Evaluating Clinical Laboratory Publications and Websites Jonathan Chang Trade Magazines Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Websites.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doug Elliott Professor, Critical Care Nursing The final step: Presentation and publication Research Workshop: Conducting research in a clinical setting.
Advertisements

Six Steps to Effective Library Research
Scientific Literature Tutorial
 A bibliography is a specifically organized list of books, journal articles and other sources that were used in the research process.  There are several.
WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS Puvaneswary Murugaiah. INTRODUCTION TO WRITING PAPERS Conducting research is academic activity Research must be original work.
Chapter 12 – Strategies for Effective Written Reports
PUBLISH OR PERISH Skills Building Workshop. Journal of the International AIDS Society Workshop Outline 1.Journal of the International.
Components of Scholarly Research Articles Abstract Introduction Methods Results Conclusion References.
About Journals What is a “journal”?
Your professor will give greater authoritative weight to an article on the Maya published in the scholarly journal American Anthropologist... than to.
Writing a Scientific Paper M Ballow, MD Division of Allergy & Immunology Department of Pediatrics University at Buffalo.
Research Proposal Development of research question
Christy Gavin Wikipedia Jimmy Wales January 15, 2001.
Field Guide to Periodical Types How to tell if an article is from an Academic/Scholarly/Peer-Reviewed Periodical Created by Jennifer Freer. Last updated.
How to Identify Peer-Reviewed, Scholarly & Academic Articles
Report Writing Format.
BIOL Tue 3:00 – 4:50 LS 207 BIOL Wed 11:00 – 12:50 LS 200 BIOL Fri 11:00 – 12:50 LS 200 Heath Blackmon LS 459 Office Hours:
Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch
Different Types of Scientific Writing. Overview Different types of papers Types of reviews Organization of papers What to leave in; what to leave out.
Publishing Reports of STEM Research—Plus Some Tips on Writing Grant Proposals! Guidelines for Getting Published or Funded James A. Shymansky E. Desmond.
Evaluating Clinical Laboratory Publications: Trade, Peer-Reviewed, & Websites Cathleen J. Pham SFSU / CLS 706 / Fall 2010.
1 Women in Management Review Dr Sandra Fielden Editor Manchester Business School
Information Lecture 2 – Evaluating Information Sources CSC Introduction to Computers and Their Applications.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
ART+FEMINISM ADVANCED WIKIMEDIA TRAINING & FAQ. Adding Images Adding Images to Wikipedia pages Talking to Other Users: How to write on talk pages Notability.
Primary and Secondary Literature Finding good sources for research.
Librarian pre-selected a variety of scholarly and popular journal articles.
Finding Credible Sources
Being an Effective Peer Reviewer Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
What is an Annotated Bibliography? A list of citations for books, articles, and documents. A list of citations for books, articles, and documents. Each.
How to read a scientific paper
 Major part of psychology for researchers, students, clinicians, etc…  Difference between journal article and popular press articles  Scholarly Journal-
How is the process of publishing printed material
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Four Reading Research: To Boldly Go Where Others Have Gone Before.
Writing Informative Grades College and Career Readiness Standards for Writing Text Types and Purposes arguments 1.Write arguments to support a substantive.
Writing Abstracts English Writing Workshop Bioforsk, Ås Spring 2009 Agro Lingua Karl Kerner - Måltrostvn 1A Vestskogen -
Advanced Wikimedia Training and FAQ. Adding Images to Wikipedia Pages Adding Images to Wikimedia Commons Adding Inboxes Talk Pages : Talking to Other.
Scientific Journal Article Evaluation Form
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 5 Research Reports.
EVALUATING SOURCES HOW DO I DETERMINE A RESOURCE’S CREDIBILITY?
Research Topics in Sustainability Thomas Christiani September 18, 2014 Sophomore Engineering Clinic I Fall 2014.
Seven Major Divisions of a research Paper Title Abstract or Summary Material and Methods Introduction (Optional) Results Discussion References.
CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE?? UNRELIABLE Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources.
Annotated Bibliography CLN4U. General Information Definition – An annotated bibliography is a list of sources Each entry consists of two parts: – a. citation.
Finding Appropriate Science Sources.  Before you do too much with the topic you have chosen, be sure to determine if there is enough research for you.
Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh. Objectives At the end of the lecture student should be able to – Define journal club Mention types Discuss critical evaluation.
The Abstract: A Key Component of a Proposal/Publication/Thesis 15th Annual HuQAS Scientific Conference Dr Margaret Muturi (KU) Kenya Institute of Curriculum.
Publishing research in a peer review journal: Strategies for success
Writing a Critical Summary of an Article or Paper
Working with Scholarly Articles
Experimental Psychology
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
APA Format What you need to know
How to Write a Short Bio About Yourself
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
خشنه اتره اهورهه مزدا شيوۀ ارائه مقاله 17/10/1388.
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
How to get published in Q1 & Q2 journals
Reliable and UNRELIABLE Sources
Put your name here Name of the Department, School or College
Put your name here Name of the Department, School or College
Field Guide to Periodical Types
How to Write a Scientific Report?
Put your name here Name of the Department, School or College
What the Editors want to see!
Research Article Title
Put your name here Department of What, School or College
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Clinical Laboratory Publications and Websites Jonathan Chang Trade Magazines Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Websites

