Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Antiretroviral- Experienced Patients Infected With CCR5-Tropic HIV-1: 48-Week Results of MOTIVATE 1 J Lalezari 1, J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Switch to RAL-containing regimen - Canadian Study - CHEER - Montreal Study - EASIER - SWITCHMRK - SPIRAL.
Advertisements

Switch to ATV + r-containing regimen - SWAN - SLOAT.
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257.
TMC125 Safety and Tolerability: 24-week Results of the Pooled DUET-1 and -2 Trials R Haubrich, M Schechter, S Walmsley, M Peeters, M Janssens, G De Smedt.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Comparative Trial of a Novel CCR5 Antagonist, Maraviroc Versus Efavirenz, both in Combination with Combivir (Zidovudine/Lamivudine),
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS , prodrug of BMS (attachment inhibitor) - AI Study.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Potent Antiretroviral Effect of MK-0518, a Novel HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor, in Patients with Triple-class Resistant Virus Potent Antiretroviral Effect.
Background There is uncertainty regarding the frequency, predictors, and outcomes of IRIS events Prior studies on IRIS have been limited to convenience.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Increased clinical events in HIV-infected patients who achieve full virologic suppression but fail to attain a CD4 count ≥ 200 cells/mm 3 after one year.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
Clinical Aspects of Treatment with Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
1 RESIST Trials - Grade 3 or 4 AST, ALT or Total Bilirubin: Actions and Outcomes Action Taken: TPV/r N=748 CPI/r N=737 Total Number of Grade 3 or 4 ALT,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Nelson DR,
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
Overview of Phase 1 and 2a Safety and Efficacy Data of Maraviroc (UK-427,857) Mary McHale, Sam Abel, Deborah Russell, James Gallagher, Elna van der Ryst.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
ALLY-2  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, in treatment-naïve genotype 1 treated for 12 weeks DCV + SOF 400 mg QD DCV + SOF.
1 Financial Disclosures ●JM Goodrich, E van der Ryst, J Sullivan, M Westby, H Mayer: are full-time employees of Pfizer Global Research and Development.
Virological Correlates Associated with Treatment Failure at Week 48 in the Phase 3 Study of Maraviroc in Treatment-Naive Patients Jayvant Heera 1, Mike.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
02-15 INFC Substitution of raltegravir for ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients: The SPIRAL study* 1 Date of preparation:
DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
VIKING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects SE/HIV/0023/14b January 2014.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
Previous SVR With Interferon-Based Therapy for HCV Lowers Risk of Hepatotoxicity in HIV/HCV-Coinfected Individuals on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on:
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
Slideset on: Emery S, Neuhaus JA, Phillips AN, et al. Major clinical outcomes in antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naive participants and in those not receiving.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
EPZICOM ® Virologic Response in ART-Naïve Patients with Baseline Viral Loads Above and Below 100,000c/mL Using the A5202 Endpoint K. Pappa, J. Hernandez,
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Financial Disclosures
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
47th ICAAC Chicago, USA, September 17–20, 2007
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
MAGELLAN-3 Study: GLE/PIB + SOF + RBV in patients who failed GLE/PIB
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of EFV vs MVC
47th ICAAC Chicago, USA, September 17–20, 2007
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Presentation transcript:

Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Antiretroviral- Experienced Patients Infected With CCR5-Tropic HIV-1: 48-Week Results of MOTIVATE 1 J Lalezari 1, J Goodrich 2, E DeJesus 3, R Gulick 4, H Lampiris 5, M Saag 6, N Bellos 7, J Nadler 8, P Tebas 9, B Trottier 10, M Wohlfeiler 11, C Ridgeway 12, M McHale 12, E van der Ryst 12, H Mayer 2, on behalf of the MOTIVATE 1 Study Team 47th ICAAC Chicago, USA, September 17–20, Quest Clinical Research, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA 2 Pfizer Global Research and Development, New London, CT, USA 3 Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, FL, USA 4 Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA 5 San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, US 6 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA 7 Southwest Infectious Disease Associates, Dallas, TX, USA 8 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA 9 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA 10 Clinique Medicale L'Actuel, Montreal, QC, CANADA 11 Wohlfeiler, Piperato & Associates, North Miami Beach, FL, USA 12 Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, UK

2 Background ● MOTIVATE 1 is one of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 studies investigating the safety and efficacy of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc, in treatment-experienced patients with R5 HIV-1 ● In a planned interim analysis at 24 weeks 1, maraviroc (QD and BID) + OBT vs OBT alone demonstrated – significantly greater virologic suppression rates – significantly greater increases in CD4+ count – no clinically relevant differences in safety profile ● The MOTIVATE 1 primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA at 48 weeks 1. Lalezari J et al. 14th CROI 2007; Presentation 104bLB

