Summary of main questions on the Partnership Agreement and the secretariat support End of day 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rationales 1. Support:ccNSO membership supports ICANN structure 2. Benefit & Costs:All constituencies should help cover reasonable costs to their abilities.
Advertisements

© 3GPP 2009 Mobile World Congress, Barcelona, 19 th February 2009© 3GPP GPP The Training Course / Module 14 1 All you always wanted to know about.
Status summary of the ad-hoc discussions 13th of July 2012 oneM2M call.
Research and Innovation Summary of MS questions on the Commission's proposal for DG Research & Innovation Research and Innovation Rules for Participation.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
The Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) The IMI Call and Evaluation Process Eva Lindgren.
European Commission DG for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Research & scientific analysis SSP Kick-off meeting The 6 th Framework Programme
Joint Legal/Participation Ad-Hoc 21 March 2012 Report.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
Doc.: IEEE /324r0 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 1 PARTNERSHIP PROJECT DESCRIPTION During the meeting held in Copenhagen, 2.
1 [4.1]a Criteria for successful consolidation SDOThreshold/Foundation/Launch After/During Formation, Near-Term Comment Summary of discussions Verticals.
FP7 Regler för deltagande 18 december 2006 Monica Hjertman, Enheten för Europaprogrammen, VINNOVA
OneM2M Draft proposal for slide set. This is not intended to be a oneM2M presentation. It is a collection of source material slides which can be used.
UK higher education: quality assurance at home and abroad Carolyn Campbell The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications 1 Summary of issues and results from GSC-11 IPR WG Dan Bart, TIA Chair IPR WG SOURCE:Dan Bart, IPR.
1 May 2007 Instructions for the WG Chair The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee: l Show slides #1 through #5 of.
M2M Global Initiative OneM2M April 24, 2012
1 TIA Engineering Committees - Policies and Procedures TIA Staff.
Business Entities under the General Corporation Law of Delaware 1 Civil Service Bureau Reform & Development Department
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
GSC-19 Meeting, July 2015, Geneva GSC-18 Summary Report Dirk Weiler, ETSI Document No:GSC-19_002 Source:GSC-18 Chair Contact:Dirk Weiler Agenda Item:1.4.
SCFAH r1 Title: Working Draft “Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future” Source: 3GPP2 Future Ad Hoc Abstract: This is the draft baseline.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 05 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: ETSI.
Science, research and development European Commission IDARI Project Meeting Tartu, June 2005 Martin Greimel Scientific Officer Directorate-E ‘Biotechnology,
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
CJK9, Zhangjiajie, China 1/14 Discussion: [Drafted] 3GPPs works in CJK Cooperation CJK 9, Zhangjiajie, China April 8-10,2009 Changho RYOO
International Telecommunication Union ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Issues Yukio Hiramatsu Chairman, TTC IPR Committee.
Brochure outline Group Name: Marcom Source: ETSI Meeting Date: Agenda Item: N/A.
1 Kingsley Karunaratne, Department of Accounting, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Colombo - Sri Lanka Practice Management.
Report of the oneM2M Legal Subcommittee Group Name: oneM2M Steering Committee Source: Thomas Goode, ATIS, Meeting Date:
