UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 1 Prospects for SUSY at ATLAS and CMS Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Advertisements

5th May 2011Fergus Wilson, RAL1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Looking for Higgs and SUSY at the LHC or...what can you get for $10,000,000,000.
Recent studies on sparticles and MSSM Higgses at CMS Massimiliano Chiorboli University and INFN Catania.
Sparticle reconstruction methods in the CMS detector Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita and INFN Catania.
Progress report on sbottom and gluino reconstruction Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita and INFN Catania.
Progress report on sbottom and gluino reconstruction Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita and INFN Catania.
Sparticle reconstruction in dilepton final state M. Chiorboli, M. Galanti & A. Tricomi University & INFN Catania CMS Physics Review I. SUSY/BSM CERN,
W.Murray PPD 1 Bill Murray RAL, CCLRC WIN 07, Kolkata 15 th January 2007 What is E-W symmetry breaking What are the known knowns? What.
Searches for the Third Generation: SUSY with b-jets in ATLAS Searches for the Third Generation: SUSY with b-jets in ATLAS Monica D’Onofrio University of.
M.Ball/K.Desch, Experimental Analysis of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a 1 Experimental Study of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a: a First Look Markus Ball.
Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Phenomenology of new neutral.
1Maiken Pedersen University of Oslo06/14/08 SUPERSYMMETRY IN THE OPPOSITE SIGN DI-LEPTON CHANNEL Supervisor Farid Ould-Saada.
University of Sheffield Dan Tovey 1 Searches for New Physics at the LHC Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
Looking for SUSY Dark Matter with ATLAS The Story of a Lonely Lepton Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
What prospects for Supersymmetry at the Large Hadron Collider ?
July 22 nd, 2005 A.Canepa, SUSY 2005, Durham 1 Search for chargino and neutralino in trilepton final states Anadi Canepa (Purdue University IN, USA) for.
PPC07, May 2007 Dan Tovey 1 Dark Matter Searches at ATLAS Dan Tovey University of Sheffield Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Higgs and SUSY at the LHC Alan Barr on behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations ICHEP-17 Aug 2004, Beijing ATLAS.
LC Workshop April 2002 ATLAS & CMS prospects Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 ATLAS and CMS activities Albert De Roeck CERN ECFA/DESY meeting St Malo April.
ADR for Massimiliano Chiorboli Universita’ and INFN Catania
1Alan Barr PASCOS 09 PASCOS 2009 DESY 9 July 2009 …AT THE LHC DARK MATTER … Alan Barr University of Oxford On behalf of the ATLAS and CMS collaborations.
SUSY Dark Matter Collider – direct – indirect search bridge. Sabine Kraml Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Grenoble, France ● 43. Rencontres.
Reconstruction of Fundamental SUSY Parameters at LHC and LC
Inclusive analysis of supersymmetry in EGRET-point with one-lepton events: pp → 1ℓ + 4j + E Tmiss + Х V.A. Bednyakov, S.N. Karpov, E.V. Khramov and A.F.
ATLAS Dan Tovey 1 Measurement of the LSP Mass Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On Behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Sapporo, June 2007 Dan Tovey 1 Supersymmetry at ATLAS Dan Tovey University of Sheffield Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Kyoto, January 2005 Dan Tovey 1 Supersymmetry at ATLAS Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
Neutralino relic density in the CPVMSSM and the ILC G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, O. Kittel, S. Kraml, H. Martyn, A. Pukhov, hep-ph/ , Phys.Rev.D Motivation.
A Linear Collider Run Scenario Choose a physics scenario that is CONSERVATIVE in the sense that it has many particles and thresholds to explore. Assume.
Supersymmetry measurements with ATLAS Tommaso Lari (CERN/INFN Milano) On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration After we have discovered New Physics, can we.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS Martin White ELECTROWEAK INTERACTIONS AND UNIFIED THEORIES XLI Rencontres de Moriond – March 2006.
SUSY Studies with ATLAS Experiment 2006 Texas Section of the APS Joint Fall Meeting October 5-7, 2006 Arlington, Texas Nurcan Ozturk University of Texas.
Latest New Phenomena Results from Alexey Popov (IHEP, Protvino) For the DO Collaboration ITEP, Moscow
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University CIPANP, June 2012.
Dave Toback Texas A&M University HCP 2004 June 17 th Run II Searches for Supersymmetry Dave Toback Texas A&M University June 17 th 2004 HCP2004.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
Gennaro Corcella 1, Simonetta Gentile 2 1. Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN 2. Università di Roma, La Sapienza, INFN Z’production at LHC in an extended.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
Alain Romeyer - Sept Light Higgs search in SUSY cascades Introduction (Previous studies) Plans for this analysis Simulation chain Reconstruction.
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
Elba -- June 7, 2006 Collaboration Meeting 1 CDF Melisa Rossi -- Udine University On behalf of the Multilepton Group CDF Collaboration Meeting.
Interpreting a CMS lljjP T Excess With the Golden Cascade of the MSSM October 1st, 2014 Journal Club Ben Allanach, Are R. Raklev, and Anders Kvellestad.
Developing Model Independent sparticle mass measurements at ATLAS Cambridge SUSY Working Group B.C. Allanach, C.G. Lester, M.A. Parker, B.R. Webber See.
LHC, Prague, July 2003Filip Moortgat, University of Antwerpen LHC Praha 2003 Detection of MSSM Higgs bosons using supersymmetric decay modes.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
SESAPS November 11, B. Scurlock, University of Florida1 Bobby Scurlock Darin Acosta Paolo Bartalini Richard Cavanaugh Alexey Drozdetskiy Guenakh.
Journées de Prospective
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Focus-Point studies at LHC
Search for BSM at LHC Fayet Fest Paris November 9, 2016 Dirk Zerwas
Sparticle reconstruction at benchmark points
Supersymmetric Particle Reconstructions at CMS
Sparticle reconstruction at benchmark points
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
mSUGRA SUSY Searches at the LHC
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
& Searches for Squarks and Gluinos at the Tevatron
SUSY parameter determination at LHC and ILC
Mass Reconstruction Methods in ATLAS
Presentation transcript:

