THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 S5 Environmental Disturbances: August ‘06 Robert Schofield, U of O Erik Katsavounidis (MIT), Laura Cadonati (MIT), Michele Zanolin (MIT), Dennis Ugolini.
Advertisements

For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007.
LIGO-G Z 1 Listening to glitches Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
LIGO Reduced Data Sets E7 standard reduced data set RDS generation for future runs decimation examples LIGO-G Z Isabel Leonor (w/ Robert Schofield)
LIGO Data Quality Monitoring Keith Riles University of Michigan.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M DMT Monitors: Beyond the FOM John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LLO August 18, 2006.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
LIGO- G Z AJW, Caltech, LIGO Project1 Use of detector calibration info in the burst group
21 Feb 2002Soumya D. Mohanty, AEI1 DCR Plan of presentation Soumya Mohanty: Overview, aims & work done R. Balasubramanian: Details of Hardware, Database.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization NeedsK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Detector Characterization Needs Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
6. Results The accompanying histograms show the empirical PDF of z for each interferometer (H1, H2 at Hanford, WA; L1 at Livingston, LA). The green areas.
Martin Hewitson Overview of DC work. GEO DC workshop June DC work Noise characterisation Noise projections, noise sources, noise couplings Calibration.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
Detector Noise Characterization with the Hilbert-Huang Transform
G Z 1 New Glitches seen/studied in Block-Normal Shantanu Desai Pennsylvania State University for Glitch Working Group and many others Detchar.
LIGO-G Z Results of the LIGO-TAMA S2/DT8 Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 LIGO-G Z Glitch and veto studies in LIGO’s S5 search for gravitational wave bursts Erik Katsavounidis MIT for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Planning notes from August 2005 Burst Group Face-to-Face Meeting LHO, August 18, 2005 Peter Shawhan, scribe LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G Z Detchar Introduction (8/16/06)K. Riles - University of Michigan 1 SixtyHertzMon Update Junyi Zhang & Keith Riles (University of Michigan)
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
Proposing a DMT monitor for studying micro- seismic noise and up-conversions S. Mukherjee & R. Grosso UTB & U. Erlangen, Germany LSC Det Char Telecon,
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LSC Meeting, August 2002 P. Shawhan / Inspiral U.L. Working GroupLIGO-G Z Vetoes Used in the E7 Inspiral Upper Limit Analysis Part 2 Peter Shawhan,
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z r statistics for time-domain cross correlation on burst candidate events Laura Cadonati LIGO-MIT LSC collaboration meeting, LLO march.
N. Saoulidou, Fermilab1 Study of the QIE Response & Calibration (Current Injection CalDet & Development of diagnostic tools for NearDet N.Saoulidou,
LSC Meeting, 10 Nov 2003 Peter Shawhan (LIGO/Caltech)1 Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests Evan Ochsner and Peter Shawhan (U. of Chicago) (LIGO / Caltech)
LSC meeting – Mar05 Livingston, LA A. Di Credico Syracuse University Glitch investigations with kleineWelle Reporting on work done by several people: L.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M DMT Monitor Verification with Simulated Data John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Online DQ Segments and Triggers John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
LIGO-G D S2 Glitch Investigation Report Laura Cadonati (MIT) on behalf of the Glitch Investigation Team LSC meeting, August 2003, Hannover.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
S5 Data Quality John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech Hanover, October 25, 2007.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Methods and Milestones
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Progress Report: Noise Storms and Beam Splitter Oscillations
S2 Bilinear Couplings Study
Inspiral Waveform Consistency Tests
Presentation transcript:

THE EVENT DISPLAY TOOL Shantanu Desai Penn. State University Scimon Camp, Livingston, LA August 18, 2006

Outline of Talk Introduction to Event Display and History Median-normalized spectrogram Example of Event display for a H1-H2 double coincidence Kleine-Welle event with significance > 35 Examples of known glitches and environmental artifacts (Rai’s question at plenary meeting on “database” of events) This talk will not go into any software details or intricacies in running the event display tool. This can be discussed offline

INTRODUCTION ● Event display is a web-based tool which produces time-series and median normalized spectrograms within ± 0.2 and 4 sec. for a fixed set of channels at any given time of interest along with some other supplementary information. ● First developed and implemented by K. Rawlins(MIT) with contributions by Shourov, Michele and others from Burst group at MIT. ● Useful to spot glitches in DARM-ERR and auxiliary channels. ● Supplements Shourov's Q-scan tool (next talk). Q-scan much better at spotting low-amplitude glitches. ● It has been extensively used by glitch group to look at outlier events from loud burst and inspiral triggers since S4. Since S5, also been used to look at HW injections, GRB events etc

● Difference between regular and median-normalized spectrogram (introduced by Gaby) LSC-DARM_CTRL_EXC_DAQ Normal Spectrogram Median-Normalized Spectrogram ● Also applies Linear Predictive Error Filter to time-series for almost all the channels (written by Shourov) (DARM-ERR exists with and without LPEF) Median-Normalized Spectra

USES AND LIMITATIONS ● Gives a nice summary and overview of what is happening in the detectors and environmental channels. ● Proved useful in S5 for spotting problems and creating DQ flags. ● Not a substitute for any quantitative analysis for the above ● One could get fooled by some of the filtering effects used in the event display (LPEF). ● Unable to spot glitches outside specified frequency range. ● For events near lock-loss you have to be careful about “cause and effect” while looking at PEM channels. For environmental channels, only plots raw ADC counts and not calibrated spectra

Extra channels Stand-alone script exists which produced same types of time-series and/or spectrograms for any channels in L1 RDS or raw frame and in any frequency range which may not be in regular event display. ISS channels (present only in raw frames) :

KNOWN GLITCHES ● Stuck “awg” Single-sample calibration line dropout ● Such calibration line glitches always cause large amplitude glitches in DARM-ERR

KNOWN GLITCHES ● Dips in DC level in light cavity. ASC-QPDX_DC LSC-DARM_ERR ● P. Shawhan creating DQ flags for such intervals.

SOLVED GLITCHES ● Switching to ASPD5 Fixed by adding LSC-AS_TRIGL channels

AIRPLANE EVENTS ● S-shaped or line with non-zero slope in the microphone spectrograms

SEISMIC ● Example of Seismic up-conversion DARM-ERR/AS-Q Many such events seen in LHO. Now possible to identify them without even looking at the seismic channels.

CONCLUSIONS ● Event display tool (along with Q-scan) can be used to find glitches. ● Codes are mainly written in matlab with perl and shell scripts as drivers. All of them are in matapps under src/utilities/event_display/ ● If you want to run ED at any time or want to install it or replace any set of channels with some different ones, please let me know. ● Under development : a CGI based interface to the event display tool. Working on a raw channel event display to track down unknown glitches. Create a similar event display for GEO