Trade Magazine Microbe Title: Sugar-Coating Bacteria with Lipopolysaccharides - Score = 1: The title is vague but interesting. The phrase “Sugar-Coating” can imply multiple connotations. Is the article about attaching sugars to bacteria, or is it about reducing pathogenicity in bacteria with liposaccharides? Author: Andrew C. McCandlish and Thomas J. Silhavy - Score = 2: Short biography tells readers that the authors have Ph.D.s. Content: Lipopolysaccharide synthesis - Score = 2: Writing is easy to understand. Clearly defines known mechanisms as well as unknown mechanisms. Descriptive diagrams.

Trade Magazine Microbe (continued) Credibility - Score = 1: While credentials were given, figures and diagrams were not cited. Suggested readings were provided, however, many were published by the same author. References - Score = 0: No references listed. Conclusion: I need to find other sources to verify information presented in this article.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Science Title: CD14, A Receptor for Complexes of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and LPS Binding Protein - Score = 2: Title is understandable and concise. Abstract - Score = 2: Provides further information which supports the title. Defines key terms. Suggests implications of the research. Introduction - Score = 2: Various molecules are defined and discussed. The researchers seek to discover potential functions of these molecules through their interactions as complexes.

Peer-Reviewed Journal Article Science (continued) Discussion - Score = 2: Authors clearly state results and their significance. They conclude that CD14 receptors bind complexes which help remove gram-negative pathogens during infection. Acknowledgments - Score = 2: Authors thank individuals who edited the manuscript and contributors of grants. Conclusion: The information is credible and there are many references supplied for additional reading.

Website 1 html html Author/Owner: Shashank Nakate/Buzzle.com - Score = 2: Buzzle.com is a network of content providers who compile general information on a variety of topics. Information about Buzzle was accessible. Objective - Score = 2: Buzzle’s objective is to educate and inform. Content - Score = 1: General information is provided. Many technical terms are not defined and someone without a background in biology would not understand. Credibility -Score = 1: The author claims to hold a degree in agriculture, but there is no way to verify this. The website does not specialize in biology related information. References - Score = 0: No references were listed. Conclusion: The credibility of this source is questionable. Information presented here needs to be verified by a credible source.

Website Author/Owner: Many authors/Jimmy Wales/Wikimedia Foundation - Score = 2: Wikipedia is publicly written by internet volunteers. Jimmy Wales created Wikipedia, a registered trademark of the not-for-profit Wikimedia Foundation. Objective - Score = 2: Wikipedia intends to educate the general public and encourage knowledgeable authors to write articles. Content - Score = 2: Information was well presented and clearly written. Key terms were all defined. Someone without a biology background could read this and understand it. Credibility - Score = 1: Credibility depends solely on the public authors who write and edit the website. References include peer-reviewed journal articles. Diagrams are cited. References - Score = 2: References listed include peer-reviewed journal articles. Conclusion: The site was well organized and informative. Since Wikipedia is publicly written, the supplied references will need to be reviewed to confirm the validity of the content.