference Washington, DC March 11, 2008 Randall Gauntt, Sandia National Laboratories Charles Tinkler,
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
PUMA : Purdue University Multi-Dimensional Integral Test Assembly Scientific Design of the Scaled Facility for GE SBWR Design SBWR : Simplified Boiling.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords BWR, main steam, piping and instrument drawing, functional operating sketch, flowpath, interrelationships, safety relief.
March “Experience Gained from the Mexican Nuclear Regulatory Authority in the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Level 2 Development for Laguna.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
RIC 2009: State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA)
Overview of Conventional 2-loop PWR Simulator. PCTRAN Dr
GSI-191 Status and Lessons Learned Presented by: Donnie Harrison Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Presented at:
State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA)
STATUS OF IRSN LEVEL 2 PSA (PWR 900)
1 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2005 October 12, 2006 Shigeyuki Wada Safety Information Division Japan Nuclear Energy Safety.
Westinghouse Perspective on New Reactor Sumps
Generation Aino Ahonen CABABILITY OF APROS IN THE ANALYSES OF DIESEL LOADING SEQUENCES E. Raiko, H.Kontio, K.Porkholm, presented by A. Ahonen.
Nuclear Research Institute Řež plc 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RELAP5-3D MODEL FOR VVER-440 REACTOR 2010 RELAP5 International User’s Seminar West Yellowstone, Montana.
Safety of Nuclear Reactors
Analyses of representative DEC events of the ETDR
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Role of the TSO in Public Information/ Debate Openness, Transparency.
1. - Condensate pump and feed pump trip! -Turbine trips! 2.
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor.
1 Kaspar Kööp, Marti Jeltsov Division of Nuclear Power Safety Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden LEADER 4 th WP5 MEETING, Karlsruhe.
ANSI-NIST Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative David Matthews, Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing Larry Burkhart, Chief, AP1000.
Nuclear Power Plant Orientation
"Congress should promote research into the next generation of nuclear plants and encourage investment in existing nuclear plants to expand a clean and.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
0 Overview of Fukushima-Accident Analysis ERMSAR 2012, Cologne (Germany) March 21 – 23, 2012 JNES Masanori FUKASAWA.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 In-vessel retention as retrofitting measure for existing nuclear power plants M. Bauer, Westinghouse Electric.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making System Analysis Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country XX - XX Month,
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Probabilistic Risk Assessment Program Workshop Information.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ASTEC V2.0 rev 1 Reactor Applications French PWR 900 MWe Accident Sequences Comparison with MAAP4 V. Lombard,
THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT OF NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1.IRSHAD NURHAKIM BIN NORAHIM (ME088151) 2.LEE SZE TENG (ME087909)
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Prof. Enrico Zio Event tree analysis Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
LOW PRESSURE REACTORS. Muhammad Umair Bukhari
1 Nuclear Power Technology Development Westinghouse View Kiev March 2012 Dr. Nick Shulyak AP1000® is a registered trademark in the United States of Westinghouse.
Plant & Reactor Design Passive Reactor Core Cooling System
Workshop on Risk informed decision making on nuclear power plant safety January 2011 SNRC, Kyiv, Ukraine Benefits and limitations of RIDM by Géza.
Post-Fukushima Severe Accident Management Update Kim, Hyeong Taek KHNP- Central Research Institute July KINS Safety Analysis Symposium.
Summary of Int’l ITL Program (1)
- Condensate pump and feed pump trip!
Defense-in-Depth and Mitigative Measures
Role of the TSO in Public Information/ Debate Openness, Transparency Technical support to regulatory body for the new NPP (OL3) project Keijo Valtonen.
T. Steinrötter, M. Kowalik, H. Löffler, M. Sonnenkalb, I. Bakalov
Pressurized Water Reactor
NRC Event Number – Event Date
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
VICTOR HUGO SANCHEZ ESPINOZA and I. GÓMEZ-GARCÍA-TORAÑO
- Condensate pump and feed pump trip!
Group 1 Best Group.
Mixing of the Atmosphere within the EPR Design Containment in Design Basis and Severe Accident Conditions Prof. Ali Tehrani ONR Principal Inspector –
THE ROLE OF PASSIVE SYSTEMS IN ENHANCING SAFETY AND PREVENTING ACCIDENTS IN ADVANCED REACTORS Moustafa Aziz Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority.
Presentation transcript:

1 RIC 2009 MELCOR Analyses to Address Regulatory Issues: Evaluation of System Success Criteria Hossein Esmaili USNRC March 12, 2009

2 MELCOR Modeling Approach Auxiliary Building Safeguards Building Containment Reactor w/ RCS Generic Models (no “built-in” nodalization) Building block approach (more flexibility =>greater user responsibility)

3 Design Certification ESBWR US APWR Westinghouse AP-1000 US EPR Severe accident response and source term Containment response to design basis accident

4 Success Criteria Application Staff Identified Inconsistencies in Similar-Plant SPAR Model Success Criteria for Currently Operating Reactors Use MELCOR for Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis –Surry (PWR) and Peach Bottom (BWR) models from State-of-the- art Reactor Consequence Analysis (SOARCA) –Definition of core damage (e.g., 2200 F) –Code calculations for various scenarios to define success criteria Collaborative Effort –Project Management: Don Helton –Calculation Matrix: Don Dube, Rick Sherry, et al. –Systems Analysis Support: Don Marksberry –MELCOR Analysis: Hossein Esmaili –SPAR Model: Pete Appignani, INL

5 Surry Calculation Matrix Small LOCA dependency on sump recirculation –Effect of sprays on RWST depletion –Does the system depressurize (and how fast)? Feed & Bleed PORV success criteria –Combination of HHSI and PORVs Steam Generator Tube Rupture –Multiple tube ruptures –Impact of secondary cooling, HHSI, forced cooldown Station blackout –Investigating time available for A/C power recovery –Both small and large RCP leaks with and without TD-AFW Accumulator injection –Spectrum of LOCA sizes –Availability of HHSI/LHSI in conjunction with number of accumulators

6 Peach Bottom Calculation Matrix SRV/RCIC –Can RCIC maintain cooling until low pressure system injects? Station blackout (RCIC/HPCI availability) –Investigating time available for A/C power recovery –Suppression pool heatup and pump NPSH limit RCIC HPCI

7 Concluding Remarks Application of MELCOR to Obtain Consistent System Success Criteria for Representative PWR (Surry) and BWR (Peach Bottom) Plants Use the Thermal-hydraulic Results to Develop a More Extensive Technical Basis for the SPAR Models Possible Extension to Other Plants (e.g., ice condenser) as Input Models Become Available

8 Acronyms A/CAlternating Current HHSIHigh-Head Safety Injection HPCIHigh Pressure Coolant Injection LHSILow-Head Safety Injection LOCALoss-of-Coolant Accident NPSHNet Positive Suction Head PORVPower (or Pilot) Operated Relief Valve RCICReactor Core Isolation Cooling RWSTRefueling Water Storage Tank SGTRSteam Generator Tube Rupture SPARStandardized Plant Analysis Risk SRVSafety Relief Valve TD-AFWTurbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater