Sanja Teodorović University of Novi Sad Faculty of Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modeling of Complex Social Systems MATH 800 Fall 2011.
Advertisements

R 0 and other reproduction numbers for households models MRC Centre for Outbreak analysis and modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
Susceptible, Infected, Recovered: the SIR Model of an Epidemic
Epidemics Modeling them with math. History of epidemics Plague in 1300’s killed in excess of 25 million people Plague in London in 1665 killed 75,000.
The Art and Science of Mathematical Modeling Case Studies in Ecology, Biology, Medicine & Physics.
Dynamical Models of Epidemics: from Black Death to SARS D. Gurarie CWRU.
In biology – Dynamics of Malaria Spread Background –Malaria is a tropical infections disease which menaces more people in the world than any other disease.
Of Viruses, Mosquitoes & Zombies How Mathematical Models can Help Control Epidemics Adnan Khan Department of Mathematics Lahore University of Management.
Marieke Jesse and Maite Severins Theoretical Epidemiology Faculty of Veterinary Science Utrecht Mathematical Epidemiology of infectious diseases Chapter.
Probability of a Major Outbreak for Heterogeneous Populations Math. Biol. Group Meeting 26 April 2005 Joanne Turner and Yanni Xiao.
Modelling Infectious Disease … And other uses for Compartment Models.
Population dynamics of infectious diseases Arjan Stegeman.
DISEASE AND PANDEMICS Brijesh Patel.
1 Epidemic Spreading in Real Networks: an Eigenvalue Viewpoint Yang Wang Deepayan Chakrabarti Chenxi Wang Christos Faloutsos.
Computational Biology, Part 17 Biochemical Kinetics I Robert F. Murphy Copyright  1996, All rights reserved.
Verify or refute the use of Non Linear Mixed Effect Model for Interferon effect on HCV Hila David Shimrit Vashdi Project Advisors: Prof. Avidan Neumann.
HIV in CUBA Kelvin Chan & Sasha Jilkine. Developing a Model S = Susceptible I = Infected Z = AIDS Patients N = S+I = Active Population.
Vaccination Externalities Bryan L. Boulier Tejwant S. Datta† Robert S. Goldfarb‡ The George Washington University, †Albert Einstein Medical.
The AIDS Epidemic Presented by Jay Wopperer. HIV/AIDS-- Public Enemy #1?
1 The epidemic in a closed population Department of Mathematical Sciences The University of Liverpool U.K. Roger G. Bowers.
Modeling the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong Dr. Liu Hongjie, Prof. Wong Tze Wai Department of Community & Family Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
System Dynamics S-Shape Growth Morteza Bazrafshan.
Network modeling of the Ebola Outbreak Ahmet Aksoy.
Maximum likelihood (ML)
Jun, 2002 MTBI Cornell University TB Cluster Models, Time Scales and Relations to HIV Carlos Castillo-Chavez Department of Biological Statistics and Computational.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS)
How does mass immunisation affect disease incidence? Niels G Becker (with help from Peter Caley ) National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health.
Chapter 21 Preview Bellringer Key Ideas What Are HIV and AIDS?
Epidemiology modeling with Stella CSCI Stochastic vs. deterministic  Suppose there are 1000 individuals and each one has a 30% chance of being.
Public Health in Tropics :Further understanding in infectious disease epidemiology Taro Yamamoto Department of International Health Institute of Tropical.
SIR Epidemic Models CS 390/590 Fall 2009
V5 Epidemics on networks
What is a model Some notations –Independent variables: Time variable: t, n Space variable: x in one dimension (1D), (x,y) in 2D or (x,y,z) in 3D –State.
CODE RED WORM PROPAGATION MODELING AND ANALYSIS Cliff Changchun Zou, Weibo Gong, Don Towsley.
Directed-Graph Epidemiological Models of Computer Viruses Presented by: (Kelvin) Weiguo Jin “… (we) adapt the techniques of mathematical epidemiology to.
Modelling infectious diseases Jean-François Boivin 25 October
System Dynamics S-Shape Growth Shahram Shadrokh.
Data and modeling issues in population biology  Alan Hastings (UC Davis) and many colalborators  Acknowledge support from NSF.
BASICS OF EPIDEMIC MODELLING Kari Auranen Department of Vaccines National Public Health Institute (KTL), Finland Division of Biometry, Dpt. of Mathematics.
1 Modelling the interactions between HIV and the immune system in hmans R. Ouifki and D. Mbabazi 10/21/2015AIMS.
Biological Attack Model (BAM) Formal Progress Report April 5, 2007 Sponsor: Dr. Yifan Liu Team Members: Richard Bornhorst Robert Grillo Deepak Janardhanan.
Showcase /06/2005 Towards Computational Epidemiology Using Stochastic Cellular Automata in Modeling Spread of Diseases Sangeeta Venkatachalam, Armin.
Mathematical Modeling of Bird Flu Propagation Urmi Ghosh-Dastidar New York City College of Technology City University of New York December 1, 2007.
Stefan Ma1, Marc Lipsitch2 1Epidemiology & Disease Control Division
Fall 2009 IB Workshop Series sponsored by IB academic advisors IB Opportunities in C-U Tuesday, Sept. 15 4:00-5:00pm 135 Burrill There are many local opportunities.
Modeling Infectious Disease Processes CAMRA August 10 th, 2006.
MA354 An Introduction to Math Models (more or less corresponding to 1.0 in your book)
Dynamics of Infectious Diseases. Using Lotka-Volterra equations? PredatorPrey VS.
Class 21: Spreading Phenomena PartI
Simple Infection Model Huaizhi Chen. Simple Model The simple model of infection process separates the population into three classes determined by the.
MA354 Math Modeling Introduction. Outline A. Three Course Objectives 1. Model literacy: understanding a typical model description 2. Model Analysis 3.
Biological Attack Model (BAM) Progress Report March 8 Sponsor: Dr. Yifan Liu Richard Bornhorst Robert Grillo Deepak Janardhanan Shubh Krishna Kathryn Poole.
CORRELATION-REGULATION ANALYSIS Томский политехнический университет.
SIR Epidemics 박상훈.
NEXT WEEK: Computer sessions all on MONDAY: R AM 7-9 R PM 4-6 F AM 7-9 Lab: last 1/2 of manuscript due Lab VII Life Table for Human Pop Bring calculator!
Matrix modeling of age- and stage- structured populations in R
Kharkov National Medical University MEDICAL INFORMATICS МЕДИЧНА ІНФОРМАТИКА.
Create a concept map of the adaptive immune system.
Differential Equations A Universal Language
Sangeeta Venkatachalam, Armin R. Mikler
Public Policy and Managing Bioterrorism
Sexually Transmitted Disease Research
Modelling infectious diseases
Effective Social Network Quarantine with Minimal Isolation Costs
Predicting the Future To Predict the Future, “all we have to have is a knowledge of how things are and an understanding of the rules that govern the changes.
(Hidden) assumptions of simple compartmental ODE models
Anatomy of an Epidemic.
Susceptible, Infected, Recovered: the SIR Model of an Epidemic
Presentation transcript:

Sanja Teodorović University of Novi Sad Faculty of Science

Mathematical modeling Standard (medical) studies are not enough Abstraction sufficient for further assessment of the solution; makes it possible to perceive a real problem in a simplified manner Description of real problems using various mathematical tools; used for the analysis, design and optimization Correctly set if: the solution of the initial problem exists the solution of the initial problem is unique the solution of the initial problem continuously depend on the initial conditions

Mathematical modeling Mathematical models: linear and nonlinear; deterministic and stochastic – predetermined by previous values and impossible to predict – the probability of change of the certain values; statistical and dynamic – constant and dependent on time; discrete and continuous – in certain points of time and continuously in time; deductive, inductive and “floating” – theoretical and experimental reasoning and an estimate of the expected relationship between variables. Formulation: simplified, real, precise Computer simulations and experimental testing of theoretical conclusions

History Daniel Bernoulli, 1760 – smallpox; the first model True development William Hamer, 1906 – measles number of new cases depends on the concentration of sensitive and infectious Sir Ronald Ross, 1922 – malaria model of differential equations Kermack and McKendrick, 1926 condition for the occurrence of epidemic – number of sensitive is greater then a finite number middle of 20 th century – accelerate d development

History Passive immunity, a gradual loss of immunity, social mixing between groups, vaccination, quarantine, different medicines etc. Smallpox, measles, diphtheria, malaria, rabies, gonorrhea, herpes, syphilis and HIV and AIDS Epidemiological (for sudden and rapid outbreaks) and endemic (for infections that extend over a longer period of time)

Classification of epidemiology models Five basic groups (classes): M class: class of people who have passive immunity S class: susceptible class E class: exposed class; infected but not infectious I class: infectious class R klasa: recovered class (removed) classes M and E are often neglected MSEIR, MSEIRS, SEIR, SEIRS, SIR, SEI, SEIS, SI, SIS SIR basic model

MSEIR births with passive immunity births without passive immunity death Classification of epidemiology models adequate contact latent period infectious period

Time and age component Number of people in classes and the fractions in the classes Basic quantities in epidemiological models passively immune fraction susceptible fraction exposed fraction infectious fraction recovered fraction

Transfer rates:  M,  E,  I;  - number of adequate contacts in the unit of time Threshold quantities: The basic reproduction number – average number of infected people after the invasion of the disease; quantitative threshold (R 0 ) Contact number – average number of adequate contacts of any infectious person during its infectious period ( σ ) Replacement number – average number of secondary infections; infectious person infects during its infectious period (R) equality holds in the initial point Basic quantities in epidemiological models

