1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Item #16 California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
A Presentation on the Management and Curriculum Audit for the Guam Public School System April 14, 2009.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Jeff Scheick –Northwest Region Manager –Highway.
Local Updates to Shoreline Management Master Programs Kitsap County and Cities Discussion Meetings Informational Briefing.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Breach of a Requirement of the Code Marisa Orbea New York 19 June 2012.
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
General Planning and Annexations Key principles, background and processes Dh 2005.
IT Governance and Management
1 FAA Reform: Congressional Staff Briefing January 24, 1996.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Update On 2000 Bureau of State Audits Report Item L; March 10, 2003 Permitting & Enforcement Committee Item J; March 12, 2003 Budget & Administration Committee.
AASHTO’s Cooperative Software Development Program AASHTOWare ® Transportation Software Solutions Trnsport User Group Meeting October 2004 Mobile, Alabama.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Project Initiation Document (PID) Strategic Plan June 25, 2012.
Delivering Results Since 1975 Vancouver Calgary Edmonton Toronto Lakeland Catholic School District Education Planning Project Objectives, Work Plan & Schedule.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
INDOT Access Management Study _________________________ Long Range Transportation Planning Section Division of Environment, Planning and Engineering INDIANA.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
Presentation to HAUC (UK) Wednesday 30 May 2012 RINA London.
April 9, 2011 Mike Wieszchowski, P.E., PTOE Professional Traffic Operations Engineer Road Use Planning Guidelines to Protect Your Roadways.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
Project Overview O CTOBER 27 TH, 2009 Presented to:
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
1 Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee Meeting State Lead Agency Presentation Chuck Andrews, Chair AAPCO Worker Protection Committee California Department.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
National Provider Identifier HIPAA Summit 13 September 25, 2006 Peter Barry Hospital Implementation Planning.
Long Range Planning Update. Sequence Long-Range Planning Projects Land Use Ordinance Revisions Comprehensive Plan Update Citizen Participation Plan Implementation.
LSylvester1 INTRODUCTION TO NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING FEDERAL MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION SERVICE.
Oregon Transportation Options Plan Statewide TO Meeting September 27, 2013.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Option for an Enhanced SPP Regional Project Review Process Presentation to the Regional State Committee January 24, 2011 Lisa M. Barton SVP American Electric.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
Work Related to Senate Bill 2202 (effective January 1, 2001)
1 © 2013 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by OOCEA’s management, audit committee, and board of directors. This.
University Assembly REVIEW AND REFERRAL OF ISSUES Session.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
The US Vehicle Safety Regulatory Process Martin Koubek Office of International Policy and Harmonization National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
PRE-PLANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. OVERVIEW ASSESSING OWNER CAPABILITIES ANALYSIS OF RESOURCES REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWING.
Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Access Management Training Brooke White, Access Management Engineer.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Presented to presented by Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council January 22, 2015 Jim Wood, Florida Department of Transportation.
Water Quality/Stormwater Seminar September House Bill 2031 Requires TCEQ to adopt an expedited permitting process for discharge permits for treated.
ICC Industry Advisory Committee Purpose and Scope The purpose of the Industry Advisory Committee (IAC) is to promote, in cooperation with the International.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
IT Governance Planning Overview
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Capacity Building for HMIS Leads
Presentation transcript:

1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program

2 Access Management Oversight Task Force Priorities SB 408 establishes new laws that change ODOT policies, rules and procedures. The new laws establish: 1.A “presumption” of ODOT’s written permission for existing approaches. 2.Requirements for access management in facility planning. 3.Requirements for access management in project development and delivery.

3 Presumption of ODOT’s Written Permission for Existing Approaches

4 Presumption of ODOT’s Written Permission SB 408 establishes a legal presumption of ODOT’s written permission for an existing approach if: –Highway project documents show ODOT built or rebuilt the approach or intended to issue approach permit; or –Documentation in any form shows that the approach: Existed before April 1, 2000; or Existed before ODOT accepted jurisdiction of the highway from another jurisdiction; or Was built or rebuilt with ODOT’s knowledge or permission.

5 Presumption of ODOT’s Written Permission Presumption of written permission: – Only applies if property has a right of access. – Only applies to uses of the approach that exist at the time SB 408 becomes law on January 1, – May be rebutted if ODOT establishes that a “factual basis” for the presumption does not exist. Presumption of written permission provides greater certainty to property owners that their driveway is legal (a.k.a. permitted).

6 New Requirements for Facility Plans

7 Facility plans include, but are not limited to: –Interchange Area Management Plans –Corridor Plans –Refinement Plans –Access Management Plans New Requirements for Facility Plans

8 SB 408 reiterates “balancing” objectives of SB 264: Plans are required to include “a methodology that balances economic development objectives of properties abutting state highways with safety and access management objectives” consistent with local Transportation System Plan (TSP) and comprehensive plans. New Requirements for Facility Plans

9 SB 408 strengthens collaboration between ODOT and local government. Local road and street locations must be determined by collaboration and agreement with cities and counties and facility plans must document those agreements. New Requirements for Facility Plans

10 SB 408 enhances transparency of ODOT decisions and plans regarding access to property. –Plans must develop “key principles” to evaluate how abutting properties may retain or obtain access during and after plan implementation. –Key principles must be detailed enough to inform owners of the potential to modify, relocate or close access. New Requirements for Facility Plans

11 SB 408 provides greater certainty about future actions that affect access. Plans that affect private access must include a timeline by which the plan may need to be implemented in order to meet safety and operational needs of the state highway. New Requirements for Facility Plans

12 New Requirements for Facility Plans SB 408 establishes review and dispute processes. –ODOT must provide notice and opportunity for review of key principles and methodology. –Two options for review available to property owners: A collaborative discussion. An Access Management Dispute Review Board.

13 New Requirements for Project Development and Delivery

14 SB 408 strengthens collaboration between ODOT, local government and property owners. ODOT must work with cities, counties, highway users and property owners affected by a project to: –Identify highway deficiencies within project limits. –Establish the long term vision for the highway segments impacted by the project to guide the scope and design of improvements. Project Development and Delivery

15 Project Development and Delivery Access Management Strategy –Each project must develop an Access Management Strategy in collaboration with affected cities, counties and property owners. –Each Access Management Strategy must engage affected property owners when: Establishing methodology by which accesses will be considered for modification, relocation or closure; or The Department proposes to acquire rights of access.

16 SB 408 establishes review and dispute processes. Within 21 days after the department finalizes the methodology it will use to determine modification, relocation or closure of accesses, a property owner may request review by: –A collaborative discussion established by rule; or –An Access Management Dispute Review Board Project Development and Delivery

17 SB 408 Implementation

18 SB 408 Implementation Effective date of new law is January 1, Requires adoption of rules for collaboration processes in project delivery and facility planning. –No date for new rules specified in SB 408. –Current schedule is for permanent rules to be adopted by OTC in June ODOT will begin implementation on January 1 based on policies under development and requirements in law, unless temporary rules are required.

19 SB 408 Implementation Work currently under way includes: –ODOT Rules Advisory Committee is developing policy/procedures papers for administrative rules. –Consultant reviewing existing rules to identify where new rules or revisions to existing rules are needed. –Identifying guidelines, manuals and policy documents affected by SB 408. –Communicating with staff about changes required when bill becomes effective on January 1.

20 Questions?