Gamma Ray Imaging Lab Tour

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Advertisements

Introduction to Ionizing Radiation
Study of plastic scintillators for fast neutron measurements
Modified Moliere’s Screening Parameter and its Impact on Calculation of Radiation Damage 5th High Power Targetry Workshop Fermilab May 21, 2014 Sergei.
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
Basic Concepts of Charged
Charged Particle Radiation
10-1 CHEM 312 Lecture 10: Part 1 Radiation Reactions: Dosimetry and Hot Atom Chemistry Readings: §Reading: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 17; Nuclear.
Carbon ion fragmentation study for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck base, prostate)
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Tumour Therapy with Particle Beams Claus Grupen University of Siegen, Germany [physics/ ] Phy 224B Chapter 20: Applications of Nuclear Physics 24.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Interactions of charged particles with the patient I.The depth-dose distribution - How the Bragg Peak comes about - (Thomas Bortfeld) II.The lateral dose.
Study of the fragmentation of Carbon ions for medical applications Protons (hadrons in general) especially suitable for deep-sited tumors (brain, neck.
1 Bragg Curve  Protons and Carbon. 2 Application of Range  The localized energy deposition of heavy charged particles can be useful therapeutically.
Particle Interactions
Interaction of Particles with Matter
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Roentgen, gray, exposure rates, absorbed dose, dose equivalent, quality factors, linear energy transfer, relative biological.
At the position d max of maximum energy loss of radiation, the number of secondary ionizations products peaks which in turn maximizes the dose at that.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2 V.Ivanchenko, BINP & CERN
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
6.1 The Atomic Models of Thomson and Rutherford 6.2 Definition of Cross Section 6.2 Rutherford Scattering 6.3 Structure of the Nucleus Rutherford Scattering.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Department of Physics University of Oslo
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
Interactions of radiation with Matter
© Jimoid.com 2005 Ionising Radiation There are two types of radiation; ionising and non-ionising. Radiation Ionising Non-ionising Indirectly ionising (neutral.
Electrons Electrons lose energy primarily through ionization and radiation Bhabha (e+e-→e+e-) and Moller (e-e-→e-e-) scattering also contribute When the.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
Passive detectors (nuclear track detectors) – part 2: Applications for neutrons This research project has been supported by the Marie Curie Initial Training.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Radiation Detectors In particular, Silicon Microstrip Detectors by Dr. Darrel Smith.
Cosmic rays at sea level. There is in nearby interstellar space a flux of particles—mostly protons and atomic nuclei— travelling at almost the speed of.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Determining Radiation Intensity
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
3/2003 Rev 1 I.2.0 – slide 1 of 12 Session I.2.0 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 2Introduction Session 0Part I Table of Contents IAEA Post Graduate.
1 Cost Room Availability Passive Shielding Detector spheres for accelerators Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.
Interaction Ionizing Radiation with Matter BNEN Intro William D’haeseleer BNEN - Nuclear Energy Intro W. D'haeseleer
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
Gas Detectors and Neutron Detection
Course : Inorganic Pharmacy II Course code: PHR 107 Course Teacher : Zara Sheikh Radioactivity and Radiopharmaceuticals.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Laboratory system and center of mass system
12th Geant4 Space Users Workshop
INTERACTION OF PARTICLES WITH MATTER
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Dose Equivilant Rad Pro III NUCP 2331.
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Interactions of Radiation With Matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX
Geant4: Electromagnetic Processes 2
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Wednesday,March 7, 2012 Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sept. 11, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu
Presentation transcript:

Gamma Ray Imaging Lab Tour Monday, March 7 @ 1100-1200 Please be prompt The lab can be hard to find so allow enough time to get there

Landau Distribution What is the distribution (probability density function) of energy loss in a given detector? So far we have just calculated the mean energy loss The mean energy loss may be fine for dosimetry (bulk deposition) but it is inadequate in describing the energy loss of single particles There are large statistical fluctuations in the distribution of dE/dx due to a small number of collisions involving very energetic electrons A real particle detector cannot really measure the mean energy loss – it measures DE deposited in Dx

Laudau Distribution

Landau Distribution Let’s define thick and thin detectors If a detector is thick For thick detectors, the energy loss distribution is a Gaussian distribution with mean given by Bethe-Bloch and sigma given by Bohr (non-relativistic) Basically the central limit theorem the sum of N random variables as N→∞ is a Gaussian For thin detectors, the energy loss distribution is given by the Landau or Vavilov distribution

Landau Distribution Is a 1 cm scintillator thick or thin?

