Group Learning Authors : Jeanne M. Wilson, Paul S. Goodman, Matthew A. Cronin Source : Academy of Management Review Oct 2007, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p1041-1059,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluating and Institutionalizing
Advertisements

Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Performance Assessment
Resource for: Stage 1, Stage 2 mentor preparation and ongoing annual Mentor Updates. 10 Chapters: Chapter 1: Mentorship – an overview. Chapters 2 – 9:
AS Level – Week 22 Theory Module 1 Information Processing Memory.
Input Data Warehousing Canada’s Experience with Establishment Level Information Presentation to the Third International Conference on Establishment Statistics.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Measures of Association.
What should researchers do about knowledge transfer? By Réjean Landry Faculty of Business Laval University Notes prepared for presentation and discussion.
Transfer of Training Instructor’s notes: This module consists of three 50-minute class sessions (which could be covered in two 75 minute class sessions.
VCE Religion and Society Revised Study
Reviewing and Critiquing Research
Marakas: Decision Support Systems, 2nd Edition © 2003, Prentice-Hall Chapter Chapter 4: Modeling Decision Processes Decision Support Systems in the.
Introduction to Research
Memory Chapter 6.
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved
FACULTY OF Management Sciences Department of Office Management and Technology 1 THE IMPORTANCE OF USING INFORMATION SYSTEMS AS VEHICLES FOR KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION.
Knowledge Management Solutions
Chapter 4 Learning: Theories and Program Design
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
Leveraging Collaborative Technologies for Sharing Tacit Knowledge: An Integrative Model (Research in progress) Vikas Sahasrabudhe
AS Level – Week 23 Theory Module 1 Information Processing Reaction Time, Decision Making and Hicks Law.
Information Processing Approach Define cognition and differentiate among the stage, levels-of-processing, parallel distributed processing, and connectionist.
Ch 6 Validity of Instrument
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment (Part 1) Robert W. Lingard and Deborah K. van Alphen California State University, Northridge.
The Influences of Learning Behavior on the Performance of Work Teams -- A System Dynamics Approach Elaine Lizeo Albany-MIT 4th SD Colloquium April 5, 2002.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Chapter 6: Memory Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Software Reliability SEG3202 N. El Kadri.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
1 / 12 PSLC Summer School, June 21, 2007 Identifying Students’ Gradual Understanding of Physics Concepts Using TagHelper Tools Nava L.
CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS IN KM B.V.L.Narayana Senior professor (T M ), RSC/BRC.
Week 4 Lecture Part 3 of 3 Database Design Samuel ConnSamuel Conn, Faculty Suggestions for using the Lecture Slides.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
S7: Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning.
Role of Statistics in Geography
HOW PROFESSIONALS LEARN AND ACQUIRE EXPERTISE  Model of professionals as learners:  How professionals know  How professionals incorporate knowledge.
Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning process To finalise the audit approach.
10 Software Architecture CSCU 411 Software Engineering.
Learning Theories with Technology Learning Theories with Technology By: Jessica Rubinstein.
Developing learner competency in the clinical environment GRACE Session 3 GRACE Program.
Dr. Rachel Wlodarsky Professor Ashland University.
By Cao Hao Thi - Fredric W. Swierczek
Introduction to IS & Fundamental Concepts Infsy 540 Dr. R. Ocker.
Teams and Knowledge management
Screen 1 of 20 Vulnerability Vulnerability Assessment LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose and scope of vulnerability assessment. Understand how vulnerability.
1 Lesson 4 Attitudes. 2 Lesson Outline   Last class, the self and its presentation  What are attitudes?  Where do attitudes come from  How are they.
Perception, Cognition, and Emotion in Negotiation
Developing a Review Protocol. 1. Title Registration 2. Protocol 3. Complete Review Components of the C2 Review Process.
WEYGANDT. KIESO. KIMMEL. TRENHOLM. KINNEAR. BARLOW. ATKINS PRINCIPLES OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING CANADIAN EDITION Chapter 11 Financial Reporting Concepts.
U SER I NTERFACE L ABORATORY Situation Awareness a state of knowledge, from the processes used to achieve that state (situation assessment) not encompass.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Information Technology and Organizational Decision Making G. P. Huber Presented by Shufan Wei.
Introduction to Research. Purpose of Research Evidence-based practice Validate clinical practice through scientific inquiry Scientific rational must exist.
 Approximately 75,000 defendants are implicated by eyewitnesses in the U.S. every year, but unfortunately, some eyewitnesses make mistakes.
Welcome to MT140 Introduction to Management Unit 10 Seminar Reflection.
Chapter Two Copyright © 2006 McGraw-Hill/Irwin The Marketing Research Process.
Chapter 7 Memory. Objectives 7.1 Overview: What Is Memory? Explain how human memory differs from an objective video recording of events. 7.2 Constructing.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
The Cost of Organization
Exam 2 Review Chapters 9-13.
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment Part 1
Purpose Emerging from Knowledge, Technology and Innovation
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Analyzing Reliability and Validity in Outcomes Assessment
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Theoretical Perspectives
Presentation transcript:

Group Learning Authors : Jeanne M. Wilson, Paul S. Goodman, Matthew A. Cronin Source : Academy of Management Review Oct 2007, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p , 19p Course: Knowledge Management Student : Pei-Hua Wu

OUTLINE Introduction Current State of Research on Group Learning Our Approach Basic Features of Group Learning Discussion and Implications

INTRODUCTION (1/2) We clarify the construct of group learning, focusing on four objectives. 2.We identify gaps in the research literature on group learning. 1.We present a set of features differentiating group learning from other concepts.

INTRODUCTION (2/2) 3. We present an illustrative set of new propositions from our conceptualization of group learning. 4. We outline some implications for research and methods.

CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON GROUP LEARNING

CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON GROUP LEARNING (1/2)

CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON GROUP LEARNING (2/2) Others have suggested that learning is primarily a process of error detection and correction (Argyris & Scho¨n, 1995) or that group-level learning is primarily about the processes of interpretation and integration (Crossan, Lane, & White, 1999).

OUR APPROACH

OUR APPROACH (1/5) Given the current limitations in the literature, we propose four criteria to be considered in a theory of group learning: 1.Level of analysis 2.Fundamental processes 3.Learning as an outcome 4.Time

OUR APPROACH (2/5) Level of analysis We are explicitly stating that the theory, measurement, and analysis of group learning should focus on changes in the group’s repertoire (cf. Klein et al., 1994).

OUR APPROACH (3/5) Fundamental processes We propose that the processes inherent in the construct of group learning include sharing, storage, and retrieval of group knowledge, routines, or behavior. The processes of sharing, storage, and retrieval are the basic elements or mechanisms of the learning process (Hinsz, Tindale, & Vollrath, 1997).

OUR APPROACH (4/5) Learning as an outcome Learning as an outcome should be distinguished from other criterion variables, such as performance or decision making.

OUR APPROACH (5/5) Time Our definition explicitly incorporates time by requiring a change in the group’s repertoire of potential behavior over some interval.

BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING

BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (1/24) Sharing Storage Retrieval Overlap of Sharing, Storage, and Retrieval

Sharing We define sharing as the process by which new knowledge, routines, or behavior becomes distributed among group members and members understand that others in the group possess that learning BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (2/24)

Sharing There are at least three stages in the development of shared knowledge. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (3/24) The first stage: An individual member’s repertoire changes to incorporate some new knowledge, routine, or behavior, x.

The second stage: In the acquisition of shared knowledge, imagine that several of the other group members have the same understanding about x. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (4/24)

The third stage: A shared understanding of x allows knowledge to be transferred to new group members and decreases the probability that the learning will be lost over time. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (5/24)

Sharing Proposition 1: The depth and breadth of sharing among group members about any given knowledge, routine, or behavior improve storage and retrieval of that information. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (6/24)

Sharing Proposition 2: Groups are more likely to focus their attention on changes to individual- level rather than grouplevel routines, decreasing the probability that group learning will occur. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (7/24)

Sharing Proposition 3: Groups with higher levels of collective efficacy will be more likely to share a commitment to changing their own routines. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (8/24)

Sharing Proposition 4: Group discussion about performance discrepancies that reflects past, present, and future scenarios increases the probability of group learning. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (9/24)

Storage Another feature of group learning is that the change in the group’s repertoire needs to be stored in memory. Memories of group members constitute the most obvious group repository BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (10/24)

Storage Shared databases, bulletin boards, and expert systems are examples of this type of repository (Olivera, 2000). Indexing, filtering, and maintenance functions are important components of any storage system (Olivera, 2000). BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (11/24)

Storage Proposition 5: Group storage systems with strong indexing, filtering, and maintenance capabilities will be used more often than systems without those features. Groups that use storage systems with indexing, filtering, and maintenance capabilities will ultimately exhibit higher rates of learning than groups that do not. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (12/24)

Storage Proposition 6: Group members with high centrality in the group will be more involved in indexing stored memories than other members of the group. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (13/24)

Storage Proposition 7: Knowledge or routines that are primarily explicit can be stored in any of the three types of group storage repositories. Knowledge or routines that are more tacit can be more easily stored and retrieved in human memory systems. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (14/24)

Storage Proposition 8: Elaboration by the group about when and where to use learning strengthens the memory record. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (15/24)

Storage Proposition 9: The more closely a group’s practice schedule matches the rhythm of events in its environment, the greater the probability of retrieving the group learning. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (16/24)

Retrieval Retrieval means that group members can find and access the knowledge for subsequent inspection or use. Group retrieval can be thought of as a sampling problem (Stasser & Titus, 1985). BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (17/24)

Retrieval For a group to effectively retrieve stored knowledge, several subprocesses must take place: BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (18/24) 1.The group or one of its members, faced with some stimulus object, must recognize the need to access stored knowledge.

2.The group, or at least one member, must identify where the knowledge is stored. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (19/24) 3.The group must actually retrieve the knowledge.

Retrieval Proposition 10: The longer group members have worked together, the stronger the established practice effects and the lower the probability of retrieving new learning. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (20/24)

Retrieval Proposition 11: The presence of a member with stored knowledge can cue retrieval of that knowledge without any additional priming, improving the group’s chances for successful retrieval. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (21/24)

Retrieval Proposition 12: The reduced “presence” of group members in geographically distributed groups will be associated with less reliable retrieval of group learning. BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (22/24)

Overlap of Sharing, Storage, and Retrieval All three processes must take place for group learning to occur (represented as an equation: GL Sharing Storage Retrieval). BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (23/24)

BASIC FEATURES OF GROUP LEARNING (24/24)

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS (1/5) The framework is designed to change how people study group learning. Our goals were to identify: (1)the features of group learning (2)gaps in the literature (3)new propositions for research (4)new ways of thinking about group learning

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS (2/5) We also have argued for an increased focus on the processes inherent in group learning: sharing, storage, and retrieval.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS (3/5) Key questions for future research include: “Under what circumstances is implicit learning most likely to occur?” “Are there certain group characteristics that make it more likely?”

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS (4/5) The final important implication of our framework concerns the methods for studying group learning, which must not only account for learning over time but must also measure the construct at the appropriate level of analysis.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS (5/5) Groups have been identified as the principal vehicle for learning in organizations. (Edmondson, 2002; Senge, 1990)

THANK YOU