3 Randomization 1:2:2 N=601 MOTIVATE 1 Trial Design OBT* + maraviroc (150 mg † BID) OBT* + maraviroc (150 mg † QD) OBT* + placebo 0 24w * OBT = optimized background therapy of 3–6 ARVs (PK boosting doses of RTV not counted as an ARV) † Patients receiving a PI (except TPV) and/or delavirdine in their OBT received 150 mg dose of MVC, all other patients received 300 mg dose of MVC Screening (6 weeks) 48w Patients stratified by: Enfuvirtide use in OBT HIV-1 RNA < and ≥100,000 copies/mL at screening Patient eligibility criteria: R5 HIV-1 infection HIV-1 RNA ≥5,000 copies/mL Stable pre-study ARV regimen, or no ARVs for ≥ 4 weeks Resistance to and/or ≥ 6 months’ experience with ≥ one ARV from three classes (≥ two for PIs)

4 Demographics and Baseline Characteristics Treated N=585 § OBT alone N=118 MVC QD + OBT N=232 MVC BID + OBT N=235 Mean age, yrs (range) 46 (31–71)46 (19–75)46 (25–69) Male, n (%) 106 (90)210 (91)212 (90) White, n (%) 99 (84)187 (81)197 (84) Median CD4+ count*, cells/mm 3 (range) 160 (1  675) 168 (1  812) 150 (2  678) Mean HIV-1 RNA*, log 10 copies/mL (range) 4.84 (3.46  6.02) 4.85 (3.20  6.75) 4.86 (3.26  6.88) Enfuvirtide in OBT, % ≤2 active drugs in OBT †, % Tipranavir use in OBT, % Darunavir use in OBTNot Permitted MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication (full analysis set) § Two patients (1 MVC QD, 1 OBT alone) were assigned to the wrong treatment group due to a transcription error * Calculated for each patient as the mean of up to three pre-dose assessments (screening, randomization, and baseline) † According to overall susceptibility score

5 Mean Change from Baseline in HIV-1 RNA Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication HIV-1 RNA value imputed as baseline if patient discontinued before 48 weeks *Treatment difference vs OBT alone MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 Mean change in HIV-1 RNA from baseline (log 10 copies/mL) Difference: -0.85* (97.5% CI: -1.22, -0.49) Difference: -1.02* (97.5% CI: -1.39, -0.66) MVC QD + OBT (N=232) MVC BID + OBT (N=235) OBT alone (N=118) Study week Difference: -0.79* (97.5% CI: -1.14, -0.44) Difference: -0.92* (97.5% CI: -1.28, -0.57) 2448

6 <400 copies/mL Percentage of Patients with Undetectable HIV-1 RNA 57.5%* 50.9%* 22.0% Time (weeks) <50 copies/mL 46.8%* 41.8%* 16.1% Time (weeks) OBT alone (N=118) MVC QD + OBT (N=232) MVC BID + OBT (N=235) Patients (%) 24.6% 48.5%* 42.2% # MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 HIV-1 RNA value imputed as baseline if missing or if patient discontinued before 48 weeks *P< vs OBT alone # P< vs OBT alone Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication Number of patients remaining on study treatment at Week 48: OBT alone, 27 (30%); MVC QD + OBT, 109 (60%); MVC BID + OBT, 127 (66%) 60.4%* 54.7%* 31.4%

7 MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 Last observation carried forward * P< vs OBT alone Mean Change from Baseline in CD4+ Count Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication Mean change from baseline in CD4+ count (cells/mm 3 ) 2448 Difference: +59 * (95% CI: +34, +84) Difference: +69 * (95% CI: +44, +93) MVC QD + OBT (N=227) MVC BID + OBT (N=233) OBT alone (N=116) Difference: +55 * (95% CI: +30, +79) Difference: +59 * (95% CI: +35, +83) Study week

8 Percentage of Patients With HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 According to Screening HIV-1 RNA* Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a post-baseline observation Patients (%) MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 <100,000 copies/mL ≥100,000 copies/mL Total population N = Last observation carried forward * Protocol-defined randomization stratum MVC QD + OBT MVC BID + OBT OBT alone

9 Patients (%) N= Maraviroc QD + OBT Maraviroc BID + OBT OBT alone MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Proportion of Patients Receiving ENF With Undetectable HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 According to ENF First Use <400 copies/mL<50 copies/mL MOTIVATE 1 & 2-Week 48 Last observation carried forward ENF first useENF experienced/ resistance ENF first useENF experienced/ resistance

10 Safety Analyses Unadjusted for Duration of Exposure All causalities and severitiesOBT alone N=118 MVC QD + OBT N=232 MVC BID + OBT N=235 Total exposure, patient-years Patients with AEs86%90%92% Patients discontinuing due to AEs6% 5% Patients with grade 3 AEs25%17%23% Patients with grade 4 AEs7%9%10% Patients with SAEs16%14%17% Patients with Category C events5% Deaths*1% 2% AEs = adverse events; SAEs = serious adverse events *Includes deaths reported up to 28 days after stopping study drug No deaths were related to study drug according to the investigator MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication

11 Incidence of Adverse Events Occurring in ≥10% of Patients in Any Group, Unadjusted for Exposure Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication Total exposure in patient-years: OBT alone 64, MVC QD + OBT 168, MVC BID + OBT 169 MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 MVC QD + OBT (N=232) MVC BID + OBT (N=235) OBT alone (N=118) Patients (%) RTI = respiratory tract infection; ISR = injection site reaction

12 Number of Category C Events Event, n OBT alone N=118 MVC QD + OBT N=232 MVC BID + OBT N=235 Total exposure, patient-years Cryptosporidial gastroenteritis010 Cytomegalovirus infection*011 Herpes simplex225 Mycobacterium avium001 Esophageal candidiasis061 Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 001 Pneumonia021 Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy 001 Kaposi’s sarcoma200 Lymphoma * 211 Total number of events Total number of patients, n (% ) 6 6 patients (5.1%) patients (4.7%) patients (5.1%) * Includes T-cell and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas MOTIVATE 1-Week 48 Includes all patients who received at least one dose of study medication

13 Maximum Liver Function Test Values Over 48 Weeks Without Regard to Baseline All causalities, n (%) Unadjusted for duration of exposure OBT alone N=116* MVC QD + OBT N=228* MVC BID + OBT N=234* AST: Grade 3 (5–10 x ULN † ) Grade 4 (>10 x ULN † ) 4 (3.4) 0 7 (3.1) 3 (1.3) 7 (3.0) 4 (1.7) ALT: Grade 3 (5–10 x ULN † ) Grade 4 (>10 x ULN † ) 2 (1.7) 0 11 (4.8) 1 (0.4) 5 (2.1) 3 (1.3) Total bilirubin: Grade 3 (2.5–5 x ULN † ) Grade 4 (>5 x ULN † ) 4 (3.4) 2 (1.7) 17 (7.4) 2 (0.9) 10 (4.3) 2 (0.9) * Total patients evaluated for each laboratory parameter † Upper limit of normal MOTIVATE 1-Week 48

14 MOTIVATE 1 and 2: Change in CD4+ Cell Count from Baseline by Tropism Result at Time of Failure MOTIVATE 1 & 2-Week 48 Tropism result, Baseline → Treatment Failure Mean change from baseline in CD4+ count in patients with treatment failure (cells/mm 3 ) OBT alone N=271 MVC QD + OBT N=477 MVC BID + OBT N=487 All treatment failures* +24 (n=111) +64 (n=92) +74 (n=96) R5 → R5 +25 (n=89) +77 (n=33) +133 (n=24) R5 → D/M or X4 +61 (n=6) +47 (n=35) +57 (n=41) * Includes patients with non-reportable/non-phenotypable tropism result at baseline and patients with non-reportable/non-phenotypable/missing tropism result at time of failure

15 MOTIVATE 1: Summary of 48-Week Primary Analysis ● Maraviroc (BID or QD) + OBT provided significantly greater virologic suppression rates and increases in CD4+ count compared to OBT alone at 48 weeks in this treatment-experienced population ● No new or unique safety findings emerged – Adverse events, serious adverse events, and lab abnormalities (including grade 3/4 transaminase elevations) occurred with similar frequency between treatment groups – Category C (AIDS-defining events) were balanced across treatment groups ● These results demonstrate that treatment with maraviroc + OBT provides sustained antiretroviral efficacy and tolerability in treatment- experienced patients

16 Acknowledgments ● Investigators and study site staff ● Patients who participated in the study ● Colleagues from Monogram Biosciences: J Whitcomb, E Coakley, C Petropoulos ● R Harrigan, BC Centre for Excellence in HIV ● Colleagues from Quintiles ● Colleagues from Pfizer: S Felstead, A Bullivant, I Oborska, K George, M Westby, K Turner, D Lindell, D Paige, S Nuttall, J Merson, L Kapili, M Dunne