BOadicea Antonis Antoniou Cancer Research - UK

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetic research designs in the real world Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar MD, PhD University of Pittsburgh
Advertisements

ANNOUNCEMENTS  Homework #2 is due on Monday in lecture.  Change to 1b. Do not calculate a  2 value. Just calculate the expected phenotypic ratios if.
Scientific themes in personal genetics Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School - Wu Laboratory
DEVELOPMENT OF NETWORK OF CANCER FAMILY SYNDROME REGISTRIES IN EASTERN EUROPE Project co-ordinator: Prof. Jan Lubiński Hereditary Cancer Centre, Pomeranian.
Sponsored by Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics Office of Women’s Health National Cancer Institute,
Hereditary Factors in Breast Cancer
The Genetics of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Patricia Tonin, PhD Associate Professor Depts. Medicine, Human Genetics & Oncology McGill University.
Breast Cancer Risk and Risk Assessment Models
Estimating the penetrances of breast and ovarian cancer in the carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations Silvano Presciuttini University of Pisa, Italy.
Genetic Susceptibility Risk Models in Clinical Decision Making Susan M. Domchek, MD Abramson Cancer Center University of Pennsylvania.
ESTIMATING CANCER PENETRANCES FROM GENETIC TEST RESULTS: Analysis of the Families from the Italian Registry of Hereditary Breast/ovarian Cancer Fabio Marroni,
Aspects of Genetics and Genomics in Cancer Research Li Hsu Biostatistics and Biomathematics Program Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.
PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT MODELS PREDICTING THE PRE-TEST PROBABILITY OF CARRYING MUTATIONS IN BRCA1 OR BRCA2 IN 330 ITALIAN FAMILIES Silvano Presciuttini,
BRCA2 Blue: Rad51; Green: BRCA2
Development of a genetic model predicting the carrier status for mmr-gene mutations Fabio Marroni 1, Piero Benatti 2, Mariapina Montera 3, Daniela Barana.
BIOST 536 Lecture 2 1 Lecture 2 - Modeling Need to find a model that relates the outcome to the covariates in a meaningful way  Simplification of the.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations and Breast Cancer: An Integrated Approach Using Four Epidemiologic Parameters Monica McClain, PhD. Assistant Director, Biometry.
BRCA Mutations and Breast Cancer Ruth Phillips and Patty Ashby.
Genetics and Risk of Breast Cancer What is the Evidence.
Breast Screening. NHS Breast Screening Programme Introduced in 1988 Invites women from age group for screening every 3 yrs. Age extension roll-out.
Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology
BRCA1/2 Mutation Testing and Breast/Ovarian Cancer in the Ashkenazi Jewish Population Glenn E Palomaki, B.S. Foundation for Blood Research Scarborough,
The genetic epidemiology of common hormonal cancers Deborah Thompson Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology.
The Cancer Pedigree BRCA What?. Outline Introduction: Understanding the weight of genetics in Ovarian Breast Cancer BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 Genes – Function.
Genomics Alexandra Hayes. Genomics is the study of all the genes in a person, as well as the interactions of those genes with each other and a person’s.
Epidemiology of Breast Cancer Selected Highlights Jack Cuzick, Ph.D Cancer Research UK London.
What is Risk Prediction? Andrew N. Freedman, PhD Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch National Cancer Institute EGRP, DCCPS, NCI June 11, 2014.
Extending the Gail model for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction to Account for Modifiable Factors in the Italian Population. Calza S, Ferraroni M, Decarli A.
Cancer Risk Assessment Judith A Westman MD Clinical Director Division of Human Genetics.
CLINICAL GENETICS (MTD-356)
Clinical Utility of BRCA Testing Mark Robson, MD September 7,
Chapter 13 Carrier Screening. Introduction Carrier screening involves testing of individuals for heterozygosity for genes that would produce significant.
Case(Control)-Free Multi-SNP Combinations in Case-Control Studies Dumitru Brinza and Alexander Zelikovsky Combinatorial Search (CS) for Disease-Association:
Perlegen Sciences, Inc. Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Common Disease: A Comparison of Genome Scans Understanding the Genetic Architecture of.
Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction Taking oral contraceptives for 5 years can reduce your risk of ovarian cancer by up to 50% Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter.
Genetic Epidemiology of Breast Cancer Susan Neuhausen, PhD Epidemiology Div., Dept. Medicine University of California Irvine Irvine, CA USA.
Your genome: What does your DNA say about you? Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School personal genetics education.
Breast Ovarian Hereditary Breast & Ovarian Cancer Knowing one’s family medical history can be life-saving.
The BOADICEA Project – translational research in practice
Risk Prediction of Complex Disease David Evans. Genetic Testing and Personalized Medicine Is this possible also in complex diseases? Predictive testing.
1 B-b B-B B-b b-b Lecture 2 - Segregation Analysis 1/15/04 Biomath 207B / Biostat 237 / HG 207B.
Risk of uterine cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: case–control study using electronic records by Sarah Walker, Chris Hyde, and William Hamilton.
Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: a large case–control study using electronic records by Elizabeth.
A GENETIC MODEL FOR PREDICTING THE CARRIER STATUS OF MSH2/MLH1 MUTATIONS: RESULTS OF AN ITALIAN MULTICENTER STUDY F. Marroni 1,2, P. Benatti 3, A. Viel.
Introduction Hereditary predisposition (mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes) contribute to familial breast cancers. Eighty percent of the.
Paolo Vineis University of Torino and ISI Foundation, Torino, Italy address: GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS IN CANCER.
Pancreatic Cancer In 2012 there were 43,920 cases of pancreatic cancer. 10% of these cases have a family clustering of pancreatic cancers and associated.
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): A Research Infrastructure sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Models William Barlow,
Scientific themes in personal genetics Personal Genetics Education Project (pgEd) Harvard Medical School - Wu Laboratory
Kevin S.Hughes, MD, FACS Co-Director, Avon Comprehensive Breast Evaluation Center Massachusetts General Hospital Surgeon The Newton-Wellesley Hospital.
Breast Cancer Ten percent of breast cancer is hereditary. Or 23,000 women a year with a genetic basis for their cancer. The most common mutations in this.
What Percentage of Cancer is Considered to be Hereditary?
Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Familial Hypercholesterolemia Mutation Status, and Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Amit V. Khera, Hong-Hee Won, Gina.
Genetic Counseling Yahwardiah Siregar Sry Suryani W Mutiara Indah Sari.
Genes and Variation Genotypes and phenotypes in evolution Natural selection acts on phenotypes and does not directly on genes. Natural selection.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 From: Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review.
Sex-linked Traits Traits (genes) located on the sex chromosomes
Kyle Salsbery Genetic Counselor
Figure 1. (A) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and ovarian (squares) cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. (B) Cumulative risk of breast (diamonds) and.
Who in the room would offer BRCA1/2 testing to this patient Who in the room would offer BRCA1/2 testing to this patient? How might the medical management.
Average Risks of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations Detected in Case Series Unselected for Family History: A Combined.
the SNP profile using 26 prostate cancer GWAS risk SNPs
The decision tree with the two alternatives.
Pierre Nahon, Jessica Zucman-Rossi  Journal of Hepatology 
by William Hamilton, Deborah J Sharp, Tim J Peters, and Alison P Round
Specific Tumor Suppressor Genes
Sex-linked Traits Traits (genes) located on the sex chromosomes
HBOC Genetic counseling: major concerns and communication skills
Giovanni Parmigiani, Donald A. Berry, Omar Aguilar 
Risk Prediction of Complex Diseases from Family History and Known Susceptibility Loci, with Applications for Cancer Screening  Hon-Cheong So, Johnny S.H.
Presentation transcript:

BOadicea Antonis Antoniou Cancer Research - UK The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: updating, validation, predictions Antonis Antoniou Cancer Research - UK Genetic Epidemiology Unit Strangeways Research Laboratories University of Cambridge, UK BOadicea

Model Development (version 1) Data: Anglian Breast Cancer Study (ABC families) 1484 breast cancer cases, unselected for family history British Families (B families) 156 multiple case families BRCA1/2 status available. Antoniou et al, Br J Cancer (2002)

Complex segregation analysis of breast and ovarian cancer occurrence. Methods (v.1) Complex segregation analysis of breast and ovarian cancer occurrence. Modelled simultaneous effects: BRCA1 BRCA2 “BRCAx” Polygenic Polygenic = large number of genes, small effect, multiplicative effect on risk Best fitting model for residual familial clustering of breast cancer: Polygenic

Updating - current data – number of families Study ABC UK1 Manchester2 B Families Meta-analysis3 Total BRCA1 8 16 9 21 247 301 BRCA2 15 14 7 18 182 236 Non-carriers 1461 587 83 117 NA 2248 1484 617 99 156 429 2785 Index mutation status 1 Peto et al, JNCI (1999) 2 Lalloo et al, Lancet (2003) 3 Antoniou et al, AJHG (2003) Population based studies

Birth cohort effect: <1920,1920-29, 1930-39, 1940-49, 1950+ Model components BRCA1 BRCA2 Allele Frequencies Penetrance Mutation testing sensitivity Polygenic Genetic Modifiers major genotype Birth cohort effect: <1920,1920-29, 1930-39, 1940-49, 1950+ All effects estimated simultaneously.

Model components - Results BRCA1 BRCA2 BRCA1: 0.06% (0.04-0.10%), carriers: 0.12% Allele Frequencies BRCA2:0.10% (0.07-0.15%) carriers: 0.2% Mutation testing sensitivity BRCA1: 70% BRCA2: 80%

Model components - Results Age 20 30 40 50 60 70 2 3.6 3.2 2.3 1.9 1.3 0.7 Polygenic Genetic Modifiers =

BRCA1 “average” cumulative risk by birth cohort

Predicted Familial Relative Risks (affected mother) BOADICEA 6.8 3.9 3.4 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 Claus et al1 10.3 6.1 5.6 2.3 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.0 Observed2 5.7 2.0 1.6 1.4 Age 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 1 Claus et al AJHG (1991) 2 Collaborative group on hormonal factors in breast cancer. Lancet (2001)

Predicted BRCA1/2 carrier frequency (%) among unselected breast cancer cases Age dx 30 40 50 60 70 BRCA1 3.3 (5.5)* 2.2 (2.9) 0.7 (1.2) 0.5 (0.3) 0.4 (0.0) BRCA2 2.8 (0.8) 2.0 (0.2) 1.6 (0.4) 1.2 (0.3) 1.0 (0.1) * Predictions by BRCAPRO (CancerGene v3.1)

Predicted number of mutations Observed Expected BRCA1 21 21.4 54 55.5 BRCA2 18 16.0 54 53.6 Non-Carriers 117 118.6 2248 2246.9 B Families All

Predicted Carrier Probabilities BC 50 44 73 75 BC 47 53 BC 61 BC 40 69 58 60 62 71 45 BC 41 48 Predicted Carrier Probabilities

BC 50 44 73 75 BC 47 53 BC 61 BC 40 69 58 60 62 71 45 BC 41 48

Model Features Currently implemented in MENDEL [Lange et al, Gen Epid (1988)]. Flexible platform for updating the model and incorporating other genetic and environmental effects. Aim: Use as the basis for developing a risk assessment package to be used in genetic clinics.

Current/Future Work and Extensions Ovarian Cancer modifying effect on BRCA1/2 risks Other BRCA1/2 associated cancers (eg prostate, pancreas)/contralateral breast cancer. Allowance for other genetic/non-genetic factors (eg CHEK2, parity etc). Allele frequencies for other populations. Validation in external datasets.

Discussion points Identify data resources for validation. Predictions by different models vary. Need to compare the predictions by various models in validation studies.

Acknowledgments Doug Easton Paul Pharoah Bruce Ponder Julian Peto (B’fams/UK case-control study) Mike Stratton (B’ fams) Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo (Manchester study) BRCA1/2 Meta-analysis group: S. Narod, H. A. Risch, J. E. Eyfjord,J. L. Hopper, N. Loman, H. Olsson, O. Johannsson, Å. Borg, B. Pasini, P. Radice,S. Manoukian, D. M. Eccles, N. Tang, E. Olah, H. Anton-Culver, E. Warner,J. Lubinski, J. Gronwald, B. Gorski, H. Tulinius, S. Thorlacius, H. Eerola,H. Nevanlinna, K. Syrjäkoski, O.-P. Kallioniemi, D. Thompson Cambridge University High Performance Computing Facility

Genetic Modification of BC Risk in BRCA1/2 carriers 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Predicted BC Risk by age 60 40 BRCA1 45 50 40 BRCA1 45 50 40 BRCA1 45 50 40 BRCA1 40 BRCA1 45 50