Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Advertisements

Alabama Height Modernization Project, NAD 83(2011), and GEOID 12 in Alabama Overview of Height Modernization Project Overview of Height Modernization.
Tidal Datums Text and Figures Source: NOAA/NOS CO-OPS Tidal Datums related publications.
Ohio Height Modernization Related Activities Great Lakes Regional Forum Sept 24-25, 2008 Madison, Wisconsin David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update to Coordination Group Ronnie Taylor alternate Subcommittee Chair Deputy Director, National Geodetic Survey.
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
LOST IN TRANSFORMATION
Texas Height Modernization and Texas Spatial Reference Center Gary Jeffress, Ph.D., RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas.
Datums and Coordinates How the Evolution of GPS is Transforming Survey and Mapping GITA/ACSM April 25, 2010 Pam Fromhertz Colorado State Geodetic Advisor,
Illinois Height Modernization Sheena K. Beaverson.
Surveying & Mapping. GPS on Bench Marks Campaign.
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
Texas Spatial Reference Center Gary Jeffress, Ph.D., RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi.
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
Streamgage Datum Conversion Eastern Region Height Modernization Consortium Webinar March 4, 2014 Jim Kolva, USGS, Office of Surface Water.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
GEODETIC INFRASTRUCTURE Walter Volkmann Manager of Technical Operations L. D. Bradley Land Surveyors Gainesville, Florida.
NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.
LINK TO SLIDES: ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/dist/whenning/FWS2011/
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
Great Lakes Regional Height Modernization Meeting March 23, 2010 Height Modernization in Indiana Who we are How we got here Thomas A. Mahon, LS.
2010 Hydrographic Services Review Panel David Steele, PLS DNR Geodetic Survey Director & Spatial Reference Center of Washington.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
NGS Produces New Coordinates: Is it still NAD83? Past, Present, Future Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor Sacramento, CA.
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
National Readjustment Dale Pursell Observation and Analysis Division National Geodetic Survey ACSM St. Louis, Mo. March 11, 2007.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
National Readjustment Dale Pursell Observation and Analysis Division National Geodetic Survey FGCS Workgroup Meeting February 14, 2007.
National Geodetic Survey – Continuously Operating Reference Stations & Online Positioning User Service (CORS & OPUS) William Stone Southwest Region (UT,
National Spatial Reference System: Present and Future Marti Ikehara, Geodetic Advisor NOAA’s NGS, Sacramento
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
PRS92 Bonifacia Daet Sylvia Esperanza
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
OUTLINE:  definition and history  three major models  how are reference shapes used  geodetic systems G EODESY.
The Importance of Accurate Elevations & Case Studies Edward Carlson Pacific Region Geodetic Advisor National Geodetic Survey (808)
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Geography 70  Basic Geodesy  Map Projections  Coordinate Systems  Scale Locating Positions on the Earth.
The INDOT CORS Indiana GIS Conference February 19, 2008 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering, INDOT Thomas A. Mahon, PE, LS Survey.
National Readjustment Geodesist, Texas State Advisor National Geodetic Survey Texas Society of Professional Surveyors October 2007.
National Ocean Service NGS, NOS, NOAA Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate Navigation Services Real-Time GPS Positioning of Ships To Integrate.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
CE 453 – Horizontal / vertical reference systems and mapping.
Mark Howard October, 2008 NGS ORIENTATION NOAA/NGS Aeronautical Survey Program.
GPS collection Survey Grade Receivers Mapping Grade Receivers Recreational Grade Receivers Differential correction Real time CORS beacon WAAS Subscription.
National Readjustment DALE PURSELL ACSM NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT? WHY HOW WHEN POST QUESTIONS.
The Delta Levees Program
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
VERTICAL DATUMS APRIL 08, 2008 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Datums and Datum Transformations Geomatics Industry Association of America December 4, 2008 Dave Doyle NGS Chief Geodetic Surveyor
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
WESTERN REGION HEIGHT MOD WEBINAR NOVEMBER 19,
Update on National Geodetic Survey Activities Joe Evjen, NGS 02 May 2006.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
Elevation and Geodetic Control Workgroup
Vertical Control Introductions Purpose for presentation
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Presentation transcript:

Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering, INDOT Thomas A. Mahon, PE, LS Survey Group Manager, Woolpert Inc

Background – Surveying Infrastructure - Horizontal NAD 27 – Best fit Spheroid for North America Fifty nine years of terrestrial, local surveying by the general public Line of sight required (Bilby towers) Regional or large scale projects only conducted by National Geodetic Survey Highest achievable relative accuracy was 1:100,000 Network accuracy 10 m

Background - Surveying Infrastucture (cont’d)

Background – Surveying Infrastructure - Horizontal NAD 83(86) – Best fit Global Ellipsoid, conventional observations along with satellite triangulation, Doppler positions, and VLBI –Incorporated satellite (non-GPS) observations into conventional data sets –Largest solution of simultaneously adjusted equations up until that time –400,000 unknowns and 1,800,000 (observations) equations

Background – Surveying Infrastructure - Horizontal NAD 83(86) Issues –Not GPS-able –Poor accessibility –Irregularly spaced –Positional accuracy Relative  1:100,000 Network 1 m

