1 Disability Retirement. 2 PART 1 The Process 3 What’s the process? 1. Application ↓ 2. Investigation ↓ 3. Independent Medical Exam ↓ 4. Staff Recommendation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Advertisements

The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
WORKERS COMPENSATION, WORKPLACE SAFETY AND JOB RELATED DISABILITIES This presentation will focus on legal and procedural issues related to workers compensation,
How does the FAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the FIBA Arbitration Tribunal (FAT)
Family Medical Leave Administration Program
This presentation is separated into three sections: 1. Overview 2. Reasonable Accommodation and Supplemental Allowance 3. Plan E to D Transfer.
Family Medical Leave Administration Program
1 DISABILITY RETIREMENT AND THE PROBLEM EMPLOYEE.
Photo by Karl Steinbrenner The Commonwealth of Virginia The Line of Duty Benefits Program.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION The Fully Developed Claims Program Compensation Service Training Staff November 2013.
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Fully Developed Claims
Reasonable Accommodation Workers’ Compensation vs. Disability Retirement Workers’ Compensation (Form of Vocational Rehab ilitation ) In Worker’s Pre-Injury.
Determining the True Root Cause(s) of Accidents and Safety Incidents Incident Investigation and Analysis.
 Definition  Purpose  Who it Applies to  When Determinations are Required  Types of Determinations  Responsibilities  LOD Packages Overview.
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION WHAT EMPLOYERS NEED TO KNOW Employer Conference August 6, 2014.
A More Effective Approach for Employers and Addressing Charges
Managing Long-Term Leave of Absence Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
Should a “carve out” be in your future? CAJPA 2012 Patti Williams, ARM, WCCP Risk Manager.
Practical Tips and Tools For Effectively Managing Worker’s Compensation Cases.
Terms Service-connected Disability Eligible from 1st day of employment Must be permanently disabled Must have a direct causational link to the workplace.
Qualified Medical Evaluations and Spinal Surgery Second Opinion Presented by Janet Coulter, WCALJ James Fisher, Industrial Relations Council III Suzanne.
Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
Countywide Job Search and Voluntary Demotion RTW Protocol Approach Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
How does the BAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT)
2012 Annual Pupil Transportation Conference June 20, 2012 Roanoke, Virginia.
DATA PRIVACY PERSONNEL FILES “P-FILE”. Wisconsin Public Records Wisconsin Statue – Wisconsin Statue – Wisconsin Statue 230 Wisconsin.
Chief Executive Office Risk Management RETURN TO WORK Unit
Long Term Leave Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources October 28, 2010.
Countywide Job Search (RTW Protocol Approach) Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
MANAGING THE PAPERWORK Yvette Talley and Mark Baumann.
WORK COMP 101 Presentation. The Way it Was……. Here is the story…..
WORKING WITH THE PLAN SPONSOR DISABILITY RETIREMENT WORKING WITH THE PLAN SPONSOR.
Workers’ Compensation Program CEO Risk Management Branch
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM: THE ROLE OF THE ON-SITE COUNTY REPRESENTATIVES TONY TARAS (800) ext 1678
Orientation Presentation Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Location: 1111 H Street Fresno, CA Phone: (559) Stop Mail #: 40.
Medical Separation Procedures Presented by: William A. McClure Chief Executive Office - Risk Management Workers’ Comp – Special Projects (213)
Bye Brown v. Bi-Lo Presented by Harold J. Willson, Jr. (864)
MENTALLY DISORDERED OFFENDER (MDO) HEARINGS Presented by: Kara Houston, Staff Attorney.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS Mission Statement The mission of the Board of Chiropractic Examiners is to protect the health, welfare,
Interdepartmental Placement of Employees Returning to Work Following Approved Leave County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources July 6, 2011.
BAM SECTION » Every employer in CA » Including the STATE ˃Legally uninsured ˃Labor Code §3700 ˃Purchase a yearly policy ˃Participate in Master Agreement.
DISCIPLINE FROM START TO FINISH. HRD REVIEW PROCESS FOR POTENTIAL DISCHARGE CASES Case Conference Dept. submits 2 copies of NOID to Service Team Manager.
Return to Work 101 Injury Reporting May 14th, 2009 Presented by: Cathy Stein-Romo Chief Executive Office Risk Management/WC Unit (213)
SERN/EHRC Conference 2015 Running the case – a practical guide to preparing a discrimination case for the Employment Tribunal Presented by Peter O’Donnell.
Repetitive Trauma Injuries in South Carolina Presented by Commissioner Andrea Roche Richard V. Davis, Esq. Jeffrey S. Jones, Esq.
Procedures A workers’ compensation injury must be reported to the Third-Party Administrator (TPA) within 24 hours. The First Report of Injury Form is.
Disability Retirement Services “A Day In the Life of an Investigator” Presenters: Tamara Caldwell & Debbie Semnanian.
Fool me twice… Shame on Me Metro Toronto Convention Centre February 2, 2010.
Managing Long-Term Leave of Absence Chief Executive Office Risk Management Return To Work Unit.
LACERA Investigators & RTW Coordinators How Your Efforts Help Us (and hopefully you too) Presented by Richard Schlosser & Shari Altmark Disability Retirement.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners in Medicine and Surgery Medical Consultant Orientation.
Long Term Leave Management Program Eliza Carrillo County of Los Angeles Department of Human Resources March 24, 2011.
LACERA Investigators & RTW Coordinators A Match Made in Heaven Presented by Shari Altmark & Richard Schlosser Disability Retirement Section Supervisors.
Colville Confederate Tribes Workmen’s Compensation What is Workmen’s Compensation?
The Hearing Process 1. 2 Notice of Claim Status Issued by Carrier Legally Binding Triggers Protest Period (usually 90 days)
Workers’ Compensation Training for Supervisors presented by the Department of Human Resources.
Workers’ Compensation Program BAM SECTION Objectives: Learn about Workers’ Compensation Understand the responsibilities of all the interested parties.
(202) King Street, Suite 650 Alexandria, VA WASHINGTON, DC DISABILITY QUALIFICATIONS.
EFFECTIVELY MANAGING YOUR CalPERS IDR PROGRAM
Workers’ compensation Program
EMPLOYMENT LAW & PRACTICES STAYING OUT OF COURT
Workers’ Compensation, Family Medical Leave, And The Americans With Disability Act: You May Have Heard of These Laws, But How Do They Apply To You! Presented.
It All Starts with the Student Study Team
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Workers’ Compensation, Family Medical Leave, And The Americans With Disability Act: You May Have Heard of These Laws, But How Do They Apply To You! Presented.
Presentation transcript:

