PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles Graduate Students: Yoojoong Choi and Andrew Liu January 18, 2002 2002 PEER Annual Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Louie 9/5/2005 OutlineOutline 1.Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Vs 2.ReMi-Borehole Comparison 3.Los Angeles Transect 4.Las Vegas Transect 5.Effect.
Advertisements

PREDICTION OF RESPONSE SPECTRAL PARAMETERS FOR BHUJ EARTHQUAKE (26TH JANUARY 2001) USING COMPONENT ATTENUATION MODELLING TECHNIQUE By DR. SAROSH.H. LODI.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Use of regression analysis Regression analysis: –relation between dependent variable Y and one or more independent variables Xi Use of regression model.
TBI Committee Members Y. Bozorgnia C.B. Crouse J.P. Stewart
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps - Inputs and Status Choi Yoon Seok Jennifer S. Haase Robert L. Nowack Purdue University.
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Kickoff MeetingApril 20, 2010.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles May 22, 2002 Geotechnical Uncertainties for PBEE.
1 Workshop on GMSM for Nonlinear Analysis, Berkeley CA, October 26, 2006 ATC-63 Selection and Scaling Method Charles Kircher Curt B. Haselton Gregory G.
Ground Motion Prediction Equations for Eastern North America Gail M. Atkinson, UWO David M. Boore, USGS (BSSA, 2006)
Further Development of Site Response in NGA Models PEER Lifelines Program NGA-West2 Project Topic #8 Working Group Meeting Meeting #2October 26, 2010.
Science for a changing world The USGS and the Development of the Nevada Great Basin Community Velocity Model.
J. Louie 2/24/2005 Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in California Urban Basins John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab UNR students: J. B.
Demand and Capacity Factor Design: A Performance-based Analytic Approach to Design and Assessment Sharif University of Technology, 25 April 2011 Demand.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
J. Louie 18/8/2005 Refraction Microtremor for Shallow Shear Velocity in Urban Basins John Louie, Nevada Seismological Lab (at GNS & VUW through July 2006–
03/24/2004NGA Workshop: Validation1 BROADBAND SIMULATION METHODOLOGY: A HYBRID DETERMINISTIC AND STOCHASTIC APPROACH  Use Deterministic Methodology at.
First a digression The POC Ranking the Methods Jennie Watson-Lamprey October 29, 2007.
Project Review and Summary of NGA Supporting Research Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #6 July, 2004.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
A Genetic Algorithm Solution for the Problem of Selection and Scaling of Ground Motion Records Arzhang Alimoradi and Farzad Naeim John A. Martin & Associates.
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2 Immediately after the mainshock, a reconnaissance team from METU Geotechnical Engineering Division visited Van, Erciş.
Earthquake Focal Mechanisms
Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)
Turkey Earthquake Risk Model Financing the Risks of Natural Disasters World Bank Washington, DC, June 2-3, 2003 Dennis E. Kuzak Senior Vice President,
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Southern California: A Natural Laboratory for Earthquake Science SCEC annual meeting, 2000.
S OUTHERN C ALIFORNIA E ARTHQUAKE C ENTER Themes by Tom Henyey.
Allowing for Uncertainty in Site Response Analysis
Writing and Bell Ringer
Comparison of Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions Presented by: Emel Seyhan, PhD Student University of California, Los Angeles Collaborators: Lisa M.
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
FORUM FOR THE PROMOTION OF SOIL DYNAMICS IN INDIA H.R.WASON, Emeritus Fellow, IIT Roorkee & President, Indian Society of Earthquake Technology 21 December,
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
Geologic Time Two Column Notes. The Geologic Column definition of geologic column: an ordered arrangement of rock layers that is based on the relative.
Next Generation Attenuation Models for Central & Eastern US (NGA-East) Stakeholder Workshop: Introduction March 7, 2008 Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER.
Session 1A – Ground Motions and Intensity Measures Paul Somerville Andrew Whittaker Greg Deierlein.
Geologic Time Scale & Fossils Notes Part 1. Rock Types & Fossils There are 3 types of rock: – Igneous, Sedimentary, and Metamorphic – Sedimentary rocks.
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
Lecture 5 Chapter 4. Relationships: Regression Student version.
C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,
Engineering Perspective on Application of Simulated Ground Motions Jonathan P. Stewart & Emel Seyhan University of California, Los Angeles Robert W. Graves.
GROUND MOTION VARIABILITY: COMPARISON OF SURFACE AND DOWNHOLE GROUND MOTIONS Adrian Rodriguez-Marek, Washington State University, USA Fabrice Cotton, LGIT,
GMSV in SEISM Project Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles.
Recognizing and mapping faults using lidar, Google Earth, and field data Anne E. Egger Central Washington University Teaching Structural Geology, Geophysics,
CHYI-TYI LEE, SHANG-YU HSIEH
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
Process for 2007 Maps CA Oct 2006 PacNW Mar 2006 InterMtn West June 2006 CEUS May 2006 National User-Needs Workshop DEC 2006 CA Draft maps (Project 07)
Tri-State Seismic Hazard Mapping -Kentucky Plan
California Earthquake Rupture Model Satisfying Accepted Scaling Laws (SCEC 2010, 1-129) David Jackson, Yan Kagan and Qi Wang Department of Earth and Space.
1 Rosalia Daví 1 Václav Vavryčuk 2 Elli-Maria Charalampidou 2 Grzegorz Kwiatek 1 Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha 2 GFZ German Research.
Repeatable Path Effects on The Standard Deviation for Empirical Ground Motion Models Po-Shen Lin (Institute of geophysics, NCU) Chyi-Tyi Lee (Institute.
Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model Nick Gregor 1, Walter.
Vertical velocities at tide gauges from a completely reprocessed global GPS network of stations: How well do they work? G. Wöppelmann 1, M-N. Bouin 2,
NGA Project Review and Status Norm Abrahamson NGA Workshop #5 March, 2004.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
Probabilistic hazard analysis of earthquake-induced landslides – an example from Kuohsing, Taiwan Liao, Chi-Wen Industrial Technology Research Institute.
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
Novel Approach to Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Modeling Vladimir Graizer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Erol Kalkan California Geological Survey.
Analysis of ground-motion spatial variability at very local site near the source AFIFA IMTIAZ Doctorant ( ), NERA Project.
Paleocurrents: A Window into Geologic History
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
Engineering Geology and Seismology
Exploratory Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