Surveying Infrastructure – Horizontal (cont’d) Along came GPS Private surveyors began finding issues with existing control Large scale surveys no longer the domain of government surveyors Projections and datums used More ties to state plane coordinates Both horizontal and vertical control in one operation Overall horizontal accuracy improving

Surveying Infrastructure in Indiana – HARNs “GPSABLE” Clear Horizons for Satellite Signal Acquisition EASY ACCESSIBILITY Few Special Vehicle or Property Entrance Requirements REGULARLY SPACED Always within Km HIGH HORIZONTAL ACCURACY A-Order (5 mm + 1:10,000,000) B-Order (8mm + 1:1,000,000)

Surveying Infrastructure in Indiana – Horizontal Indiana HARN Phase I – 1997 (GPS1200) Indiana HARN Phase II – 1998 (GPS1200) Indiana HARN last of all 50 state HARN’s No state HARN has better vertical component NAD 83(97) Statewide Readjustment by NGS ‘NAD 83’ no longer enough to define adjustment Indiana HARN Phase III (GPS1850) –FBN Vertical Enhancement Survey

High Accuracy Reference Network Positional Accuracy HARN Stations –Network (absolute): 0.1 m –Relative B-order: one part per million A-order : one part per 10 million CORS Stations –0.01 m

Indiana HARN 1997/1998

Phases of Indiana Surveying Infrastructure – Horizontal (cont’d) HARN Participants: –HARN Phase I - Collaborative effort between federal government, local government, private contractors (The Schneider Corporation & Plumb-Tuckett) and various volunteers –HARN Phase II - Private contractor (Woolpert LLP) –HARN Phase III - federal government, local government and various volunteers. No private contractor.

Indiana HARN Components: FBN/CBN The Indiana HARN consists of stations maintained by the federal government and those maintained by the locals (anyone other than the federal government) HARN – High Accuracy Reference Network (161 Total Points) FBN – Federal Base Network (21), a subset of HARN stations sufficiently dense for the federal government to meet their surveying obligations within the state (100 km) CBN – Cooperative Base Network (140), all other HARN stations, more densely spaced to meet local needs.

Indiana HARN w/ FBN Stations

GPS & CLASSICAL ADJUSTMENTS COMPLETED GPS ADJUSTMENT COMPLETED GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS197 GPS GPS908 GPS GPS GPS404 GPS GPS GP S291 reobs 9/ GPS721 reos 7/96 GPS1047 reos 1/96 GPS GPS1133 reos-6/95-GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS GPS1150 reos-1996

Horizontal Control Stations A-order horizontal) Adjusted to VLBI stations (NCMN 7291 Bloomington), CORS stations and other FBN stations B-order horizontal) Adjusted to A-order stations C-order (all 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd order stations) Rubber sheeted to A & B-order stations

Indiana FBN Portion of the Indiana HARN

Horizontal Adjustments NAD 83(97) –adjusted horizontal coordinates in Indiana based on the first two HARN campaigns –adjustment based on NAD 83(CORS) which had been adjusted in 1996 –adjustment tied into surrounding readjustment –adjusted coordinates moved on the order of magnitude of ±1’ in Indiana –adjusted only satellite observations and rubber sheeted conventional control into HARN stations

Horizontal Adjustments NAD 83(NSRS2007) –NSRS - National Spatial Reference System – readjustment of all GPS data in the National Spatial Reference System simultaneously, not just a state or regional readjustment –adjustment tied to CORS network as of 2002 –adjusted data in Indiana to be available Spring 2007 –states on stable North American plates will not be given an epoch date (considered fixed)

NAD 83(NSRS2007)

Phases of Surveying Infrastructure – Vertical NGVD 29 – National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (sea level) Thousands and thousands of km of level loops run since 1929 NAVD 88 – North American Vertical Datum of 1988 Many monuments have move or been destroyed over the years

Phases of Indiana Surveying Infrastructure – Orthophotography & DEM Statewide Digital Color Orthophotography – 2005 Statewide Color Infrared Aerial Photos – 2005 Statewide Digital Elevation Model – 2005 Statewide Digital Surface Model – 2005 gis.iu.edu Google Earth

What’s Next – Height Modernization Height Modernization is any program aimed at improving elevation estimates Typical activities have included: –differential leveling establishing/re-establishing elevations on horizontal control stations –survey mark recovery and remonumentation –GPS surveying establishing horizontal positions and ellipsoidal heights on bench marks –Gravity data observations for inclusion in the national geoid model

Height Modernization in Indiana Supplements the HARN and INDOT CORs To be done in phases Phase I – differential leveling –By INDOT District starting in Vincennes District Phase II – GPS observations on additional bench marks

Height Modernization in Indiana – Phase I (Vincennes)

Height Modernization in Indiana – Phase I  125 miles of leveling in Vincennes District $1,500/mile $190,000 for Vincennes District Extrapolating to entire state –  $1,140,000 Funding for OISGA –$60,000 Total for Phase I - $1.2M

Height Modernization in Indiana – Phase I Activities Virtual Mark Recovery Actual Mark Recovery Coordination with INDOT CORS Planning and Route Selection Differential Leveling Adjustment and Report

Height Modernization in Indiana Questions?