Ramp Count Estimation Procedures Daniel Jenkins, PE Office of Highway Policy Information October 24, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Advertisements

Chapter 12 Freeway Driving.
Intersection Sight Distance Case C1 Ryan Miller CE /19/10.
Dynamic Programming In this handout A shortest path example
1 Freeways and Interchanges CE453 Lecture 33 Source : A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (The Green Book). Washington, DC. American Association.
Page 1 Recursion and Exhaustion Yip Lik Yau. Page 2 Why Exhaustion?  Many problems can be solved by brute force in a reasonable amount of time if the.
Corridor planning: a quick response strategy. Background NCHRP Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques (1978) Objective: provide tools.
Calculating Slope Y-interceptWhat’s that line? What’s that graph? Vocabulary $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Freeway Signing Plan Design April 29, 2008
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
1Chapter 9-4e Chapter 9. Volume Studies & Characteristics Understand that measured volumes may not be true demands if not careful in data collection and.
MODULE 6 Objectives: Students will learn about using risk reducing strategies to manage multiple-lane roads at speeds up to 65 mph in complex risk environments.
TYPES OF INTERSECTIONS OF ROAD AND DESIGN PARAMETERS OF INTERSECTION
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 04/19/12 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 04/21/11 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Interchanges, Arterials, And Networks Last Week. Interchanges Freeway – Multilane highway Ramps and weaves are the same Problem comes in when you have.
2/27/06Michael Dixon1 CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 16: Freeways Basic Sections.
Highway Functional Classification PEAR Workshop September 2009 Spencer Stevens, Planning Office Joe Hausman, Office of Highway Information Ed Christopher,
Chapter 3. Highway Design for Performance
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 9 COUNTING AND PROBABILITY.
3/6/06Michael Dixon1 CE 578 Highway Traffic Operations Lecture 21: Freeway Ramps and Ramp Junctions Diverge Areas.
Chapter 9 Flashcards. measurement method that uses uniform procedures to collect, score, interpret, and report numerical results; usually has norms and.
Traffic Volume Data Collection Daniel Jenkins, PE Substitute – Steven Jessberger Office of Highway Policy Information October 23, 2012.
Flash Distillation Flash distillation is the simplest method of separation. A feed stream is “flashed” into a chamber or “flash drum” and the liquid and.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
INTRODUCTION Grade separation is an effective way of handling intersecting traffic with greatest efficiency, safety, capacity. An interchange is a system.
Interstate 435 and Front Street Interchange Improvements This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use.
National VMT Development Procedure Highway Information Seminar October , 2012 Patrick Zhang, PE
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Lec 17, Ch.9, pp : Capacity of freeway sections (objectives) Understand capacity and level of service are the heart of transportation analyses Understand.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Chapter 1: Highway Functions
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
Grade separation.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
CHAPTER 10 DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY. RISK Risk and uncertainty are similar in that they both present the problem of not knowing what future conditions.
1 INTERCHANGE SELECTION CE 550 SPRING OBJECTIVE Identify types of interchange by function and geometry Learn process for optimizing the type of.
Chapter 13: Weaving, Merging, and Diverging Movements on Freeways and Multilane Highways Chapter objectives: By the end of these chapters the student will.
Sullivan Algebra and Trigonometry: Section 14.2 Objectives of this Section Solve Counting Problems Using the Multiplication Principle Solve Counting Problems.
1 Part 4 HPMS Vehicle Summary Data Computation. Additional Columns 2  Ucode=if(urban_code=99999, “Rural”, “Urban”)  VMT=(end_point-begin_point)*AADT.
Virginia Department of Education
 Links the optimized settings to VISSIM, the operational analysis results is: Synchronization of Intersections This study employs the core logic of MAXBAND.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
 Manage Visibility –  6 second rule –  Judge gaps in traffic –  Signed Intersections –  T-Intersections –  4-Way Intersections -
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
Information Processing: Complex Risk Environments Topic 1 -- Characteristics of Expressways Topic 2 (through Lesson 1)-- Entering, Changing Lanes, and.
Intersections.
What is algebra? It is the language of mathematics It is a vehicle we use to condense large amounts of data into efficient mathematical statements It.
Expressway Driving Legacy High School Drivers Education.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
DRIVING THE FREEWAYS ALABAMA DRIVER MANUAL CHAPTER 8.
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
HCM 2010: FREEWAY FACILITIES PRAVEEN EDARA, PH.D., P.E., PTOE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
Session 2 History How did SPF come into being and why is it here to stay? Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
1 Intersection Design CE 453 Lecture Intersections More complicated area for drivers Main function is to provide for change of direction Source.
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
What is Physics? The study of matter, energy, and the interaction between them Physics is about asking fundamental questions and trying to answer them.
MODULE 6 Expressway Driving AliciaAlisonElizabeth.
Math 1320 Chapter 6: Sets and Counting 6.4 Permutations and Combinations.
Solving a Proportion by “Cross” Multiplying
UNIT 3 Foundations of Effective Driving
Cost Estimation & Cost Behaviour
Unit 1 Motion Lab Test.
Interchanges Ch. 6.
CONSERVATIVE FORCES, POTENTIAL ENERGY AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE Four exit ramp, split level (SPUI)
lesson 16.1 CLASSIFICATION OF HIGHWAYS
Presentation transcript:

Ramp Count Estimation Procedures Daniel Jenkins, PE Office of Highway Policy Information October 24, 2012

Ramp Count Requirements Grade separated interchanges on Federal-aid highways – Except minor collectors and local (rural) – Except local (urban)

Ramp Count Study Develop mathematical formulas to estimate ramp volumes Typical interchanges – Diamond – Trumpet/3-leg directional – Cloverleaf Requires some ramp data counts

4 Algorithm Development Volume relationships can be created for any interchange using this concept A directional downstream volume at a standard diamond interchange is equivalent to: A cross street relationship exists as well requiring a weight factor for each ramp:

5 Diamond Interchange Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI)

6 Diamond and Single-Point Urban Interchanges Formulas (2) through (5) were derived to represent ramp volumes at a typical diamond interchange or SPUI

7 Diamond and Single-Point Urban Interchange Mainline and cross-street AADTs available with one ramp known – In this case, one additional ramp needs to be counted that is opposite to the ramp already known. Once this data is collected, formulas (3) and (5) can be used to determine the other two ramp volumes. – Due to the complexity of the cross street relationships, these formulas involve all four ramps. They can be used to validate the volumes derived mined by using the two mainline equations.

8 Diamond and Single-Point Urban Interchange Mainline and cross-street AADTs available – If only mainline and cross street count data is available, formulas (3) and (5) can be used once two opposite ramps are physically counted. The specific ramp combination does not matter as long as it is one of the following four combinations: – Similar to the first scenario, the cross street equations can be used to validate the derived values from formulas (3) and (5).

9 Diamond and Single-Point Urban Interchange Only mainline AADT data available (most typical situation) – In a scenario with less data, having only mainline counts requires two opposite ramps to be counted in order to establish counts for all ramps. Potential permutations include: – Once a permutation is counted, formulas (3) and (5) can be used to determine estimated counts for the remaining two ramps.

EXAMPLE A diamond interchange located on an E/W freeway has directional mainline data both upstream and downstream of the interchange. Two ramps need to be counted in order to use formulas (3) and (5). Ramps R 1 and R 4 were counted and the following data is now known:

Trumpet Interchange Three-leg Directional Interchange

14 Trumpet and Three-leg Directional Using the relationships of mainline to ramp volumes and cross street to ramp volumes, formulas (8) through (11) were derived to represent ramp volumes at trumpet and three-leg directional interchanges. No weight factor was applied to R 3 to determine how many cars travel towards C 1. – The amount of vehicles using this to u-turn is trivial compared to the total number of vehicles using that ramp.

15 Trumpet and Three-leg Directional Mainline and cross-street AADTs available with one ramp known – No additional ramp counting is needed in this scenario. Formulas (8) through (11) can be used to solve for the remaining ramps.

16 Trumpet and Three-leg Directional Mainline and cross-street AADTs available – If only mainline and cross street counts are available, formulas (8) through (11) can be used once on ramp is counted. It does not matter which ramp is counted.

17 Task 3 – Trumpet and Three-leg Directional Only mainline AADT data available (most typical situation) – In a scenario with less data, having only mainline counts requires two opposite ramps to be counted in order to establish counts for all ramps. Potential permutations include: – Once a permutation is counted, formulas (9) and (10) can be used to determine estimated counts for the remaining two ramps.

EXAMPLE A trumpet interchange located on an E/W freeway has directional mainline data both upstream and downstream of the interchange. Two ramps need to be counted in order to use formulas (9) and (10). Ramps R 1 and R 4 were counted and the following data is now known:

If no mainline data exists, an origin/destination approach to the interchange yields two relationships in most instances (especially rural interchanges): Alternate Estimate method for Diamonds/Trumpets/Three-Legged Interchanges

Cloverleaf Interchange

23 Cloverleaf Cloverleaf interchanges are the most complex and data intensive scenario for volume to ramp count relationships. – Formulas (14) through (17) can be used directly assuming some combination of mainline, cross street, and ramp volumes are known for a given year. A weight factor does not need to be used for exit ramps when approaching the cross street because vehicles do not have an option of which direction to take once on a ramp.

24 Cloverleaf Mainline and cross-street AADTs available with one ramp known – In order to calculate all ramps, two ramps from each of the following groupings must be counted in total: – For example, if R 1 is already known, then count L 1, R 2, or L 2 plus two ramps from the second group. – Once volumes are known for four ramps, use formulas (14) through (17) to determine the remaining volumes.

25 Cloverleaf Mainline and cross-street AADTs available – If only mainline and cross street data is available, formulas (14) through (17) can be used once four ramps are counted. – The four counted ramps must be diagonal to one another, i.e. one of the two groups of ramps below needs to be counted:

26 Cloverleaf Only mainline AADT data available (most typical situation) – If only mainline AADT data is available, count three ramps from each of the following lists: – With six ramps counted, use formulas (14) and (16) to determine the volumes for the remaining ramps.

27 EXAMPLE A cloverleaf interchange located at an intersection of two highway has directional mainline (E/W) data both upstream and downstream of the interchange. Six ramps need to be counted in order to use formulas (14) and (16). Ramps 1, 2, 3, and 4, and Loops 1 and 3 were counted and the following data is now known:

Cloverleaf Interchange

QUESTIONS?