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 1 Prospects for SUSY at ATLAS and CMS Dan Tovey University of Sheffield

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 2 Introduction SUSY particularly well-motivated solution to gauge hierarchy problem, unification of couplings etc. etc. (see Weiglein talk). Also often provides natural solution to Dark Matter problem of astrophysics/cosmology. One of main motivations for building LHC and GPDs. Much work carried out historically by LHC experiments esp: –ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance TDR ( –CMS SUSY mega-note (J. Phys. G28 (2002) 469). Will concentrate in this talk on more recent studies and areas where new groups/people could get involved. DISCLAIMER: Will try to cover both CMS and ATLAS activities where relevant, however in places will focus more on ATLAS (personal bias due to familiarity). Will not cover non-SUSY exotica (ED, BH production etc.) PS: Spot a missing tilde and win a prize!

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 3 Model Framework Minimal Supersymmetric Extension of the Standard Model (MSSM) contains > 105 free parameters, NMSSM etc. has more difficult to map complete parameter space! Assume specific well-motivated model framework in which generic signatures can be studied. Often assume SUSY broken by gravitational interactions mSUGRA/CMSSM framework : unified masses and couplings at the GUT scale 5 free parameters (m 0, m 1/2, A 0, tan( ), sgn( )). R-Parity assumed to be conserved. Exclusive studies use benchmark points in mSUGRA parameter space: LHCC Points 1-6; Post-LEP benchmarks (Battaglia et al.); Snowmass Points and Slopes (SPS); etc… LHCC mSUGRA Points

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 4 SUSY Signatures Q: What do we expect SUSY LHC to look like? A: Look at typical decay chain: Strongly interacting sparticles (squarks, gluinos) dominate production. Heavier than sleptons, gauginos etc. cascade decays to LSP. Long decay chains and large mass differences between SUSY states –Many high p T objects observed (leptons, jets, b-jets). If R-Parity conserved LSP (lightest neutralino in mSUGRA) stable and sparticles pair produced. –Large E T miss signature (c.f. W l ). Closest equivalent SM signature t Wb. l q q l g ~ q ~ l ~ ~ ~ p p

