Samantha Steckel Mughil Muthupari Aparna Natarajan Julia Roh 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Advertisements

UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Alex Aueron, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
BYU Rocket Team Special thanks to:
CAP Model Rocketry Program.  1. MATERIALS. I will use only lightweight, non-metal parts for the nose, body and fins of my rocket.  2. MOTORS. I will.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
How to Make a Model Rocket
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Launch Lug – helps to guide the rocket upward until it reaches enough velocity for the fins to engage. Parachute – assists in the safe recovery of the.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Model Rocketry Mr. Capella Technology Education. Parts of a Model Rocket n Nose cone n Body tube n Fins n Launch lug
Rocketry 101 Jeremy Young American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics at UCF.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Launch Procedures No-Go Criteria 1.Winds exceeding 10 knots steady from any direction 2.Cloud ceiling below 10,000 ft AGL 3.Data acquisition systems not.
Applied Software Project Management Andrew Stellman & Jennifer Greene Applied Software Project Management Applied Software.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocketeering Sub-space Flight Made Easy. History of Rocket Technology  First occurrence in recorded history places rockets in China during the third.
Team 7139 Madison West High School, WI
2009 Team America Rocketry Competition Some Thoughts on Having a Successful TARC Experience.
Types of Rockets Avionics Phases of Flight Materials Home Page High Powered Rocketry End Show.
Science Fiction. Rocket flight Centre of Mass or Centre of Gravity (CM or CG) Centre of mass is the mean or central location of all the mass of an object.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
Fun With Physics Intersession By: Richie Durbin. Catapult  The catapult was the first project. This project had some success, but the catapult did not.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
TARCkan Nasir Almasri Audrey Kelly Kari Schulz. Overview Problem Statement Timeline Background Scope Brainstorming & Research Criteria Constraints Explore.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
TARCkan Nasir Almasri Audrey Kelly Kari Schulz. Overview Problem Statement Timeline Background Scope Brainstorming & Research Criteria Constraints Explore.
Brain Surgery and Rocket Science By Howard Botting and Benjamin Mitchell.
Rockets Applied Science Fall 08 Mrs. Dickerson.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team Rockville, Maryland Team America Rocketry Challenge Final Fly-Off Presentation May 12, 2012.
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Expectations vs. Reality The Banshee. Flight Data Motor – J800T, 1280ns Total Impulse, 1.9 sec burn time Apogee – seconds Main – 697.
Explorer Post 1010 Team 8186 Research P resentation Ben Fann, Mattie Bryant, Disa Yu, Kathleen Yu Samantha Steckel, Becca Foster, Jon Boruch.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
Model Rocketry Saturn Phase
Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team 8296 Chris Fann Ronnie Foreman Phil Manougian Amanda Steckel.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
Neelam Patel Brian Reyes David Wade ????? Mystery Member ????? STATUS UPDATE TEAM ALPHA.
UPDATE #2.  The predicted altitude was ~9500 feet.  Actual altitude was ~11960 feet.  After investigation the error was found in the simulated weight.
Bernadette Cannon Daniel Roh Daniel Du. Design Team America Rocketry Challenge’s goal is to get a model rocket to fly to a height of exactly 825 feet.
Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team 8296 Chris Fann Ronnie Foreman Phil Manougian Amanda Steckel.
Aerospace Engineering Jerry &Yaquelin. Article
Egg-O-Naut. Purpose The purpose of this project is to practice the process of Engineering Design.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
High Altitude Rocket Project School of Science and Engineering | Integrated Project Mjölnir.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – reorder the slides and/or make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least.
* 07/16/96 Propulsion Lab 6 Winter Quarter *.
Critical Design Review Presentation
Nasir Almasri Audrey Kelly Kari Schulz
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Eric building the fin mount.
November 7, 2014.
Team Name Preliminary Design Review (this is a bare-bones template – reorder the slides and/or make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least.
Mr. Capella Technology Education
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW
Design Review 4 Chris Bredberg, Ryan Dwyer, Kjell Gordon
November 7, 2014.
Team Name Round 2 Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – reorder the slides and/or make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address.
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 TEKNOFEST ROCKET CONTEST PRELIMINARY DESİGN REPORT (PDR)
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Skills Practice pg 265 – 270 A relation is a set of ordered pairs while a function is a special type of relation where each input has one unique output.
Presentation transcript:

Samantha Steckel Mughil Muthupari Aparna Natarajan Julia Roh 1

 We used OpenRocket to design our rocket.  We used the same simple booster design from last year.  Used dremels, saws, sanders, and manpower to construct our rocket.  We used a round fin design.  When our rocket was damaged by a tree, we had to use our backup rocket 2

 We tried several parachute designs, connecting two chutes at different places.  We tried 12 inch chutes, but then switched to 15 inch chutes  Initially we used an E20-7W single use motor, but didn’t get high enough.  Putting in past experience and the weight, we selected our E28-7T motor.  We had to the learn to assemble the reloadable motor. 3

 We each put in our own individual input to making the fins and building the body.  We each contributed to the laborious process of sanding.  For the design of the rocket to be cohesive, we all coordinated our ideas and attended all the launches.  Recovery from a tree took some special skills.  Demonstrated rockets at USA Science & Engineering Festival 4

 Our flight altitudes were too high, we adjusted the weight of our rocket (about one gram for three feet)  We tested, and repeated the process until scores improved.  We plotted the altimeter data and reviewed the results at meetings the following week. 5

 We learned that lot number for engines is very important.  3 launches done with engines from the same lot showed consistent data across them. 6 DateRocketEngineRailRecoveryWeightResultsComments 12/28/13Green flight 2E28-7T7ft 5d2-15" Round415g826ft, Team sec 2/17/14Green flight 1E28-7T7ft 0d2-15" Round421g831ft, Team ec 2/17/14Green flight 2E28-7T7ft 0d2-15" Round423g822ft,Qualification Score: Team sec 3/15/14Green flight 1E28-7T7ft 6d2-15" Round419g788ft, Team ec 3/15/14Green flight 2E28-7T7ft 6d2-15" Round417g772ft, Team sec 3/28/14Green flight 1E28-7T7ft 3d2-15" Round408g745ft, Team ec 3/28/14Green flight 2E28-7T7ft 3d2-15" Round406g826ft, Team sec 3/29/14Green flight 1E28-7T7ft 0d2-15" Round405g816ft,Qualification Score: 9.0 Team sec 3/29/14Green flight 2E28-7T7ft 0d2-15" Round406g810ft,Qualification Score: Team sec Same lot

 We kept a close eye on weather patterns.  There seemed to be less wind when we launched early. 7