By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
Advertisements

Jeopardy Famous People Causes of the war Compromise Of 1850 Kansas Nebraska Act Leftovers Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400.
CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
The Dred Scott Decision
II. Basis of Citizenship
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Slavery during the time of Civil War. Political Effects on slaves and free blacks 1. Missouri Compromise – Missouri entered the Union as a slave state.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
Causes of the Civil War and The Election of 1860 We will look at events that polarized the country, including the 1860 election. We’ll compare that election.
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
The Civil War and the Constitution Unit 3, Lesson 17.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
Emerson DeLoach Elicia Bilyeu Isidro Hernandez Noah Hickman Supreme Court Cases.
The Civil Rights Movement
Government Powers STATION 2. 2 Court Cases that Increased Government Power- Under Chief Justice Marshall! Gibbons V. Ogden- NY State gives Ogden rights.
Supreme Court Cases Overview. Marbury v. Madison Marbury sued Sec of State Madison for his appointment to be a judge (midnight judges – Adams administration)
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
DRED SCOTT CASE JESSI PALKOVIC - JACKSON STEPHENS - WILLIAM UNMISIG POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY on the.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
What lead to the Civil War. Missouri Compromise 1819 Missouri asks to join the United States as a slave state – South wanted it to be a slave state –
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES Elizabeth Benavides Mariya Gershkovich.
LEHHS FOCUS: Lawyer Reconstruction to the Rise of Railroads.
Key Terms Review # 2. What are 4 or 5 aspects of the “Unwritten Constitution”? C________ ________ to the _____________.
Supreme Court Cases Setting the Precedent. John Marshall Helped make the Supreme Court the powerful institution it is today Presided over several important.
Slavery in the 1850s: Changing National Politics Chapter 10 Section 3.
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)
Dual Federalism I (Founding to 1860) Harold Jackson Mr. Knock p.1 9/14/12.
Law in American Society Review for 1 st 6 USSC cases Exam The Exam is on: 3/16/11 & 3/17/11 Mr. Novak Periods 5 & 8 3/9/11 Uplift Community High School.
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution The strength and path of the court were found with Chief Justice John Marshall 4 th Chief Justice 1801 – 1835.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
The Road to Disunion The Dred Scott Decision. Focus Question: What role do the Courts play in national politics?
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
Chapter 14 The Judiciary Joel Pazol AP Government Class 2.
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3.
Implied Powers of the National Government
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Dred Scott.
Warm-Up What are the 3 major Effects of the War of 1812?
Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Famous Abolitionists.
Defining National Power
DRED SCOTT CASE.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
8X Tuesday Objective: Describe political developments in the US that led to Civil War. Agenda: Do Now: Explain the rise of the Republican Party.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
The Road to Civil War A Nation Divided Aim: What were the social
Day #5 Supreme Court Cases
Presentation transcript:

By: Mireina Barrios

Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri had appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted his freedom. Taney a staunch supporter of slavery and intent on protecting Southern from Northern aggression. He wrote in the court’s majority opinion that because Scott was black, he was not a citizens and therefore had no right to sue. The Dred Scott decision effectively ended the Missouri Compromise, hardened the political rivalry between North and South and paved the way for the Civil War. It determined slaves were not citizens

People Who Where Involved George Washington James Madison How Was He Important and Stuff About Him He was important because he made the U.S Supreme Court what is today. Not only that he was chief justice of the U.S Supreme Court then he even handed down numerous important decisions which gave the federal government more power.

People involved: James Mcculoch Details: Imposed a tax on all banks operating in Maryland not charted by the states. Importance: It gave power to the states to collect taxes; borrow money, to regulate commerce, to declare and conduct war and to raise armies & navies. Info: All banks were prohibited from issuing bank notes.

People involved John Adams John Marshall info Commissioned by john Adams Decided in 1803 Court considered violation of constitution Written in 1803 by justice john Marshall Important Supreme court had right to review all laws

John Marshall Mcculloch V. Dred vs Scott Marbury