Collimation in the ILC BDS Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory People Requirement Recent Successes Future Aims.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
S. N. HOM Impedance in Vacuum … 1 of 40 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Machine-Detector Interface Joint Session April 22, 2005 HOM Impedance.
Jonathan Smith, 1 st March, COLSIM, CERN 1 Recent Developments with ILC Collimator Wakefield Calculations Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft.
08/01/2007Juan Luis Fernandez-Hernando End Station A Measurements on Collimator Wakefields 4th Wakefield Interest Group - CI 05/03/2008 Luis Fernandez-Hernando,
Jonathan Smith, LC-ABD, 12 th April 07, RHUL 1 Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute)
Wire scanners MDW chicane energy collimator 3 MPS collimators in this region end of linac Damage Simulation in MPS Collimators L. Keller Apr. 9, 2006.
1 Collimation Simulations and Optimisation Frank Jackson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
R.M. Jones (University of Manchester/Cockcroft Inst.) on behalf of CLIC Collaboration., ESTB Workshop, SLAC, 17 th March Collimator Wakefield Measurements.
Ongoing & Planned BDS work Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (CCLRC)
MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.
The Compendium of formulae of kick factor. PLACET - ESA collimation simulation. Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
ILC Beam Delivery System Layout and Lattice Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft Institute SAC th November 2006.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
CLIC RTML collimation systems and beam stabilisation R. Apsimon CERN, TE-ABT-BTP ECFA LC2013 at DESY, Hamburg 27 th -31 st May 2013.
WP9 : Cavity BPM spectrometry Royal Holloway S. Boogert & G. Boorman University College London D. Attree, A. Lyapin, B. Maiheu & M. Wing Cambridge University.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
WP: Parameters and design. Plans from IFIC, Valencia Javier Resta López on behalf of the IFIC accelerator group ( IFIC (CSIC-UV),
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Plans for collimator survival and SLAC tests J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
1 Collimator Design Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester, UK Annual EuroTev meeting - Frascati, Italy, January 2008.
EUROTeV WP4 Report Polarised Positron Source Jim Clarke, on behalf of the WP4 team DESY Zeuthen STFC (Daresbury and RAL) University of Durham University.
Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.
2 nd EuroTeV Annual Meeting, Daresbury 9 th January 2007 WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
Slide 1 FP7: Collimator Wakefields program Building on the achievements in EuroTeV to provide a comprehensive system of knowledge of wakefield effects.
Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
ILC-BDS Collimators - Simulation and Experiment Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Group Annual Meeting December, 2007, Manchester Adriana Bungau.
Collimation Wakefield Simulations Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
Nigel Watson / Birmingham CollimationCollimation EDR to specify and find optimal solutions for  Damage survival, 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV  Jaw.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
G.Kurevlev - Daresbury meeting Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Nigel Watson, 17 Nov 2008 ILC08/LCWS08 FNAL ILC: Beam Delivery System Collimation System Outline Comments on changes since EDR plan Nigel Watson / Birmingham.
Collimator Wakefields Igor Zagorodnov BDGM, DESY
Jonathan Smith, 27 th August 2008, Uppsala 1 Optimal Collimators for the ILC Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute)
Jonathan Smith, COLSIM, 4 th December, CERN 1 GdfidL Simulations of ESA Prototype Collimators Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft Institute)
G.Kurevlev - Manchester meeting1 Collimators Material Damage Study Previous results In our group - Adriana Bungau’s thesis - heat deposition on.
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Jonathan Smith, European LCW, 8 th January 2007, Daresbury 1 GdfidL Simulations of ESA Prototype Collimators Jonathan Smith (Lancaster University/Cockcroft.
Towards Improved Collimation for the ILC
(T-488) FONT: C Clarke, C Swinson, P Burrows, T Hartin, G Christian, H Dabiri Khah SLAC: Mike Woods, Ray Arnold, Steve Smith et al.
Status of Collimator Damage Studies
Experimental tests of wakefields and material damage for ILC spoilers
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Collimator design and short range wakefields
Potential failure scenarios that can lead to very fast orbit changes and machine protection requirements for HL-LHC operation Daniel Wollmann with input.
PLACET collimator studies
Coupler kick and wake simulations upgrade
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Nigel Watson (Birmingham) LAL, 16-May-2006
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Collimator Wakefields
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Collimation in the ILC BDS Carl Beard ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory People Requirement Recent Successes Future Aims

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 People Task Leader – Nigel Watson (Bham) Damage Studies L. Fernandez (ASTeC), A.Bungau (Manc) R. Barlow (Manc) G. Elwood (RAL), J. Greenhaulgh (RAL). Wakefield Simulation and TDR C. Beard (ASTeC), J. Smith (Lanc), R. Jones (Manc), R.Carter (Lanc), S Jamison (ASTeC), P Corlett (ASTeC)… I. Zagorodnov (DESY), M.Kärkkäinen, W.Müller, T.Weiland (TEMF) Beam Tests (T-480 Experiment) Frank Jackson…plus most of the above SLAC ESA Team – Steven Malloy, Mike Woods…

