1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec. 2005 Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

CITIZEN REVIEW PANEL Theresa Costello, MA Director National Resource Center for Child Protective Services.
Effective Casework Practice (Foster Care) Ongoing assessment of childs needs and interventions Ongoing assessment and implementation of services/supports.
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
State of New Jersey. Quick Context Lawsuit in 2004, revised in 2006 to MSA Reporting on 250 measures, including placement stability Started by “focusing.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
Child Welfare Practice Model
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Inspiration  Ideas  Improvement Practice Improvement Unit District Practice Improvement Specialists District Automation Liaisons Inspiration An agent.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Citizens Review Panels Blake Jones Program Coordinator.
 By Amie Little  EDU 644 Discussion 1 week 2. The mission of DCFS is to protect children who are reported to be abused or neglected and to increase.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Wisconsin Educational Collaboration for Youth in Foster Care John Elliott Hilary Shager April 25 th, 2013.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 G-FORCE MEETING Division of Family & Children Services September 25, 2009.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Tehama Linkages Commitment Presented by LaDeena Coates, Employment & Training Worker, II Richard Phillips, Social Worker, II.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Child Welfare in Georgia: How Effective Are We? Andrew Barclay, Barton Child Law and Policy Clinic (Founder), Emory University School of Law.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
“A half-century of research demonstrates convincingly that children’s well-being builds upon meeting first their primary needs for a stable and lasting.
Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement Options: Community Partnership Governor’s Action Group for Safe Children Work Group 3 Seamless System of Placement.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Provincial Permanency Data Results for DFNAs and CFSAs Prepared by Service Analysis Branch May 27, 2009.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Office of Children's Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
2016 Child & Family Annual Report
GOT PERMANENCE? DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES G-FORCE MEETING
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Presentation transcript:

1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being January 13, 2006

2 Permanency Achieved for Children During 2005 A comparison to 2004 P ermanence Reunification (15.9%) 704 (14.7%) 677 (15.6%) Guardianship ( 5.7%) 198 ( 4.1%)232 ( 5.4%) Adoption (10.3%) 560 (11.7%)373 ( 8.6%) Subsidized Guardianship 101 ( 2.3%) Permanency Counselor: Voluntary TPR125* * The number of children who achieved permanency through the Permanency Counselor program are counted in the number of adoptions. * The number of children who achieved permanency through the Permanency Counselor program are counted in the number of adoptions.  In 2005, 31.9% of the children who had an out-of-home placement achieved permanency compared to 30.5% in  The rate of reunification and guardianship has remained consistent since  Although the number of adoptions has decreased there is increased efficacy in the timeliness of adoptions within 24 months (Percentages are based on total number of children in out-of-home care.)

3 Referrals to Ongoing Services and Safety Services 1999 to 2005 Safety Services safely maintains children in their homes Families transferred to Ongoing Services and Safety ServicesFamilies transferred to Ongoing Services and Safety Services OngoingSafety ServicesRatio: Ongoing to Safety to to to to to to to 1.5 The Safety Service program has safely diverted a significant number of families from entering the Ongoing program every year since it began. Prior to the advent of Safety Services in 1998, families were transferred to Ongoing Services.  Since 1999 the data indicates that, overall, for every family referred to Ongoing nearly 2 were referred to Safety Services. Safety

4 Comparison of Families Entering/Exiting Ongoing Services 1999 to 2005 Families entering and exiting Ongoing Services Year Families enteringFamilies exitingRatio: entering to exiting to to to to to to to 1.1 Both the number of families entering and exiting Ongoing services has declined since Since 2002, the ratio of families entering and exiting Ongoing services has gradually achieved equilibrium; in 2005, for every 1 family that entered Ongoing services, 1 family exited.

5 Children in Out of Home Care 2001 to 2005 The data suggest that the rapid downward trend in children placed in out-of- home care first reported in 2002, may have reached a 3-year plateau as indicated by the slower rate that children left out-of-home care between 2003 through 2005.

6 The areas highlighted in this report cover critical milestones in child welfare; achieving permanency, and ensuring the safety of children in their homes whenever possible. The information provided indicates a common trend across the various data sets presented; the current status of these milestones may be the net effect of the permanency and safety strategies implemented by BMCW since These strategies include but are not limited to: Partnership with the private agencies who provide ongoing, safety, licensing and adoption services Partnership with University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Child Welfare training Partnership with the Children’s Court Center; implementation of the Permanency Plan Review Court Partnership with the Assistant District Attorney’s office to increase the number of TPR attorneys A Permanency Counselor at Children’s Court Center who facilitates voluntary TPRs Implementation of Safety Services and the diversion of families from Ongoing Case Management Implementation of Family Intervention Support and Services (FISS) and the diversion of families with adolescents from Ongoing services Coordinated Services Team meetings, enhancing parent participation in case planning and including the inclusion of foster parents and adoption staff at the meetings Enhanced service provider networks, increasing the number of services available to parents Child Abuse Review Team: Multi-Disciplinary Team Staffing and the Child Fatality Review Panels Child Protective Center’s initial screening and forensic interviews Subsidized Guardianship Waivers Mobile Urgent Treatment Team for Foster Families (MUTT-FF) providing support to foster families Assessment Homes, Centers and Placement Stabilization Centers Summary

7 BUREAU OF MILWAUKEE CHILD WELFARE