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 5 Inclusive Searches One of first tasks of LHC experiments (SUSY cross-section large). Is LHC sensitive to all phenomenologically favoured models? Especially important given current interest in focus-point models with large mass scales. Use 'golden' Jets + n leptons + E T miss discovery channel. –Heavy strongly interacting sparticles produced in initial interaction –Cascade decay via jets and leptons –R-Parity conservation gives stable LSP (neutralino) at end of chain Map statistical discovery reach in mSUGRA m 0 -m 1/2 parameter space. Sensitivity only weakly dependent on A 0, tan( ) and sign( ). –Choose 'reasonable' values e.g.A 0 =0, tan( ) = 10, 35, sign( )=+/-1 Systematic + statistical discovery reach harder to assess –Focus of current and future work.

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 6 mSUGRA Reach ATLAS 5 5

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 7 SUSY Mass Scale First measured SUSY parameter likely to be mass scale: –Defined as weighted mean of masses of initial sparticles. Calculate distribution of 'effective mass' variable defined as scalar sum of masses of all jets (or four hardest) and E T miss : M eff = p T i | + E T miss. Distribution peaked at ~ twice SUSY mass scale for signal events. Pseudo 'model-independent' measurement. Typical measurement error (syst+stat) ~10% for mSUGRA models for 10 fb -1. Jets + E T miss + 0 leptons ATLAS 10 fb -1

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 8 Exclusive Studies With more data will attempt to measure weak scale SUSY parameters (masses etc.) using exclusive channels. Different philosophy to TeV Run II (better S/B, longer decay chains) aim to use model-independent measures. Two neutral LSPs escape from each event –Impossible to measure mass of each sparticle using one channel alone Use kinematic end-points to measure combinations of masses. Old technique used many times before ( mass from decay spectrum, W (transverse) mass in W l ). Difference here is we don't know mass of neutral final state particles. lq q l g ~ q ~ lRlR ~ ~ ~ pp

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 9 Dilepton Edge Measurements When kinematically accessible can undergo sequential two-body decay to via a right-slepton (e.g. LHC Point 5). Results in sharp OS SF dilepton invariant mass edge sensitive to combination of masses of sparticles. Can perform SM & SUSY background subtraction using OF distribution e + e e e - Position of edge measured with precision ~ 0.5% (30 fb -1 ). ~ ~ 0 2 ~ 0 1 ll l e + e ~ ~ 30 fb -1 atlfast Physics TDR Point 5 e + e e e - 5 fb -1 FULL SIM Modified Point 5 (tan( ) = 6) ATLAS Preliminary

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 10 Measurements With Squarks Dilepton edge starting point for reconstruction of decay chain. Make invariant mass combinations of leptons and jets. Gives multiple constraints on combinations of four masses. Sensitivity to individual sparticle masses. ~ ~ ~ ll l qLqL q ~ ~ ~ b h qLqL q ~ b llq edge 1% error (100 fb -1 ) lq edge 1% error (100 fb -1 ) llq threshold 2% error (100 fb -1 ) bbq edge TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 TDR, Point 5 ATLAS 1% error (100 fb -1 )

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 11 Model-Independent Masses Combine measurements from edges from different jet/lepton combinations to obtain model- independent mass measurements. 0 1 lRlR 0 2 qLqL Mass (GeV) ~ ~ ~ ~ ATLAS Sparticle Expected precision (100 fb -1 ) q L 3% 0 2 6% l R 9% % ~ ~ ~ ~

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 12 Sbottom Mass Following measurement of squark, slepton and neutralino masses move up decay chain and study alternative chains. One possibility: require b-tagged jet in addition to dileptons. Give sensitivity to sbottom mass (but actually two peaks). lb b l g ~ b ~ lRlR ~ ~ ~ pp Post-LEP Point B: m 0 =100 GeV, m 1/2 = 250 GeV, tan( ) = 10, A 0 =0, >0 10 fb -1 CMS

