A New Cosmological Distance Measure Using AGN X-Ray Variability Stefano Bianchi The X-ray Universe 2014 - 17 June, 2014, Dublin, Ireland Fabio La Franca,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Sulentic -- IAA - CSIC P. Marziani -- OA Padova – INAF A. Del Olmo – IAA - CSIC I. Plauchu-Frayn – UNAM, Ensenada.
Advertisements

Marianne Vestergaard Dark Cosmology Centre, Copenhagen First Galaxies, Quasars, and GRBs, June Determining Black Hole Masses in Distant Quasars.
1 Reverberation Mapping of the Broad-Line Region Bradley M. Peterson The Ohio State University Collaborators: M. Bentz, S. Collin, K. Denney, L.-B. Desroches,
UNCERTAINTIES ON THE BLACK HOLE MASSES AND CONSEQUENCES FOR THE EDDINGTON RATIOS Suzy Collin Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, France Collaborators: T. Kawaguchi.
Radio and X-ray emission in radio-quiet quasars Katrien C. Steenbrugge, Katherine M. Blundell and Zdenka Kuncic Instituto de Astronomía, UCN Department.
AGN Eddington Ratio Distributions
Prospects for the Planck Satellite: limiting the Hubble Parameter by SZE/X-ray Distance Technique R. Holanda & J. A. S. Lima (IAG-USP) I Workshop “Challenges.
A reflection origin for the soft and hard X-ray excess of Ark 120 Ferrara, 2010 May in collaboration with: Andy Fabian, Rubens Reis, Dom Walton (Institute.
On the geometry of broad emission region in quasars Roberto Decarli Turin - May, 20 th, 2008 Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Dipartimento di Fisica.
ACCRETION AND JET POWERS IN NEARBY ACCRETION AND JET POWERS IN NEARBY UNOBSCURED RADIO GALAXIES UNOBSCURED RADIO GALAXIES E. Trussoni (1), S. Vattakunnel.
TeV blazars and their distance E. Prandini, Padova University & INFN G. Bonnoli, L. Maraschi, M. Mariotti and F. Tavecchio Cosmic Radiation Fields - Sources.
Authors: O.Gonzalez-Martin, S. Vaughan Speaker: Xuechen Zheng
Photometric Reverberation Mapping of NGC 4395 The Restless Nature of AGNs 22 May, 2013 Stephen Rafter – The Technion, Haifa Israel.
Ben Maughan (CfA)Chandra Fellows Symposium 2006 The cluster scaling relations observed by Chandra C. Jones, W. Forman, L. Van Speybroeck.
Swift/BAT Hard X-ray Survey Preliminary results in Markwardt et al ' energy coded color.
First X-Ray Results from the Optically Selected Red Sequence Cluster Survey (RCS) at Z ~ 1 Amalia K. Hicks, Erica Ellingson, Howard Yee, Tesla Jeltema,
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
Reverberation Mapping - Extending the Luminosity Range Shai Kaspi Tel-Aviv University & Technion – Haifa Israel “AGNs: From Atoms to Black Holes” Tel-Aviv.
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
Characterizing activity in AGN with X-ray variability Rick Edelson.
X-ray Variability of AGN
Accretion Physics in the SDSS/XMM-Newton Quasar Survey Monica Young with Martin Elvis, Alan Marscher & Guido Risaliti.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Observation of Solar Wind Charge Exchange Emission from Exospheric Material in Earth's Magnetosheath S. L. Snowden, M. R. Collier, T. Cravens, K. D. Kuntz,
Disentangling disc variability in the hard state
An Accretion Disc Model for Quasar Optical Variability An Accretion Disc Model for Quasar Optical Variability Li Shuang-Liang Li Shuang-Liang Shanghai.
X-Ray Observations of RCS Clusters at High Redshift
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Decoding the time-lags in accreting black holes with XMM-Newton Phil Uttley Thanks to: P. Cassatella, T. Wilkinson, J. Wilms, K. Pottschmidt, M. Hanke,
1 The Fundamental Plane Relationship of Astrophysical Black Holes Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking University Ran Wang Supervisor: Xuebing Wu Peking.
Radio-loud AGN energetics with LOFAR Judith Croston LOFAR Surveys Meeting 17/6/09.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
W.Kollatschny, Zetzl, Z.Alvi.  Information about the Structure and the Kinematics of the inner most region surrounding an AGN can be revealed by analyzing.
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Constraining cluster abundances using weak lensing Håkon Dahle Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo.
Results from AGN multiple wavelength observations and the importance of monitoring campaigns 24 – 28 April 2012, Andrevlje, Republic of Serbia G. La Mura.
The Fundamental Plane of Astrophysical Black Holes WU Xue-Bing (Peking University) Collaborators: WANG Ran (PKU) KONG Minzhi (NAOC)
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
“The X-ray Universe 2011” Berlin – June 28 th 2011 Stefano Bianchi AGN without BLR New clues for a new scenario A. Marinucci, G. Matt, F. Nicastro, F.
Long-term X-ray and optical variability of radio-quiet AGN Phil Uttley, University of Southampton with: Ian McHardy, University of Southampton Iossif Papadakis,
The Evolution of AGN Obscuration
Dipole of the Luminosity Distance: A Direct Measure of H(z) Camille Bonvin, Ruth Durrer, and Martin Kunz Wu Yukai
Extreme soft X-ray emission from the broad-line quasar REJ R.L.C. Starling 1*, E.M. Puchnarewicz 1, K.O. Mason 1 & E. Romero- Colmenero 2 1 Mullard.
Monitor of all-sky X-ray Image (MAXI) was designed to be capable of monitoring variability of a medium-sized sample of active galactic nuclei. As of November.
University of Leicester, UK X-ray and Observational Astronomy (XROA) Group Estelle Pons - The X-ray Universe June 2014.
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 2-1: Active galaxies and super massive black holes in the local universe Seminar: Gultekin et al. 2009, ApJ, 698,
X-ray emission properties of BLAGN in the XMM-2dF Wide Angle Survey S. Mateos, M.G. Watson, J. A. Tedds and the XMM-Newton Survey Science Centre Department.
Deborah Dultzin-Hacyan
The X-ray mirrors Giovanni Miniutti Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge SIMBOL-X May -Bologna.
X-ray Variability of AGN Judith Racusin Astro 597A Week 5 October 6, 2004.
X-ray spectroscopy of bright AGN GiorgioMatt & Stefano Bianchi Giorgio Matt & Stefano Bianchi (Dipartimento di Fisica, Università Roma Tre) (Dipartimento.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LUMINOSITY AND BLACK HOLE MASSES IN ACTIVE GALAXIES: USING NEAR-INFRARED LINE Do-hyeong Kim, Myungshin Im Astronomy Program, Department.

