Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
Professional Growth and
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
What it means for New Teachers
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Professional Growth and
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Artifacts 101: The Role of Artifacts in Educator Support and Evaluation Spring 2015 Webinar.
Who’s on our Team? CLASS Phoenix Design Team Classroom educators, specialists, administrators, and classified from all grade levels Association groups.
District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar November 17, 2014 Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
WSD’s Committee Structure Steering Committee Superintendent, 4 Administrators, 3 Teachers Teacher CommitteePrincipal Committee 5 Administrators, 6 Teachers6.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools.
MPS Memorandum of Agreement Renewal with Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors MUID Presentation December 13, 2011.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
Presented to:Bellefontaine City Schools RECOGNIZING TEACHING EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
Improving the Craft of Teaching: Training & Implementation of Idaho’s Teacher Evaluation Framework Nick Smith, Deputy Superintendent School Support Services.
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
Educator Evaluation Self-Reflection and Evidence Webinar February 28 th, 2013.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
The Use of Artifacts as Evidence in Educator Evaluation Fall 2015.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
TESS & LEADS Implementation Awareness for End-of-Year Success Office of Educator Effectiveness Arkansas Department of Education Spring, 2016.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education May 2, 2012.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
What it means for New Teachers
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Five Required Elements
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Principal Evaluation Process
Owatonna Public Schools Teacher Development PLAN (TDE)
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
Presentation transcript:

Educator Growth & Evaluation Marshall Public Schools

The goal of teacher evaluation The ultimate goal of all teacher evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE TEACHING AND LEARNING

Yet recognize individual needs of each teacher...

To mutually agree to a teacher evaluation and peer review process that is designed to develop, improve, and support teachers and effective teaching practices and improve student learning and success.

Key Elements of Teacher Evaluation in MN  Based on professional teaching standards  3 year review cycle (Summative Evaluation)  Summative evaluation by a qualified & trained evaluator  Individual Growth & Development Plan (Renewed every 3 years)  Peer review process & opportunity to participate in PLC  Longitudinal data on student engagement  Portfolio option  Student growth ~ Evidence of Student Learning (35%)  Teacher improvement process  Discipline for teachers not making adequate progress in TIP (Teacher Improvement Plan/Process)  Coordinated staff development with evaluation process and outcome

The Summative Evaluation Includes:  Teacher Practice  Evidence of Learning  Student Engagement

Annual Evaluation Framework to Meet the Teacher Practice Portion:  Use of Charlotte Danielson model…

Evidence of Student Learning  35% of Summative Evaluation Student learning goals Marshall team – Divide 35% among:  District wide goal  School improvement plan  Personal goal – goal determined by teacher

Student Engagement  The 3 rd component of the summative evaluation  MPS will use Danielson’s 3c: Engaging Students in Learning

Personal Growth & Development Plan Goals based on self assessment, data, district & site goals, previous summative evaluations, etc. May align one personal goal with your Growth and Development Plan

Portfolio option Possible option to e-portfolio to gather and retain evidence If submitted, considered as evidence in summative evaluation

Putting it all together  SSI team and subcommittee meeting  Developing a framework  Share key elements of plan and information on process over next 3 months  Goal – to present to teaching staff and board for approval in April

Question?  We can collect your questions, thoughts, and/or concerns today to discuss at our next meeting. Responses to questions or concerns will come at a later date. Also, you can talk with your building principal or SSI rep.

Marshall Schools - 17 OR, contact information Dr. Klint Willert ~ Superintendent of Schools 401 South Saratoga Street Marshall, MN (507)