2011-12 KCS DATA OVERVIEW. Accountability Results Composite School Performance 2011-12 School2010-112011-12 1-Year Change 2-Year Change Met All AMO Targets?Growth?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Advertisements

Testing & Accountability Results North Forest Pines Elem,
Alabama’s New Testing Plan: What’s Happening? practice.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.
Strategies for Success – Grade 9 Lesson Ms. Cooper Ms. Drummer.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENT OF ACADEMIC READINESS. What is STAAR? State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness STAAR assessments will be available for:
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Monroe County CCRS and PLAN 2020 Update January 2013
Espanola Public School Back to School Administrative Meeting July 28, 2015, 8:00-5:00 PM Presented by: Myra L. Martinez Associate Superintendent The mission.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
1 Mobile County Public School System 2008 Accountability Report September 18, 2008.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
High School Common Exam Implementation Proposal Spring 2013 NHCS.
2014 DISTRICT STRATEGIC PLAN CHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOLS.
EXPLORE and PLAN College Readiness Benchmark Scores The EXPLORE and PLAN College Readiness Benchmark Scores are based on the ACT College Readiness Benchmark.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) & North Carolina Essential Standards (NCES) June 12, 2012.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR) STAAR Reading and Writing.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
November 12,2013. Agenda Information American Legion Important Dates Common Exams Honors Portfolio Credit by Demonstrated Mastery Data Dig Learning and.
Annual Student Performance Report September
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
1 1 Next Generation School Assessment and Accountability Thursday, November 17, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Accountability & Quality Update. – ACCESS ELLs/Alternate ACCESS March 20 th end of testing window. Materials should be returned within two instructional.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
> Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of Presentation > Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Pennsylvania’s.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
Eighth Grade Parent Presentation Explain graduation requirements. Go over registration sheet. Curriculum Fair to answer questions Explain graduation requirements.
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
End of Course Exams  In February, 2007 the Missouri State Board of Education approved End of Course (EOC) exams.  WHY?
Update on District and School Accountability Systems 2014 AdvancED Michigan Fall Conference November 7, 2014.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
1 1 Assessment and Accountability Tuesday, November 1, 2011 Draft - July 13, 2011.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Communication Webinar:
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Spring 2017 Georgia Milestones State Results
Weslaco East High School
RISING 9TH GRADE REGISTRATION PREVIEW 2017 – 2018 Registration
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Accountability Update
NORTH CAROLINA Educator Effectiveness Update
Michigan School Report Card Update
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Presentation transcript:

KCS DATA OVERVIEW

Accountability Results Composite School Performance School Year Change 2-Year Change Met All AMO Targets?Growth? ALB76.70%74.00%-2.70%-5.00%YesYes- High KIS68.30%67.10%-1.20%-2.10%No KMS73.70%74.40%0.70%3.90%No Yes- Expected FP75.70%76.90%1.20%5.90%YesYes- High FLW74.60%71.90%-2.70%-1.30%No JP73.80%74.60%0.80%4.00%YesYes- High SB66.30%68.80%2.50%-1.10%NoYes- High WW73.10%71.4%-1.70%3.70%No

Three Ways to Meet AMOs Meet the target outright -The target is indicated by the yellow line which is the target for Meet the target using Safe Harbor*- If applicable, this is indicated by the red hash mark. If a school decreases the number of students not proficient by 10% in one year then they get credit for meeting that goal. Meet the target using Confidence Interval*- This is indicated by the hash mark the color of the performance bar. The confidence interval is a way of taking into account the precision of the performance composite. *Confidence Interval analysis is independent of the Safe Harbor calculations cannot be combined with Safe Harbor for any one student subgroup.

Reading Results

Math Results

EOC Results

MAKE UP OF THE READING EOG * The percentage of Informational Reading is going to increase significantly on the READY assessments. Goal 2: Apply strategies and skills to comprehend text that is read, heard, and viewed Goal 3: Make connections through the use of oral language, written language and media and technology

Goal Summaries

Summary Graduation Rate of 82.8% AMO Results do not paint the whole picture for KCS 7 of 8 schools met all of their Math AMOs 7 of 8 schools met 80% or more of their Reading AMOs Celebrate our progress in the many areas of sustained student growth Have worked throughout the year to create a strategic plan for continued growth

New in New Curriculum and New Tests ◦ Online for all EOC’s and Science Assessments ◦ EXPLORE, PLAN & ACT ◦ New paper/pencil format for ELA and Math Re-norming of EOGs and EOCs New Accountability Model ◦ Using AMOs rather than AYP ◦ Using new measures for high school  ACT, Work Keys, Future Ready Core, Grad Project, English 11 replaces English1 ◦ Using new growth model (EVAAS) New Reporting MSLs & Standard 6

Purpose of Measures of Student Learning Measure student learning in subjects and grades that are not part of the state testing program for Standard 6 of the teacher evaluation process. “Standard 6: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. The work of the teacher results in acceptable, measureable progress for students based on established performance expectations using appropriate data to demonstrate growth.” Measures of Student Learning (MSLs) are NOT part of school or district accountability.

MEASURES OF STUDENT LEARNING Timeline: Phase 1 Phase 1: Fall 2012* *Fall semester MSLs will be available to LEAs on November 7, High School Science Courses High School ELA Courses High School Math Courses Occupational Course of Study Courses High School Core Social Studies Courses Earth/Environmental Science ELA IPre-calculusELA I, III, and IVWorld History PhysicsELA III Advanced Functions and Modeling Financial Management Civics & Economics ChemistryELA IVGeometryIntroductory MathU.S. History Physical Science Algebra II/Integrated Math III Applied ScienceAmerican History I American History II Phase 1: Spring 2013 Grade 3- N/AGrade 4- N/AGrade 5- N/AGrade 6- N/AGrade 7Grade 8 Science Social Studies

MEASURES OF STUDENT LEARNING Timeline: Phases 2 & 3 Phase 2: Fall 2013 High School Social Studies CoursesHealthful Living 21 st Century Global GeographyHealth Education Grade 9 PsychologyPhysical Education Grade 9 Sociology World Humanities American Humanities The Cold War 21 th Century Civil Liberties and Rights Turning Points in American History Phase 2: Spring 2014 Healthful Living Health Education Grades 3–8 Physical Education Grades 3–8 Phase 3: 2014–15 School Year More information coming soon.

K-2 MSLs DPI is currently working with the General Assembly and the early learning community on a grades K-3 reading assessment that would function like a running record and could be used to measure growth. There is a chance that DPI might be able to get the system up and running by second semester of 2012–2013, but it’s more likely this program would roll out in 2013–2014.

Testing Schedule  W-APT Testing o Begins August 27 th  AIG Testing at Grades 3 and 5 o September 13 th and October 3 rd  EXPLORE, PLAN, Work Keys and ACT o EXPLORE & PLAN window October 16 th o ACT- March 5 th (Make up- March 19 th )  ACCESS Testing o February 1 st - March 15 th  READY EOGs & online READY EOCs o Last 15 days of the school year/semester  EXTEND1 o April 15 th - June 14 th  EXTEND2 EOGs and EOCs o Last 25 days of the school year  MSLs in Grades 7-12 o Near the end of each semester

Math Results

Reading Results