Classic, most primitive and the simplest model S susceptibles, I infectives and R removed Significant insight into the dynamics of infectious diseases Basic assumptions: total population size is constant population is homogeneously mixed an infectious person can only become a recovered person and cannot become a susceptible person The classic SIR epidemic model

Special case of the MSEIR model Vital dynamics are neglected Meets basic assumptions s(t), i(t) and r(t) converge number of susceptible must be greater so the epidemic could spread throughout the population; the basic reproduction number average number of adequate contacts of the infectious person during its infectious period; the contact number the replacement number

The classic SIR epidemic model at each next moment less people become infectious and so the epidemic loses its strength number of infectious increases until it reaches the maximum number of infectious The epidemic begins to lose its strength at the moment The contact number can be experimentally calculated

The classic SIR epidemic model susceptible fraction infectious fraction The solution of the classic epidemic model (SIR)

The classic SIR endemic model Modification of the classic epidemic model Vital dynamic (rates of birth and death) – the average life expectancy the basic reproduction number the contact number is equal to the basic reproduction number, at any given moment, since there is an assumption that after the invasion of the disease there are no new cases of susceptible or infectious

Constant size of population is not realistic; different rates of birth and death, significant data about the dead Black Plague (14 th century) – 25% of the population; AIDS Size of population additional variable  additional differential equation All five basic groups More accurate, more realistic and more difficult to solve MSEIR model

where the size of the population changes Directly transmitted illnesses Lasting immunity b – rate of birth, d – rate of death population growth q = b – d has impact on the size of population

HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) Basic condition for the appearance of AIDS Gradual decrease of the immune system T cells, macrophage and dendritic cells; CD4 + T cells Stages of the infection: acute phase – 2 to 4 weeks; symptoms of the flu; decrease number of virus cells, increase number of CD4 + T cells seroconversion phase – the immune system gets activated and the number of virus cells decreases asymptotic phase of the infection – absence of symptoms, up to 10 years, number of virus cells varies AIDS – immune system is unable to fight any infection HIV virus

P – unknown function that describes the production of the virus c – clearance rate constant V – virus concentration The simplest HIV dynamic model assumption that the drug completely blocks the virus  easy to calculate  incorrect, imprecise and incomplete

A model that incorporates viral production T – concentration of uninfected T cells s – production rate of new uninfected T cells p – average reproduction rate of T cells T max – maximal concentration of T cells when the reproduction stops d T – death rate of the uninfected T cells k – infection rate T * – concentration of infected T cells  – death rate of the infected T cells N – virus particulates c – clearance rate constant

The probability of contact between T cells and HIV cells is proportional to the product of their concentrations The system provides significant data about the concentration of the virus and the behavior of cells that the virus had impact on The system is more accurate; can be modified in order to get results that are more precise A model that incorporates viral production

Analysis of the model that incorporates viral production Concentration of the virus is constant before the treatment  V, N, , c are const.  concentration of infected cells is const.   quasi – steady state

Analysis of the model that incorporates viral production  the virus clearance rate is greater than the speed of virus production so therefore after a finite amount of time the concentration of virus decreases to zero

Analysis of the model that incorporates viral production no single point is stable, but the entire line is a set of possible equilibrium points; the multiplicity of equilibrium point provides the ability to maintain the parameters V and T * on some positive and finite values the concentration of virus increases indefinitely

Models of drug therapy RT inhibitors RT inhibitors reduce the appearance of the infected target cells. Perfect inhibitor   T does not depend on the concentration of the virus Naive and nonrealistic, demands modifications

Models of drug therapy RT inhibitors  RT – efficiency of the RT inhibitor   inhibitor is 100% efficient inhibitor has no influence

Models of drug therapy RT inhibitors Unreal assumption, since it is known that with the decrease of virus cells, CD4+ T cells increase  RT should be much greater in order to eliminate the virus from the human body   

Models of drug therapy Protease inhibitors Protease inhibitors enable the production of infectious virus cells V I – virus cells created before the treatment; infectious V NI – virus cells created after the treatment; not infectious 100% inhibitor 

Before the usage of the inhibitor, all virus cell are infectious Models of drug therapy Protease inhibitors more parameters unreal 

Models of drug therapy Imperfect protease inhibitors  PI – efficiency of protease inhibitor

Models of drug therapy Combination therapy The attack on the virus in two independent points 100% efficient inhibitors 

Models of drug therapy Combination therapy   Assumption of 100% efficiency  model is simpler and easier to solve Exponentially decreasing values – medical researchers goal Not real

Time the virus needs to infect cells and reproduce V 0 of virus cells infects a patient with T 0 uninfected target cells The sum of an average lifetime of a free cell and an average lifespan of an infected cell Viral generation time

A way to represent the appearances in nature and especially medicine, by using different mathematical tools and rules A way to study a behavior of the disease in a real situations The mathematical modeling of epidemics and HIV can significantly contribute to solving these problems Given mathematical models haven certain limitations and they can be additionally modified Conclusion