7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, 29-31 October 2007 1/17 AMIRAS campaign Fernando Martin-Porqueras.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The ESA CoSMOS study for the validation of the SMOS L2 prototype K Saleh Contell, Y. Kerr, MJ Escorihuela, G. Boulet, P. Maisongrande, P. de Rosnay, JP.
Advertisements

1 © ACRI-ST, all rights reserved – 2012 TEC estimation Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN)
First Flights of High-Altitude Imaging Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler (HIWRAP) During GRIP Lihua Li, Matt Mclinden, Martin Perrine, Lin Tian, Steve Guimond/
HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY OF SPACE TECHNOLOGY SMOS SAG meeting, HUT-2D First results using the 36-element fully integrated.
1 Analysis of Airborne Microwave Polarimetric Radiometer Measurements in the Presence of Dynamic Platform Attitude Errors Jean Yves Kabore Central Florida.
ElectroScience Lab Studies of Radio Frequency Interference in SMOS Observations IGARSS 2011 Joel T. Johnson and Mustafa Aksoy Department of Electrical.
ATMOSPHERIC REENTRY TRAJECTORY MODELING AND SIMULATION: APPLICATION TO REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE MISSION (Progress Seminar Presentation - 2) K. Sivan (Roll.
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
Cold Sky Calibration Aquarius: D. M. Le Vine MWR: J. C. Gallo.
MIRAS Demonstrator Pilot Project #3 (MDPP-3) SMOS SAG Meeting No November 2006Slide 1 ESAC - Villafranca del Castillo Airborne MIRAS Description.
A Development and Parallelization of an air temperature Spatial Interpolation and Prediction Program Student: Erik LaBerge Advisor: Munihiro Fukuda.
Atmospheric phase correction for ALMA Alison Stirling John Richer Richard Hills University of Cambridge Mark Holdaway NRAO Tucson.
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
Lineage February 13, 2006 Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors.
6-1 EE/Ge 157b Week 6 EE/Ae 157 a Passive Microwave Sensing.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya INTERFEROMETRIC RADIOMETRY MEASUREMENT CONCEPT: THE VISIBILITY EQUATION I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Workshop, 18-19/11/2008, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands SMOS Validation Rehearsal Campaign Mediterranean flights C.
Initial Results on the Cross- Calibration of QuikSCAT and Oceansat-2 Scatterometers David G. Long Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Brigham.
Galactic noise model adjustment Jean-Luc Vergely (ACRI-ST) Jacqueline Boutin (LOCEAN) Xiaobin Yin (LOCEAN)
September 23-24, 2014Dawn Conway, AMSR-E / AMSR2 TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E / AMSR2 Team Lead Science Computing Facility TLSCF at UAH Dr. Roy.
Remote Sensing Image Rectification and Restoration
SMOS Science Workshop, Arles, th Sept, 2011 IMPROVING SMOS SALINITY RETRIEVAL: SYSTEMATIC ERROR DIAGNOSTIC J. Gourrion, R. Sabia, M. Portabella,
Progress Meeting #27, April 2015, Barcelona SPAIN T3.2 Retrieval algorithm Estrella Olmedo BEC team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la.
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
Presented by: 15 Oct 2001 Neptec Laser Camera System Preliminary Post Flight Results Neptec Design Group.
Yimin Ji - Page 1 October 5, 2010 Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Precipitation Processing System (PPS) Yimin Ji NASA/GSFC,
International Ocean Vector Winds Science Team Meeting, Annapolis, May 2011 ASCAT backscatter processing status Julia Figa-Saldaña, Craig Anderson, Hans.
GISMO Simulation Study Objective Key instrument and geometry parameters Surface and base DEMs Ice mass reflection and refraction modeling Algorithms used.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
SCIENCE PROCESSING OVERVIEW David Le Vine Aquarius Deputy PI 07 July 2009.
