WIPO Tools for Countries in Transition Mr. Ilya Gribkov, Program Officer, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia (DCEA), WIPO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4 th Global Congress Combating Counterfeiting & Piracy Dubai, February 3-8, 2008 Challenge 7 : Strengthening Cooperation and Collaboration at the Global.
Advertisements

Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)
IP Teaching in Countries in Transition
WP6: Dissemination and exploitation Vladimir Meglič.
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Intellectual Property Rights Regulations in Russia: Case of Government-Supported R&D Irina Dezhina Leading Researcher, Ph.D. Institute for the Economy.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
Public Procurement in Albania in the framework of recent reforms PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
DOING BUSINESS INTERNATIONALLY The inaugural WIPO SEMINAR SERIES WIPO Programs and Services for Business Australia August 2013 Yo Takagi Assistant Director.
An Introduction to WIPO
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO SUB-REGIONAL SEMINAR ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DATABASES Mangalia, Romania, August 25 to.
5 November 2012 PERMANENT MISSION OF THAILAND TO THE WTO 1 Intellectual Property and Development: Thailand’s Experience.
Financing of Intellectual Property & WIPO’s work ATRIP Congress 2005 Montreal July 11-13, 2005.
Non-governmental Actors in the Compliance with and Monitoring of Multilateral Environmental Decisions.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
SMEs Division National IP Action Plan for Entrepreneurs and SMEs March 2008 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development WIPO’s Strategies on Intellectual Property and Economic Development United Nations.
‘Approaches to programme planning and budgeting’ Experience of Regional Centre for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in South-Eastern Europe.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Building Capacities for Management of IPRs in Countries in Transition. WIPO Tools. Tbilisi, November 12, 2012 Mr. Michal Svantner, Director, Division for.
The WIPO Development Agenda: An Overview Geneva May, 2009 Esteban Burrone World Intellectual Property Organization.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
National Seminar on Intellectual Property and its Impact on Economic Development Human Resource Development in the Field of Intellectual Property for Scientific,
IP Policy and its linkages with Economic, Science & Technology Policies Muhammad Ismail Deputy Director IPO-Pakistan October 09, 2013 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH,
Subregional Capacity-Building Seminar on the Commercialization and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Skopje, FYR Macedonia, 1-3 April 2009 Prepared.
Model Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions in Countries in Transition Mr. Michal Svantner, Director, Division for Certain.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY OFFICE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC WIPO’s Support in Development of Intellectual Property (IP) Strategies.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
Management of Intellectual Property Rights in Countries in Transition and Relevant WIPO Studies for Countries in Transition Budapest, April 15 and 16,
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
1 Sibiu, Romania June 2008 Development of National IP Strategies Sibiu, Romania June 2012.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regenerations Prof. Maros Finka, M.arch., Ph.D. „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
COMBINING ACCESS TO CULTURAL HERITAGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Brussels November 2010 Victor Vazquez Senior Legal Counsellor, Digital Future.
World Intellectual Property Organization DCPPS 1 presented by Mr. Vladimir Yossifov WIPO NATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Commercialization of IP - National Perspective 1 © 2009 Nikola Radovanovic Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia.
IP Offices and the Implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda: Challenges and Opportunities September 18, 2009 Geneva Irfan Baloch World Intellectual.
11 WIPO Technical Assistance & Capacity Building Programs and Activities in Asia and the Pacific Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Bureau for.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
CONTRIBUTING TO THE ELABORATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF STRATEGIES FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP) DEVELOPMENT Loretta Asiedu Senior Counselor WIPOWindhoek,
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
CLUSTERING PROJECT Oto Hudec Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice.
Public health, innovation and intellectual property 1 |1 | The Global Strategy on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property Technical Briefing.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.
Reforms in the Albanian Public Procurement System 7 th Regional Public Procurement Forum Tbilisi, Georgia May 16-19, 2011 PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AGENCY 1.
Slovak Centre of Scientific and Technical Information Technology Transfer in Slovakia Miroslav Kubiš SLOVAKIA INDUSTRY AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Bratislava,
Designing a Dynamic IP System in the Republic of Belarus
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regeneration
Patent Office Responsibilities in Technology Transfer
IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities
Knowledge Transfer Office
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Maribor, November 5 to 7, 2012 Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain.
Presentation transcript:

WIPO Tools for Countries in Transition Mr. Ilya Gribkov, Program Officer, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia (DCEA), WIPO

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. Proverb

World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations It is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible international intellectual property system, which rewards creativity, stimulates innovation and contributes to economic development while safeguarding the public interest

WIPO Strategic Goals 1.Balanced Evolution of the International Normative Framework for IP 2.Provision of Premier Global IP Services 3.Facilitating the Use of IP for Development 4.Coordination and Development of Global IP Infrastructure 5.World Reference Source for IP Information and Analysis 6.International Cooperation on Building Respect for IP 7.Addressing IP in Relation to Global Policy Issues 8.A Responsive Communications Interface between WIPO, its Member States and All Stakeholders 9.An Efficient Administrative and Financial Support Structure to Enable WIPO to Deliver its Programs

Specific features of Countries in Transition Specific features: -lower IP awareness inadequate in comparison with the growing performance of the industry and export of the products -high cost of international protection of IPRs -low awareness of legal aspects at research institutions, universities as well as within the business sector -lack of qualified mediating entities such as technology transfer agencies and IP/licensing agencies -level of economic development and place in the world economic sharing -lack of match between business and technology needs -EU component -enforcement issues

Background Heads of the IP Offices of the Visegrad countries in early 2007 Strategic Planning Meeting, July 2007, Moscow Reconfirmed at the Strategic Seminar for the Use of IPRs for Development, November 2007, Ljubljana Interregional Symposium on the Use of IPRs Involving Modern Management Methods, January, 2008, Tashkent

WIPO Tools Guidance for Elaboration of IP Strategies – revised version will be available shortly Management of Academic Intellectual Property and Early Stage Innovation Special Features of the Copyright Systems Nation Branding in Countries in Transition Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Recommendations on Strengthening the Role of Innovative SMEs in CIS countries Tool on IP Teaching in Countries in Transition Tool on Economic Aspects of IP in Countries in Transition Tool on Traditional Knowledge in Countries in Transition Tool on Digitalization of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Countries in Transition

Tool 1: Guidance for Elaboration of IP Strategies Development of National IP Strategies – priority for WIPO and DCEA, in particular Guidance on IP Strategies – first step and action plan Role of WIPO Revised Guidance

Tool 2: Management of Academic Intellectual Property and Early Stage Innovation in Countries in Transition Identification of legal and institutional elements of the early stage innovation systems, including existing innovation and IP laws, role of central innovation promotion bodies, incubation parks, etc. Identification of the best practices and their comparison with practices in other countries Creation of a model for the early stage management of academic IP Follow-up : Case Study on Technology Transfer Follow-up : Model IP Policy for Universities

Model IP Policy - Background Requested at the Inter-regional Consultation on Management of Academic Intellectual Property (IP) and Early Stage Innovation in Countries in Transition, Budapest, October 27 and 28, 2010 Expected results – will promote and stimulate universities to elaborate their own IP policies Ready to be applied

Objectives Promote, encourage and aid scientific investigation and research; Provide legal certainty in research activities and technology-based relationships with third parties; Set out the Institute’s procedures on the identification, ownership, protection and commercialization of Intellectual Property; Ensure the timely and efficient protection and management of Intellectual Property; Facilitate the recording, monitoring and maintenance of the Institute’s Intellectual Property portfolio; Ensure that economic benefits arising from the commercialization of Intellectual Property are distributed in a fair and equitable manner recognizing the contributions of the Inventors, the Institute as well as any other relevant stakeholders; Enhance the reputation of the Institute as an academic research institution and a member of society as well as the reputation of the Researchers through bringing the research results to public use and benefit.

