Christine James 01530 454689

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Models for Planning & Affordable Housing – HBF conference Planning Agreements – use, abuse and some possible solutions Paul Winter, Eversheds LLP 14.
Advertisements

Strategic Spending of Developers Contributions Bournemouth and Poole Borough Councils Poole  L17 Policy and context  The Green Card system  Scoring.
Planning: Can localism work in your area? Dr Michael Harris Deputy Head of Policy & Research John Romanski Senior Neighbourhood Planning Advisor, Planning.
Rushcliffe Borough Council Development Management Process Changes to Planning Legislation Andrew Pegram Service Manager, Communities February 2015.
LES and Planning Policy
Planning for Cyclists Andrew Wayne Mangham – Welwyn Hatfield Cycling Forum (WHCF) : 9 April 2014.
1 An overview of neighbourhood planning and protection of open space.
EAST MIDLANDS COUNCILS Affordable Housing Seminar 19 June 2013 Chan Kataria, Group Chief Executive.
The Croydon Monitoring Report Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy December 2014.
The Community Infrastructure Levy – A planning gain? 1 Janet Askew, Adam Sheppard University of the West of England, Bristol Lorraine O’Connor Foot Anstey.
A Local Plan for Liverpool National and Local Planning Policy David Hughes Head of Planning.
Droitwich South Ward Meeting Yew Tree Development Community Hall 29 th June 2011 Facilitated by Cllr Richard Morris Neil Pearce, Development Manager Andrew.
November 7, 2013 Open House Manitoba Municipalities Modernization Act RM of Daly & Town of Rivers.
Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan 2016 Identification of issues.
Affordable Housing: Policies into Practice Louise Dwelly Housing Strategy & Enabling Manager October 2004.
1 'Eco - Town' Andy Robinson East Area Have your Say.
Section 106 Obligations – when are they caught?
Salford Draft Core Strategy Graham Gentry Head of Spatial Planning.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Municipal Tax Increment Financing Daniel Stevenson, Office of the Commissioner, DECD Phone:
Embedding Travel Planning in the Development Process Sarah Cummings Behaviour Change Transport for London.
The evidence base for your Neighbourhood Plan Clive Keble MRTPI Planning Aid England Advisor.
Community Infrastructure Levy Preliminary Draft Consultation.
59 ½ Southwark Street London SE1 0AL (UK) ++44 (0) / Land Use Planning and Mobility Management Securing travel.
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Environmental, Housing and Planning Scrutiny Committee 23 rd September 2005.
Planning Obligations & Section 106
Section 106 Overview Tony Melia – Section 106 Officer.
The Local Development Framework and other Planning matters Presentation to the Bradford Property Forum 19 June 2007.
#neighbourhoodplanning Golden Rules. First Golden Rule PLAN POSITIVELY “Planning must be a creative exercise in finding ways to enhance and improve the.
Neighbourhood Planning. Frequently Asked Questions What is Neighbourhood Planning? What can a Neighbourhood Plan do – and what can it not do? What are.
SECTION 106 AGREEMENTS Martin Hooker Assistant Director (Planning)
Presented by Ian Robinson How many hats do we wear?
Old Sarum Airfield Enquiry by Design 24 th & 25th September 2013 Kim Slowe – Managing Director, ZeroC Holdings Ltd.
Regional planning I local plan I design & regeneration I transport planning I research & information Southend-on-Sea Core Strategy Development Plan Document.
Sustainable Development and Neighbourhood Plans Chris Gooding and Bill Bloxsome Data Orchard/Community First.
Muston planning for Bath & North East Somerset Council 3 June 2015 Councillor Training – Planning Mike Muston – Muston Planning.
Muston planning for Bath & North East Somerset Council 3 June 2015 Councillor Training – Planning Mike Muston – Muston Planning muston planning.
Know your Community Rights Localism 6 months on Neighbourhood Planning Collecting the Evidence Alyson Linnegar 16 November 2012.
S106, Developer Contributions & Delivering Infrastructure Mike Kiely Director of Planning LB Croydon Chair Planning Officers Society.
Local Authorities Building Stronger Communities The Role of Philanthropy and Alternative Funding Initiatives Thursday 25th February 2016 Dublin Castle.
CIL : The Spending. Background and Context The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just.
PLANNING ADVISORY SERVICE SEMINAR January 2015 SECTION 106 – ISSUES, APPROACHES AND CLAUSES Presented by Shabana Anwar.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
TO CIL OR NOT TO CIL? Alison Fairhurst DCLG January 2016.
PLANNING & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT City Planning Team PLANNING OBLIGATIONS – BRISTOL’S APPROACH Jim Cliffe Planning Obligations Manager Bristol City Council.
Councillor briefing Developer contributions: Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 obligations, viability Date: April 2015www.pas.gov.uk.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 and S278 vs CIL July 2014.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Emily Harvey, Associate.
Savills.com CIL Latest Research & Findings Lizzie Cullum, UK Development.
Local Authority Experience Managing an effective S106 process Stephen Pointer Strategic Planning and Housing Manager Harborough District Council.
S106 Agreements Development Control User Panel. s106 agreements What are s106 agreements? How are they managed? The future:Community Infrastructure Levy.
S day viability course- York Gilian Macinnes Date: June 2015www.pas.gov.uk.
1 Section 106: What they are and where we are DARREN WILDING DCLG.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
Planning and Development Viability Delivering Sustainable Development John Wacher - CIL & Development Viability Manager.
SECTION 106 UPDATE DARREN WILDING DCLG. S106 - LEGISLATION Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 restricts the development or use of the.
Neighbourhood Planning in Haringey Myddleton Road Strategic Group 7 th November 2013.
Community Infrastructure Levy The fundamentals. Response to questions.
Community Infrastructure Levy S106 vs CIL July 2014.
Councillor briefing Developer contributions: Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 obligations, viability Date: July 2013www.pas.gov.uk.
Phillipa Silcock Using and discharging conditions.
Development contributions – S106 & CIL - update Gilian Macinnes March
Laura McCulloch Strategic Manager – Planning Hampshire County Council The Community Infrastructure Levy: The Hampshire Experience.
S106 – Where we are- current context Gilian Macinnes Date: March 2015www.pas.gov.uk.
SECTION 106 INFORMATION PRESENTATION. WELCOME This presentation provides an overview of the way Wellingborough Council negotiates and processes developer.
Community Benefits agreements and policies
Stroud District Local Plan Briefing on Stroud District Local Plan (- Conrad Moore, Planning Strategy Team) January 2016.
Neighbourhood Planning in the North Wessex Downs AONB
LES and Planning Policy
AUTHORS: JUAN GARCIA RYAN CHERRINGTON LEE McMELLON.
Presentation transcript:

Christine James

Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990

What are Section 106 Agreements? Planning obligations Planning agreements Section 106 agreements Planning gain

WHY DO WE NEED PLANNING OBLIGATIONS? New development can place a burden on existing resources: schools libraries medical centres leisure and community facilities the environment and transport infrastructure

MITIGATION Section 106 T&CPA 1990 allows local authorities to require developers or any other person interested in land to enter into obligations when seeking planning permission to address these issues

What are they used for ? Operations or activities Land to be used in a specified way Payments either as a single sum or periodically

District Council Requirements National Forest Planting - Housing developments (District Council) Over 0.5 ha - 20% of site to be woodland planting and landscaping; either on-site or near to the development

Affordable Housing Site thresholds Sites of 15 or more dwellings. Targets 40% affordable housing outside of the greater Coalville area and 30% in the greater Coalville area. Tenure An appropriate mix of tenure types A copy of Affordable Housing SPD can be found in full on the Council’s web site

Local Leisure Facilities & Children’s Play Area Provision £1,100 per dwelling to enhance local leisure facilities Provision of children’s play area, (Policy L21 & L22 of the North West Leicestershire Local Plan ) Supplementary Planning Guidance note on play area provision provides advice on this matter (see Council’s website -

Leicester, Leics and Rutland Facilities Consortium (NHS) Health Care Provision 1-2 Bedroom Dwelling - £583. each dwelling 3-4 Bedroom Dwelling - £1,167. each dwelling 5 Bedroom Dwelling - £1,750. each dwelling Student dwelling - £219. each dwelling

County Council Requirements Education Highway Authority Civic Amenity Site Infrastructure

. Libraries 1 bedroomed £27.18 per house 2 bedroomed £54.35 per house 3/4/5 bedroomed £63.41 per house 1 bedroomed £27.18 per apartment 2 bedroomed £54.35 per apartment 3/4/5 bedroomed £63.41 per apartment

What else can be required? Affordable housing Affordable business use Flood defence Highway, transport and travel schemes Recreation Community Centres Recycling Crime and Disorder prevention Employment and Training Archaeology and conservation Education Open spaces Libraries Healthcare Fire and Rescue Town Centre Improvements Environmental Improvements

Planning Permission cannot be bought or sold!!!! “Despite the fundamental principle that planning permissions can not be sold or bought it sometimes seems that the UK is close to selling planning permissions”

The Act and Circular 05/2005 Relevant to planning Necessary to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms Directly related to the proposed development; Fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development and Reasonable in all other respects.

Evidence What is the impact of this development on facilities? How is it relevant to planning? Why is it necessary to make the proposed development acceptable in planning terms? How is it directly related to the proposed development?

Evidence Show it is fairly and reasonably related in scale and kind to the proposed development AND Be prepared to explain how it is reasonable in all other respects

SPEND THE MONEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANNING OBLIGATION WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT ENSURE THERE IS AN AUDIT TRAIL

30% of Councils have paid money back to developers because it has not been spent appropriately!

Monitoring and enforcing s106 agreements Deal or no deal? Applies to all parties of the contract! Only the Planning Authority can enforce Can’t pay – won’t pay!!!! - Viability study

The future Community Infrastructure Levy Not mandatory – will work side by side with s106 agreements. Section 106 agreements to be retained but will be scaled back

Benefits …… Legal certainty Enable mitigation of cumulative Impacts/pooled contributions Transparency Support development of an area rather than just one development

Opportunities???? LA will need to set out the quantum and type of development anticipated The LA will need to make an assessment of the infrastructure that will be required. It will need to estimate how much CIL is likely to be collected. There must be an up to date adopted development strategy

The Election Conservatives have already published their ‘Green Paper’ on Planning – if they win the general election. They will abandon CIL and introduce a ‘Tariff’ system.

Scenario 1 “The Council was so keen for this development to go ahead that they overlooked the conservation group. The conservation group felt they had been railroaded. Planning should be squeaky clean but it isn’t always”

Scenario 2 Planning officer ignored Missed by the audit commissioner!!! Loss to the community.

Scenario 3 The agreement required that the Council to hold the money for a particular purpose - A ‘Trust’ was formed. The developers remained the owners of the money until it was spent on the highway improvements within the time specified – the money had to be returned to the developer (Patel v Brent 2005)

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING Christine James Principal Planning Officer Tel