Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
Advertisements

1 Alignment using high Pt tracks 1.Small w.r.t. large barrel chambers 2.BEE w.r.t. EC chambers 3.Endcap – Barrel 4.BIS8 w.r.t. BIS7 5.Inner tracker – Muon.
Digital Filtering Performance in the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger David Hadley on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Muon Data Quality and Performance A. Belloni - G. Zevi Della Porta for the ATLAS Harvard Group DOE Site Visit
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
D. Peterson, Muon Spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS, presentation to LEPP 19-Nov  spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS Our charge: Survivability Resolution.
LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.
CMS Alignment and Calibration Yuriy Pakhotin on behalf of CMS Collaboration.
First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.
The digitization procedure occurs separately for each Muon technology, MDT, CSC, RPC and TGC. Here the main steps of each MuonHits to Muon Digits conversion.
Test Of Distributed Data Quality Monitoring Of CMS Tracker Dataset H->ZZ->2e2mu with PileUp - 10,000 events ( ~ 50,000 hits for events) The monitoring.
Muon System and Physics Performance Ludovico Pontecorvo CERN-INFN.
14 August Magnetic Field in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Masahiro Morii for the ATLAS Group Harvard University Laboratory for Particle Physics and.
F.Fanzago – INFN Padova ; S.Lacaprara – LNL; D.Spiga – Universita’ Perugia M.Corvo - CERN; N.DeFilippis - Universita' Bari; A.Fanfani – Universita’ Bologna;
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
F. Fassi, S. Cabrera, R. Vives, S. González de la Hoz, Á. Fernández, J. Sánchez, L. March, J. Salt, A. Lamas IFIC-CSIC-UV, Valencia, Spain Third EELA conference,
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
LHC Upgrade: Evaluation of monitored drift tubes inclusion into the ATLAS level 1 muon end cap trigger ICEPP, KEK A Katarina Bendtz, Takayuki Kamiya, Tatsuo.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Toronto, Canada High-Precision, Large-Volume Particle Tracking U. Bratzler* Outline (Example: Muon Tracking in ATLAS)
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
TRT Offline Software DOE Visit, August 21 st 2008 Outline: oTRT Commissioning oTRT Offline Software Activities oTRT Alignment oTRT Efficiency and Noise.
Status & Readiness of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer J. Chapman - University of Michigan on behalf of the ATLAS Muon Groups Particular Thanks to C. Ferretti,
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
T. Kawamoto1 ATLAS muon small wheels for ATLAS phase-1 upgrade LHCC T. Kawamoto (New) small wheels ? Why new small wheels for high.
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
Data Quality Monitoring for the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber Detector Anna Cimmino etc etc etc Università degli Studi di Napoli “ Federico II ” & INFN of.
Integration of the ATLAS Tag Database with Data Management and Analysis Components Caitriana Nicholson University of Glasgow 3 rd September 2007 CHEP,
The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer 1 has ~355,000 drift tubes installed into 1200 precision Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) tracking chambers arrayed over a 22 m high,
Analyzing Praxial Platform Positions on MDT Barrel Chambers Using X-Ray Tomograph Measurements Chris Hayward Advisor: Silvia Schuh August 14, 2003 UM CERN.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
Atlas Muon Spectrometer: installation and commissioning L. Pontecorvo INFN Roma.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
CGEM-IT project and beam test program G. Felici for the FE-LNF-TO team Partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the Program.
Software for the CMS Cosmic Challenge Giacomo BRUNO UCL, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium On behalf of the CMS Collaboration CHEP06, Mumbay, India February 16,
1 A Scalable Distributed Data Management System for ATLAS David Cameron CERN CHEP 2006 Mumbai, India.
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
Distributed Analysis Tutorial Dietrich Liko. Overview  Three grid flavors in ATLAS EGEE OSG Nordugrid  Distributed Analysis Activities GANGA/LCG PANDA/OSG.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Javier Castillo3rd LHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 15/06/ Status of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Alignment Strategies & Results from Cosmic run Javier.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,
ATLAS The ConditionDB is accessed by the offline reconstruction framework (ATHENA). COOLCOnditions Objects for LHC The interface is provided by COOL (COnditions.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
ANDREA NEGRI, INFN PAVIA – NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM – ROME 20th October
The ATLAS detector … … is composed of cylindrical layers: Tracking detector: Pixel, SCT, TRT (Solenoid magnetic field) Calorimeter: Liquid Argon, Tile.
Status of Digitization, Testbeam Simulation, and Production ATLAS Muon Week -CERN, February 18th 2005 Daniela Rebuzzi – Pavia University and INFN.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Llea Nasira Samuel Benedict College Charlotte Wood-Harrington
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Calibration
ATLAS MDT HV – LV Detector Control System (DCS)
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Controlling a large CPU farm using industrial tools
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer and
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Presentation transcript:

Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework

Outline 20/10/2010 Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna) 2 ATLAS muon spectrometer MDT drift tube chambers Resolution requirements Calibration strategy stream processing Latency

ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Standalone Muon Spectrometry ∆p T / p T < 10% up to 1 TeV Coverage | η | < 2.7 (| θ | < 86 0 ) Layout Superconducting air coil toroid Trigger chambers: RPC (Barrel) and TGC (end-cap) Precision chambers: MDT, CSC (inner end-cap) Muon Stations 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

MDT Drift Tube Chambers Drift Tube Ar/CO 2 3 bar absolute Ø Tube = 30 mm and Ø Wire = 50 μ m High Voltage = 3080 Gas gain = 2.0 x Resolution = 80 μ m MDT Chambers 2 multi-layers with 3 or 4 layers Surface 0.5 to 11 m 2 Monitoring of geometry, temperature and magnetic field. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Resolution Requirements First Collisions p T < 100 GeV: Resolution dominated by multiple scattering and energy loss Required rt –precision: O(100 μ m) Design Parameters p T > 100 GeV: Resolution dominated by spatial resolution. Required rt –precision: O(20 μ m) 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Calibration Strategy t0 determination Starting point of drift time spectrum Needed for equalization of time measurement of all the drift tubes ~10K hits per tube are needed Integration of drift time integration Gives start rt with precision O(100 μ m) Auto calibration Fit segments using input rt Deviation of r drift from r segment gives correction Iterate Resolution Fit segment omitting one tube σ (residual) = σ residual ⊕ σ drift Iterate Required precision 20 μ m to be done within 24 hrs after data taking. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Correction Functions One rt relation is fitted by chamber. To compensate for effects, which are inhomogeneous inside one chamber, rt correction functions are applied Wire-sag Barrel: Bend tubes so that the wire is always in middle End-cap: Apply rt-correction Temperature Magnetic field 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Calibration Stream Muon trigger RPC-chambers muon trigger level 1 momentum from mdt-chambers muon trigger level 2 event filter level-3 trigger Calibration centers outside CERN (tier-2 subclusters) Michigan Munich (MPI+LMU) Roma & Napels calibration stream ~100 kHz ~1 kHz ~100 Hz 1/3 μ 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Calibration Processing: Data Flow Calibration datasets from ATLAS Tier0 are sent to remote calibration center using distributed data management system. Calibration Farms at remote center process the files as soon as they are available in local storage element. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Calibration Processing: Calibration center Calibration centers are established at ATLAS Tier2 with additional job and data management components to control the calibration task Dynamic partitioning of computing resources Reservation of storage resources Job management Entry point for grid jobs which needs a digital certificate to operate and are integrated in Batch Queue Manager. Recently, job submission tool Ganga has been integrated for job management and bookkeeping Tasks can be submitted to different backend like Panda and LCG Tasks can be splitted on basis of number of files, events and subjobs. Better management of task output. For more information on Ganga, see talk by Johannes Elmeshuer. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Calibration Processing: Architecture Local Calibration Data Splitter (LCDS) permanently watches for incoming data. As soon as the first data arrive in local storage element, LCDS starts submitting a set of jobs to calibration batch queue. Monitoring of calibration task is performed by monitoring client integrated in LCDS. Relevant data gets store at the end of calibration task and data could be in principle released and marked for deletion from Tier2 storage. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Latency  Calibration tasks were submitted using job submission tool Ganga.  Number of subjobs corresponding to a dataset depends upon number of files in the dataset.  Latency is peaked at around 2 hrs.  Most of the datasets are processed in the calibration centers after 2 hrs of data taking. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)

Summary Ganga as job submission tool has been integrated into LCDS. Remote center used for calibration of MDT chambers have been setup and their functionalities have been tested with real data. Latency is peaked around 2 hrs. ATLAS muon calibration framework can be extended for calibration to other sub system of detector. 20/10/ Manoj Kumar Jha (INFN – Bologna)