25 June 2009 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E Team Leader Science Computing Facility.
1 / 13 Current activities at ICM-SMOS-BEC J. Gourrion, C. Gabarró, R. Sabia, M. Talone, V. González, S. Montero, S. Guimbard, F. Pérez, J. Martínez, M.
SPCM-9, Esac, May 3 rd, 2012 MODEL-INDEPENDENT ESTIMATION OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES J. Gourrion, S. Guimbard, R. Sabia,
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
EMIRAD Data coSMOS2 campaign. coSMOS2 campaign objectives Validation of SMOS SM L2 prototype processor Assimilation of root zone moisture Investigation.
1 Abstract - KNU and KIGAM are developing a ground-based Arc-scanning SAR system (ArcSAR) mounted on a truck. The system achieves a coherent integration.
SMOS QWG-6, ESRIN October 2011 OTT generation strategy and associated issues 1 The SMOS L2 OS Team.
IOCP High Level Plan, 8 September In-Orbit Commissioning Phase: High Level Planning.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
Workshop Agenda: Day One 9:30 IntroductionLagerloef / Le Vine 9:45 Workshop objectivesG. Feldman 10:00 Overview of the Aquarius Data Processing System:G.
SMOS Quality Working Group Meeting #2 Frascati (Rome), September 13 th -14 th,2010 SMOS-BEC Team.
CCAR / University of Colorado 1 Airborne GPS Bistatic Radar in CLPX Dallas Masters University of Colorado, Boulder Valery Zavorotny NOAA ETL Stephen Katzberg.
March 8, 2005 Calibration and Operation of the Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer during the 2005 Hurricane Season Ivan PopStefanija
© UPC IGARSS 2011 Vancouver July / 13 First results of the PAU Synthetic Aperture Radiometer I. Ramos-Perez, G. Forte. X. Bosch-Lluis, E.
Faraday Rotation David Le Vine Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 9-11, 2010.
Estimation of wave spectra with SWIM on CFOSAT – illustration on a real case C. Tison (1), C. Manent (2), T. Amiot (1), V. Enjolras (3), D. Hauser (2),
Level 2 Scatterometer Processing Alex Fore Julian Chaubell Adam Freedman Simon Yueh.
16-17 September 2015 Dawn Conway, AMSR-E / AMSR2 TLSCF Lead Software Engineer AMSR-E / AMSR2 Team Lead Science Computing Facility TLSCF at UAH Dr. Roy.
Aquarius Level 0-to-1A Processing Rule #1: save everything from the Level 0 data. Rule #2: never forget Rule #1! The objective is to ensure that the Level.
Impact of sea surface roughness on SMOS measurements A new empirical model S. Guimbard & SMOS-BEC Team SMOS Barcelona Expert Centre Pg. Marítim de la Barceloneta.
Page 1 ASAR Validation Review - ESRIN – December 2002 Advanced Technology Centre ASAR APP & APM Image Quality Peter Meadows & Trish Wright  Properties.
Dependence of SMOS/MIRAS brightness temperatures on wind speed: sea surface effect and latitudinal biases Xiaobin Yin, Jacqueline Boutin LOCEAN.
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya CORRECTION OF SPATIAL ERRORS IN SMOS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IMAGES L. Wu, I. Corbella, F. Torres, N. Duffo, M. Martín-Neira.
OMI Meeting KNMI June 2006 OMI groundpixels Bert van den Oord.
10/31/ Simulation of Tightly Coupled INS/GPS Navigator Ade Mulyana, Takayuki Hoshizaki October 31, 2001 Purdue University.
8th Cross-calibration Workshop CIS data delivery report Kinsale – October 2008.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
R. Santer and B. Berthelot Final meeting, ESRIN, Frascati, April 21, 2009 Calibration Test Sites Selection and Characterisation WP260 – Error analysis:
RENISH THOMAS (GPM) Global-Precipitation- Mapper
Analysis Ready Data ..
CoSMIR Performance during OLYMPEX
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Calibration Activities of GCOM-W/AMSR2
PGE06 TPW Total Precipitable Water
Dorothee Coppens.
MIPAS-2D water database and its validation
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
V. Corcione, G. Grieco, M. Portabella, F. Nunziata, M. Migliaccio
Presentation transcript:

