ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

ACCREDITATION Community Day February 1, Significance of Accreditation Accreditation – Accreditation – Allows the students at KC to apply for Federal.
Cedarville University Accreditation Self-Study Plan Presented by Dr. Thomas Mach.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
World’s Largest Educational Community
UMR’s Accreditation Self-Study. The Value of Accreditation  Institutional Reputation  Standard of Quality  Vehicle for Self Improvement  Transferability.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools Continuing Accreditation 2005 Self-Study and Site Visit.
The Role of the National Authority for Quality Assurance and Accreditation (NAQAAE) in Egyptian Education   The National Authority for Quality Assurance.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
Institutional Accreditation: An Overview HLC Accreditation Kick-Off March 24, 2006.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
Institutional Accreditation Review by Christine M. Ladisch Vice Provost for Academic Affairs Getting Prepared:
THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES The Higher Learning Commission.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Outline Introduction to accreditation by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) The criteria and process for accreditation.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Linda J. HLC Assessment Coordinator/AQIP Liaison.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Incorporating Student Engagement into the Accreditation Process April 11, 2010.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
University-wide Accreditation Academic Leadership Program February 18, 2010.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
Banner County Schools Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Amy Trauernicht Stacy McDaniel Troy Lurz Maribeth Moore Kaci Kearns Dan Spatzierath.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
1 SCU’s WASC Reaccreditation Diane Jonte-Pace, Self Study Steering Committee Chair Don Dodson, Academic Liaison Officer Winter 2007.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Mission and Accreditation Strategic Planning Steering Committee March 9, 2009 Dr. Richard Beck.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Strategic Planning for the Department of Health and Human Performance Iowa State University T. Gilmour Reeve Director of Strategic Planning Office of the.
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.
Preparing for the Future Criterion 2 Open Forum March 30, 2006.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Getting Ready for the Higher Learning Commission (NCA) July 2011 Dr. Linda Johnson HLC/Assessment Coordinator/AQIP Liaison Southeast Technical Institute.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
3A – The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible 3B --
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Planning with the Five Criteria Ozarka College This PowerPoint was made in 2008 and slightly updated in August It explains the current yearly planning.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Accreditation Who does it? Why do it? How is it done?
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010
University Community Briefing
Task Force Orientation
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Presentation transcript:

ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning - Improve the school’s programs and operations that support student learning

WHO CERTIFIES North Central Association of Schools and Colleges (NCA founded in 1895) North Central Association of Schools and Colleges (NCA founded in 1895) –Purpose: Encourage & support cooperative relationships among member schools colleges and universities (over 1000 in 19 states) –The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the NCA grants the accreditation

NCA AREA OF OPERATIONS

FOCUS ASSESS the effectiveness of the scope and quality of student learning ASSESS the effectiveness of the scope and quality of student learning Make recommendations for improvement Make recommendations for improvement ASSIST the institution in carrying out improvements to operational effectiveness ASSIST the institution in carrying out improvements to operational effectiveness

WHY DOES A SCHOOL NEED ACCREDITATION? Assures the community that the purpose and scope of its’ education programs are viable and effective. Assures the community that the purpose and scope of its’ education programs are viable and effective. Validates the integrity of a school’s programs and its’ transcripts Validates the integrity of a school’s programs and its’ transcripts Fosters continual improvement efforts for programs that support student learning Fosters continual improvement efforts for programs that support student learning

ACCREDITATION HELPS FOSTER: Course transfer between institutions Course transfer between institutions Scholarships – often granted only for attendance at accredited schools Scholarships – often granted only for attendance at accredited schools Acceptance of students to programs at the next level Acceptance of students to programs at the next level Influences teacher salary schedule Influences teacher salary schedule

ACCREDITATION EXPECTS: Clear and appropriate mission/goal statements Clear and appropriate mission/goal statements High achievement of students High achievement of students Effective and varied assessments Effective and varied assessments Plans that are aligned to findings Plans that are aligned to findings Ongoing improvement and accountability Ongoing improvement and accountability Total involvement and collaboration Total involvement and collaboration

OUR ASSESSMENT WILL BE BASED ON: Our mission and programs and the HLC’s standards for evidence of: Our mission and programs and the HLC’s standards for evidence of: –Student learning –Governance and administration –Student services –Financial stability –Resources: Faculty, staff, capital, technology, etc..

