Ladder of Inference Instructional Leadership:. © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012. Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developmentally Appropriate Practice
Advertisements

Focus on Instructional Support
DIALOGUE. What does ‘Dialogue’ mean to you? WHAT DOES DIALOGUE MEAN TO YOU? A – General Discussion B – Random thoughts C – Focused problem solving D.
Best Practices for Adolescent Literacy Secondary Alabama Reading Initiative ARI Content Literacy 2010.
Modeling 21 st Century Work and College Readiness Skills in Your Program and Classroom Effective Transitions in Adult Education Conference Warwick, RI.
TEAM MANAGEMENT SERIES: COACHING INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE UCP Central PA Supervisor Meeting November 20, 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Planning High Standards for Student Learning Instructional Leadership:
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Communication Skills Anyone can hear. It is virtually automatic. Listening is another matter. It takes skill, patience, practice and conscious effort.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Name of Facilitator Instructional Leadership:. Welcome ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved. Name of Superintendent.
Collaboration Works, Inc. IEP Facilitation: Preventing and Effectively Engaging Conflict in Meetings October 5, 2007 Karen Hannan Collaboration Works,
+ REFLECTIVE COACHING APRIL 29, Goals for Today Check in on where everyone is in our self-guided learning and practice with reflective coaching.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Foundations of Inclusion Training Workshop
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Performance Reviews Coaching and Feedback. Performance Reviews: Coaching and Feedback Module 1: At our best Coaching and feedback refresh.
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
GVSU Learning Network Supporting Student Learning Needs January 21 & 22, 2015.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Leadership for Learning September 5, 2007 LEARNERS = LEADERS.
Crucial Conversation . Conducting Learner-Focused Conversations with Teachers Session 1: Planning the First Conversation Source: Crucial Confrontations.
Instructional Leadership Planning an Accountability System Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Supporting Ethical Decision Making Laura Kent, Valerie Cervantez, Velma Kitcheyan Workshop Facilitators.
Foundations of Inclusion Training Workshop
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Implementing an Ethical Decision Making Process Name Workshop Facilitator.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Customer Focus Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint is.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
ISLLC Standard #4 Planning Collaboration with Families Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Science Leadership Support Network September 25, 2009 Supported by PIMSER and Kentucky Department of Education Welcome!
National Board Study Group Meeting Dan Barber 5 th Grade Teacher, Irwin Academic Center
Network for New Science/Math Teachers December 10, 2009 Lexington, KY Brought to you by University of Kentucky Partnership Institute for Math & Science.
Instructional Leadership: Instructional Quality. Welcome Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name of Facilitator –Overview / Agenda –Enduring.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
ISLLC Standard #6 The Education System Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Instructional Leadership.
Collaborative Grouping 6-12 Math Teachers. Workshop Outcomes Participants will gain effective strategies for forming and facilitating a classroom culture.
Iowa Leadership Academy: “Superintendent Network” Heartland AEA 11 Pilot Network Facilitators Denny Wulf Sharon Kurns Dave Stickrod.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
1 Session #1 Superintendent’s Network January 7, & 28, 2009 “I wanted to change the world. But I have found out that the only thing one can be sure of.
School-Based Teacher-Led Instructional Rounds FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ARTS AT THE CAPITOL THEATER (ACT) MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL WILLIMANTIC, CONNECTICUT.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
Coaching and Feedback Mark Cannon.
Instructional Leadership:
Instructional Leadership
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Conscious Competence Ladder: Debrief
Presentation transcript:

Ladder of Inference Instructional Leadership:

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name of Facilitator –Overview / Agenda –Enduring Understandings –Guiding Questions –Targeted Objectives –Introductions Welcome & Introductions

Proposed Norms & Expectations Stay focused and fully engaged –no competing conversations please Participate to grow –share openly and monitor your listening Be a learner –create your own meaning and application Get your needs met –ask questions that benefit the group –personal questions on breaks Housekeeping –silence cell phones –handle business later – share ONE point …then next person

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Surface prior knowledge effective teachers.  Explain the Ladder of Inference as a tool for stimulating conversation.  Apply knowledge about at-risk student tendencies.  Clarify why it is important to test perceptions by checking for data, evidence, etc.  Connect with current practices to gather data.  Organize indicators of quality instruction in a framework with monitoring methods.  Create a plan of action to take back to your building to monitor for quality instruction. Intended Outcomes