Stakeholders There are several stakeholders in the R&D process each of them contributing to the generation or exploitation of IP. These include: universities researchers/inventors students research sponsors industrial partners mediator organizations (TTOs) organizations exploiting University IP (licensees) investors others.

Issues to be addressed by an IP policy Scope of the policy Legal issues relating to the status of researchers External sponsorship, research collaboration with third parties Ownership of IP Disclosure, protection and exploitation of IP Revenue sharing Conflict of interest and confidentiality issues

Summary recommendations in order to avoid legal conflicts and to ensure the best possible exploitation mode To researcher staff: find out whether the Institute has a policy regarding IP management consult with the TTO or other official representative of the clinic before consulting your new results or research plans with third parties. If this is not possible, at least sign a confidentiality agreement before launching any cooperation with third parties, an appropriate agreement should be signed disclose all IP generated in the course of the clinical or research activity as soon as possible to the clinic consider protection business exploitation before publishing new results consider conflict of interest when working at I for outside organizations To enterprises, external partners: consult with an official representative of the research institute regarding cooperation and IP issues - it is not always enough to visit and negotiate with the researchers

Tool 3: Special Features of the Copyright Systems of Countries in Transition Research/overview on the following issues/situation in countries in transition: State administration of copyright (governmental tasks and organizational structure, including relevant provisions in the copyright laws). Adherence to, and implementation of, the 1996 WIPO Internet treaties and the related provisions in national legislation. Provisions of the copyright laws on original ownership of rights (in particular as regards works created by employed authors) and on the issue of transferability of economic rights. Legislative regulation of copyright contracts. Collective management of copyright and related rights and the regulation thereof in the copyright laws. Two researches are ready Follow-up: Chapter on Enforcement of Copy Rights in the Digital online Environment

Components Adaptation of the Copyright Laws of Countries in Transition to New Technologies; Accession to, and Implementation of, the WIPO “Internet Treaties” Typical Features of Copyright in Countries in Transition: Review of the Transition Process – Guidance for Its Completion Where It May Still Be Needed Case Study – Chapter on Enforcement of copyright, in particular, in the digital online environment

Tool 4: Nation Branding in Countries in Transition Development of methods for identification of the country image on foreign markets Identification of basic practices for creation of national brands Establishment of main types of cooperation between national governments and private sector in creation and improvement of the external country image

Tool 5: Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Countries in Transition Development of methods of determination of the piracy and counterfeiting in the country Identification of areas where enforcement is insufficient Development of model legislative provisions on enforcement of IPRs for incorporation into national laws Further development of the national systems of enforcement, development of coordination and interaction among law-enforcement bodies, courts etc.

Tool 6: Recommendations on Strengthening the Role of Innovative SMEs in Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS countries) Intended for the CIS countries Need to strengthen the role of SMEs innovation enterprises in the economic development of society General characteristics of the role of SMEs innovation enterprises in the economic development of CIS countries Measures to strengthen the role of SMEs

Recently WIPO has started the development of the new Tools tailored to the specific needs of the Countries in Transition: 1.Tool on IP Teaching in Countries in Transition 2.Tool on the Economic Aspects of IP in Countries in Transition 3.Tool on Traditional Knowledge in Countries in Transition 4.Tool on Digitalization of Intangible Cultural Heritage in Countries in Transition

IP Teaching in Countries in Transition Targeted to provide for an effective education in IP at relevant levels. It is expected that the results of this project will further shape the institutional practices in different government agencies and universities. Identifying, among others, the current situation regarding IP teaching in the countries concerned. To benchmark the best practices in comparison with those of some developed countries. Web project under elaboration

Conclusion WIPO has been and will continue to play a major role in supporting elaboration and implementation of IP Strategies, policymaking, legal reforms, participation in international standard setting in countries in transition.

Thank you for your attention. Mr. Ilya GRIBKOV Program Officer Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia World Intellectual Property Organization Tel.: Fax: