UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Weighting the BHPS Nick Buck Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARK is a resource dedicated to making social and political information on Northern Ireland available to all.
Advertisements

The ONS Longitudinal Study - plans for the 2011 Census and beyond
Sampling: Theory and Methods
Evaluating the Effects of Business Register Updates on Monthly Survey Estimates Daniel Lewis.
Innovation data collection: Advice from the Oslo Manual South East Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics.
Innovation Surveys: Advice from the Oslo Manual South Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics Kathmandu,
Innovation Surveys: Advice from the Oslo Manual National training workshop Amman, Jordan October 2010.
Statistical Significance and Population Controls Presented to the New Jersey SDC Annual Network Meeting June 6, 2007 Tony Tersine, U.S. Census Bureau.
ESRC UK Longitudinal Studies Centre The British Household Panel Survey Nick Buck Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Accessing longitudinal data via the UK Data Archive / ESDS Jack Kneeshaw NCDS summer school course, July 2005 ESDS Longitudinal.
ELSA English Longitudinal Study of Ageing The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing Rebecca Taylor National Centre for Social.
An Introduction to the UK Data Archive and the Economic and Social Data Service November 2007 Jack Kneeshaw, UKDA.
Gender and healthy ageing in Britain Emily Grundy, LSHTM, UK. GeNET Seminar October 2005.
Samples of Anonymised Records: a resource for ethnicity research Ed Fieldhouse Director, SARs Support team
Poverty trajectories after risky life events in Germany, Spain, Denmark and the United Kingdom: a latent class approach Leen Vandecasteele Post-doctoral.
ESRC UK Longitudinal Studies Centre A Framework for Quality Profiles Nick Buck and Peter Lynn Institute for Social and Economic Research University of.
An Introduction to the Families and Children Study (FACS)
Session 1: Introduction to Complex Survey Design
Outline of talk The ONS surveys Why should we weight?
Peter Lynn ESDS Event, 12 March 2004 Weighting for Longitudinal Surveys Peter Lynn University of Essex, UK.
Longitudinal LFS Catherine Barham and Paul Smith ONS.
1 Using the government data in employment research Vanessa Higgins CCSR University of Manchester.
Health Expectancies in the UK and its constituent countries, 1981 – 2001 Claudia Breakwell Madhavi Bajekal.
The Samples of Anonymised Records: Understanding Individual differences Mark Brown.
Employment transitions over the business cycle Mark Taylor (ISER)
Unido.org/statistics International workshop on industrial statistics 8 – 10 July, Beijing Non response in industrial surveys Shyam Upadhyaya.
ESRC UK Longitudinal Studies Centre The British Household Panel Survey and its Scottish Extension Nick Buck Institute for Social and Economic Research.
BHPS User Group 19 January Overview News on progress with data availability and access. Uses of the new sub-samples and weighting Open session -
Research on Improvements to Current SIPP Imputation Methods ASA-SRM SIPP Working Group September 16, 2008 Martha Stinson.
An example of longitudinal LFS weights
9. Weighting and Weighted Standard Errors. 1 Prerequisites Recommended modules to complete before viewing this module  1. Introduction to the NLTS2 Training.
Nonresponse bias in studies of residential mobility Elizabeth Washbrook, Paul Clarke and Fiona Steele University of Bristol Research Methods Festival,
The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) Sample design & response Shaun Scholes NatCen.
Dependent questioning on the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) Iain Noble, Strategic Analysis, DfES Patten Smith, BMRB.
Chapter 11 Contingency Table Analysis. Nonparametric Systems Another method of examining the relationship between independent (X) and dependant (Y) variables.
NLSCY – Non-response. Non-response There are various reasons why there is non-response to a survey  Some related to the survey process Timing Poor frame.
© John M. Abowd 2005, all rights reserved Analyzing Frames and Samples with Missing Data John M. Abowd March 2005.
Mean for sample of n=10 n = 10: t = 1.361df = 9Critical value = Conclusion: accept the null hypothesis; no difference between this sample.
PPA 415 – Research Methods in Public Administration Lecture 5 – Normal Curve, Sampling, and Estimation.
Formalizing the Concepts: Simple Random Sampling.
FINAL REPORT: OUTLINE & OVERVIEW OF SURVEY ERRORS
Aspects of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Chris Moriarity National Conference on Health Statistics August 16, 2010
Improving Quality in the Office for National Statistics’ Annual Earnings Statistics Pete Brodie & Kevin Moore UK Office for National Statistics.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
Definitions Observation unit Target population Sample Sampled population Sampling unit Sampling frame.
Sampling: Theory and Methods
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Sampling: Overview MICS Survey Design Workshop.
© John M. Abowd 2007, all rights reserved Analyzing Frames and Samples with Missing Data John M. Abowd March 2007.
Living arrangements, health and well-being: A European Perspective UPTAP Meeting 21 st March 2007 Harriet Young and Emily Grundy London School of Hygiene.
1 Introduction to Survey Data Analysis Linda K. Owens, PhD Assistant Director for Sampling & Analysis Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois.
Sampling “Sampling is the process of choosing sample which is a group of people, items and objects. That are taken from population for measurement and.
Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Richard Curtin University of Michigan.
Handling Attrition and Non- response in the 1970 British Cohort Study Tarek Mostafa Institute of Education – University of London.
The Challenge of Non- Response in Surveys. The Overall Response Rate The number of complete interviews divided by the number of eligible units in the.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Reducing Non-Response Section B 1.
Essex Dependent Interviewing Workshop 17/09/2004 British Household Panel Survey.
Understanding Sampling
STA Lecture 171 STA 291 Lecture 17 Chap. 10 Estimation – Estimating the Population Proportion p –We are not predicting the next outcome (which is.
Living arrangements, health and well-being: A European Perspective UPTAP-ONS Meeting Southampton University 19 th December 2007 Harriet Young and Emily.
Chapter 10 Sampling: Theories, Designs and Plans.
Item-Non-Response and Imputation of Labor Income in Panel Surveys: A Cross-National Comparison ITEM-NON-RESPONSE AND IMPUTATION OF LABOR INCOME IN PANEL.
CROSS-COUNTRY INCOME MOBILITY COMPARISONS UNDER PANEL ATTRITION: THE RELEVANCE OF WEIGHTING SCHEMES Luis Ayala (IEF, URJC) Carolina Navarro (UNED) Mercedes.
Statistics Canada Citizenship and Immigration Canada Methodological issues.
1/22#/ Post Enumeration Survey for Population Census Jaewon Lee Statistical Research Institute Statistics Korea.
Slide 7.1 Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students, 5 th Edition, © Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009.
Handling Attrition and Non-response in the 1970 British Cohort Study
Effect of Panel Length and Following Rules on Cross-Sectional Estimates of Income Distribution: Empirical Evidence from FI-SILC Marjo Pyy-Martikainen Workshop.
Workshop on best practices for EU-SILC revision, −
Presentation transcript:

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Weighting the BHPS Nick Buck Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Outline Brief description of the BHPS What this means for weighting How we calculate BHPS weights Basic use of BHPS weights, Implications of new samples for weighting

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Overview of the BHPS Repeated data collection about a panel of individuals Usually interview all members of respondent households Follow individuals as they move between different households Short intervals between surveys, allows collection of continuous information Use Household panel where household context is important (e.g. income dynamics) Collects information on changing household units

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre BHPS overview Annual survey of members of initial sample of 5511 households interviewed in autumn 1991 Random sample representative of population of Great Britain (south of Caledonian canal) Follow sample members as they move and form new households Sample increased by births, new household members,... reduced by deaths, refusals, moves out of scope

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre BHPS sample members Original sample members – in originally selected households (plus births to OSMs) – always eligible for interview if living in GB/UK Temporary sample members – people who join households with OSMs – indeterminate selection probabilities; only eligible for interview if living with OSM) (also Permanent sample members, subset of TSMs who continue to be eligible for interview if not longer living with OSM)

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Implications of BHPS design for weighting Analysis at both individual and household levels Design for both longitudinal and cross sectional analysis – separate weights? Different types of respondent – full interview respondents, children etc Different types of sample membership status Presents issues of both unequal selection probabilities and unequal response probabilities, attrition

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Types of weights Longitudinal – respondent at all waves up to last wave in sequence (only individual level, not household) Cross-sectional – all respondents at wave, regardless of sample status and response history, available at individual and household levels Weights for full-interview respondents and weights for all individuals (including children) in respondent households So, for main sample, four person level and one household level weight

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Longitudinal weights Based on a sequence of attrition models for each wave, which is multiplied by the previous wave weight (cf Lynn discussion). Models are based on a CHAID algorithm to identified best prediction imputation classes Post-stratified against 1991 census Trimmed to maximum value of 2.5 Only available for individuals respondent at each wave up to latest (but sample children who reach 16 and are then interviewed have respondent weights)

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Cross-sectional weights Enumerated individual weight computed as a single step, adjusting for attrition from first wave (and multiplied by first wave weight) TSMs given weight on the basis of fair shares method (i.e. sum of OSM weights divided by total number of OSMs+TSMs) Respondent weight based on probability of responding given in enumerated household Cross-sectional household weight = enumerated individual weight

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Variables used in construction of weights Respondent weight models use a wide range of social, economic and demographic characteristics from previous wave, measured at both household and individual variable (also whether recorded as mover between waves) Enumerated individual weights use individual demographic characteristics, plus measures of socio-economic status of household, including household level measures (e.g. income and tenure) and characteristics of key individuals in household

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Advice on using weights Analysis of change up to wave W should use wave W longitudinal weight, adjusting for attrition losses. Cross-sectional analysis can use either cross-sectional weight or longitudinal weight – the former includes many more cases. If use cross-sectional weights must include temporary sample members in analysis. Weights affect standard errors and significance tests – e.g. SPSS does not adjust for this.

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre BHPS samples Initial 1991 GB sample ECHP low income sub-sample Scotland and Wales extension samples about 1500 extra households in each 1999-> Northern Ireland extension sample, 2000 extra households, > Each contain OSMs, TSM, and PSMs

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre New samples and weighting Cases in new samples have different selection probabilities from initial sample ECHP sample marginally raises selection probability of low income households Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland substantially raise selection probabilities in these areas New cross-sectional weights incorporating ECHP Full new set of weights from 1999 onwards (rebased on all OSM respondents in that year) – and further new set from 2001

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre New sample and weighting II So, increasing proliferation of weights, increasing complexity of weight selection – need to decide what sample of interest is (will depend on both substantive concerns and years for which data required) Data set contains two versions, one for GB/UK analysis, the other for separate analysis of Scotland Wales etc. New weights have higher variance, so lower effective sample size. For example at wave sample longitudinal weight increases variance by 14%, all sample weight by 47%.

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Gross usual pay: confidence intervals WeightCountryMeanLower bound Upper bound UnweightedEngland Wales Scotland XRWTSW1England (STATA)Wales Scotland XRWTSW1England (SPSS)Wales Scotland XRWTSW1England with design effect Wales Scotland

UK Longitudinal Studies Centre Further issues Computing weights for other response samples Arguments for not using weights Arguments for constructing special purpose weights Pooled multi-wave samples Statistical procedures which do not accept weights