1 Disability Retirement

2 PART 1 The Process

3 What’s the process? 1. Application ↓ 2. Investigation ↓ 3. Independent Medical Exam ↓ 4. Staff Recommendation to Board

4 Case Load and Staffing Approximately cases are currently being processed. 4 staff members process the initial phase: 2 Disability Investigators 2 Disability Office Specialists 3 staff members process the subsequent phases: 2 Disability Attorneys ~ Hearings 1 Attorney ~ Superior Court Writ of Mandamus

5 Initial Application The application consists of the following documents: Application Employee’s Statement of Disability Information Release Attorney Designation form (if applicable) Physician’s Statement of Disability Applications will not be accepted without a completed physician’s statement of disability or medical report supporting the claim. The applicant may submit their forms in person or by US mail.

6 Filing the Application All forms must be completed properly. An Employee’s/Applicant’s statement is taken. Benefit counseling is done. Confirmation of accepted application is sent to the applicant. Employer filed applications require member notification and involvement.

7 Filing the Application Processing time is approximately 9-12 months from receipt of completed application to Board decision Processing time depends on: the complexity of the case the number of conditions being evaluated and the level of applicant cooperation

8 Why does it take so long?

9 Evidence Gathering The gathering of evidence can take anywhere from 1-5 months. Requests for information are sent to the employer: Department file Central file Personnel file Worker’s Compensation file Employer & Supervisor’s statements Additional medical records are requested from the applicant’s personal physicians if necessary. Follow-up requests are made.

10 Disability Investigator Roles The Investigator evaluates the evidence consisting of the applicant’s statements, employer records and medical records. Seeks clarifications or explanations of discrepancies. Determines whether multiple conditions will be evaluated based upon the medical evidence.

11 Pre-Med Phase The Pre-Med phase typically takes 1-3 months. A chronological index of all of the evidence is created and sent to the applicant for review. The applicant is given the opportunity to add medical records. Applicants and their attorneys routinely request extensions to gather additional evidence.

12 BOE Board Ordered Examination The examination phase typically takes 2-3 months. An appointment is made with a panel physician. Multiple conditions require numerous evaluations.

13 BOE Report Reports are typically received days from the date of the exam. The Investigator will follow up with the panel physician if the report is not received timely. The Investigator reviews the report and any discrepancies or inconsistencies are addressed. Supplemental reports are requested if necessary. A copy is provided to the applicant (and attorney if applicable).

14 Final Investigations The Investigator interviews coworkers, supervisors and witnesses. Review of job assignment, usual duties and the possibility of an accommodation.

15 Final Preparation The Investigator reviews the entire file. Any last minute questions are addressed. The staff recommendation is finalized. All cases are reviewed by the Member Services Director. The application is tentatively placed on next available Board Agenda and prepared for the Committee Review.

