© OECD/IEA Renewable Energy Developments in Europe and the EU Targets Convegno “Le Incentivazioni alle fonti rinnovabili e gli obiettivi europei: analisi e proposte” GSE Rome, 27 April 2009 Dr. Paolo Frankl Head, Renewable Energy Unit International Energy Agency
© OECD/IEA Drivers for an energy transition and long- term global objectives Current trends and EU targets Need for effective and efficient policies Impacts of the current crisis and outlook Contents
© OECD/IEA WEO 2008 Energy-related CO2 emissions In both 550 and 450 policy scenarios energy efficiency and renewables account for more than 75% of total CO 2 emission reductions Gigatonnes Reference Scenario550 Policy Scenario450 Policy Scenario CCS Renewables & biofuels Nuclear Energy efficiency 550 Policy Scenario 450 Policy Scenario 54% 23% 14% 9% [Source: WEO 2008] Current trends in energy supply and use are patently unsustainable, economically, environmentally and socially
© OECD/IEA Renewable share of global electricity in WEO policy scenario Renewables account for 40% of global electricity in 2030 [Source: WEO 2008] 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Wind Other Renewables Biomass & Waste Hydro Nuclear Gas Oil Coal 41% 19% 2% 6% 22% 18% 20% 5% 9% 21% 16% 15% 1% 4% 18% 40%
© OECD/IEA /20/20 Targets by 2020 and burden sharing 10% of energy from RE in transport The Challenge: EU Targets [Data Source: RES EU Directive Proposal, 2008 ]
© OECD/IEA Indicative RES-E target: 34% by 2020 [PRIMES Policy Scenario] Current Trends in EU27 - Electricity [ Data Source: Reference Scenario WEO 2008] Ann ual Growth (%) Total Generation (TWh) RES-E Gener. (TWh) Effective and efficient policies are needed to achieve the objective
© OECD/IEA Comparative assessment of effectiveness and efficiency of renewables support policies in OECD countries plus Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) Chosen policy effectiveness indicator on a yearly basis: Global Renewable Energy Markets and Policies Programme (GREMPP) Incremental RE generation in a given year Remaining additional realisable potential (by 2020)
© OECD/IEA Achieved (2005) and Additional realisable mid-term potential (2020) for RES-Electricity Achieved (2005) and additional realisable mid-term (up to 2020) potential for RES-Electricity by country (OECD+BRICS) – in absolute terms (TWh) Source: IEA & EEG, 2008
© OECD/IEA Effectiveness Indicator Wind on-shore Average vs. average Source: IEA & Fh-ISI, 2008
© OECD/IEA Effectiveness & Efficiency Wind On-shore 2005 (OECD & BRICS) Source: IEA & Fh-ISI, % 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% 0,002,004,006,008,0010,0012,0014,0016,0018,00 Annualised renumeration in [US cent / kWh] Effectiveness indicator 2004/2005 EU Countries Non EU OECD BRICS
© OECD/IEA Effectiveness & Efficiency Wind On-shore 2005 (OECD & BRICS) Source: IEA & Fh-ISI, 2008 Long-term predictable incentives (FIT or FIP) + Appropriate framework Higher risk (TGC) + Non-economic barriers
© OECD/IEA Effective policies only in a limited set of countries Sometimes depending on specific technology Perceived risk, more than profit, is key to policy effectiveness & efficiency Price support can not be adequately addressed in isolation; non-economic barriers must be addressed concurrently Grid barriers Administrative barriers Social acceptance issues Other barriers (e.g. training, information, financial, etc.) Effective systems have, in practice, frequently been the most cost efficient Move beyond ‘FIT vs TGC’ debate Both systems show success and failures depending on specific country framework and/or technology Main Lessons Learnt
© OECD/IEA Recent Trends Policy Effectiveness Indicator Wind and PV [Data Sources: IEA Deploying Renewables and Renewables Information, 2008 ]
© OECD/IEA Recent Trends Non-Hydro Renewable Electricity [Data Sources: IEA Renewables Information, 2008 ]
© OECD/IEA Remove non-economic barriers to improve market functioning 2. Establish predictable support framework - to attract investments 3. Set up transitional incentives decreasing over time – to foster and monitor technological innovation and move towards market competitiveness 4. Ensure specific support in function of technology maturity to exploit potential of large RET range 5. With increasing mass-scale RET penetration impact on overall energy system must be taken into account Continuity Certainty Key Principles for Effective Renewable Energy Policies
© OECD/IEA Fostering RE’s transition towards mass market integration Niche marketsMass market Low cost-gap (e.g. wind onshore) High cost-gap (e.g. PV) Mature tech (e.g. hydro) Prototype & demo stage (e.g. 2 nd gen biofuels) Time Market Deployment Development 1. Development RD&D financing, capital cost support, investment tax credits, rebates, loan guarantees 2. Stable, low-risk, sheltered FIT, FIP, Tenders 3. Shared/imposed market risk, guaranteed minimum but declining support FIP, TGC (technology banding) 4. Technology-neutral competition TGC, Carbon trading (e.g. EU ETS) [Source: Adapted from IEA Deploying Renewables, 2008 ]
© OECD/IEA Impacts of the crisis 10% of global energy infrastructure spend But the top-line hides what is happening in the past few quarters 5x increase from low level by around between 2004 and % Growth 59% Growth 58% Growth 68% Growth $35bn 2004 $60bn 2005 $93bn 2006 $148bn 2007 $155bn 2008 Source: New Energy Finance, 2009
© OECD/IEA RE policy framework is improving in several EU countries, including Italy However, additional efforts needed to achieve targets and improve effectiveness and cost-efficiency Recognise major potential of RETs Focus on coherent implementation of key policy design principles Address non-economic barriers, in particular in the current economic downturn conjuncture Conclusions
© OECD/IEA Economic crisis must not make us lose focus on long-term goal of a more secure and sustainable energy future Energy technology is key to this future An integrated and strategic policy approach is required that bridges the short to the long- term Initial emphasis on energy efficiency Roadmaps and international co-operation Increasing RD&D funding for new technologies Tailored deployment policies, including for renewables Clean Energy New Deal can provide win-win benefits Recommendations Nobuo Tanaka, IEA Executive Director G8 Environment Ministers meeting, Siracusa, Italy 22 April, 2009