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Steve Barclay, ATIS] [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M-Cons#4, 28 Mar 2012.
3GPP2 Publication Process Training TSG-S PMT. December Presentation Overview Background OP Input and Intent Publication Process Overview The Revised.
- 1 - TTA View of Budget & Secretariat Functions March 28~29, 2012 (Tokyo, Japan) TTA.
1 [4.7]a Structure of M2M Consolidation SDOStructureComment Overall Goals of Structure: Be responsive to the needs of the vertical market stakeholders.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 Summary of GSC-16bis IPR WG Meeting Greg Ratta, ITU IPR WG Rapporteur Document No: GSC-16bis-IPR-12 Source: IPR WG Rapporteur Contact:
C O R P O R A T E T E C H N O L O G Y Information & Communications Interaction Technologies ECESS Consortium Agreement Herbert Tropf (Siemens AG)
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Financial Guidelines FP6 – IST Directorate C 1 st Evaluation proposals co-ordinators Briefing 17 July 2003.
SCFAH Title: Draft Baseline Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future ver2 Source: J. Brownley, Ad-Hoc Chair Abstract: This is a proposed.
Summary of main questions on the Partnership Agreement and the secretariat support.
1 Summary of issues and results from GSC-12 IPR WG Dan Bart, TIA Chair IPR WG SOURCE:Dan Bart, IPR WG Chair TITLE:Report of GSC-12 IPR WG AGENDA ITEM:Closing.
05/02/ “Report on general ETSI activities since GSC#8” Karl Heinz Rosenbrock ETSI Director-General GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:ETSI TITLE:Report on general.
WMM in Confidence oneM2M Ecosystem Accelerator (OEA) Presentation to oneM2M TP meeting Beijing, November 2015 Paul Russell.
Participation Ad-Hoc Legal Ad-Hoc Joint status. General General good progresses made on the document’s structure The two ad-hocs are meeting jointly One.
OneM2M Partnership Project. Contents Introduction Founding Partners Participation Scope & Objectives Structure Deliverables Contacts © 2013 oneM2M Partners.
Timeline for the oneM2M Partnership Project Timeline and Milestones [Joachim Koss, ETSI] Contribution to oneM2M plenary, 14 Mar 2012 Doc: Source: [ETSI]
Unlimited Partnership Prepared by Afif Zarif Atef Toutanji Ziad Ballouz.
SCFAH r2 Title: “Ad-Hoc Recommendation to SC on 3GPP2 Future” – Working Draft Source: 3GPP2 Future Ad Hoc Abstract: This is the draft baseline.
Status summary of the ad-hoc discussions 29th of June 2012 oneM2M call.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
MoW Report Group Name: TP20 Source: MoW Convenor, Enrico Scarrone, Telecom Italia, Meeting Date:
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT oneM2M Project Presenter: Luis Jorge Romero oneM2M Steering Committee Chairman Document No: GSC17-PLEN-38.
31 January Table of Contents (1) 3- Draft Partnership Project Description22- The Partnership Project Agreement (1)3- Draft Partnership Project Description22-
Summary of issues and results from GSC-12 IPR WG
WP1 - Consortium coordination and management
3GPP Status.
Presenter: Luis Jorge Romero oneM2M Steering Committee Chairman
Table of Contents (1) 31 January 2001
TTA M2M Activities & Proposal of revised resolution
ICA principles towards EU legislation?
Office of Sponsored Programs & Research
Summary of GSC-16bis IPR WG Meeting
Institutional changes The role of Bilateral Oversight Boards
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Procedural Updates INCITS TC Officers Symposium April 1-3, 2019
3gpp-liaison-report-may-2005
Presentation transcript:

Summary of main questions on the Partnership Agreement and the secretariat support End of day 1

Q1: Voting in technical groups -in case an organization controlling more than one oneM2M membership 1 vote per “company”/ per Partner Type 1 (ATIS, CCSA if we do not go for a CAP) or 1 vote per “company” (TIA) or One member one vote with a CAP [CAP is max number of votes for a company] (ETSI, ARIB) or 1 vote per “company”/ per Partner Type 1 with a CAP [CAP max number of votes for a company] (TTA, TTC, CCSA if we go for a CAP) To be defined: Company, CAP

Q1: Voting in technical groups AGREED -in case an organization controlling more than one oneM2M membership 1 vote per “company”*/ per Partner Type 1 (ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TTA, TTC, TIA, ARIB) Selected or 1 vote per “company” (-) ARIB: would like to introduce a CAP * The assumption is that “company” includes all its affiliates

Q2: Definition of “P arent and subsidiaries ” AGREED Clarification of parent and subsidiaries Company – the set of corporate entities and affiliates. –Any corporate entity and/or its affiliates may be a oneM2M member. –"AFFILIATE" of a first legal entity means any other legal entity: directly or indirectly owning or controlling the first legal entity, or under the same direct or indirect ownership or control as the first legal entity, or directly or indirectly owned or controlled by the first legal entity,

Q3: Technical contribution for member based organization AGREED IPR policies for technical contribution for Partner Type 2 -> It is enough to assure that Partner type 2 has an IPR policy compatible with Partner type 1. YES. IPR policy for technical contribution for members of Partner Type 1 that are associations -> Is this case covered in the current Partner type 1 IPR policies? YES.

Q3: Technical voting for member based organization AGREED IPR policies for technical voting for Partner Type 2 -> At a minimum, a Partner Type 2 must: (1) Have an IPR policy that is compatible with a Partner Type 1 IPR Policy; or (2) Provide written assurance that: (i) its oneM2M contributions are made in accordance with a Partner Type 1 IPR Policy; and (ii) its members are bound by such an IPR policy relative to any oneM2M contributions.

Figure for Clarifying some Issues concerning IPR AGREED 7 Partner Type 1 oneM2M Member Member of Partner Type 1 oneM2M Affiliate of Partner Type 1 IPR policy P1 commitment oneM2M Partner Type 1 oneM2M Partner Type 2 oneM2M Associate Member IPR policy P1 commitment Member of Partner Type 1 Member based association IPR policy P1 commitment Partner Type 2 Member based association Member IPR policy compatible to a Partner Type 1

Q4: Partner Type 1 Publishing AGREED Partner Type 1 should be requested to be capable to publish Standards in the context oneM2M scope? YES –At least one Type 1 Partner per region shall publish. More Type 1 Partners can publish. Note. A Partner using or publishing a oneM2M technical specification or technical report shall not impose an IPR policy more restrictive than that described in the oneM2M IPR statement attached to this Partnership Agreement. Note. Regional requirements to be included in the oneM2M specifications

Q5: Meeting hosting - long term Should meeting hosting provided by the oneM2M secretariat (ATIS, CCSA, TIA) or Directly by the Partners/members? (ARIB, ETSI, TTA, CCSA, TTC) Short term: By rotation per region (arrangements as for meeting 1-4) AGREEMENT

Q6: Funding Principles - Long Term Core secretariat functions (meeting hosting excluded) How to share the costs? –Funding formula: AGREED i) fixed part (flat fee or a percentage of the total budget) equal to all Type 1 Partners and ii) variable part which is proportional to number of Members admitted to oneM2M by Type 1 Partners –Type 1 Partner will fund AGREED Members; will not pay a fee directly to oneM2M. Allocation of the variable part of the funding to their individual Members is at the discretion of each Type 1 Partner –Type 2 Partner Free of charge participation to the end of 2012 AGREED After that? –ATIS, TIA, TTA: not 2013? –CCSA, ETSI, ARIB: also including free of charge to end of 2013, then revisited? –Free of charge for the first year? –Associate Members (redefined to: regulatory agencies, government agencies) AGREED Free of charge AGREED –Note. Guest status to be defined in the Working Procedures. –Funding by means of monetary and/or resources AGREED Each Type 1 Partner shall have a funding requirement, the value which can be satisfied by monetary contribution and/or commitment of resources according to the funding formula. The resources subject to acceptance by the Steering Committee. Ensuring long term commitment? –Rest of 2012 –2013? Short Term –Voluntary resources (ARIB, TTC, ETSI, CCSA, TTA,TIA, ATIS) AGREED ETSI is commited to provide 2 full time resouces to end 2013 for support of secretariat functions –End of 2012 AGREED TIA, ATIS, TTA: not 2013 ARIB, TTC, ETSI, CCSA: end of 2013