IETF – ECRIT Emergency Context Resolution using Internet Technologies ESW 5 – Vienna October 2008 Marc Linsner.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whos who in the IETF Zoo? Geoff Huston Executive Director, Internet Architecture Board.
Advertisements

1 ISMS WG 79th IETF Beijing November 10, 2010 Goal:Creating a security model for SNMPv3 that will meet the security and operational needs of network administrators.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 78 – Maastricht, NL July 29, 2010 Marc Linsner Richard Barnes Roger Marshall.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 89 London March 5, 2014.
ECRIT Virtual Interim Meeting 26th February, 2PM EST Marc Linsner Hannes Tschofenig.
Russ Housley IETF Chair 23 July 2012 Introduction to the IETF Standards Process.
IETF ECRIT update Marc Linsner 5/11/10. ECRIT Charter (or a piece of it) ………The group will show how the availability of location data and call routing.
Origins of ECRIT IETF has been working on location since 2000 –Spatial BoF, eventually GEOPRIV chartered in 2001 GEOPRIV provides location information.
Emergency Services IAB Tech Chat 28 th February 2007 Hannes Tschofenig.
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Honolulu, IETF-91, 14th Nov 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol by: Kirk Z. Moreno.
Management of the Internet
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 92 - Dallas March 24, 2015.
RTCWEB WG draft-aboba-rtcweb-ecrit-00 Bernard Aboba Martin Thomson July 30, 2012 IETF 84, Vancouver Please join the Jabber room:
Ernst Langmantel Technical Director, Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunication (RTR GmbH) The opinions expressed in this presentation.
Stefano Trumpy -- Update on the Internet Society 1 TERENA Networking Conference 2001 Session 1B Update on the Internet Society Stefano Trumpy VicePresident.
MPTCP – Multipath TCP WG Meeting Toronto, IETF-90, 21 st July 2014 Philip Eardley Yoshifumi Nishida 1.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 76, Hiroshima Nov 11, 2009 Hannes Tschofenig Marc Linsner (attending virtually) Roger.
SIPREC Conference Recording (draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-01) IETF 89, March 7, 2014 Authors: Michael Yan, Paul Kyzivat, Simon Romano.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) IETF 81 – Quebec City, QC Canada July 25, 2011 Marc Linsner Richard Barnes Roger Marshall.
DIME WG IETF 82 Dime WG Agenda & Status THURSDAY, November 17, 2011 Jouni Korhonen & Lionel Morand.
Draft-rosen-ecrit-emergency- framework-00 Brian Rosen NeuStar CPa
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP Interim meeting #3 20 th October 2011 audio Yoshifumi Nishida Philip Eardley.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 87 Berlin July 29, 2013.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 84 Vancouver July 31, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0691r0 Submission May 2011 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE IETF Liaison Report Date: Authors:
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 81 Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
ECRIT Virtual Interim Meeting 3rd June 2009, 1PM EDT (New York) Marc Linsner Hannes Tschofenig.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG IETF 79, Beijing, China Margaret Wasserman Hui Deng
ROLL Working Group Meeting IETF-81, Quebec City July 2011 Online Agenda and Slides at: bin/wg/wg_proceedings.cgi Co-chairs:
Architectural Design of a Multi- Agent System for handling Metadata streams Don Cruickshank, Luc Moreau, David De Roure Department of Electronics and Computer.
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well.
IEEE Emergency Services Working Group Report to: Emergency Services Workshop #7 Geoff Thompson/GraCaSI (supported by Interdigital) Working Group.
Who’s watching your network The IETF standards process and OpenPGP Jon Callas 8 October 1998.
Internet and Intranet Fundamentals Class 3 Session B.
PAWS Protocol to Access White Space DB IETF 83, Paris Gabor Bajko, Brian Rosen.
ECRIT IETF 72 July 2008 Dublin Hannes Tschofenig Marc Linsner Roger Marshall.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies BOF (ecrit) Jon Peterson, Hannes Tschofenig BOF Chairs.
ECRIT IETF 70 December 2007 Vancouver Hannes Tschofenig Marc Linsner Roger Marshall.
Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) Cullen Jennings (WG co-chair) DISPATCH WG IETF 90.
Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environment (ACE) WG Chairs: Kepeng Li, Hannes
MPTCP – MULTIPATH TCP WG meeting #1 Nov 9 th, 2009 Hiroshima, ietf-76.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) Hannes Tschofenig, Marc Linsner IETF 65.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Liaison Report Date Submitted: September 16, 2010 Presented at IEEE session.
Interface to the Routing System (IRS) BOF IETF 85, Atlanta November 2012.
MODERN BoF Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, and Registering telephone Numbers IETF 92.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) Hannes Tschofenig, Marc Linser Chairs.
Questions phones off (please). Question 1 Which of the following statements is incorrect a) A URL maps to an IP address b) HTTP stands for Hypertext Transfer.
SIPREC Conference Recording (draft-kyzivat-siprec-conference-use-cases-00) IETF 87, November 4, 2013 Authors: Michael Yan, Paul Kyzivat, Simon Romano.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ecrit) Hannes Tschofenig, Marc Linsner IETF 66, Montreal, June 2006.
Doc.: IEEE /0122r0 Submission January 2012 Dorothy Stanley, Aruba NetworksSlide 1 IEEE IETF Liaison Report Date: Authors:
SIPPING Working Group IETF 67 Mary Barnes Gonzalo Camarillo.
SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Overview
CLUE WG Interim Meeting San Jose, CA Sept , 2012
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Chairs: Marc Linsner & Roger Marshall Standing In for the Chairs: Brian Rosen IETF 94.
STIR Secure Telephone Identity Revisited
CLUE WG Interim Meeting San Jose, CA Sept , 2012
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 86 Orlando March 13, 2013.
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) Overview
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
draft-ietf-ecrit-rough-loc
CONEX BoF.
MODERN Working Group IETF 97 November 14, 2016.
Routing Area Open Meeting IETF 99 – Prague
IEEE IETF Liaison Report
lemonade Eric Burger Glenn Parsons November 10, 2003
16th November 2016 Gorry Fairhurst (via webrtc) David Black WG chairs
SIPBRANDY Chair Slides
Marc Linsner Richard Barnes Roger Marshall
Presentation transcript:

IETF – ECRIT Emergency Context Resolution using Internet Technologies ESW 5 – Vienna October 2008 Marc Linsner

The IETF The IETF working groups are grouped into areas, and managed by Area Directors, or ADs. The ADs are members of the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Providing architectural oversight is the Internet Architecture Board, (IAB). The IAB also adjudicates appeals when someone complains that the IESG has failed. The IAB and IESG are chartered by the Internet Society (ISOC) for these purposes. The General Area Director also serves as the chair of the IESG and of the IETF, and is an ex-officio member of the IAB.

ECRIT Charter “…The group will show how the availability of location data and call routing information at different steps in session setup would enable communication between a user and a relevant emergency response center. Though the term "call routing" is used in this document, it should be understood that some of the mechanisms which will be described might be used to enable other types of media streams. Video and text messaging, for example, might be used to request emergency services. While this group anticipates a close working relationship with groups such as NENA and ETSI EMTEL, any solution presented must be useful regardless of jurisdiction, and it must be possible to use without a single, central authority. Further, it must be possible for multiple delegations within a jurisdiction to be handled independently, as call routing for specific emergency types may be independent. This working group cares about privacy and security concerns, and will address them within its documents.”

Completed Work Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (RFC 5012) A Uniform Resource Name (URN) for Emergency and Other Well-Known Services (RFC 5031) Security Threats and Requirements for Emergency Call Marking and Mapping (RFC 5069) LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol (RFC 5222) Discovering Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Servers Using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) (RFC 5223)

In-Progress Work Location-to-URL Mapping Architecture and Framework – ‘Framework Draft’ Best Current Practice for Communications Services in support of Emergency Calling – PhoneBCP Last remaining issue is Calling Party Hold A Design Team is being formed to address this issue Framework for Emergency Calling using Internet Multimedia Location Hiding: Problem Statement and Requirements Specifying Holes in LoST Service Boundaries Synchronizing Location-to-Service Translation (LoST) Servers

Future Maintain LoST – New extensions – Maintenance from implementations Authority to Citizen – Currently a BOF for the upcoming Minneapolis BOF is a charter proposal for a new WG – An IESG decision whether to start a new WG or let ECRIT do it.