Other models. A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Southern Voices networks Asia Consortium and networks.
Advertisements

Creating a Window of Opportunity for Policy Change By Nancy Yinger, The Population Reference Bureau AMDD Conference Kuala Lumpur, 2003.
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
Bridging Research, Policy and Practice
Context, Evidence, & Links
Action Research for Maximum Impact
RAPID Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Julius Court & Enrique Mendizabal Overseas Development Institute, London.
Day 1 Recap… Opps & Challengs – context improving but many challenges remain for CSOs. Problem tree analysis. RAPID Framework (what are key issues) RAPID.
Tools to Promote the Use of Research-Based Evidence in Policy
Bridging Research and Policy An Overseas Development Institute Seminar 9th October 2003.
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur? How to promote pro-poor policy & practice? An ODI Workshop London, 16 th March 2004 John Young & Julius Court Research and.
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
Progressive Policymaking
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Methods for Assessing Policy Impact Process and Partnerships for Pro-Poor Policy Change, Project.
Context, Evidence, & Links
Turning Insight into Impact: Approaches and Tools Research and Policy in Development Programme DSA-BOND Conference 2005 John Young and Julius Court.
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur?
Promoting Evidence-Based Development Policy DSA Conference 2004 Workshop 1.5 Speakers: John Young, Dominic Furlong, Dylan Winder & Naved Chowdhury Chair:
The Analytical Framework
John Young: ODI, London Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Groupwork; The Kenya Chapter Agenda; Gender mainstreaming in the management of water resources.
The RAPID Analytical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Definitions Research: any systematic effort to increase.
Civil Society Organisations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute, London.
A Practical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, An Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Education Policy Advocacy Objectives: 1.To learn why advocacy is one of the roles of CSOs. 2.To learn the process for developing an effective strategic.
From Research to Advocacy
Guidelines for good project management An output of the RE-ACT project under Interact Ronan Gingles for AER, Strasbourg, 14 June 2007.
Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:
Monitoring and Evaluation of Influence John Young.
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Health Communication, Advocacy and Integrated Strategic Communication. The case of HIV/AIDS Jan Servaes Professor and Chair, Department of Communication.
Welcome to The Expert Community Forum 19 November 2007.
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
RAPID Programme Civil Society Partnerships Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute,
INASP- ODI Research – Policy Symposium A practitioner´s understanding of the key factors in play to promote evidence based policy processes Av. Callao.
Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Case study 1: Dairy marketing policy in Kenya.
THE MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE… THE ONGOING MYSTERY OF GETTING RESEARCH INTO USE.
Performance Measurement an Management of PACA and LED: The Compass of Local Competitiveness Jörg Meyer-Stamer
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Can ILRI hope to influence pro-poor policy change through research? John Young, ODI, UK Dannie.
1 Introduction and Basic Elements of Advocacy. 2 What is advocacy? A systematic approach to changing policies and programs to reflect the needs of individuals.
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 The Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Challenges of putting research into action. Oxfam-Monash Partnership Research that will “make a difference in people’s lives” Research conducted by academics.
VisualConnect™ Waterfield© Strategic Planning Workshop Wednesday 4 th November 2009.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Effective Research for Development Policy John Young & Louise Shaxson CFHSS Congress 2006 York University
PARTNER VIEWS AT THE START OF TULIP TULIP evaluator Kari Seppälä Tallin
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Capacity Strengthening Strategy RENEWAL 3. Core Pillars of RENEWAL Action research Communications Capacity.
Bridging the gap between research and policy making? Ajoy Datta Foundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan Civil Society Partnerships Programme
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Learning lessons from the Kampala urban agriculture policy process Process and Partnerships for.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Linking Research, Policy and Practice Dr Niamh Gaynor IAP Director.
NEW ACTORS, NEW MONEY & NEW CONVERSATIONS Mapping The Current Landscape & Potential Resources For Women’s Rights Results & Analysis MAY
Gender Equity in Sport for Social Change Advocacy & Networking Connect and Commit People to your work.
IMPLEMENTING THE AFRICA DATA CONSENSUS: PLAN OF ACTION AND ROAD MAP 1.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Enrique Mendizabal.
RAPID Programme Civil Society Partnerships Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute,
Engaging with End–Users of Research OCTOBER 2015 Cathy Harris MBA, MInstKT Research Engagement Manager Research & Enterprise Extn 6755,
Sauder Unlimited presents… Corporate Development 101 Corey Wong President of BizTech ( )
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
Enriching Policy With Research
Launch of the Urban Pathways project
Presentation transcript:

Other models

A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy, Networking Research, learning & thinking Scientific information exchange & validation Policy analysis, & research

What you need to know The external environment: Who are the key actors? What is their agenda? How do they influence the political context? The political context: Is there political interest in change? Is there room for manoeuvre? How do they perceive the problem? The evidence: Is it there? Is it relevant? Is it practically useful? Are the concepts familiar or new? Does it need re- packaging? Links: Who are the key individuals? Are there existing networks to use? How best to transfer the information? The media? Campaigns?

What researchers need to do What researchers need to know What researchers need to do How to do it Political Context: Evidence Links Who are the policymakers? Is there demand for ideas? What is the policy process? What is the current theory? What are the narratives? How divergent is it? Who are the stakeholders? What networks exist? Who are the connectors, mavens and salesmen? Get to know the policymakers. Identify friends and foes. Prepare for policy opportunities. Look out for policy windows. Work with them – seek commissions Strategic opportunism – prepare for known events + resources for others Establish credibility Provide practical solutions Establish legitimacy. Present clear options Use familiar narratives. Build a reputation Action-research Pilot projects to generate legitimacy Good communication Get to know the others Work through existing networks. Build coalitions. Build new policy networks. Build partnerships. Identify key networkers, mavens and salesmen. Use informal contacts

Paravets in Kenya 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment collapse. ­Paravet projects emerge. ­ITDG projects. ­Privatisation. ­ITDG Paravet network. ­Rapid spread in North. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ­Still not approved / passed!

Paravets in Kenya - Political Context 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment collapse of services. ­Paravet projects emerge. ­ITDG projects. ­Privatisation. ­ITDG Paravet network. ­Rapid spread in North. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ­Still not approved / passed! ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment ­Privatisation ­ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies.

Paravets in Kenya - Research 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment collapse of services. ­Paravet projects emerge. ­ITDG projects. ­Privatisation. ­ITDG Paravet network. ­Rapid spread in North. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ­Still not approved / passed! ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment ­Privatisation ­ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ITDG projects – collaborative action research. The Hubl StudyInternational Research

1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment collapse of services. ­Paravet projects emerge. ­ITDG projects. ­Privatisation. ­ITDG Paravet network. ­Rapid spread in North. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ­Still not approved / passed! ­Professionalisation of Public Services. ­Structural Adjustment ­Privatisation ­ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS. ­KVB letter (January 1998). ­Multistakeholder WSs new policies. ITDG projects – collaborative action research. International ResearchThe Hubl Study Dr Kajume Paravets in Kenya - Links

Political stagnation, professional protectionism Practical evidence invisible to policy makers Powerful individuals, professional interests Bad timing - ITDG missed the boat – twice! A Tipping Point New champions Collaborative policy-research Paravets in Kenya - Lessons

What should ITDG have done? Learned more about the political context Involved more policy makers earlier Collected more empirical data & used it better Seized the chance in 1989 Involved non-livestock policy makers Controlled the club Looked for champions Involved bilaterals and multilaterals

When and how to use it Historical analysis of a policy event –Identify the event –Elaborate the history – critical events, key people –Review context, evidence and links at key moments –Identify & prioritise the influences Current analysis & strategic planning –Identify key players –Workshop the issues & develop a strategy for maximising impact

A current example to maximise impact of DFID forest/ground water research project in India Researchers, policy makers and activists Used framework to analyse factors in water sector in India Developed strategy for final phase: –Less research –More communication –Developing champions in regional and national government –Local, Regional & National advocacy campaign

Policy entrepreneurs Storytellers Engineers Networkers Fixers

>44 = Low Policy Entrepreneur Scores <23 = V.High <30 = High Herman Joseph Kraft Vijay Kanapathy Hach Sok Prof Ragayah Hj Mat Zin Average

Ashley Parashram Bernard Lawer Tetteh-Dumanya Dan Start David Redhouse Enrique Mendizabal Gerry Power Harinder Janjua Karen Iles Lydia Richardson Marta Foresti Michael Majale Mike Albu Monica Blagescu Patrick Watt Richard Graham Average >44 = Low Policy Entrepreneurs in UK <23 = V.High <30 = High

Any Questions?