Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Advertisements

© 2001 The MITRE Corporation Document Number Here Traffic Flow Management Impact Assessment Research TFM Technical Interchange Meeting 31 October 2001.
Modeling Airport Capacity
Air Traffic Management
Presented to: REACT Workshop By: Jay Merkle Date:25 June 2008 Federal Aviation Administration High Density Airport Time- based RNAV/RNP NextGen/JPDO Demonstrations.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
By: Steve Lang Date: September 2007 Federal Aviation Administration Wake Vortex R&D Status Briefing NBAA Convention.
NextGen GA Fund, LLC A Fund to Accelerate NextGen Equipage Benefits for the General Aviation Operator Community.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
Airspace Concept Evaluation System- State of Development
Delivering NextGen June 5, 2015 Maryland Airport Managers Association Presented by Carmine Gallo, Eastern Regional Administrator Federal Aviation Administration.
Gate-to-Gate Project: Implementing Sequencing, Merging, and Spacing Captain Bob Hilb September 11, 2006.
Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.
Presented to: By: Date: File: apo130\Airport Efficiency\TAER SAER Updated Briefing(2).ppt 1030 Federal Aviation Administration Presentation of System Airport.
1 AvMet Applications, Inc Alexander Bell Dr., Ste. 130 Reston, VA Applying FAA Aviation Weather Metrics Program Research to Operational Benefits.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
02/10/08 NextGen dependence on GPS! Captain Joe Burns Managing Director Flight Standards, Technology, Flight Test United Airlines.
Revised March CSSI, Inc. Headquarters 400 Virginia Avenue, SW Suite 210 Washington, DC fax toll-free.
Performance Based Navigation Industry Forum Issues Workshop Presentation to Industry Forum 18 November 2009.
NAS Acquisition Programs
Exploring Control Strategies in ATC: Implications for Complexity Metrics Jonathan Histon & Prof. R. John Hansman JUP Meeting, June 21-22, 2001.
Federal Aviation Administration Valuation of NextGen Capacity Benefits A Consumer Surplus Approach to the Monetization of NASPAC Results For: INNOVATIONS.
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Federal Aviation Administration Date: July 2011 Terminal Arrival Efficiency Rate (TAER) 101 Metric Explanation.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
Federal Aviation Administration ATO Future Schedule Generation Performance Analysis and Strategy January 27, 2010.
Gate-to-Gate Operations Update Captain Bob Hilb UPS Advanced Flight Systems April 14, 2008.
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation & NextGen workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, Joseph Post Date: December 10th, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration The Modernized.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
FPAW – Weather Forecast Performance Requirements Validation 25 August 2015 Chris Ermatinger, Ops. Research Analyst Aviation Weather Division, Policy and.
PBN Deployment – New Zealand Domestic Airspace CAA PBN Forum November Auckland.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN) Canadian Implementation Presentation to Air Transport Association of Canada 9 November 2010.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.
Harris.com Alex Murray | DCIS Benefits Lead DCIT Brief Data Comm Benefits & Metrics Alignment with DC Program, NIWG, & NAC.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
Banavar Sridhar NASA Ames Research Center Second Annual Workshop
Baseline Future Scenarios for JPDO Evaluation and Analysis March 18, 2005 (408) Matthew Blake.
© 2015 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. Dr. Christine Taylor Principal Simulation and Modeling Engineer 25 August 2015 Automation to Support.
NextGen Next Generation Air Transportation System
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-65/PIA-1 Optimization of Approach Procedures Including Vertical Guidance.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Implementation Team (DCIT) DCIT En Route Services Survey Results A Review 5/8/2013.
© 2015 Noblis, Inc. Jonathan Hammer Modeling for Verification and Validation Workshop, FAA WJHTC Monte Carlo Modeling Techniques in FAA Systems Development.
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
Joint Planning & Development Office Evaluations & Analysis Preliminary Scenario Analyses Strategy Assessment to Provide a Basis for Prioritizing Investments.
NY/NJ/PHL Metropolitan Area Airspace Redesign Project and Implementation Update Presentation to: Congressional Staffers By: Steve Kelley, Airspace Redesign.
William C. Withycombe March 14, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Pacific Aviation Directors Workshop State of the FAA.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration New York Center System Operations Traffic Flow Management Operations Weather Users Workshop Tom.
Presented to: Friends of Aviation Weather Forum By: Dan Citrenbaum, FAA, Investment Planning and Analysis Office, Operations Research Group Date: October.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
Performance Based Navigation: Navigation Specifications
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) Aviation System Block Upgrade (ASBU)
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Ops Specs The performance data for takeoff and landing an aircraft can be obtained from the aircraft's flight manual or pilot's operating handbook. The.
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen Modeling in NASPAC