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS campaign Fernando Martin-Porqueras

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Contents AMIRAS instrument and campaign L1 Processor Description of L1A, L1B and L1C processors Performances Examples Data format and availability

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS instrument Small MIRAS instrument Y-shape 13 antennas: 4 LICEF per arm 1 NIR in the centre Angular resolution: 11.8 degrees Spatial resolution: 84 metres (altitude = 400 m) PMS of receiver B1 has to be repaired

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS installation

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Location: Lahti, Finland Dates: June 20 th, 2006 (Flight1) – night Acquired data: Measurements over land, sea and fresh water (Lake Lohja) Duration: 1 hour 39 min Operation mode: Dual polarization AMIRAS Campaign – Flight 1

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Location: Lahti, Finland Dates: July 19 th, 2006 (Flight2) - night Acquired data: Measurements over land, sea and fresh water (Lake Lohja) AMIRAS Campaign – Flight 2 Duration: 2 hours 24 min Operation mode: Dual polarization Full polarization

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 AMIRAS L1 Processor Snapshot Layer Instrument Characterization database Libraries L1B processor L1C processor L1C product Visibility Layer L1A processor Correlation layer Database reader Raw data

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 L1A processor Scope: The computation of the denormalized visibilities Processing: Calibration algorithms are based on the SMOS In-Orbit Calibration documentation Input: Correlations, physical temperatures, PMS voltages, NIR output, instrument characterization database Output: Denormalized visibilities Differences with SMOS: Variable integration time (0.3 – 1.2 s) Centralized calibration Calibration based on internal load, cold sky and lake

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 L1B processor Scope: The computation of the brightness temperature at the antenna polarization frame Processing: Input: Denormalized visibilities, instrument characterization database Output: Brightness temperature snapshots Inversion algorithm: Inverse FFT (Blackman windowing) Flat Target Transformation Antenna pattern correction

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 L1B processor The processor implements the Flat Target Transformation (FTT) The FTT minimizes the impact of the antenna errors in the brightness temperature snapshots Location: Lahti Date: 19:43 UTC 20/07/2006 Orientation: Azimuth 180 deg Elevation 76.5 deg

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 L1C processor Scope: The geolocation of the brightness temperatures over a fixed grid (UTM) on the surface and the computation of the polarization rotation angles Input: Brightness temperature snapshots, flight database Output: Brightness temperature geolocated, incidence and polarization rotation angles Differences with SMOS: No pixel-flagging Only AF-FOV Processing: Polarization rotation angle computation Geolocation using navigation information Incidence angle computation Velocity

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Radiometric Performances Radiometric performances estimated from L1B data Data used: 51 snapshots over the sea Assumptions: Constant flight dynamics along the dataset Unpolarized sea surface at 3 deg incidence angle Homogeneous sea surface Radiometric variability at boresight Radiometric accuracy = 1.5 K (1-sigma, 300 ms) = 2 K Equivalent radiometric variability in 1.2 sec = 0.75 K (1-sigma)

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Examples X polarizationY polarization Velocity

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Examples V - polarizationH - polarization Velocity

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 L1C product content Planned data content: Time Position in UTM coordinates Incidence angle Brightness temperatures in the antenna polarization frame (X-Y) Polarization rotation angle between the antenna polarization and ground polarization frame Each UTM coordinate has different incidence angle availability x utm y utm Amount of data Velocity

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 Data availability Release date: Christmas 2007 Distribution method: FTP Released data: L1C product from AMIRAS Flight1 Format: ASCII (data structure still on definition)

7 th SMOS Workshop, Frascati, October /17 On-going and future tasks L1C development Format definition for L1C Delivery Flight1 – dual polarization data (Christmas 2007) Delivery Flight2 – dual/full polarization data (March 2008) On-going tasks: Future tasks: