Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Advertisements

What do politicians really need to know? Jan A. Martinsen Norwegian Public Roads Administration Presentation on TRB’s International symposium on road pricing.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
I-15 MANAGED LANES Building on Success Institute of Transportation Studies’ Center for Urban Infrastructure March 7, 2003.
Norwegian Public Roads Administration VIKING PMB Lillehammer 9-10 February 2004 Host project presentation: Two recent milestones for Norwegian EFC, National.
Austrian Ministry of Transport, Innovation and Technology Barcelona, April 2008 Charging of heavy vehicles in Austria Experience and View.
Improving the Urban Public Transport in Developing Countries: The Design of a New Integrated System in Santiago de Chile Antonio Gschwender
GE541 Economic Geography of Transport October 30th.
Tolling and Congestion Charging in Norway Presentation at the NFP/NI Workshop Frankfurt April 7, 2011 Chief Engineer Bjørn Sandelien Norwegian Public Roads.
CONGESTION PRICING Traffic Solution or Tax Scheme?
The effects of major toll-road financed investments in private and public transport infrastructure on public transport – the “Oslo package” Thredbo conference.
1 Questioning the measurement of environmental taxes Annegrete Bruvoll Energy and environmental economics Research Department, Statistics Norway Environmental.
Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.
CONGESTION CHARGING AND PRICING Drawing by Ruairi O Brien CONGESTION CHARGING AND PRICING.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
Norman W. Garrick Travel Flow Data Some Basic Concepts Good travel flow data for all modes of travel is important for transportation planning and design.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Maurizio Tomassini S.T.A.- The Mobility Agency of the City of Rome Final conference Bruxelles, 13 December 2002 Final conference Bruxelles, 13 December.
A Very Big Experiment Congestion Charging in London Peter Jones Transport Studies Group University of Westminster.
URBAN ROAD PRICING: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE Sittha Jaensirisak (PhD) Assistant Professor / Head of department Department of Civil Engineering Ubon-Ratchathani.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
The London Congestion Charge. Facts Traffic speed in central London had fallen more that 20% since the 1960s (14.2 mph to 10mph) I n 1998 drivers in inner.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
Paul Roberts – TIF Technical Manager Presentation to the TPS – 3 June 2009.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Seminar 23rd November 2001 Other Policies: Demand Management & Highway Investment Professor Marcial Echenique.
RAC Foundation Pricing, planning and new technology. Are they alternatives? Sir Christopher Foster RAC Foundation for Motoring 23July 2004 To the Conference.
Towards sustainable urban freight transport Some reflections with results from RENAISSANCE Barry Ubbels (Panteia/NEA) Rotterdam, 12 October 2012.
PRICING Transparencies 2003 EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL.
TRANSPORT INNOVATION FUND Stephen McFarlane Regional & Local Transport Delivery - DfT.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Why reform transport prices? An overview of European transport infrastructure charging policy and research Chris Nash, Bryan Matthews and Batool Menaz.
Norwegian Public Roads Administration Oslo Toll Ring Experiences Overall reduction in traffic: 3-5% Growth in public transport: 6-9% Situation back to.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Cordon charges and the use of revenue – a case study of Edinburgh Prof Chris Nash Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds Revenue use from.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Financing and regulating highway construction in Scandinavia – experiences and perspectives Svein Bråthen Molde University College
PLUTO FOR WINDOWS P lanning L and U se and T ransport O ptions Dr. Csaba OROSZ associate Prof. Department. of Highway and Railway Engineering, BUTE.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
Evaluating the Impacts of Real Time Passenger Information and Bus Signal Priority in Trondheim Morten Welde, Norwegian Public Roads Administration Trond.
W. Suchorzewski, WUT, th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw.
ECOPLAN 1 Case Study Switzerland: Railway Investment Fund Stefan Suter ECOPLAN, Economic Research and Policy Consultancy REVENUE Final Conference Brussels,
Key problems and priorities in urban transport sector in SEE Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest,
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
More on supply and demand relationships. Characteristics of congestion  Unlike the production of other goods, in transportation consumers provide their.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “It’s time…New Zealand extended charging for public infrastructure” Proponent: Geoff Cooper.
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
EMTA General Meeting in Copenhagen, 19 April 2013 Espen Martinsen, Strategy Manager The Oslo Packages Experiences from tollring & car users contributing.
EFC in Norway A brief overview Ivar Christiansen SGT EFC Team Meeting in Oslo.
Congestion Charging and Air Quality in central London 12 November 2004 Charles Buckingham Monitoring Manager, Congestion Charging Division, Transport for.
DEMOCRITOS DEveloping the MObility CRedits Integrated platform enabling travellers TO improve urban transport Sustainability Grant agreement no
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “It’s time…New Zealand extended charging for public infrastructure” Opponent: Peter Conway.
The Proposed London Low Emission Zone
The London Congestion Charge Past, present and future… Lauren Sager Weinstein Chief of Staff, Finance and Planning Transport for London.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Freight Railway Integration Strategy For Inter-American Development Bank Transport Week 2009 by Transportation Technology Center, Inc. (TTCI) Subsidiary.
43 RD ASECAP STUDY & INFORMATION DAYS 2015 A Multimodal, Smart and Safe European Transport System: The Key Role of Motorways Epic Sana Hotel May.
Road Pricing in London Presentation to IMPRINT –EUROPE Seminar 16 October 2003 – Budapest Mark Valleley Association of London Government IMPRINT EUROPE.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Norwegian School of Economics
Transantiago July 2005.
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
Presentation transcript:

Civil and Environmental Engineering 1 Norway’s toll rings: Full scale implementations of urban pricing Dr. Terje Tretvik - SINTEF, Norway IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar on IMPLEMENTING PRICING POLICIES IN TRANSPORT: With special regard to NAS countries October 2003, Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Civil and Environmental Engineering 2 36 various toll projects in operation in Norway Further information: english/oversiktskart.html

Civil and Environmental Engineering 3 Urban Tolling in Norway In 1986 (Bergen), tolling was first introduced to an urban area. Later Oslo (1990) and Trondheim (1991) followed Since then, several Norwegian cities have discussed road pricing, and some have decided on specific local systems The design of the schemes, and the composition of investment packages, have changed in line with developments in technology and changing political preferences The urban toll rings are based on local initiatives. They need approval by political bodies and sanctioning by the National Parliament. An agreed operating period is decided, usually 15 years They are managed and operated by private companies, jointly owned by public and private interests

Civil and Environmental Engineering 4 The Package Approach to Urban Road Pricing The purpose of the charging is to fund urban transport investment packages Toll revenues are supplemented by additional Government funds The toll companies are able to take up loans, and start financing new infrastructure before charging of motorists is initiated

Civil and Environmental Engineering 5 Two Key Dimensions of Norwegian Road Pricing Schemes The emphasis on demand management The proportion of revenue spent on public transport and the environment Bergen 1 Bergen 2 Kristiansand 1 Kristiansand 2 Oslo 1 Oslo 2 Stavanger Trondheim Tromsø 1Tromsø 2

Civil and Environmental Engineering 6 Characteristics of the Early Toll Rings Data Positive/negative split in public opinion just before implementation 19 / 8130 / 709 / 91 BergenOsloTrondheim City population Percentage living inside toll ring10%50%40% Starting dateJan, 1986Feb, 1990Oct, 1991 Number of toll stations71911 Entry charge for a small vehicle (NOK). (Manual payment. Heavy vehicles are charged double price. 1 NOK=0,125 Euro) Charging period Mon-Fri 6am-10pm all days all hours Mon-Fri 6am-5pm Average daily crossings during toll hours Annual gross revenue, NOK millions Annual operating costs, NOK millions10727 Positive/negative split in public opinion after 1-2 years of operation 58 / 4241 / 5947 / 53

Civil and Environmental Engineering 7 The Bergen Toll Ring The first Norwegian City to introduce an urban investment package, partly financed by user fees The 6 (later 7) tolling stations forms a tight cordon around the city centre Manual operation, including season tickets as a payment option One year after opening, the tolling was estimated to have reduced traffic crossings by 6-7 % during its hours of operation Original package agreement ended 2002 and was dedicated almost entirely to road investments New agreement Basic charge increased to NOK 15. Only 45% allocated to road investments

Civil and Environmental Engineering 8 The Oslo Toll Ring Only three main transport corridors lead to the central part of Oslo. Still, 19 toll stations are needed The main focus of the original investment package was on increase in road capacity A new package for is dedicated entirely to public transport investments. Contributors are National Government (71%), Oslo (5%), property developers (3%) and users of public transport and cars (21%) A total decrease of 5% in car travel during the first year of operation is reported. 3-4% is attributed to the toll ring. The rest is explained by a recession at that time No significant effect on use of public transport or car occupancy

Civil and Environmental Engineering 9 The 1991 Trondheim Toll Ring All stations had no-stop lanes for electronic payment 80 % of transactions in morning peak by electronic tags already at opening in October 1991 Only inbound crossings were charged Full chargesMon-Fri, 6am-10am Reduced chargesMon-Fri, 10am-5pm No chargesEvenings, Weekends Every crossing was charged for, but up to a limit of one crossing per hour and 75 crossings per month Very few exemptions

Civil and Environmental Engineering 10 Trondheim 1998: Introducing a Second-generation Road Pricing System Number of toll stations increased from 13 to 22 The new system divides the city into six zones Twin rationales of increased “fairness” and increased income November 2003: New CBD ring (5 more toll stations) Ultimo 2005: Charging to be terminated ?

Civil and Environmental Engineering 11 Political Acceptance: The Three “Areas of Preference” Concerning Road Pricing Bergen 1 Oslo 1 Tromsø 1 Regulation interests Road building interests Carrot-and-stick interests The emphasis on demand management The proportion of the revenue spent on public transport and the environment

Civil and Environmental Engineering 12 Conclusions (page 1 of 2) Public acceptance is not likely, but political acceptance is possible ! Interests overlap, so that several compromises are possible Schemes must be flexible enough to be adjustable to shifting political preferences Road pricing implementation is probably most likely to succeed when starting with crude systems The initial crude system may be developed and refined An implementation process typically lasts 5-10 years

Civil and Environmental Engineering 13 Conclusions (page 2 of 2) City-specific factors easing acceptance Long distance to “rival” cities The benefits of improving the road system should be obvious both to the politicians and to the public Both mobility and environmental improvements should be provided by the schemes Traffic impacts have been small. The primary objectives of the designs have been fund raising, rather than congestion pricing The time-differentiated charging in Trondheim did show substantial shifts in timing for car trips Some demand management effects may be achieved even if the official main rationale is fund raising