Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Advertisements

Gareth Berry University of Reading, UK. Evaluation of some daytime boundary layer forecast techniques. Undergraduate project presentation.
AREP GAW Section 14 – Daily Air Quality Forecast Operations 1 Overview of Course Course Content: Background –Introduction and Overview of Course –What.
2. The WAM Model: Solves energy balance equation, including Snonlin
ECMWF Training Course 2005 slide 1 Forecast sensitivity to Observation Carla Cardinali.
Modelling complexity in the upper atmosphere using GPS data Chris Budd, Cathryn Mitchell, Paul Spencer Bath Institute for Complex Systems, University of.
Bristol Wind-blown plume model Mark Woodhouse, Andrew Hogg, Jeremy Phillips and Steve Sparks.
Integral models of volcanic plumes in a cross wind Mark Woodhouse 1 with Andrew Hogg 1, Jeremy Phillips 2 & Steve Sparks 2 1 School of Mathematics 2 School.
Research Questions How is the chemical composition* of the aerosol burden in Northern Europe modulated? –What are the chemical properties of the burden.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.
Observations of volcanic ash by lidar and MODIS Robin Hogan University of Reading Last updated: 20 April 2010.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
Robin Hogan, Chris Westbrook University of Reading Lin Tian NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phil Brown Met Office Why it is important that ice particles.
© University of Reading 2007www.reading.ac.uk Sting Jets in severe Northern European Windstoms Suzanne Gray, Oscar Martinez-Alvarado, Laura Baker (Univ.
Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan OConnor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (DYMECS) University: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein, Kirsty Hanley, John Nicol Met Office:
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Robin Hogan & Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology University of Reading UK Parameterizing ice cloud inhomogeneity and the overlap of inhomogeneities.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Anthony Illingworth Department of Meteorology, University of Reading UK PDFs of humidity and cloud water content from Raman lidar.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
INVESTIGATION OF LOCAL STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TURBULENT WIND FLOW IN ATMOSPHERE BOUNDARY LAYER WITH OBSTACLES Yuriy Nekrasov, Sergey Turbin.
Moisture Transport in Baroclinic Waves Ian Boutle a, Stephen Belcher a, Bob Plant a Bob Beare b, Andy Brown c 24 April 2014.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
FE Review for Environmental Engineering Problems, problems, problems Presented by L.R. Chevalier, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
P LUME R ISE. P URPOSE OF A IR Q UALITY M ODELING Policy Analysis Regional Planning Supplementary Control Systems / Air Quality Prediction System Emergency.
 Depth Into the earth Surface of the earth Distance along the fault plane 100 km (60 miles) Slip on an earthquake fault START.
National Institute of Environmental Research Atmospheric Physics Division National Institute of Environmental Research Fax: ,
Page 1© Crown copyright Simulation of radar reflectivities in the UK Met Office model: comparison with CloudSat Data Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, M.E. Brooks.
The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature
Use of Lidar Backscatter to Determine the PBL Heights in New York City, NY Jia-Yeong Ku, Chris Hogrefe, Gopal Sistla New York State Department of Environmental.
Running a model's adjoint to obtain derivatives, while more efficient and accurate than other methods, such as the finite difference method, is a computationally.
Future impacts on sewer systems in England and Wales Overview of a project for Ofwat Presented to the Water Statistics Group Andrew Heather and Adam Grove.
Tutorial: Understanding the normal curve. Gauss Next mouse click.
1 Atmospheric models for damage costs TRADD, part 2 Ari Rabl, ARMINES/Ecole des Mines de Paris, November 2013 There are many different models for atmospheric.
Cloud Radar in Space: CloudSat While TRMM has been a successful precipitation radar, its dBZ minimum detectable signal does not allow views of light.
For the Lesson: Eta Characteristics, Biases, and Usage December 1998 ETA-32 MODEL CHARACTERISTICS.
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
Reconstructing the Emission Height of Volcanic SO2 from Back Trajectories: Comparison of Explosive and Effusive Eruptions Modeling trace gas transport.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
© University of Reading 2007www.reading.ac.uk RMetS Student Conference, Manchester September 2008 Boundary layer ventilation by mid-latitude cyclones Victoria.
Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 1 Helen Dacre 1, Alan Grant 1, Natalie Harvey 1, Helen Webster 2, Ben Johnson 2, David Thomson.
(#694) Monitoring the Hawaii Volcano Plume From Satellite By John Porter School of Ocean Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu,
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
Observations of volcanic ash by lidar, MODIS and surface air-quality measurements Robin Hogan University of Reading Last updated: 18 April 2010.
Simulation of Summertime Wind Speed at Turbine Hub Height: Model Sensitivities to Speed and Shear Characteristics Shannon L. Rabideau, Daniel A. Rajewski,
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Eyjafjallajökull eruption: How well were the volcanic ash clouds predicted? Helen Dacre and Alan Grant Robin.
