1 Ankit D. Mohapatra, Dr. Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
Advertisements

Program Degrad.1.0 Auger cascade model for electron thermalisation in gas mixtures produced by photons or particles in electric and magnetic fields S.F.Biagi.
Application of Straw Tube Detectors to Hyperon Studies Sedigheh Jowzaee Symposium on Applied Nuclear Physics and Innovative Technologies Sep. 2014,
GM COUNTER.
Speed-I View from Material Side Qing Peng, Anil U. Mane, Jeffrey W. Elam Energy Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Limitations on Fast Timing.
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
Gas Detector Developments Jin Li. Liquid Xenon case Liquid Xenon can be considered as a gaseous xenon of 520 atm. K.Masuda, S. Takasu, T.Doke et al. (Doke.
Amsterdam, April 2,2003P. Colas - Micromegas TPC1 Micromegas TPC: New Results and Prospects New tests in magnetic fieldNew tests in magnetic field FeedbackFeedback.
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Fusion Physics - Energy Boon or Nuclear Gloom? David Schilter and Shivani Sharma.
Status of simulation studies of IBF for GEMs
10 Picosecond Timing Workshop 28 April PLANACON MCP-PMT for use in Ultra-High Speed Applications.
Type of Material: Instrumentation Review
Gain measurements of Triple Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) detector with zigzag readout strips V. BHOPATKAR, E. ESPOSITO, E. HANSEN, J. TWIGGER M. HOHLMANN.
C.Shalem et al, IEEE 2004, Rome, October 18 R. Chechik et al. ________________RICH2004_____________ Playa del Carmen, Mexico 1 Thick GEM-like multipliers:
Simulation of the spark rate in a Micromegas detector with Geant4 Sébastien Procureur CEA-Saclay.
Systematic studies on the rate capability of MWPC operated in Xe/CO 2 D. Gonzalez-Diaz for the CBM-TRD group March, 2008.
Chevron / Zigzag Pad Designs for Gas Trackers
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
GEM: A new concept for electron amplification in gas detectors Contents 1.Introduction 2.Two-step amplification: MWPC combined with GEM 3.Measurement of.
Sheffield : R. Hollingworth, D. Tovey R.A.L. : R.Luscher Development of Micromegas charge readout for two phase Xenon based Dark Matter detectors Contents:
Update on TPC R&D C. Woody BNL DC Upgrades Meeting October 9, 2003.
High Energy Physics Group Department Of Physics Banaras Hindu University Prakhar Garg (A. Kumar, A. Prakash, B.K Singh, V. Singh & C.P Singh)
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
2nd RD51 Collaboration Meeting, Paris, October PENNING TRANSFERS Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -Turkey 2nd RD51 Collaboration.
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
March 28-April, Particle Acceleratior Conference - New York, U.S.A. Comparison of back-scattering properties of electron emission materials Abstract.
Muon Drift Tube Gases Chris Clark Advisors: Rachel Avramidou, Rob Veenhof.
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
BURLE update Peter Križan Friday meeting, Mar 24, 2006.
TUDelft-IRI-ST A new Tissue-Equivalent Proportional Counter design M. Farahmand, A.J.J. Bos, J. Huizenga and C.W.E. van Eijk Radiation Technology Group,
Atsushi Aoza ( saga University ) A Simulation Study of GEM gating at ILC-TPC A.Ishikawa, A.Sugiyama, H.Fujishima, K.Kadomatsu(Saga U.) K.Fujii,M.Kobayashi,
2009 Florida Academy of Sciences at Saint Leo University, Saint Leo, Florida Performance comparison of the triple gas electron multiplier (GEM) and the.
Performance Studies of BULK Micromegas with Different Amplification Gaps Purba Bhattacharya 1, Sudeb Bhattacharya 1, Nayana Majumdar 1, Supratik Mukhopadhyay.
Snowmass, August, 2005P. Colas - InGrid1 M. Chefdeville a, P. Colas b, Y. Giomataris b, H. van der Graaf a, E.H.M.Heijne c, S.van der Putten a, C. Salm.
Effect of Re Alloying in W on Surface Morphology Changes After He + Bombardment at High Temperatures R.F. Radel, G.L. Kulcinski, J. F. Santarius, G. A.
Numerical Studies on IBF of BULK Micromegas RD51.
Electron Transmission Measurement of GEM Gate Hirotoshi KUROIWA (Saga Univ.) Collaboration with KEK, TUAT, Kogakuin U, Kinki U, Saga U Introduction Motivation.
Özkan ŞAHİN & Tadeusz KOWALSKI Uludağ University, Physics Department, Bursa – TURKEY Faculty of Physics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of.
Construction and Characterization of a GEM G.Bencivenni, LNF-INFN The lesson is divided in two main parts: 1 - construction of a GEM detector (Marco Pistilli)
MPGD (RD-51) Workshop Nikhef, Amsterdam, April Penning Effect on Gas Amplification Factor Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department.
T. Zerguerras- RD51 WG Meeting- CERN - February Single-electron response and energy resolution of a Micromegas detector T. Zerguerras *, B.
Penning transfers: survey of available data, life-time of excited states, pressure dependence Ozkan SAHIN Uludag University Physics Department Bursa -TURKEY.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Gas Electron Multiplier
Gain and Time Resolution Simulations in Saturated MCP Pores Valentin Ivanov, Zeke Insepov, Sergey Antipov 1 First Author Institution, 2 Second Author Institution,
Werner Riegler, Christian Lippmann CERN Introduction
SPES Target Group Data…… INFN-CISAS-CNR collaboration The Ablation Ion Source for refractory metal ion beams A preliminary design.
R&D activities on a double phase pure Argon THGEM-TPC A. Badertscher, A. Curioni, L. Knecht, D. Lussi, A. Marchionni, G. Natterer, P. Otiougova, F. Resnati,
Max Chefdeville, NIKHEF, Amsterdam
A particle detector for educational purposes
Studies at BINP Alexander Krasnov
Activities on straw tube simulation
Secondary avalanches in gas mixtures
Yeong-Shin Park and Y. S. Hwang
UK Dark Matter Collaboration
WG1 Task2 New structures, new designs, new geometries
THGEM: Introduction to discussion on UV-detector parameters for RICH
Development of Hard X-ray Detector with GEM
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
Potential Ion Gate using GEM: experiment and simulation
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Ionization detectors ∆
MWPC’s, GEM’s or Micromegas for AD transfer and experimental lines
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Development of microchannel plate phototubes in Novosibirsk
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #16 Monday ,April 2, 2012 Dr. Brandt
Production of a 3D-Printed THGEM Board
Micro Resistive Well Detector for Large Area Tracking
Presentation transcript:

1 Ankit D. Mohapatra, Dr. Marcus Hohlmann Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

Made from a borosilicate glass functionalized with a resistive and a secondary emissive coating both applied by atomic layer deposition (layer of metal oxide) … Kind of a hybrid detector where gain comes from two mechanisms : Metal oxide layer Gas gain The biggest assets of these detectors is their robust performance in magnetic fields. (Va’vra 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium) 2 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

They have been there since (Probably the first paper) The earliest MCPs were used as pre-amplifiers to the Multi Wire Proportional Chambers (MWPCs) or as a standalone proportional counter. 3 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

The first successful operation of MCPs (both single and double) as standalone detectors used along with photo-cathodes was shown by V. Peskov. * Gas gains as high as 10 4 (single MCPs) were observed. Most of the testing done on GCPs (Glass capillary tubes), which are MCPs not treated with H 2. Significant charging up * (NIM A 433 (1999) ) 4 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

Gas-based MCPs with emissive coating have never been tested. Also the use of MCPs as a standalone detector for measuring the position of the extracted electron clouds (an approach similar to GEMs) has not been properly investigated. No prior knowledge of a gas mixture which could work for metal oxide coated gaseous MCPs(Magboltz simulation tells us it has to be a helium based mixture, still undecided about the quencher …) 5 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

6 Post-processed MCP (potential map from cathode to anode) Just the dielectric, simulating half a hole … Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

7 Only gas mixture where the probability of electrons having an energy more than 80 eV is non-negligible

Simulated (T.Tamamura et al) 8 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

X-Z view X-Y view 9 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

Motion of electrons and ions in GEMs/MCPs (Sven Dildick) * To be replaced with animation from Garfield++ 10 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

First we try to match the simulated gain with the experimental gain in GCPs from Peskov’s paper. The parameters are : Pitch : 130 microns Diameter : 100 microns Thickness : 800 microns Drift field : 720 Volts/cm* Drift space : 1 mm The gas mixtures used is Argon(95)/Methane(5) 11 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013 Pitch

The main parameter to be fine-tuned in the simulation is the penning transfer ratio. Studied extensively in 2008 for Argon based mixtures (O.Sahin-JINST 2008) Penning transfer – group of processes by which excitation energy is used to increase the gas gain Literature suggests that the ratio should be ~20 % for Argon(95)/CH 4. However we find it to be in the range (Preliminary simulations have ruled out ratio greater than 50%), but we have not scaled the gain yet … (preliminary, it is a statistics game) 12 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

One can see that with increase in transfer ratio from o to 50, the gain increases exponentially Interestingly, the simulated gain would match with the measured gain if r p lies between 30 and Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

From preliminary simulation, r p should be between 30 and 40 (not in agreement with theory) (from Garfield++) The higher potentials have lesser statistics (the batch jobs are still running …) Gain From Tamamura/Peskov’s paper 14 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

We can see that the gas mixture is not suitable for our purpose. (the mean energy is ~ 5 eV). The loss to attachment is very less (as expected ). 15 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013 Electron energy in eV

A plot of the z-coordinates gives us an idea of how the geometric loss compares with the effective gain. Effective gain when we want to extract the electron cloud Includes Geometric loss as well as the gain in Peskov’s scenario 16 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013 Z-coordinate in microns

A cleaner look at the geometric losses (plotting the electron end-points): The cylindrical structure can be seen One can see the holes clearly 17 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

Collect more statistics to pin-point the penning transfer ratio for argon as well as helium based mixtures. (already have an estimate for He(90)/CO2(10) at ~34.5 % (from O.Sahin …) ) After that, predict the gain for the MCPs we have in the lab (1200 microns metal oxide coated) Compare it with the hardware results. 18 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013

Thanks …. 19 Barry University, 8-9 March, 2013