Overview of Evaluation ED. 883.721 Session 1: 01/28/10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Advertisements

REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
REGIONAL CONFERENCES Planning, Doing, and Using Evaluation.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Program Theory and Logic Models (1) CHSC 433 Module 2/Chapter 5 Part 1 L. Michele Issel, PhD UIC School of Public Health.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Basic Principles of Program Evaluation Corinne Datchi-Phillips, Ph.D. CEBP Learning Institute May 26 th, 2010.
A Realist Evaluation of Performance Management for Social Services Lessons from the implementation of “Outcome Management” in the voluntary sector in Singapore.
Randi Korn and Stephanie Downey Randi Korn & Associates, Inc. Evaluation Workshop October 10, 2013 SENCER-ISE Civic Engagement Partnership.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
Policy Governance® Theory of Change & Logic Model* What is a theory of change? A theory of change articulates the assumptions, philosophies and principles.
Process Evaluation: Considerations and Strategies CHSC 433 Module 4/Chapter 8 L. Michele Issel UIC School of Public Health.
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Session Four: M&E System for AfT bankable projects UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
2014 AmeriCorps State and National Symposium How to Develop a Program Logic Model.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENT TRAINING Logic Models OBJECTIVES FOR TODAY: n Recognize and understand components of a logic model n Learn how to create a logic.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Domus Leadership Training TOPIC - Planning June 2015.
Dr. G. Johnson, Program Evaluation and the Logic Model Research Methods for Public Administrators Dr. Gail Johnson.
HR Session 5 Performance Management and Appraisal Dr. Debra Munsterman
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Measuring the effectiveness of your volunteer program Meals On Wheels Association of America 2011 Annual Conference August 30, 2011 Stacey McKeever, MPH,
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Performance Measurement 201: Best practices in performance measure design & implementation Ia Moua, Deputy Director, Grants & Program Development Patrick.
Evaluation Tools & Approaches for Engaging Stakeholders: The AREA Approach Presentation at the Canadian Evaluation Society Dr. Mariam Manley, Principal.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
Implementation and process evaluation: developing our approach Ann Lendrum University of Manchester Neil Humphrey University of Manchester Gemma Moss Institute.
Beyond logical frameworks to program impact pathways CIIFAD M&E Workshop 5 November 2011  135 Emerson Hall Sunny S. Kim, MPH PhD candidate Division of.
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama CHAPTER 11 Performance Management and Appraisal Section 3 Developing Human Resources.
 Welcome, introductions  Conceptualizing the evaluation problem  stakeholder interests  Divergent and convergent processes  Developing evaluation.
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH METHODS Dr. Kimaro. INTRODUCTION Why Research; Increase body of knowledge Explain social phenomena Test theoretical hypothesis Explain.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Private Health Sector Assessments (PHSA) April Harding 2011.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Fiver Foundation TOC Cari Kupec-do not reproduce without permission.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
From Monitoring Through Evaluation To Impact Assessment The case of NHDRs and vulnerable groups Andrey Ivanov Human Development Adviser, Bratislava RSC.
Program Evaluation Planning Taylor-Powell, E., Steele, S., & Douglah, M. (1996). Planning a program evaluation. Retrieved from University of Wisconsin-Extension-Cooperative.
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Develop Schedule is the Process of analyzing activity sequences, durations, resource requirements, and schedule constraints to create the project schedule.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
Reading Discussion – s519 by Peter Hall – 1/21/09 Ryan, J., McClure, C. R., & Bertot, J. C. (2001). Choosing measures to evaluate networked information.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Stages of Research and Development
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Rebecca McQuaid Evaluation 101 …a focus on Programs Rebecca McQuaid
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
What It Is and How It Works
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
THEORY OF CHANGE APPROACH
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Troubleshooting Logic Models
Performance and Quality Improvement
Quality Framework Overview
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Evaluation ED Session 1: 01/28/10

Assignment 1 Handouts Review your problem and program for us Discussion Clear problem statements Defining terms Clear program or policy Scope and scale

“A program is a theory and an evaluation is its test.” (Rein, 1981 p141)

What is a program theory? Theory of action – why should the program work? Explains why the program does what it does and provides the rationale for expecting that doing so will achieve the desired results Explicit or implicit in all programs and policies

Why would we want to know the program’s theory of action? Develop knowledge of issues Aid to identify evaluation questions Framework for data collection Help to understand the data Interpret the evidence Make sound recommendations Better reporting Object of evaluation itself

Social programs are complex things Can be clearly defined In terms that are clear and reproducible Involves a mechanism that is well understood or visible or “fuzzy” Programs are not “Black Boxes” Y

Conceptualizing a Program Define the Boundaries of the Program Program Goals Official, Stated Goals As perceived by staff Distinct from objectives Problems? Assumptions

Important Components Program Goals and Objectives Can they be realistically be obtained? Program Functions, Components and Activities Linking Functions, Components and Activities How does everything fit together?

Finding out about a Program Review program documents Interview stakeholders Site visits and observations Literature review Corroborate it

Program Theory Target Population Program Outcomes

Impact Theory Assumptions about the change process actuated by the program Assumptions about the improved outcomes Target Population Program Outcomes

Impact Theory Causal – cause and effect relationship Diagrams of the chain of causes and effects Proximal versus Distal Outcomes

Service Utilization Theory How to reach targets Provision and sequence services How to conclude services Target Population Program Outcomes

Service Utilization Theory Focus on assumptions how and why recipients will become engaged in the program and follow through to desired outcomes Flow charts of paths through program

Organizational Theory Program resources, personnel, administration, organization Factors that make it possible to develop and maintain service delivery Target Population Program Outcomes

Organizational Theory/Plan Who is in charge of what? What resources are necessary at critical points? Charts preconditions for each critical point Inputs and activities

Inputs/Factors Positive and Negative Resources and Barriers Tangible

Activities Processes, tools, events, actions Products Curricula, materials Services Education, training Counseling Infrastructure Relationships, capacities

Outputs DIRECT results of program activities Speak to size and scope Data about activities Number of classes taught Participation rates Hours of services provided

Outcomes & Impacts Outcomes What is expected to result from activities Individual level Impacts Higher level changes that result from program activities

Problem Statements

Feb 11: Identifying Problems and Asking Researchable Questions RLF Chapters 3 & 4 Light, R., Singer, J., & Willet, J. (1999). What are your questions? In By design: planning research on higher education (pp ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Kerlinger, F. (1986). Problems and hypotheses. In Foundations of behavioral research (pp ). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.