The Analytical Framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
Advertisements

Other models. A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence links Campaigning, Lobbying Politics and Policymaking Media, Advocacy,
Bridging Research, Policy and Practice
Context, Evidence, & Links
Action Research for Maximum Impact
RAPID Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Julius Court & Enrique Mendizabal Overseas Development Institute, London.
Policy Analysis, Engagement and Advocacy A workshop for Southern Africa Regional Poverty Network Johannesburg, South Africa 4-5 April 2007 Naved Chowdhury.
Tools to Promote the Use of Research-Based Evidence in Policy
Bridging Research and Policy An Overseas Development Institute Seminar 9th October 2003.
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur? How to promote pro-poor policy & practice? An ODI Workshop London, 16 th March 2004 John Young & Julius Court Research and.
Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
Progressive Policymaking
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Methods for Assessing Policy Impact Process and Partnerships for Pro-Poor Policy Change, Project.
Context, Evidence, & Links
Day 2. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Outline of the Workshop Day 1 General Introductions Theory - Research Policy.
Networks and Policy Influence in International Development Julius Court and Enrique Mendizabal RAPID Programme, ODI
Turning Insight into Impact: Approaches and Tools Research and Policy in Development Programme DSA-BOND Conference 2005 John Young and Julius Court.
Research and Policy in Development Aim for the bulls eye How to maximise the impact of development research John Young Overseas Development Institute,
Are you a Policy Entrepreneur?
Naved Chowdhury and Fletcher Tembo
Promoting Evidence-Based Development Policy DSA Conference 2004 Workshop 1.5 Speakers: John Young, Dominic Furlong, Dylan Winder & Naved Chowdhury Chair:
John Young: ODI, London Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Bridging Research and Policy East Asia Development Network Workshop Jakarta, July 2004 John Young & Cokro Leksmono Overseas Development Institute, UK
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Groupwork; The Kenya Chapter Agenda; Gender mainstreaming in the management of water resources.
The RAPID Analytical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Definitions Research: any systematic effort to increase.
Civil Society Organisations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute, London.
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 Definitions Research: any systematic effort to increase the.
A Practical Framework. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, An Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
From Research to Advocacy
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
Programs to Support LG Innovation: case studies Can LG innovate its way out of funding cuts? Transition to people-powered public services.
Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:
Monitoring and Evaluation of Influence John Young.
Valuing evaluation beyond programme boundaries: Communicating evaluations to enhance development effectiveness globally Anna Downie
Building the Community of Practice for Pro-poor Livestock Development Main Findings from the Need Assessment Silvia Sperandini Consultant, Knowledge Management.
“Look, Listen & Learn” Promoting the use of CSOs evidence in policies for food security By Lindiwe Majele Sibanda
External Relations Marketing, Networking, and Social Action.
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Health Communication, Advocacy and Integrated Strategic Communication. The case of HIV/AIDS Jan Servaes Professor and Chair, Department of Communication.
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
Making Knowledge Count Maximising the value of Research for Development John Young: ODI, London
RAPID Programme Civil Society Partnerships Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute,
Factors that Influence Evaluation Utilisation. Theoretical Perspectives Michael Quinn Patton’s ‘Utilisation Focused Evaluation’ Addresses issue of use.
INASP- ODI Research – Policy Symposium A practitioner´s understanding of the key factors in play to promote evidence based policy processes Av. Callao.
Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Case study 1: Dairy marketing policy in Kenya.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Can ILRI hope to influence pro-poor policy change through research? John Young, ODI, UK Dannie.
1 Introduction and Basic Elements of Advocacy. 2 What is advocacy? A systematic approach to changing policies and programs to reflect the needs of individuals.
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Delhi, 3 rd January 2004 The Analytical Framework The political context – political.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Challenges of putting research into action. Oxfam-Monash Partnership Research that will “make a difference in people’s lives” Research conducted by academics.
Effective Research for Development Policy John Young & Louise Shaxson CFHSS Congress 2006 York University
Building a Smarter Economic Future The UK Economic Development Conference October 2009 Royal Bath Hotel, Bournemouth.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Bridging the gap between research and policy making? Ajoy Datta Foundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan Civil Society Partnerships Programme
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
ILRI Process and Partnership for Pro-Poor Policy Change Learning lessons from the Kampala urban agriculture policy process Process and Partnerships for.
(1) Bridging research, policy and politics the RAPID+ framework This presentation is based on: Court, J., and Young, J Bridging research and policy.
Linking Research, Policy and Practice Dr Niamh Gaynor IAP Director.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Enrique Mendizabal.
RAPID Programme Civil Society Partnerships Programme Civil Society Organizations and Policy Entrepreneurship Naved Chowdhury Overseas Development Institute,
Stimulating innovation in engaged practice and developing institutional cultures that support it 3. Capacity building and skills development  Supporting.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach
Presentation transcript:

The Analytical Framework External Influences Socio-economic and cultural influences, donor policies etc The political context – political and economic structures and processes, culture, institutional pressures, incremental vs radical change etc. The links between policy and research communities – networks, relationships, power, competing discourses, trust, knowledge etc. The evidence – credibility, the degree it challenges received wisdom, research approaches and methodology, simplicity of the message, how it is packaged etc

Other models

The Analytical Framework External Influences Socio-economic and cultural influences, donor policies etc The political context – political and economic structures and processes, culture, institutional pressures, incremental vs radical change etc. The links between policy and research communities – networks, relationships, power, competing discourses, trust, knowledge etc. The evidence – credibility, the degree it challenges received wisdom, research approaches and methodology, simplicity of the message, how it is packaged etc

A Practical Framework External Influences political context evidence Politics and Policymaking Campaigning, Lobbying Policy analysis, & research Media, Advertising, Networking Scientific information exchange & validation Research, learning & thinking evidence links

Using the framework The external environment: Who are the key actors? What is their agenda? How do they influence the political context? The political context: Is there political interest in change? Is there room for manoeuvre? How do they perceive the problem? The evidence: Is it there? Is it relevant? Is it practically useful? Are the concepts familiar or new? Does it need re-packaging? Links: Who are the key individuals? Are there existing networks to use? How best to transfer the information? The media? Campaigns?

Putting it into practice What researchers need to know What researchers need to do How to do it Political Context: Evidence Links Get to know the policymakers. Identify friends and foes. Prepare for policy opportunities. Look out for policy windows. Work with them – seek commissions Strategic opportunism – prepare for known events + resources for others Who are the policymakers? Is there demand for ideas? What is the policy process? Establish credibility Provide practical solutions Establish legitimacy. Present clear options Use familiar narratives. Build a reputation Action-research Pilot projects to generate legitimacy Good communication What is the current theory? What are the narratives? How divergent is it? Get to know the others Work through existing networks. Build coalitions. Build new policy networks. Build partnerships. Identify key networkers, mavens and salesmen. Use informal contacts Who are the stakeholders? What networks exist? Who are the connectors, mavens and salesmen?

Paravets in Kenya 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment → collapse. Paravet projects emerge. ITDG projects. Privatisation. ITDG Paravet network. Rapid spread in North. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Still not approved / passed!

Paravets in Kenya - political context Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment Privatisation and change of DVS. ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment → collapse of services. Paravet projects emerge. ITDG projects. Privatisation. ITDG Paravet network. Rapid spread in North. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Still not approved / passed!

Paravets in Kenya - Research International Research 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment Privatisation and change of DVS. ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Professionalisation of Public Services. Structural Adjustment → collapse of services. Paravet projects emerge. ITDG projects. Privatisation. ITDG Paravet network. Rapid spread in North. KVB letter (January 1998). Multistakeholder WSs → new policies. Still not approved / passed! ITDG projects – collaborative action research. The Hubl Study

DELIVERI Project - Indonesia 5-year DFID-funded programme to make livestock service more responsive to the needs of the poor Action-research. 5 components: Pilot projects Institutional Development HRD Total Quality Management Information & influence Astonishingly successful – why?

Success factors Designed for policy influence – at the right time. Approach – participatory action-research, with all stakeholders. Marketing / Communication strategy. Luck – economic crisis caused a poliitical crisis. Ready to seize the policy window. Flexible, opportunistic.

Other sources of information: http://www.odi.org.uk/rapid