Chapter 6 Pragmatics
6.1 Introduction
Review of semantics Meaning in lg. words Mothervs.Mother-in-law sentence: in, am, I, T-shirt, today
Review of semantics “ I’m in T-shirt today.” What does the sent. mean ? ↓ What does the speaker mean ? What does the utterance mean ?
Pragmatics speaker mg. semantics + pragmatics=study of mg. “ I’m in T-shirt today.” “Mum, I’m in T-shirt today.” “Mum, I’m in T-shirt today.”Mum, I’m in T-shirt todayMum, I’m in T-shirt today
Social norms Belief Motivation Social setting Lg. users Time, space Non-verbal Pre-text Context speaker mg.: dependent on ???
Social norms Belief Motivation Social setting Lg. users Time, space Non-verbal Pre-text Context speaker mg.: context-dependent Physical Social Mental
Pragmatics = study of mg in context; use; communication; What does the speaker mean ? What does the utterance mean ?
Pragmatics Semantics Concrete Implicit Abstract Explicit 该来的没有来,不该走的倒走了。 Man: Do you love me? Woman: Well, I like you. conversational implicature
Pragmatics Waste basket
Indispensable ‘basket’ e.g. “ Today is Sunday.” Situation 1 Situation 2 ………… Pragmatic mg. conversational implicature
SALE: BABY & TODDLER p.142
6.2 Micropragmatics
Ss presentation real life instances the speaker means more than what s/he said
Lead-in task (3) You’ll have to bring that back tomorrow, because they aren’t here now. (3) You’ll have to bring that back tomorrow, because they aren’t here now. TB example p.144 (1) A: Where is the fresh salad sitting? B: He’s sitting by the door. B: He’s sitting by the door.
Lead-in task p.146 p.146 (6) When did you stop beating your wife? TB example p.145 (4) A: Can I borrow your dictionary? B: Yeah, it’s on the table. B: Yeah, it’s on the table.
Discussion Keywords: Reference Deixis Anaphora Presupposition Ss’ exapmples Ss’ definitions
Discussion Deixis –person deixis –space/spatial/place deixis –discourse deixis –social deixisCompare person deixis vs. social deixis
Discussion Presupposition Features: What are presupposition triggers? TB p.147 Q: Does one sentence just allow for one presupposition?
In-class activities 1. video clip (twice) Sound of Music Task: To identify specific reference, deixis, anaphora and presuppositions involved Comment and feedback
In-class activities 2. Brain teaser “when 1+1=3?” Task: To identify the presupposition(s) involved Comment and feedback
6.3 Macropragmatics
lead-in tasks Act out Ss in pairs act out typical situations of apologizing, promising, commanding and congratulating Find out the specific utterances perfroming these actions
Discussion Compare e.g. Mr Smith was mad with his secretary. Vs. e.g. Stop that nonsense, Joe. Find out differences in their com. value ‘saying things’ Vs. ‘doing things with words’ ‘doing things with words’
Discussion Speech act theory What?Who? performative act e.g. TB p.149 Trichotomy= locution+illocution+perlocution locution+illocution+perlocution
A. Locutionary act: the act of saying, the literal meaning of the utterance; B. Illocutionary act: the extra meaning of the utterance produced on the basis of its literal meaning; C. Perlocutioanry act: the effect of the utterance on the hearer, depending on specific circumstances.
(18) a. Husband: That’s the phone. b. Wife: I’m in the bathroom. b. Wife: I’m in the bathroom. c. Husband: Okay. c. Husband: Okay.Analysis:
In-class activities brainstormTask: To brainstorm five sorts of situations where the speaker: states a fact, makes a suggestion, turns down a offer, express an attitude and delivers a declaration
In-class activities Classification of illocutionary acts Representatives Directives Commissives Expressives Declarations
Demonstration Ss offer examples for directives Identify the degrees of indirectness Compare forms and functions indirect speech acts What? TB (p.152-3)
6.3.2 The Cooperative Principle
lead-in tasks Act out Ss in pairs strike a short conversation in whatever way as they wish. (two groups present) Find out whether there are principles governing the conduct of conversation
Discussion Ss comment on four aspects of conversation: quality quantity relation manner
Discussion the Cooperative Principle: For what? By whom? Maxims: Maxim of quality Maxim of quantity Maxim of relation Maxim of manner
Discussion the Cooperative Principle: ObservingFlouting conversational implicatures: TB examples (33, 40, 41, 42)
In-class activities CP-based analysis Data: verbal jokes Task: to identify conversational implicatures derived from non-observance of certain CP maxims
In-class activities CP-based analysis Data: metaphor, irony or tautology Task: to account for their meanings on the ground of CP
6.3.3 The Politeness Principle
lead-in tasks pick up Ss watch the comedy clip (bu chaqian 《不差 钱》, picking up 5 utterances conveying conversational implicatures Find out why speakers always bother with implicit and indirect ways of saying things
Discussion evaluate Ss’ accounts Approach the weakness of the CP
In-class activities Fulfill the goal Task: Ss design a situation where they: show disagreement with your manager borrow money from your bad-tempered brother Maxim of relation let your kids know that you cannot stay with them for the coming Xmas
In-class activities Ss presentation Are there politeness considerations? The Politeness Principle (TB p. 158) Who? For what? Maxims
Puzzle session Big Q: Are there culture-specific differences between Chinese and westerners (e.g. English and Americans) in what counts to be politeness of verbal behaviors?
Exercises and Discussion Questions TB (p ) extended exercises