EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
Advertisements

POLAND Development Management System in Poland Brussels, 2 July 2010.
Cyprus Project Management Society
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Europe and Education School Education COMENIUS. The School Education Action of the European Community’s Programme “Socrates” on Education 2 nd phase:
Bilateral Relations Programme level Bilateral Fund & Complimentary actions, reporting on them Andreas Aabel Bilateral officer EEA and Norway Grants Riga,
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
Cross-cutting M&E functions in MENARID MENARID Knowledge Exchange workshop 24th to 28th of March, Hammamet, Tunisia 1.
Information and Publicity Requirements Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 24th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
EEA and Norway Grants Reducing disparities Strengthening relations Bjarni Vestmann, Head of Communication February 2015.
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
PARIS21 CONSORTIUM MEETING Paris, October 2002 Progress Report of the Task Team on Food, Agriculture and Rural Statistics  Objectives  Past activities.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Norwegian partners and Project Promoters Kick-off seminar for Estonian-Norwegian research projects, Tallinn Senior Adviser Aleksandra Witczak.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Local Development Annual Programme Review 2004 Chisinau, 17 December, 2004.
Strengthening bilateral relations: - Programme development Andreas Aabel Bilateral officer FMO Operational definition Cooperation,
Implementation progress Programme BG 15 Norwegian Financial Mechanism Programme BG 15 June, 2015.
Rektoru Padomes sēde, Norwegian Financial Mechanism – cooperation possibilities Latvian Rector’s Council,
The Global Centre for Information and Communication Technologies in Parliament 14 June 2006 V Legislative XML Workshop Towards European Standards for Legislative.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
Implementation Progress Programme BG 14 Norwegian Financial Mechanism Cooperation Committee, Sofia, June 2015.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Expert group meeting on draft delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) under cohesion policy
PLI training on DoRIS Bulgaria Training for NFP, CA, PO and AA November 2013 Hansen Kerimel, Daniela Parisi and Ottar FMO – Financial Mechanism Office.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Statistical manual 2012 Statistical manual for project and programmes of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009 – August
Orientation for new Lead Partners and Partners Information & Publicity Requirements Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 12 June 2008 – Voss, Norway Kirsti.
Reporting on Bilateral Relations Andreas Aabel Bilateral Officer EEA and Norway Grants Tel: Reporting.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP RIGHT AND CITIZENSHIP
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
EEA and Norway Grants Programme risk management Inger K. Stoll, Head of Communication, Reporting and Evaluation, Financial Mechanism Office November 2012.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Developing a programme for the implementation of the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics Seminar on Developing a programme for the implementation of the.
MINISTRY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION General Directorate for Regional Development Regional Policy and Pogramming Directorate REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME.
Statistical manual 2012 Statistical manual for project and programmes of the EEA and Norway Grants 2009 – 2014 Riga 5 March
NFPs at the 4th Ministerial Conference Peter Mayer Vienna, COST E19, September 2003.
Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs General Secretariat for Research and Technology EEA Financial Mechanism GR07 Research within.
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Your Input Feedback from NGOs Presentation by Anne Marie Darmanin.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee for Public Works 14 August 2002.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
S&E and BMW Regional Operational Programmes 14 – 20 Training for Local Authorities involved in DUCGS projects, 21st April 2016 REPORTING, DATA COLLECTION.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
URBACT INFODAYS PORTUGAL TOWARDS URBACT III Lisbon 21st January 2015.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Building an ENI CBC project
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Our Understanding of Institution/Capacity Building
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Home Affairs Programme in Bulgaria: From Development to Actual Implementation Cooperation Committee Meeting 28 November
Reporting on results and evaluating health programmes
Reporting on results and evaluating health programmes
Thematic areas and overview of the opportunities for bilateral cooperation under the Active Citizens Fund Bulgaria Bilateral Workshop between Bulgarian.
The Active Citizens Fund in Bulgaria Programme Priorities and Measures for Support Short version of the presentation delivered at the Official Launch.
Presentation transcript:

EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November

Donors annual report FMO Status Report PO Annual Programme Report 15 February July NMFA Annual Report to Parliament Donors reports to EFTA NFP Strategic Report 31 March January Timeline FMO compile annual report based on programme reports and strategic reports

Annual Programme Report The main body of the report should not exceed 20 pages, excluding any attachments. 3

1. Executive summary This section shall provide a short summary of the principal findings and points of the report. 4

2. Programme area specific developments Describe important developments in the Programme area, also in respect of policy, financial or administrative changes. If possible, add and analyse statistical trends 5

3. Reporting on outputs Give a summary and analysis of how the selected projects have contributed or are contributing to each of the Programme outputs set out in the Programme proposal. Analyse progress towards the defined outputs, and explain any deviation from the plan.  Use the indicators that have been set to verify progress. If any reviews of projects have been undertaken, these shall also be used to verify progress. Use examples to illustrate and show progress. Focus on the most important results at output level. 6

Reporting on outputs 3.2 Give a summary of the implementation of each pre‐defined project. When projects have been completed give a summary of their actual contributions to the output targets. 3.3 Give a summary of the implementation of small grant schemes. If this is a Final Report, provide a summary of their actual contributions to the Programme output. 7

Example Output: Increased inter-municipal and inter-sectoral cooperation in planning and implementation of social and economic development strategies between local governments participating in the Project. Indicators: 1.Number of strategies developed in accordance with the model of inter- municipal and inter-sectoral cooperation 2.Number of social and private partners who participated in consultations on the strategy by formulating opinions/conclusions concerning planned measures 8

4. Reporting on Programme outcome Analyse how the projects and the Programme’s outputs contribute to the expected outcome(s) defined in the Programme proposal. Use the indicators that have been set to verify progress. If the Programme has been subject to a review, this shall also be used to verify progress. Focus on the most important results at the outcome level. Refer to baseline studies Refer to qualitative surveys, studies etc. Assess the use of indicators 9

Example Outcome: Regions and urban areas are cooperating in the fields of public and private services, business development and innovation, to stimulate social and economic development Indicators: 1.Number of measures promoting cooperation and economic development between urban and rural institutions. 2.Number of partnerships between self-government units and between local authorities and representatives of the NGO sector and business 3.Number of institutions with strengthened capacity 10

5. Project selection With reference to the Programme proposal list the calls carried out during the reporting period. Include a summary of the call(s) and describe the level of interest. 11

6. Progress of bilateral relations Give a summary of how partnerships between the Beneficiary States and the Donor State(s) have been facilitated during the reporting period. 12

7. Monitoring Describe the monitoring activities that have been carried out and give a summary of the findings. Provide a monitoring plan for the next reporting period. 13

8. Need for adjustments If the Programme Operator has made use of a possibility to modify the Programme in line with Article 5.9 of the Regulations and the Programme Agreement during the reporting period, the modifications shall be described in this section. 14

9. Risk management With reference to the risks identified in the Programme proposal, give an analysis of the situation and any mitigating actions carried out or planned. If any new risks have been identified, then they shall also be discussed in this section. Be aware of the Risk management strategy of the Donors. The Donors expect similar strategies to be elaborated in each Beneficiary State. A Corruption risk assessment tool will be applied with TI to each Programme to assist in the identification of programmes at risk. 15

10. Information and publicity With reference to the Communication Plan provided in the Programme proposal give a summary of the activities carried out during the reporting period. 16

Examples of planned communications events? 17

11. Cross‐cutting issues Describe how the Programme has performed (positively or negatively) in relation to the three crosscutting issues (ref. Chapter 3.11 in this Manual), and which measures, if any, that have been put in place to improve performance. 18

12. Reporting on sustainability If this is a Final Report, provide an assessment of the extent to which the positive effects of the Programme will continue after the funding period. 19

13. Attachment to the Annual Programme Report Monitoring Plan 20

14. Attachment to the Final Programme Report Financial annex 21

Questions 22