16 Committee Review The Disability Committee, made up of OCERS personnel, reviews all disability applications prior to placement on a Board agenda. The Committee is looking for: Substantial evidence Legal standard Reasonable accommodation

17 Board Materials Board Materials consist of: Staff recommendation Board options Staff analysis (including accommodation) Medical analysis Employee and employer statement Applicant receives written notification with details of the staff recommendation and the date/time of the meeting.

18 The Board’s Adjudicatory Role

19 Ultimate Decision Maker The Board must pay benefits only to those who are eligible. (City of Sacramento v. PERS) The Board of Retirement exclusively determines “permanent incapacity” and “service-connection”. (Masters v. San Bernardino CERA) The Board is not bound by any decision made in the Workers’ Compensation system or other legal schemes such as Social Security.

20 The Board’s Role The Board determines, in all cases, whether a member is permanently incapacitated for duty and whether that incapacity is service connected. The Board makes this determination after reviewing the evidence presented in support of disability retirement applications, along with the staff recommendation. The Board should ask questions of staff and/or the applicant if necessary.

21 PART 2 The Legal Standard

22 Applicant’s Burden of Proof The applicant must prove by a preponderance of “Substantial Evidence” that: He is Incapacitated to perform his usual duties. His incapacity is Permanent. His job Caused the incapacity (for service connected disability) Government Code §31720 “Any member permanently incapacitated for the performance of duty shall be retired…if the member’s incapacity is a result of injury or disease arising out of and in the course of the member’s employment, and such employment contributes substantially to such incapacity.”

23 SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE Based on correct material facts Based on complete information Based on applicable legal theories Supported by analysis A medical opinion is not substantial evidence when the physician:  relies on false information, or misunderstands the facts  is unaware of complete applicable medical history  ignores a material fact  applies the wrong legal standard (Work Comp, Social Security)  provides no analysis to support his opinion  does not demonstrate a mechanism of injury

24 WHAT IS INCAPACITY? “Incapacitated for the performance of duty … means the substantial inability of the applicant to perform his usual duties” Mansperger v. PERS (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873 Applied to the CERL by: Harmon v. Board of Retirement of San Mateo Schrier v. San Mateo County ERS Curtis v. Board of Retirement

25 SUBSTANTIAL INABILITY An applicant proves “Substantial Inability” by establishing: He cannot perform duty at all, Ex. truck driver goes blind; can’t drive Performing the duty creates high probability of further injury, or discomfort so severe so as to preclude further effective performance Ex. teacher has asthma, chalk dust severely aggravates her symptoms Hosford v. Bd. of Admin.; Wolfman v.Bd. of Trustees; Thelander v. City of El Monte

26 SUBSTANTIAL INABILITY Substantial inability is not proven by:  Performance of duty with mild discomfort  Thelander v. City of El Monte  Fear of future injury  Hosford v. Board of Administration  Wolfman v. Board of Trustees  Speculative future disability  Wolfman v. Board of Trustees  Hosford v. Board of Administration  Inability to perform “full range” of duties  Harmon v. Board of Retirement

27 USUAL DUTIES 1. Usual duties are:  Performed frequently  Performed in a specific assignment (Barber) 2. An applicant does not prove incapacity, if he cannot perform duties that are:  A remote or uncommon occurrence (Mansperger  Listed in a job description, but not actually performed (Hosford)  Voluntary duties 3. An applicant does not prove incapacity,  If he is capable of performing the usual duties of another assignment in his job class (Barber, Craver, O’Toole) (Reasonable Accommodation)

28 PERMANENCY An applicant proves his incapacity is permanent by showing that: Further change for better or worse is not reasonably anticipated under usual medical standards. (Sweeney v. Industrial Acc. Com.) He exhausted standard medical treatment – (mitigation of damages) (Reynolds v. City of San Carlos ) He has not unreasonably refused untried standard risk medical treatment, unless required to do so by his religion. (Montgomery v. Bd. Of Retirement)

29 SERVICE CONNECTION An applicant proves that his incapacity is service connected if there is substantial evidence of a real and measurable link between the job and the incapacity. What does “Real and Measurable” mean: Material and traceable connection Greater than infinitesimal or inconsequential More than “any” but may be less than the “principal” cause

30 SERVICE CONNECTION Service connection is established, if:  The job is not the sole cause, but is a substantial cause, (Heaton v. Marin County Board of Retirement)  Unlike Workers’ Compensation, psych cases do not require more than a 50% contribution by the job  The job did not initially cause the incapacitating condition, but did aggravate the condition causing incapacity at an earlier time. (Turner v. WCAB)  Pre-existing condition aggravated → Incapacity  The employer takes the employee as they find him

31 SERVICE CONNECTION Service connection is not established:  if the “link” between the job and the incapacity is speculative or incapable of being quantified or measured, OR  the job was merely a “passive stage” on which the incapacitating condition played out. (Atascadero Unified School Dist. V. WCAB)

32 ??Questions??