Lake County Schools LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. About Our District Lake County is a medium size district 40,000 students 2,700 teachers Mixture of rural, urban.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Advertisements

Purpose of Instruction
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Philip Parker Administrator Training and Certification.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Currituck County Schools “READY, Set, Go-ing to be a Great year!” Convocation
Data supported by professional development Baron Rodriguez Chief Information Officer Oregon Department of Education Mickey Garrison School Improvement.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Ryve Prekorogja 13 June VET Vocational Education and Training.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
District of Columbia Public Schools | 1200 First Street, NE | Washington, DC | T | F | dcps.dc.gov DCPS TLF Group 3 Updated.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Distributed Leadership for Mathematics Bringing Together District, School, & University Leadership to Support Highly Qualified Teachers University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Technology Use Plan Presented by: Bob Santi. Rationale A technology plan is a current guideline for the appropriate and effective use of technology a.
Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Professional Development PeopleSoft Enterprise Learning Management (ELM) One Stop Shopping.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
Teacher Appraisal System Updates by: Dawn Capes, Coordinator for Teacher and Administrator Appraisal Systems.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Student Learning Objectives. An SLO is a measurable, long-term, academic goal informed by available data that a teacher or teacher team sets at the beginning.
Lesson Study Lesson study is a particular form of job-embedded professional development that involves collaborative discourse among teachers over an extended.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
New Teacher Induction.
A Productive Partnership
Accreditation External Review
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Lake County Schools LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA

About Our District Lake County is a medium size district 40,000 students 2,700 teachers Mixture of rural, urban and suburban areas Averages 60% free/reduced lunch district-wide Located in Central Florida - Borders on Orange, Polk, Seminole, and Sumter Counties Named Lake County because it is comprised of 1,200 named lakes

Role and Responsibilities in the District Manager of Evaluation and Compensation Oversees teacher evaluation, principal evaluation and district administrator evaluations Develops yearly plans for FLDOE, ensuring compliance with state statutes Provides training for teachers and administrators Supervises the data analyst in charge of calculating student performance measures Oversees the implementation, modification and maintenance of the Truenorthlogic system Runs reports and provide data to school-based administrators and principal assessors as needed Ensures all evaluators using the Teacher Evaluation & Achievement Model system (TEAM) are properly trained and certified Works with teacher evaluators to ensure Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) and consistency in and across schools

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Based on the Marzano Instructional Framework Evaluation decisions are recommended through a TEAM Committee (joint committee with district and teacher’s union representatives) Uses triangulated data – observations (40%), deliberate practice (10%), student performance measures (50%) Number of observations varies by number of years experience Uses Truenorthlogic to track observations; provide scoring and data for evaluations; link data to PD; track certification and licensure; provide reports by individual, schools and district-wide data Yearly certification assessment for all observers and ongoing Inter-Rater Reliability training Moodle site for resources and training

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Based on the Marzano Instructional Framework

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Evaluation decisions are recommended through a TEAM Committee (joint committee with district and teacher’s union representatives) In place for more than twenty years Joint committee that coordinates and monitors development and implementation of the teacher evaluation process Composed of an equal number of representatives from each party and includes teachers, principals, district administrators and LCEA (Lake County Education Association) leaders Meets regularly to review implementation of the new teacher evaluation system and to make recommendations for revisions as needed Has been instrumental in the ability of the new evaluation system’s move forward

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Use triangulated data – observations (40%), deliberate practice (10%), student performance measures (50%) Student Performance 50% Observations 40% Deliberate Practice Plan 10%

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Number of observations varies by number of years experience TEAM Observation Requirements For All Plans for (No Changes) TEAM PlanInformal Observation Formal ObservationArtifact Conference Total Classroom-Based Category 1A (1 st Year) 4 2 by Dec by April by Dec by April Classroom-Based Category 1B or 2 1 yearly2 1 by Dec by April Non-Classroom Based Category 1A 2 1 by Dec by April by Dec by April by Dec by April 15 6 Non-Classroom Based Category 1B or 2 1 Yearly1 by Dec. 311 by April 153 SSPEM Category 1A 02 1 by Dec by April by Dec by April 15 4 SSPEM Category 1B or 2 01 by Dec. 311 by April 152

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Use Truenorthlogic to track observations, provide scoring and data for evaluations, link data to PD, track certification and licensure, provide reports by individuals, schools and district-wide data Track your evaluations Track staff evaluations Link PD to evaluations Run Data Reports Track Certification and Licensure

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Yearly certification for all observers and ongoing Inter-Rater Reliability training Training Videos Assessment Results Create Assessments

Overview of Teacher Evaluation Process Moodle Site for Resources and Training

Truenorthlogic…Changing the way we do Business! Ease of Use for Teachers: Consistent method of evaluating teachers Ease of use for teachers – “One stop shopping” Past Evaluation Plans Current Evaluation Plans Deliberate Practice Plan (DPP) Observations (Formal and Informal) Pre/Post Conferences Instructional Practice Score (DPP and Observation Ratings) Summative Scores (DP, Observation Ratings and Student Performance Score) Professional Development Offerings match areas of need Current Certification and Licensure information Provides teachers with up-to-date data on their yearly performance Provides longitudinal data for teachers Links areas in need of improvement to district PD offerings

Truenorthlogic…Changing the way we do Business! Ease of Use for Evaluators and District Staff: Automates the calculation process Provides ability to track individual teacher, school or district data for PD purposes Provides historical view of teachers and schools Provides the opportunity to automatically send messages regarding re-certification and licensure expiration Allows system flexibility and modification, as well as support for district personnel on a regular basis Is available 24/7 both in-district or outside internet access

Evaluation - Best Practices Research-based instructional model (Marzano) Evidence-based model (teacher and student) Clear rubrics for each observation rating Triangulated data for evaluation measures (Observations, DPP, Student Performance Measures) PD linked to areas of need (teacher, school and district) Evaluation aligned to FL Standards and PD Data-based decision making Track observers to ensure Inter-Rater Reliability

Evaluation – Lessons Learned Joint TEAM Committee is critical to success Common language is needed between all district departments and schools Clear connections between curriculum, PD and evaluation must be made Aligning Courses to PD is difficult with so many course creators – initial and ongoing training is critical Inter-Rater Reliability certification and ongoing training is critical Ongoing training at the teacher-level is essential to teacher success Training through a variety of models is essential in a large district