A deep view of the iron line and spectral variability in NGC 4051 James Reeves Collaborators:- Jane Turner, Lance Miller, Andrew Lobban, Valentina Braito,
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
AGN Unification in COSMOS Jonathan Trump Chris Impey (Arizona), Martin Elvis, Brandon Kelly, Francesca Civano (CfA), Yoshi Taniguchi, Tohru Nagao (Ehime),
Tools for computing the AGN feedback: radio-loudness and the kinetic luminosity function Gabriele Melini Fabio La Franca Fabrizio Fiore Active Galactic.
W.Becker 1, M.C.Weisskopf 2, Z.Arzoumanian 3, D.Lorimer 4, F.Camilo 5, R.F.Elsner 2, G.Kanbach 1, O.Reimer 6, D.A.Swartz 2, A.F.Tennant 2, S.L.O’Dell 2.
Reverberation mapping with eXTP
Why is the BAT survey for AGN Important? All previous AGN surveys were biased- –Most AGN are ‘obscured’ in the UV/optical –IR properties show wide scatter.
AKARI Spectroscopic Study of the Rest-frame Optical Spectra of Quasars at 3.5 < z < 6.5 Hyunsung Jun¹, Myungshin Im¹, Hyung Mok Lee², and the QSONG team.
X-ray Fluctuation timescale and Black Hole masses: a new relation? A.Wandel - Mbh-t relation of BHs1 Amri Wandel - The Hebrew University of Jerusalem collaborators:
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
How to Better Weigh a Black Hole and Other Adventures in Quasar Physics Michael Brotherton.
Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: an SDSS Perspective
Black Hole Candles for Expansion History of High-z Universe
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
Janie K. Hoormann University of Queensland 23 April 2019
Presentation transcript:

A New Cosmological Distance Measure Using AGN X-Ray Variability Stefano Bianchi The X-ray Universe June, 2014, Dublin, Ireland Fabio La Franca, Gabriele Ponti, Enzo Branchini, Giorgio Matt

One of the most important results of observational cosmology is the discovery of the accelerating expansion of the universe, using SNeIa as standard candles However, the use of SNeIa is difficult beyond z ∼ 1 and limited up to z ∼ 2 Given their high luminosities, there have been several studies on the use of AGN as standard candles

Virial BH Masses: From Reverberation Mapping to Single-Epoch Methods The BLR in AGN is powered by photoionization from the central source. RM lags provide an estimate of its size. If we assume that the BLR is virialized and dominated by the gravitational field of the central BH, then the BH mass is Geometrical Factor BLR Velocity (FWHM) BLR Radius (RM lag) RM observations found a tight correlation between the BLR size and the optical continuum luminosity. A slope of alpha = 0.5 is found, as expected, if U and the electron density are more or less constant, and/or if the BLR size is set by dust sublimation It was suggested to use the R - L relation (~0.15 dex) as an absolute luminosity indicator, although RM is very time consuming and still limited to local AGN Bentz et al. 2009

Virial BH Masses: From Reverberation Mapping to Single-Epoch Methods The observed R-L relation provides a much less expensive way to estimate the size of the BLR, allowing a single-epoch virial BH mass estimator: from the same spectrum, one estimates the BLR size from the measured luminosity using the R-L relation, and the width of the broad emission line (typically, Hβ or MgII 2798Å or CIV 1459Å). The derived BH masses have uncertainties ~0.5 dex Shen & Liu 2012

BH Mass and X-ray Variability AGN X-ray PSDs are generally well modeled by two power laws, P(ν) ∝ 1/ν n, where the PSD slope is n ∼ 1 down to a break frequency, ν b, that scales primarily with M BH, and then steepens to n ∼ 2 at larger frequencies 10 8 M  10 7 M  10 6 M  Uttley et al The break frequency scale with M BH in all accreting BHs McHardy et al AGN GBHs

BH Mass and X-ray Variability Kelly et al AGN X-ray PSDs are data demanding, requiring high-quality data on different timescales. On the contrary, the excess variance is a robust estimator as it corresponds to the integral of the PSD on the timescales probed by the data The scaling of the characteristic frequencies of the PSD with M BH induces a dependence of the excess variance with M BH (if computed at frequencies above ν b )

BH Mass and X-ray Variability Several studies have indeed found a significant anti-correlation between M BH and X-ray variability (Nandra et al. 1997; Turner et al. 1999; Lu & Yu 2001; O’Neill et al. 2005; McHardy et al. 2006; Gierliński et al. 2008; Zhou et al. 2010; Ponti et al. 2012; Kelly et al. 2013) The constants depend on the timescale and the energy range where the variable flux is measured According to X-ray variability studies on samples of AGNs whose M BH has been measured with reverberation mapping techniques, these kinds of relationships could have spreads as narrow as 0.2–0.4 dex (Zhou et al. 2010; Ponti et al. 2012; Kelly et al. 2013) Ponti et al. 2012

 ~0.5 (R-L relation) β~2 (virial motion) Single Epoch M BH estimate X-ray variability M BH estimate It should be noted that in many previous studies a correlation between the AGN luminosity and X-ray variability has been measured (e.g., Ponti et al. 2012; Shemmer et al. 2014, and references therein). Such a correlation is the projection on the L–rms plane of our proposed three-dimensional relationship among L, rms, and ∆V. If this is the case, we should measure a more significant and less scattered relation than previously reported using only L and rms We have a luminosity (distance) estimator!

Calibration: The Sample CAIXA Catalogue of AGN In the XMM-Newton Archive (Bianchi et al. 2009, Ponti et al. 2012) 38 with H  18 with Pa  rms (2-10 keV, 20ks) with significance greater than 1.2  H , L 5100 OR Pa  40 AGN (mostly with z<0.1)

Calibration: The Fits The square of the virial product, using L 5100 and FWHM Hβ, is strongly correlated with the rms (N=31, r =−0.73, P ∼ 3×10 −6 ) The observed and intrinsic (subtracting in quadrature the data uncertainties) spreads are 1.12 dex and 1.00 dex If the same sample is used, the linear correlation between L 5100 and rms has a spread of 1.78 dex, while the correlation coefficient is −0.36 (P~5x10 -2 ) The virial product is significantly better correlated with the AGN variability than the luminosity alone

Calibration: The Fits Slightly better results are obtained if the intrinsic 2–10 keV luminosity is used to compute the virial product (N=38, r =−0.81, P ∼ 3×10 −10 ) In this case, the total and intrinsic spreads are 1.06 dex and 0.93 dex Also in this case, the virial product is better correlated with rms than L X alone is (r=−0.57 and spread 1.36)

Calibration: The Fits If the virial product is computed using L X and Paβ, the spreads considerably decrease down to 0.71 dex (total) and 0.56 dex (intrinsic) (N=18, r =−0.82, P~3×10 −5 ) The correlation between L X only and rms has instead a less significant coefficient r =−0.63 (P~4×10 −3 ) and a larger spread of 1.33 dex

The fits described above show that highly significant relationships exist between the virial products and the AGN X-ray flux variability. These relationships allow us to predict the AGN 2–10 keV luminosities Landt et al The less scattered relation has a spread of 0.6–0.7 dex and is obtained when the Paβ line width is used This could be either because the Paβ broad emission line, contrary to Hβ, is observed to be practically unblended with other chemical species or, as our analysis is based on a collection of data from public archives, the Paβ line widths, which come from the same project (Landt et al. 2008, 2013), could have therefore been measured in a more homogeneous way

To use this method to measure the cosmological distances and then the curvature of the universe, it is necessary to obtain reliable variability measures at relevant redshifts. The relations based on the Hβ line are the most promising, as they can be used up to z ∼ 3 via NIR spectroscopic observations (e.g., with the James Webb Space Telescope) With the proposed Athena survey, our estimator will provide a cosmological test independent from SNeIa able to detect possible systematic errors larger than 0.1 Significantly lower uncertainties can be reached by using all the data from the whole Athena lifetime Our XMM measures, using LX and Paβ ATHENA survey (10 Ms, 250 deg 2 ): D L could be measured with a 0.02 dex and with a 0.06 dex

In order to further exploit our proposed rms-based AGN luminosity indicator at higher redshifts to constrain the universe geometry, a dedicated X-ray telescope with a ∼ 2deg 2 large field of view could be used. With a 40 Ms long program, it would be possible to measure D L with less than dex (0.015 mag) uncertainties at a redshift below 1.2 and an uncertainty of less than 0.02 dex (0.1 mag) in the redshift range 1.2 <z < 1.6 We conclude that our estimator has the prospect to become a cosmological probe even more sensitive than current SNeIa if applied to AGN samples as large as that of a hypothetical future survey carried out with a dedicated mission More details in La Franca et al., 2014, ApJ, 787, 12L