PEER Jonathan P. Stewart University of California, Los Angeles Graduate Students: Yoojoong Choi and Andrew Liu January 18, PEER Annual Meeting Site Categories and Amplification Factors

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Context Conventional PSHA (Cornell, 1968): Attenuation Relationship Derived from PDF f(IM|m,r,…) Described by: - median - standard deviation

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Attenuation Relations Tectonic regime m, r Focal mechanism Site condition Factors affecting attenuation of S a : - Broad site categories

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Amplification Factors Used to adjust moments of attenuation relation Reference site approach –e.g.: Idriss, 1990; Borcherdt and Glassmoyer, 1994; Borcherdt, 2002 –Azimuth and distance corrections –Derived error term

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Amplification Factors Non-reference site approach –Amplification taken as residual from attenuation relation –e.g.: Sokolov, SCEC, this study –Azimuth corrections, event terms –Direct error terms

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Classification Schemes Surface geology

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Classification Schemes NEHRP/V S-30 Reference: Martin (1994)

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Classification Schemes Geotechnical data Reference: Rodriguez- Marek et al. (2001)

2002 PEER Annual Meeting This Study Large strong motion database Leverage new geologic data sources –CDMG mapping –Borehole and geophysical data (e.g., ROSRINE) Reference motions from Abrahamson and Silva (1997) rock attenuation –Directivity correction –Event term correction

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Data Resources Strong motion data –PEER data set (1032 recordings from 51 eqks), up to 1999 Duzce, Turkey event Site classifications –Surface geology 460 age only 240 age + depositional environment 168 age + material texture –NEHRP, 185 sites –Geotechnical data, 183 sites

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Interpretation of Results Data Regression Evidence of nonlinearity –Hypothesis testing –b-value departs from zero by more than its estimation error Distinction between categories –F-test Holocene (all)

2002 PEER Annual Meeting HolocenePleistocene

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Discussion of Results Effect of period Distinct categories for each scheme Comparison to previous studies Inter-category error –Measure of relative effectiveness of classification schemes

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Effect of Period Holocene Age-only

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Surface Geology Holocene lacustrine/marineQuaternary alluvium Tertiary Mesozoic + Igneous Age + Depositional Environment

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Surface Geology Holocene CoarseHolocene Fine Age + Material Texture

2002 PEER Annual Meeting NEHRP B CD

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Geotechnical Data B C DE

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Comparison C D

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Comparison

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Inter-Category Error Terms Individual residual Category residual Scheme residual Inter-category error

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Results: “Soil” Categories

2002 PEER Annual Meeting Final Remarks Desired features of classification schemes: –Minimize dispersion (detailed geology) –Categories have distinct amplification levels (NEHRP) Amplification factors smaller than design standards Further improvements require consideration of basin geometry