The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers 2013-2014 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 DPAS II Process and Procedures for Teachers Developed by: Delaware Department of Education.
Advertisements

Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Training Overview For separate modules:
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Developing Principals One State’s Initiative Dr. Sharon Brittingham RTTT Project Director, Development Coaches Dr. Jacquelyn Wilson Director, Delaware.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Student Learning and Growth Goals 101: Requirements and Recommendations Spring 2015 Webinar.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 4 Component Five – Student Improvement.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction
Differentiated Supervision
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
ADEPT Framework
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 3 The DPAS II Process Training for Teachers.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Teacher Evaluation: Professional Practice Compass Update April 2012.
OVERVIEW OF SB 290 CHANGES IN LICENSED STAFF EVALUATION WHAT IT MEANS TO YOU SOESD’s Teacher Evaluation & Support System.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education October 2012.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Georgia Department of Education
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Introduction to Core Professionalism
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers

Training Overview  Four separate modules: Module 1: Introduction to DPAS II Module 2: DPAS II and the Delaware Framework Module 3: The DPAS II Process Module 4: Component Five – Student Improvement

Materials for this module  Power Point Presentation  DPAS II Guide for Teachers 

DPAS II Overview  Statewide evaluation system  Required for all public school educators (state law)  Three versions: DPAS II for Teachers DPAS II for Specialists DPAS II for Administrators

Objectives of DPAS II  Three objectives of DPAS II are to assure and support: Professional growth: enhancing the skills and knowledge of educators. Continuous improvement of instructional practice and student outcomes: educators commitment to continuously improving practice so that student performance is continuously enhanced. Quality educators in every school building and classroom: the collection of credible evidence about educator performance.

Who is evaluated through DPAS II for Teachers?  Any educator who Holds a Delaware teaching license Holds a Delaware certificate in a particular content area, AND Is employed as either a part-time or full-time teacher in a Delaware public school.  Also, any specialist who teaches in a classroom setting part of the instructional day may be evaluated using the teacher process.

Who evaluates teachers?  Supervisors of teachers who: Have successfully completed the DPAS II training and have been certified by the Department of Education May be a direct supervisor May be another supervisor within the district (e.g., a district office administrator, an administrator from another building, a designated teacher leader)

Design of DPAS II for Teachers  DPAS II for Teachers is aligned to Delaware Professional Teaching Standards Establish common set of knowledge, skills, and attributes expected of Delaware Teachers Outlined in Delaware regulation –AND Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Defines professional practice and outlines criteria and elements of practice

Structure of DPAS II  The DPAS II framework has three tiers Components – broad areas of teacher practice and responsibility Criteria – essential knowledge and skills related to each component Elements – observable areas of knowledge and skills related to each criterion

DPAS II: Components

Use of DPAS II Rubrics  Evaluators are expected to use rubrics: To rate Appraisal Criteria observed To focus pre-observation, post-observation, and summative conference discussions with teachers To develop a common understanding of the teacher’s strengths and areas for improvement As a guide to organize relevant evidence of teacher performance  Teachers are expected to use rubrics: For reflection and self-assessment To develop a common understanding of his or her own strengths and areas for improvement

DOE monitoring/auditing of DPAS II documentation quality  Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documents Use of review criteria to ensure written evaluation documents provide: Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of teacher performance and areas of commendation Supportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations to improve performance Conducted by DOE staff All information is confidential

What’s new in ?  Changes to DPAS II, beginning in the school year: Provide more flexibility in the announced vs. unannounced observation(s) Additional credentialing of educators/instructional leaders not serving as “Evaluators.” Opportunity for LEAs to utilize one less criterion in each Component Provide flexibility in when/how Improvement Plans are utilized Require ratings at the criteria-level for observations and Summative Evaluations

More Information