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Student Achievement Teacher Quality Instructional Leadership ImplementingMonitoring Supporting CommunicatingAdvocatingPlanning Instructional Leadership Key Processes Applied to Performance Accountability

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, There are effective instructional practices that maximize student academic and social learning Quality Instruction:

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  How do instructional leaders observe each teacher’s instructional practices routinely to provide feedback?  How do instructional leaders evaluate how instructional time is used?  How do instructional leaders use data to monitor the quality of instruction?  How do instructional leaders evaluate teachers’ instructional practices? Research-Based Critical Behaviors

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  By the end of this workshop you will develop an action plan focused on applying the Research- Based Critical Behaviors.  In the column labeled “Current Reality”  Rate yourself on a scale of 1-5  5 = Highly effective  3 = Satisfactorily Effective  1 = Ineffective  Describe the evidence that supports your application of this concept Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  How does the Ladder of Inference help us to test perceptions by checking for data, evidence, etc. Ladder of Inference Segment Guiding Question

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  What did that teacher do to bring out the best in you?  Share Think back to your childhood and pick out the teacher that did the most for you? Flashback:

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, The most effective teachers have….  High energy and the ability to help all students learn – the low achievers, the average achievers, and the high achievers. They tend to be hard workers who are willing to share their expertise and resources with each other. They keep themselves and their students on task…Interestingly, they frequently are described as having a good sense of humor (1992, 32). According to Bratton’s view

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  But there is an apparent difficulty with this structure  Do we jump up the ladder?  Do we stick to the facts? Ladder of Inference  The concept is actually a Reinforcing Loop, where the interactions build on what comes before it and influence what comes next

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Systems Tool: The Ladder of Inference

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, S cenario One: Work Situation Bob, it’s plain as day.” You think everything’s my fault, and you’re motivated to get me. Obviously Bob always disapproves of the way I do things. Bob thinks I don’t know how to handle this type of situation but he doesn’t want to say so. Bob is expressing criticism of me. On the tape, Bob said, “Diana, you were advocating and not inquiring just now.” ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Scenario Two: Classroom Assumption Anna will never function as a capable adult Anna is so disorganized. Anna can never find anything Anna has lost her homework. Anna says she can’t find her homework. ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Scenario Three: Student Perception Ms. Kenerson is going to be fired. She’s always getting into trouble in this school. Ms. Kenerson must have done something wrong. The principal was pretty mad. The principal came in and said “I need to speak to you in the hallway right now.”

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Scenario Four: Friendships My friends might not tell me the truth. She lied to me about being busy with family. My best friend doesn’t like me anymore. He/She must be here with another friend. I see my best friend at the mall after he/she told me that they were busy with family today and couldn’t go to the mall with me.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, How do my experiences and perceptions affect my beliefs? Research Articles: Choose one of the following articles to read: Learning from Poor and Minority Students Who Succeed in School. Harvard Education Letter (May/June 1999) or Tasting Failure: Thoughts of an At-Risk Learner. Phi Delta Kappan ( , pg ). ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Work with a partner  Stop after a small chunk & discuss  one comment and one question  Identify -x- that influences the situation  Factual data, affixed meaning, assumptions,  Conclusions, beliefs, & actions  How might each affect a person’s success.  After reading fill-in the blank graphic  Consider the following  What insights are provided by your awareness of the Ladder of Inference.  What implications might this have for monitoring the quality of instruction? TASK: Reading for a Purpose

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  What insights are provided by your awareness of the Ladder of Inference. Sharing  What implications might this have for monitoring the quality of instruction?

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Why is it important to understand the human tendency to “climb the ladder”?  Why is it important to test perceptions by checking for evidence, etc.?  How might this tool be used to guide an instructional leader in gathering observation data and/or in planning a conversation with a teacher about instruction? Application of the Ladder of Inference

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Consider the guiding question  Use column labeled “Strategies/Ideas”  Connect today’s discussions with the “Research-Based Critical Behaviors.”  List at least THREE things per box  Pair Share ONE strategy you learned today and how you plan to use it at your school. Closure for this Segment 22

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Review the following…  Targeted Objectives  Research-Based Critical Behaviors  Next Steps  What additional data do you need?  Who will you involve in process?  What resources do you need?  Action Plan  Do what? By when? Conclusion and Development of an Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  In table groups (in a round robin format)  Share one new learning and describe how you will apply it in your job  NO REPEATS! Workshop Closure

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Please complete “Participant Feedback” form  Grant research  Improve future workshops Workshop Closure