Landau Distribution The Landau distribution looks like

Landau Distribution The Landau probability density function is given by In practice one uses a numerical approximation found in most math libraries

Landau Distribution Notes Usually D is used to represent the energy loss and Dp the most probable energy loss The probability functions describing the D distribution are frequently called straggling functions but in EPP they are called Landau functions The long tail is called the Landau tail It comes from a few scatters having large energy transfers (up to Wmax) There are also expressions for the most probable energy loss Dp

Landau Distribution Given the skewed distribution, one can see why either the most probable energy loss or restricted energy loss are preferred to describe the energy loss distribution for heavy charged particles

Restricted Energy Loss Because the mean energy loss is unreliable, one improvement is to restrict the energy loss below some value Tcut (sometimes called D) Since Tcut instead of Tmax appears in the ln term, the mean energy loss will approach the Fermi plateau at high energies

Landau Distribution Restricted dE/dx and most probable energy loss

Landau Distribution Theory and experiment

Linear Energy Transfer As mentioned, in radiation physics, often linear energy transfer (LET) is used for dE/dx LET is defined as LET is used in radiobiology and radiation protection dosimetry

Range Since we know the energy loss we can calculate the range (pathlength) a heavy charged particle travels before stopping This is called the CSDA (Continuously Slowing Down Approximation) range It is a very good approximation to the real range The range is defined as a straight-line thickness The projected range is the average value to which a charged particle will penetrate measured along the initial direction Detour factor is the ratio of the projected range to range and is always < 1

Range A useful formula is the Bragg-Kleeman rule Alpha from 214Po Can be used to determine the range in one material if one knows the range in another material Alpha from 214Po R in air ~ 6 cm R in tissue ~ 0.007 cm

Range Another useful relationship can be used to find the range for different particles (ions) with the same velocity in different materials z1, z2 are the charges of particles 1 and 2 M1, M2 are the masses of particles 1 and 2 Comparing protons and 12C in water R(12C) = 12/36 = ~1/3 (see slide 26)

Range In our discussion of dE/dx loss we included only the contribution from electrons Electronic stopping power We ignored the contribution from collisions with nuclei Nuclear stopping power At very low energies, nuclear recoil energy loss becomes more important and in fact dominates for heavier ions Both the electronic and nuclear stopping power at low energies (<500 keV protons) is a quite complicated subject and software (SRIM) or fitting formulas based on experimental data are used Very important for ion implantation

dE/dx (Stopping Power) For protons

dE/dx (Stopping Power) For alphas

dE/dx (Stopping Power) Argon on Copper

Range protons

Range protons

Range

Detour Detour is the projected range / range <= 1 Protons

Range As we saw, energy loss is a statistical process This means that the range is not the same for every particle An approximation is to use a Gaussian distribution about the mean range (point of 50% transmission) It’s difficult to calculate so a parameterization or simulation (GEANT or MCNP) must be used

Bragg Curve The 1/b2 dependence of dE/dx means that most of the energy loss will be deposited towards the end of the trajectory rather than uniformly along it A plot of the energy loss versus distance is called a Bragg curve

Bragg Curve Protons and Carbon

Bragg Curve Alpha particles in air

Application of Range The localized energy deposition of heavy charged particles can be useful therapeutically = proton radiation therapy

Proton Therapy

Proton Therapy Another particle physics connection – original idea from Robert Wilson, particle physicist

Proton Therapy Energy range of interest from 50 (eye) – 250 (prostate) MeV

Proton Therapy Nuclear reactions are important in this energy range as well About 20% of 160 MeV protons stopping in water have a non-elastic nuclear reaction where the primary proton is seriously degraded and secondary protons, neutrons and nuclear fragments appear

Proton Therapy asdf

Proton Therapy Modulator, aperture, and compensator Modulator

Proton Therapy

Proton Therapy

Proton Therapy Lung cancer treatment Intensity modulated radiation therapy vs proton therapy

Proton Therapy

Proton Therapy Especially useful for chordomas (tumors in the skull base), ocular tumors, and prostate cancer But “Proton and other particle therapies need to be explored as potentially more effective and less toxic RT techniques. A passionate belief in the superiority of particle therapy and commercially driven acquisition and running of proton centers provide little confidence that appropriate information will become available…An uncontrolled expansion of clinical units offering as yet unproven and expensive proton therapy is unlikely to advance the field of radiation oncology or be of benefit to cancer patients.” from Brada et al. in J.Clin.Oncol. (2007)

Proton Therapy Existing and new proton centers in the US

Multiple Scattering A charged particle traversing matter will undergo multiple (small angle) Coulomb scattering from nuclei Small angle scattering – Gaussian Larger angle scattering – Rutherford scattering

Multiple Scattering The trajectory looks like At low momentum, position and momentum resolution is usually dominated by multiple Coulomb scattering

Landau Distribution For very thin detectors, the Landau distribution may not be appropriate