Class 5: Evidence Based Interventions and logic models UTA SSW, SOCW 6371 Community & Administrative Practice UTA school of social work Dr. Dick Schoech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nursing Diagnosis: Definition
Advertisements

Definitions of EBP Popular in SW
Developing the Learning Contract
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
700: Supporting Supervisors in Using Critical Thinking Skills.
Teaching/Learning Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice Asoc. prof. Vida Staniuliene Klaipeda State College Dean of Faculty of Health Sciences.
Class 5: The Community as Client UTA SSW, SOCW 5306: Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright 2005 (permission required before use) Suggest.
Computer Applications in Testing and Assessment James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2002 by James P. Sampson, Jr., All Rights Reserved.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Class 9: The Organization as Client UTA SSW, SOCW 5306: Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright 2005 (permission required before use)
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE Prepared By Dr. Nahed Said El Nagger Dr. Nahed Said El Nagger Assistant Professor of Nursing H UMM AL- QURA UNIVERSITY.
Taking Research to Practice: Rethinking Outcomes and Performance Measures for the Child and Family Service Reviews John D. Fluke, Child Protection Research.
Leadership & Organizational Achievement UTA SSW, SOCW 5306 Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Suggest printing slides for class using: Print.
DEFINING JOB PERFORMANCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO ASSESSMENTS.
Introduction to evidence based medicine
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
1 Qualitative Evaluation Terms Coding/categorization The process of condensing qualitative data through the identification of common themes. Data Matrix.
RRTC-EBP-VR The Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Effective Vocational Rehabilitation Service Delivery Practices (RRTC-EBP-VR) is established.
Week 9: Administrative practice overview UTA SSW, Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright (permission required before use) Suggest printing.
Class 12: Supervising UTA SSW, SOCW 5306 Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright 2005 (permission required before use) Suggest printing.
Assessment with Children Chapter 1. Overview of Assessment with Children Multiple Informants – Child, parents, other family, teachers – Necessary for.
REACH-SW Research & Empirical Applications for Curriculum Enhancement in Social Work Defining Research Evidence.
Clinical Social Work Research Patience Matute-Ewelisane Eugene Shabash Jayne Griffin.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Class 3: Problem Definition, Theories of Need, Capacities & Needs Assessment Overview UTA SSW, SOCW 6371 Community & Administrative Practice UTA school.
1 Promoting Evidence-Informed Practice: The BASSC Perspective Michael J. Austin, PhD, MSW, MSPH BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management.
Research Utilization in Nursing Chapter 21
Class 10: Administrative practice overview UTA SSW, SOCW 5306: Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright 2004 (permission required before.
Medhin Kahsay RN,BSN. MN519 Evidence based practice Project Seminar Presentation. 03/02/09 NUR 310 Students.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
Class 7: Program goals and objectives UTA School of Social Work 6371: Community & Administrative Practice Dr. Dick Schoech Copyright 2009 (permission required.
Overview of Chapter The issues of evidence-based medicine reflect the question of how to apply clinical research literature: Why do disease and injury.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
Week 4: The Community as Client UTA SSW: Practice III Professor Dick Schoech Copyright (permission required before use) Suggest printing slides for class.
Barriers to EBP Prepared by: Dr. Hoda Abed El-Azim.
Class 6: Identifying social conditions as problems/opportunities UTA SSW, SOCW 5306: Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright 2005 (permission.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
Christopher Manacci, MSN, ACNP, CCRN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner Critical Care Transport Services The Cleveland Clinic Director, ACNP Flight Nursing.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Week 8: Intervening in Social Conditions: action, development, and planning approaches UTA SSW Generalist Macro Practice Professor Dick Schoech Copyright.
Is the conscientious explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of the individual patient (Dr. David Sackett)
CRITICAL THINKING AND THE NURSING PROCESS Entry Into Professional Nursing NRS 101.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
102: Supporting Families in Using Critical Thinking Skills.
Validity and utility of theoretical tools - does the systematic review process from clinical medicine have a use in conservation? Ioan Fazey & David Lindenmayer.
Class 6: Program Description, Community Linkages UTA School of Social Work 6371: Community & Administrative Practice Dr. Dick Schoech Copyright 2009 (permission.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 1 Research: An Overview.
Introduction Outcome-Informed Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
Copyright © 2010, 2006, 2002 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 10 Evidence-Based Practice Sharon E. Lock.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 40 The Nurse Leader in.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 15 Evidence-Based Practice.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. EVIDENCE-BASED TEACHING IN NURSING – Chapter 15 –
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
Review of Evidence-Based Practice and determining clinical questions to address This group of 17 slides provides a nice review of evidence-based.
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Class 4: Capacities & needs Assessment Continued — Sources of Data
Evidence-Based Practice
Role of The Physical Therapist in Critical Inquiry
Class 8: The Organization as Client
Presentation transcript:

Class 5: Evidence Based Interventions and logic models UTA SSW, SOCW 6371 Community & Administrative Practice UTA school of social work Dr. Dick Schoech Copyright 2009 (permission required before use) Suggest printing slides for class using: Print | Handouts | 3 slides per page | grayscale options