CONT’D Every process and aspect of institutional operations Every process and aspect of institutional operations Relationships with internal and external constituencies Relationships with internal and external constituencies

STEPS IN THE ACCREDITATION PROCESS Annual reports to the HLC Annual reports to the HLC Multiyear self study process Multiyear self study process –A process for critical self evaluation –Needs to be open, transparent and should engage the entire college and all constituencies –1. Self study 2. Site visit 3. Follow up

EVERYONE’S INVOLVED? All stakeholders All stakeholders –Administration –Staff –Faculty –Students –Alumni –Board –The community

SPECIFIC ROLES Steering Committee Steering Committee Criterion subcommittees Criterion subcommittees –Five criterion which went into effect in 2005 Evaluative writers Evaluative writers Hospitality coordinators Hospitality coordinators

FIVE CRITERION 2. Preparing for the future 3. Student Learning 4. Acquisition, discovery, & applied knowledge 5. Engagement & Service 1. Mission & Integrity

UNDER THE FIVE CRITERIA 21 Core components 21 Core components –Four to five under each criteria Four themes or effectiveness indicators Four themes or effectiveness indicators This provides the structure and back drop for the self study This provides the structure and back drop for the self study

FOUR THEMES The FUTURE oriented organization The FUTURE oriented organization The LEARNING FOCUSED organization The LEARNING FOCUSED organization The CONNECTED organization The CONNECTED organization The DISTINCTIVE organization The DISTINCTIVE organization

FUTURE-ORIENTED Our key theme for criterion two Our key theme for criterion two –Engages in planning –Driven by the mission –Accommodates social and economic change –Focuses on future needs of the constituents –Integrates new technology

FUTURE Visualize what will be different Visualize what will be different –One year from now –Two years from now –Three years from now –Further down the road

1. MISSION AND INTEGRITY The organization operated with integrity to ensure fulfillment of its’ mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students The organization operated with integrity to ensure fulfillment of its’ mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students

2. PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE The organization’s allocation of resources and its’ processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its’ capacity to fulfill its’ mission, improve the quality of its’ education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities The organization’s allocation of resources and its’ processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its’ capacity to fulfill its’ mission, improve the quality of its’ education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities

3. STUDENT LEARNING & EFFECTIVE TEACHING The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates fulfillment of its’ educational mission The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates fulfillment of its’ educational mission

4. ACQUISITION, DISCOVERY, & APPLYING KNOWLEDGE The organization promotes a culture of learning for faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with the mission The organization promotes a culture of learning for faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with the mission

5. ENGAGEMENT & SERVICE The organization identifies its’ constituents and serves them in ways mutually valued The organization identifies its’ constituents and serves them in ways mutually valued

BACK TO CRITERION TWO Four core components Four core components –2a: The organization realistically prepares for a future shaped by multiple societal and economic trends –2b: The organization’s resource base supports its’ educational programs and its’ plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future

TWO CONT’D –2c: The organization’s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly informs strategies for continuous improvement –2d: All levels of planning align with the organization’s mission, thereby enhancing its’ capacity to fulfill that mission

WHAT DO WE DO? Assign teams and tasks Assign teams and tasks Dedicate time Dedicate time Answer criteria questions with short answers or bullet phrases Answer criteria questions with short answers or bullet phrases Find evidence and documentation Find evidence and documentation Examples Examples Consolidate Consolidate Write Write

NEED TEAM WORK To do until we meet: To do until we meet: –Find evidence –What do we expect in the future? –How are we planning to accommodate? –How will we budget to meet expected needs? –How have we modified or changed as a reaction to feedback/assessment

THANKS FOR YOUR TIME Questions/discussion Questions/discussion