Efficiency of data presentation & utilization in state soybean variety trials Lingxiao (Ling) Zhang Delta Research and Extension Center Mississippi State.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Open Water Certification Count
OPEN WATER CERTIFICATION COUNT As of Q1, 2015 Compiled from PADI, SDI & SSI Certified Diver Files ©2015 THE DIVING EQUIPMENT & MARKETING ASSOCIATION |
Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
Visual description is an art
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
Open Water Certification Count
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
Medicaid Eligibility for Working Parents by Income, January 2013
Visual Description of Data
House Price
Electronic Death Registration Systems, by Jurisdiction
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Open Water Certification Count
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Cathy Schoen Senior Vice President The Commonwealth Fund
Average annual growth rate
Sampling Distribution of a Sample Mean
Market Share of Two Largest Health Plans, by State, 2006
Uninsured Rate Among Adults Ages 19–64, 2008–09 and 2019
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
Uninsured Nonelderly Adult Rate Has Increased from Percent to 20
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Coming Soon to Your State!
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

Efficiency of data presentation & utilization in state soybean variety trials Lingxiao (Ling) Zhang Delta Research and Extension Center Mississippi State University Tampa, FL

State Soybean Variety Test Procedures Variety collection Experimental design Find locations &locations cooperators PreparationPlanting Data collection Harvest Data analysis Result Report Recommendations OVT Group Producers Seed company Uni. researcher Extension agent

Hard copy Internet -htm -pdf - xls - database Field Day Report Methods for OVT

Soybeans Variety Test Results in Illinois

SOYVA 2009SOYVA Soybean Variety Selection Program (SOYVA) is a computerized soybean variety selection program (U-AR).

Data Utilization from OVT An Internet-base soybean variety trial database for research, extension and production Deltasoy DatabaseModeling Internet Information system

Diagram of a three-tier of architecture of a Web-based database

Entity relationship diagram of parameters in Deltasoy database.

Dependency diagram of parameters in Deltasoy database.

Variety selection interface of Deltasoy

An example of Deltasoy result table

Multi-year => result

Multi-year => single variety)

Deltasoy – Home page

Variety comparison of Deltasoy Database

“Disease info” of Deltasoy Database

Soypheno

“SoyPheno” of Deltasoy Database

SoyPheno - search results & recommendation

A database for national soybean OVT? Soyrus Soy-r-us

Who gets benefit from Soyrus? Crop grower Seed company Private consultant County agent University researcher

How can a database help? Multi-year Multi-location Comparing different Variety or systems Add more function for analysis (weighted) Vt = (a) P1 + (b) P2 + (c) P3 + … Long-term data accumulation Initial other research topics

Modify Soybean MG Adaptation Zones (Scott and Aldrich, 1970)

Test site distribution of OVT SD MS MI IL

Materials and Methods Data sources - State soybean variety trials - All soybean producing states Data criteria - Most of irrigated test - Yield over 45 bu/A (3030 kg/h) - 30 varieties or more in a test - Planting date within certain range

(Locations selected for creating adaptive zones of soybean MG in the USA) Map construction

Zones of optimum soybean maturity groups for maximum yield in the US (Figure was created by the Kriging interpolation method using variety trial data from 1998 to 2003 )

Modified zone of optimum soybean maturity groups for maximum yield in the US

Application of OVT data Growth stage and maturity prediction at all location? - Data source – latitude, PD & MD - Method – modeling (regression, ANN, etc.)

Information links to soybean producing states in the USA

Diagram of 3-layers of back propagation ANN

A sigmoid function and calculation process for one node.

Potential researchable topics using an OVT database * Protein & oil content? - Type of variety - Year trend under diff. envion. conditions * Yield trend? - historical data may tell real genetic gain? * Environmental effects on yield? - G x E - Soil type, - Irrigation, disease, insect

Major Problems Funding - USB ? - Other agents? Different focuses for each state - Focus on the similarity Need action - Form a committee

Parameters in database Common Variety name MG (RM) Yield Plant height Maturity Date Location Irri. vs. N-iir. Conv. vs. RR (Planting Date) ….. May be Varied Shattering score Lodging score Protein content Oil content ….. Genetic controlled Flower& Pod Pubescence Disease …..

Other Problems Update information? - Variety turn over past - Disease resistance Other Website/Server maintenance - Web submission

A Diagram of Soyrus for Soyean Production

Thank You ! Question?

Field Day – what makes up the lunch?

Comparison summary The adaptive zone for one MG is about 3-4 degrees latitude, wider than it was suggested, especially for mid-late MGs (>III) in the south. VI is the latest MG adapted in the US for the optimum yield, and MG VII-VIII are not optimum MGs for the US (if not count FL) Late maturity (VI) soybeans adapted to East coast rather than the Midsouth due to available late precipitation. 00 -

Recent Soybean Variety Turn-over Ratio Data source: popular conventional and roundup ready soybean varieties collected by NCST (n=245)

Zones and planting date divided for soybean producing states involved in MG map construction RegionLatitudeStates includedPlanting date North> 43 o ND, SD, MN, WI, MI.5/10 – 6/20 Central43 o -36 o NE, IA, KS, MO, IL, IN, OH, PA, WV, VA, NJ, DE, MD, NY. 4/25 – 6/15 South<36 o OK, AR, TX, LA, MS, AL, GA, SC, TN, NC, KY, 4/10 – 6/10

Materials and Methods (cont.) Determination of the values of optimum maturity groups - regression method: yield vs. MG - maximum yield weighted average

Determination of MG values using regression

Calculation of optimum values of MG using weighted yields V mg =  w*x/  w = (w 1 x 1 +w 2 x 2 +…+w 30 x 30 )/ (w 1 +w 2 +…w 30 )  where, w is the weighing fact, the percentage of yield relative to the maximum yield, and x is the value of maturity group. VarietyMG x Yield (bu/A) Weight w (%) 1. H R A ….…. ….…. ….…. ….…. 28. DP DG HX