Overview of Sessions To Date 1. Generalist macro practice history, change process, roles, levels of intervention 2. Theories, perspectives, values 3. Problem definition, theories of need 4. Capacities and needs assessment 5. Evidence based interventions & logic models 6. Program descriptions, community linkages

Learning Objectives for Today  Understanding evidence & decision making  Understanding evidence based practice (EBP) & similar concepts (evidence informed practice is the term used at the UT Arlington SSW)  Understand difference between EBP & options  Understand traditional EBP perspective  Understand traditional EBP process  Understanding logic models and their use  Understand a performance mana EBP approach

Traditional Approaches to Decision Making  Common sense approach to decision making – what’s common to me makes sense – can be very limiting  Expert approach (but who is an expert)  Theory approach (too vague for detailed decisions)  Often if lacking evidence, use the bureaucratic structure (1:8 ratio staff to supervisors) to control for variance, but expensive (e.g., CPS)  Decision making too complex for management control so Street Level Bureaucrats (Lipsky)

More Scientific Approaches to Decision Making  Best practices = finding & using best possible way of doing something  established by history, utilization review, CQI, committees, etc.  Data mining = searching agency data for trends, predictions, performance on objectives and standards, etc.  Data visualization = display data in an easy-to-understand format so decisions are obvious from the data  Research = application of scientific principles to practice  Program evaluation = Review process, outcome, and impact of intervention, e.g., pre-post client measures, focus groups, key informant interviews, public opinion surveys  Clinical trials = experimental designs with randomly assigned control group & control for intervening variables. Look for significance & effect size  Fidelity = A measure of how well the intervention was replicated. For example, dosage is often important. If research shows that 15 training sessions are needed and clients on the average only attend 10 sessions, then fidelity is compromised.

Classic EBP Perspective Placing the client’s benefits first, evidence-based practitioners adopt a process of lifelong learning that involves continually posing specific questions of direct practical importance to clients, searching objectively and efficiently for the current best evidence relative to each question, and taking appropriate action guided by evidence. Evidence-based practice is "a total process beginning with knowing what clinical questions to ask, how to find the best practice, and how to critically appraise the evidence for validity and applicability to the particular care situation. The best evidence then must be applied by a clinician with expertise in considering the patient's unique values and needs. The final aspect of the process is evaluation of the effectiveness of care and the continual improvement of the process" (DePalma, 2000). DePalma, 2000DePalma, 2000

EBP Process 1. Ask answerable questions about the decision/problem/situation 2. Track down the best evidence to answer the questions 3. Appraise the validity, impact, and applicability of the evidence 4. Determine if something needs to or can be done 5. Inform those involved and consider their opinions and expectations 6. Integrate all forms of evidence into an action plan 7. Monitor and evaluate the processes and outcomes of the intervention

Understanding logic models and their limitations  Logic Model is tool for:  Explicating and communicating program theory, assumptions, rationale (Here is how we see it)  Assessing program feasibility (Is program needed)  Developing programs (How does program work)  Performance management (Tie outputs to mission)  Program evaluation (Assess if program works & why)  knowledge building (capture why things work)  Review logic models in template  Reading by Savaya gives examples also

Problems with Current EBP Approach  Originated in medical field, not typical SW practice  Evidence in academic journals, not easy to use  Evidence is old--need evidence in real time  Requires new generation of trained social workers  No time to track down evidence  Difficulty of interpreting complex research  Focuses on individual, not organization’s role  Evidence always lost, no “organizational learning”  Few practitioners evaluation practice as per EBP  Few consider evidence when select interventions  No evidence that EBP is better than other options  May be culturally destructive, e.g., Native Americans powwow to solve family problems vs. EBP

Key EBP Changes Needed  Web support e.g. help desk or travel agent example  FROM: individual practitioner searching down relevant research for each case  TO: organization with tools that make data readily available so that workers can monitor their performance on well-researched, outcome based, practice standards.  Source: Schoech, D., Basham, R., and Fluke, J. (2006). A Technology Enhanced EBP Model. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3(3/4),

CPS Example: Performance Mana EBP Indicator 1. Length of time to achieve reunification 2. Stability of foster care placement 3. Foster care re-entries 4. Length of time to achieve adoption 5. Recurrence of maltreatment 6. Incidence of child abuse and/or neglect in foster care Standard 1. At least 76.2% are reunified in less than twelve months from the time of the latest removal from home 2. At least 86.7% had no more than two placement settings 3. Less than 8.6% re-entered foster care within 12 months of a prior foster care episode 4. At least 32% exited care in less than 24 months from the time of the latest removal from home 5. Less than 6.1% had another substantiated or indicated report within six months 6. Less than.57% were the subject of substantiated or indicated maltreatment by a foster parent or facility staff

Illustration of DEMOS EBP Approach

Advantages: Performance Mana EBP  Quicker to implement  Staff correct data that impact their work  Responsibility shifts from the worker to the organization, consistent with Deming TQM theory  Questions to ask are in organizational performance standards tied to agency goals  Shift from bureaucracy to decision support  Instantly available  User customized models & interfaces (e.g., my.yahoo)

Disadvantages of Approach  Infrastructure is required  Agreement on performance standards is required  Costly in terms of technology – human services can more easily justify hiring people than IT  EBP requires a cultural change

Discussion & Questions