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Need for Collimation Reduce the background levels in the detector, by removing halo particles built up over the long linac. Machine Protection, in the event of a beam miss-steer. Collimators are introduced, as a result of this the change in impedance has detrimental effects to the beam quality. The collimators have to be robust to withstand the full impact of several ILC Bunches. Design / optimisation of spoiler jaws (geometry and materials) for wakefield and beam damage performance

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Development of Advanced EM modelling methods Benchmarking of wakefield calculations against experiments SLAC ESA beam test / data analysis RF bench tests (training/code comparisons) Tracking simulations with best models of wakefields Simulations of beam damage to spoilers Material studies using beam test Submitted 7 papers at EPAC, several EUROTeV reports/memos Objectives

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Collimator Parameter and Beam Parameters Beam Energy, GeV250, 500 MaterialCu, Ti, C Penetration (mm)2 to 10 e- Particles/bunch2 x Copper Fracture temperature ~200 °C (473 K) Melting temperature 1085 °C ( K)

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Collimator Proposals 0.3 Xo of Ti alloy each side, central graphite part (blue). 0.6 Xo of Ti alloy leading taper (gold), graphite (blue), 1 mm thick layer of Ti alloy Ti/C 2 mm, 10mm 250, 500 GeV e-

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Cu+Graphite spoiler T [K]; 250 GeV e - T [K]; 500 GeV e - 2 mm from top 465 K860 K 10 mm from top 440 K870 K Difference-5%1% Fracture temp. Melting temp. Carbon zonesCu zones 500 GeV: σx = 79.5 µm, σy= 6.36 µm 250 GeV: σx = 111 µm, σy= 9 µm

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Ti / Graphite Spoiler Tmax = 575 K per a bunch of 2E10 e- at 500 GeV σ x = 79.5 µm, σ y = 6.36 µm 270 K 405 K 540 K 2 mm deep from top Ti alloy and graphite spoiler 400 K Temperature data in the left only valid the Ti-alloy material. Top increase of temp. in the graphite ~400 K. Dash box: graphite region. [L.Fernandez, ASTeC]

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Fluka Benchmark Measurements courtesy of SLAC, Marc Ross et al. Fluka Prediction of beam Damage (Evaporated material not considered Measurements of Beam damage crater in cooper on the FFTB.

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Damage Studies Beam tests are being planned to benchmark the Fluka/Geant Simulations No electron beam is available with sufficient intensity Or probability to hit the same point due to beam jitter. Dynamic Simulations in ANSYS are being studied in support of the FLUKA/GEANT Simulations

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Wakefield Analysis Analytical Formula SimulationBench Tests (TDR) Tests with Beam Instant solution for only simple geometry Real life measurements, slow turnaround time for measurements Good indicator – poor resolution Fast Results – Limited by Resolution/ confidence

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Simulation and Wire tests Current TDR and TDT measurements are limited to 10 ps Pulse lengths. TDR and TDT are being used to measure the Impedance of a vessel and its loss factor

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Achieving a 1 ps Pulse (In development)

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 MAFIA Simulations

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Limitations / Advances Limiting the simulations to short structures or only sufficient resolution for >>300 um bunch length. A new technique is being applied to allow full structures to be simulated with substantially higher resolution MAFIA/HFSS GDFIDL / ECHO 2 &3D

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Beam Tests in ESA Simple Shapes to allow benchmarking with Calculations/Code Geometric Wakefields Resistive Wall Wakefields Surface Roughness

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 T-480 Experiment Vertical mover BPM 2 doublets ~40m BPM Two triplets ~16m Wakefields measured in running machines: move beam towards fixed collimators Problem Beam movement oscillations Hard to separate wakefield effect Solution Beam fixed, move collimators around beam Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation Many ideas for collimator design to test…

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 T-480 Experiment Vertical mover BPM 2 doublets ~40m BPM Two triplets ~16m Wakefields measured in running machines: move beam towards fixed collimators Problem Beam movement oscillations Hard to separate wakefield effect Solution Beam fixed, move collimators around beam Measure deflection from wakefields vs. beam-collimator separation Many ideas for collimator design to test…

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Wakefield Box ESA z ~ 300 m – ILC nominal y ~ 100 m (Frank/Deepa design) Magnet mover, y range = mm, precision = 1 m 1500mm E beam =28.5GeV

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Initial Comparison of Results Analytical: V/pC/mm MAFIA: V/pC/mm Beam Test V/pC/mm

Carl Beard – Cockcroft SAC Meeting 23 rd – 24 th November 2006 Future Work Continue study into beam damage/materials In the process of designing a 4th beam test Collimators designed and built in EU, to be installed at SLAC ESA. 3 rd Physics run Mar/April 2007 Application of the Moving Mesh Technique TDR Measurements with Optically generated 1 ps Pulse. Combine information on geometry, material, construction, to find acceptable baseline design regarding all of Wakefield optimisation Collimation efficiency Damage mitigation