Reducing the risk of volcanic ash to aviation Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
© University of Reading 2006www.reading.ac.uk11 April 2008 Boundary layer ventilation by baroclinic systems Victoria Sinclair Suzanne Gray & Stephen Belcher.
Atmospheric Lifetime and the Range of PM2.5 Transport Background and Rationale Atmospheric Residence Time and Spatial Scales Residence Time Dependence.
The evaluation of updrafts in the Unified Model using single-Doppler radar measurements Nicol JC a, Hogan RJ b, Stein THM b, Hanley KE c, Lean HW c, Plant.
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Convective Scale Modelling Humphrey Lean et. al
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Lidar Measurement Accuracy under Complex Wind Flow in Use for Wind Farm Projects Matthieu Boquet, Mehdi Machta, Jean-Marc Thevenoud
John Marsham and Steven Dobbie
Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
Presentation transcript:

Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are emitted at the source is (a) 3-3.5km, (b) 4-4.5km, (c) 5-5.5km and (d) 6-6.5km. The height at which ash is emitted into atmosphere influences the plume evolution as wind speed and direction vary with height. The operational model assumes a uniform distribution of ash from the summit to the plume height to account for a fluctuating plume. Emitting ash in layers at decreasing heights above volcano decreases the plume depth and width and delays the arrival time over Chilbolton. Particle size distribution at source Mass concentration from 0-12km at 00UTC on16/04/10 for (a) 0-30 μ m (b) μm (c) μ m diameter particles Time-height plots of mass concentration for particle size distribution (a) operational, (b) more fine particles. Particle size distribution influences plume evolution as coarse particles have greater fall speeds than fine particles. Particles with diameter > 100μm fall out within 1000km of volcano. Operational model uses a particle size distribution with 20% of mass in 3-10μm range and 70% of mass in 10-30μm range (distribution A). Emitting a larger proportion of fine particles increases the peak mass concentration and the altitude of the centre of mass over Chilbolton. How sensitive are NAME ash plume forecasts to input source characteristics? Helen Dacre, Robin Hogan, Stephen Belcher, University of Reading, UK Introduction The Eyjafjöll volcano erupted on 14/04/10 causing widespread disruption. The Met Office dispersion model, NAME, is used to predict the evolution of the ash plume. The accuracy of these predictions depends heavily on the input of accurate source characteristics. The aim of this work is to analyse the sensitivity of the NAME model results to uncertainty in the input source characteristics. Case Study: 16 th April 2010 A high-pressure system was located over the UK and the north Atlantic and a low-pressure system was located over northern Europe. The ash plume was observed by a ground-based lidars at Chilbolton. Overview Observed Mass Concentration Time-height plot of mass concentration determined from a combination of lidar retrievals and sun photometer measurements at Chilbolton from 10-18UTC on 16/04/10. The lidar observes the ash plume with a depth of 3km, width of 500m and arrival time at 12UTC on 16/04/10. Peak concentrations of 800μg m -3 are observed at a height of 1.8km Conclusions Vertical and horizontal structure of ash plume predicted by NAME model is very sensitive to height at which ash is emitted above volcano and is also to sensitive to particle size distribution. Magnitude of mass concentration is determined by the %of mass in sub 100μm range. Comparison with observations suggests between 1 and 10% of total emitted mass is contained in this range. Synoptic Analysis 00UTC 16/04/10 Emission rate of source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton for varying mass flux in the sub 100 μ m range, (a)10 6 kg/s (operational), (b) 10 5 kg/s and (c)10 4 kg/s. The mass flux attributed to the sub 100μm range determines the magnitude of the mass concentration contours. An empirical relationship is used to determine the emission rate H = 0:365M 0:225, where H (km) is the maximum plume height above the summit an M is the total emission rate (kg/s). For an initial plume height of 8.5km above the summit, this implies a total emission rate of ~ 10 6 kg/s. The mass concentration over Chilbolton scales linearly with the percentage of the total mass flux in the sub 100μm range. Initially the ash plume is advected SE from Iceland towards Europe. After 24 hours the ash plume diverges; one branch is advected around the high-pressure system whilst another branch is advected around the low-pressure system. During the16/04/10 the anti-cyclonic branch of the ash plume was advected over the UK. The vertically slanted structure observed by the lidar is captured by the NAME model and is a result of vertical wind shear. Mass concentration at 00UTC on 16/04/10. (Left) average concentration from 0-12km. (Right) vertical cross- section taken from o N and at 2 o W. Note the contours are factors of 10 concentrations in arbitrary units. Lidar backscatter 10-18UTC 16/04/10 Chilbolton