2013-2014 ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Advertisements

Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Kings Mountain Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
10/17/2007GZHANG GCSNC C:\Presentation\2008\GEA_ Tough Accountability Situation Great GCS Achievement P resentation for Guilford Education.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.
+ Utah Comprehensive Accountability System (UCAS) 1 Hal Sanderson, Ph.D. Research and Assessment August 21,
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Accountability Services North Carolina Department of Public Instruction January 14, 2015 School Performance Grades.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Math Department Team Leaders’ Meeting.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
Accountability Updates NCAEE Region 1 May 2, 2014 M. E. (Butch) Hudson, Jr. Regional Accountability Coordinator Accountability Region 4.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
1 Superintendents’ Quarterly Meeting A Next Generation Accountability Model March 25, 2010.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Havelock High School Faculty Meeting September 10, 2014.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.
Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.
NHCS READY Report October READY Annual Report Contents Growth Proficiency: Detail for Grades 3- 8 and High School Progress: Annual Measurable Objectives.
Testing Updates Updates New assessments in all areas Grades 3 – 8 ELA/Math Alternate Assessments - Online New Accountability Model Status,
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Globalization. Innovation. Graduation.  Transition to Five Achievement Levels  School Performance Grades (A–F)  EVAAS as a Tool NC READY ACCOUNTABILITY.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Communication Webinar:
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
Accountability Update
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
State Assessment Update
Spencer County Public Schools
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services

Transition to 5 Achievement Levels October 2013 State Board of Education adopted four academic achievement levels with descriptors March 2014 State Board of Education adopted an additional academic achievement level for a total of five levels Level 1: Limited Command Level 2: Partial Command Level 3: Sufficient Command (State Proficiency Standard) Level 4: Solid Command (College & Career Readiness) Level 5: Superior Command (College & Career Readiness)

Two Reporting Standards GLP - Grade Level Proficiency Achievement Levels 3 and above Used in School Performance Grades Present in all accountability reporting and NC School Report Card Is not used in AMO calculations

Two Reporting Standards CCR - College & Career Readiness Achievement Levels 4 and 5 Present in all accountability reporting and NC School Report Card Used for annual measurable objective (AMO) calculations (Baseline 2012–13 was CCR)

Understanding the Five Achievement Levels Scale score ranges for EOY assessments did not change New level III was created from the scale score range that met the standard error of measurement (SEM) for Level II’s

EOG / EOC Scale Score Distribution Prior to March 2014 Level I

EOG / EOC Scale Score Distribution Prior to READY Model Level II Standard Error of Measure

EOG / EOC Scale Score Distribution In March 2014 New Level III

EOG / EOC Scale Score Distribution After March 2014 Level I

New Achievement Level III Identifies students who are prepared for the next grade but do not meet the college and career readiness standard. Students are grade level proficient for READY accountability, but NOT proficient for College Career Readiness and AMOs.

Accountability Reporting Report On Grade Level Proficiency (Level III and above) College and Career Readiness (Level IV and above) NC Report Card   READY Accountability   Individual Student Reports   Read to Achieve  School Performance Grades  AMOs 

Reporting Comparisons 2012–13 College and Career Readiness at Level 3 and above 2013–14 College and Career Readiness (CCR) at Level 4 and above AND State Proficiency (GLP) at Level 3 and above

READING Grades Levels III & IV Levels IV & V Levels III-V

Levels III & IV Levels IV & V Levels III-V More Accurate Comparison Includes Level II Standard Error (SEM) READING Grades 3 - 5

School Performance Indicators Elementary/Middle  EOG Math  EOG Reading/ELA  EOG Science  EOC Math I High School  Biology  English II  Math I  ACT  Math Course Rigor  ACT WorkKeys  Graduation Rate

Performance Composite EOG/EOC Overall Percent Proficiency

Math % of Students Proficient in Mathematics (Grades 3-8)

Reading/ELA % of Students Proficient in Reading (Grades 3-8)

Science % of Students Proficient in Science (Grades 5 & 8)

Biology % of Students Proficient in Biology

English II % of Students Proficient in English II

Math I % of Students Proficient in Math I

ACT % of students that met minimum UNC admissions standard (Composite score of 17)

Work Keys % of students that scored Silver level or better

Cohort Graduation Rate 4-year Cohort Graduation Percentages

GROWTH Schools that make progress similar to the progress at an average school in the State. Growth is reported as: Met Exceeded Did Not Meet

Growth Summary WSFCS50 of 71 (70.5%)48 of 70 (68.6%) Elementary32 of 42 (76.2%)33 of 42 (78.6%) Middle9 of 14 (64.4%)6 of 13 (46.2%) High11 of 15 (73.3%)6 of 12 (50.0%) CompositeN/A3 of 3 (100%) * 11 schools did not meet the criteria for the calculation of a school-wide growth score in

Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools EVAAS Growth Status

Elementary Schools EVAAS Growth Status

Middle Schools EVAAS Growth Status

High Schools EVAAS Growth Status

AMOs Annual Measurable Objectives

AMO Summary Subject# Met# TargPct %# Met# TargPct % RD MA SCI ENG II BIO MATH I CY EOC ATTEND CGR ACT WKKEYS MCR TOTAL

Reading Sub-group Proficiencies in Reading (Grades 3-8) *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Mathematics Sub-group Proficiencies in Mathematics (Grades 3-8) *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Science Sub-group Proficiencies in Science (Grades 5 & 8) *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Reading Grade 10 Sub-group Proficiencies in English II *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Math Grade 10 Sub-group Proficiencies in Math I *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Science Grade 11 Sub-group Proficiencies in Biology *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

ACT % of Students Scoring a Composite Score of 17 or Higher % of Students Scoring a Composite Score of 17 or Higher *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

ACT WorkKeys CTE Concentrators Earning Minimum NCRC Silver *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Math Course Rigor % of Graduates Earning Credit in Math III / Algebra II *AMO proficiency targets are in green.

Cohort Graduation Rate % of Student Graduating in 4 Years

Questions?