Federal Aviation Administration 2 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Modernized NASPAC Environment Fleet Evolution Trajectory Module Sector Crossings Core Queuing Model Capacity Scheduler Future Schedule Generato r Output Parser Itinerary Generation Industry/ Regulatory Response GDP Generator Preprocessor (Demand) Output Parser Preprocessor ( Capacity)

Federal Aviation Administration 3 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 ETMS TAF Modernized NASPAC Environment Wx = weather TAF = Terminal Area Forecast MAP = Monitor Alert Parameter ETMS = Enhanced Traffic Management System Pareto Curves MAP Values Wx Flight Table Airport Table Sector Table Fleet Evolution Unconstrained Traj.-Based Forecast (2D) Constrained Traj.-Based Forecast (2D) Trajectory Module 4D Trajectories Sector Crossings Core Queuing Model Delay Wx Time dependent Airport Capacities Time dependent Sector Capacities Unsatisfied Demand Capacity Scheduler Future Schedule Generator Output Parser Itinerary Generation Industry/ Regulatory Response Wind Field Sector Geometries Fuel Burn Rate Δ Fuel Burn Flight Delays Fleet Forecast GDP Generator Flow Restriction Defns & Caps

Federal Aviation Administration 4 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Airport Capacity Scheduler Modeling airport capacity –Previously Used ceiling and visibility to determine VMC, MMC, and IMC conditions and apply associated capacity curve –Now Considers wind speed, wind direction, and time of day Use special condition curves –Configuration specific –Wake Turbulence Mitigation for Departures (WTMD)

Federal Aviation Administration 5 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Previously –No GDP module Now –GDP generator identifies GDPs and assigns expected departure clearance times Given flight times and weather dependent airport capacities Flights assigned arrival slot based on priority –Distance based tiers –International flights exempt –Airport specific GDP triggers Max flight delay Max queue length Next –Airline response and cancellation module –Probabilistic GDP triggers –Probabilistic weather forecast Ground Delay Program (GDP) Generator

Federal Aviation Administration 6 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Model Q-Routes –Previously No special treatment –Now Allow equipped flights, between certain city pairs to fly special routes Impose aircraft separation standards using restrictions Performance Based Navigation (PBN)

Federal Aviation Administration 7 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Oceanic Separation Previously –Flights flew unconstrained in oceanic airspace Now –Oceanic separation standards imposed using static restrictions –Considers lead/following aircraft type/equipage to determine separation Next –Incorporate altitude restrictions –Oceanic in-trail climb and descent ZOA

Federal Aviation Administration 8 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Standard Terminal Arrival Routes (STARs) –Previously All flights had continuous descent arrivals Estimated time/fuel inefficiencies by historical data analysis –Now Assign each flight to a STAR –based on route and equipage Define more detailed 4-D trajectory –with altitude restrictions Standard Instrument Departures (SIDs) –Similar technique implemented SIDs and STARs

Federal Aviation Administration 9 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Previously –Baseline equipment data used throughout forecast Soon –Evolve future fleet equipment to meet forecast –Equipment categories include Datacomm ADS-B In and Out PBN: RNAV and RNP Equipage Evolution Notional PBN Forecast Notional ADS-B Forecast

Federal Aviation Administration 10 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010 Next Steps Incorporate Traffic Flow Management (TFM) –Airspace Flow Programs Improve Terminal Approach Control (TRACON) –Update and automate arrival fix and departure fix flows –Incorporate fix balancing Improve local and en-route weather effects –Model severe IMC conditions Incorporate dynamic events –Dynamic rerouting, dynamic sectorization Include Monte Carlo simulation capability –Re-factored source code Validation, validation, validation

Federal Aviation Administration 11 NextGen Modeling in NASPAC 28 January 2010