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 13 Gluino Mass Can also move further up the decay chain to gain sensitivity to gluino mass. Can use either light squark decay or sbottom (as here). Problem with large error on input 0 1 mass remains solve by reconstructing difference of gluino and squark/sbottom masses. Allows separation of b 1 and b 2 with 300 fb fb -1 Sbottom ChainSquark Chain 10 fb fb fb fb fb fb -1 M(sbottom)500±7502±4497±2M(squark)536±10532±2536±1 (sbottom) 42±541±436±3 (squark) 60±936±131±1 M(gluino)594±7592±4591±3M(gluino)592±7595±2590±2 (gluino) 42±746±339±3 (gluino) 75±559±2 M(gl)-M(sb)92±388±290±2M(gl)-M(sq)57±347±244±2 (gl-sb) 17±420±223±2 (gl-sq) 9±316±511±2 Post-LEP Point B CMS Post-LEP Point B 300 fb -1 ~ ~ ~

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 14 Higgs Signatures Lightest Higgs particle produced copiously in 0 2 decays if kinematically allowed. Prominent peak in bb invariant mass distribution. Possible discovery channel. ~ CMS 100 fb -1 m 0 =500 GeV, m 1/2 = 500 GeV, tan( ) = 2, A 0 =0, <0

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 15 RH Squark Mass Right handed squarks difficult as rarely decay via standard 0 2 chain –Typically BR (q R 0 1 q) > 99%. Instead search for events with 2 hard jets and lots of E T miss. Reconstruct mass using stransverse mass (Allanach et al.): m T2 2 = min [max{m T 2 (p T j(1),q T (1) ;m ),m T 2 (p T j(2),q T (2) ;m )}] Needs 0 1 mass measurement as input. Also works for sleptons. q T (1) +q T (2) =E T miss ~ ~ ~ qRqR q ~ ATLAS 30 fb -1 Preliminary Left slepton Right squark ~ ~ SPS1a Precision ~ 3%

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 16 Heavy Gaugino Measurements Also possible to identify dilepton edges from decays of heavy gauginos. Requires high stats. Crucial input to reconstruction of MSSM neutralino mass matrix (independent of SUSY breaking scenario). ATLAS 100 fb -1 Preliminary ATLAS 100 fb -1 Preliminary ATLAS 100 fb -1 ATLAS Preliminary SPS1a

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 17 Mass Relation Method Hot off the press: new idea for reconstructing SUSY masses! Impossible to measure mass of each sparticle using one channel alone (Page 8). –Should have added caveat: Only if done event-by-event! Remove ambiguities by combining different events analytically mass relation method (Nojiri et al.). Also allows all events to be used, not just those passing hard cuts (useful if background small, buts stats limited – e.g. high scale SUSY). Preliminary ATLAS SPS1a

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 18 Chargino Mass Measurement Mass of lightest chargino very difficult to measure as does not participate in standard dilepton SUSY decay chain. Decay process via +slepton gives too many extra degrees of freedom - concentrate instead on decay + 1 W 0 1. Require dilepton 0 2 decay chain on other leg of event and use kinematics to calculate chargino mass analytically. Using sideband subtraction technique obtain clear peak at true chargino mass (218 GeV). ~ 3 significance for 100 fb -1. PRELIMINARY lq q l g ~ q ~ lRlR ~ 0 2 ~ 0 1 ~ p p + 1 ~ ~ q q q q q 0 1 ~ W g ~ Modified LHCC Point 5: m 0 =100 GeV; m 1/2 =300 GeV; A 0 =300 GeV; tanß=6 ; μ>0 100 fb -1 ~ ~ ~

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 19 Measuring Model Parameters Alternative use for SUSY observables (invariant mass end-points, thresholds etc.). Here assume mSUGRA/CMSSM model and perform global fit of model parameters to observables –So far mostly private codes but e.g. SFITTER, FITTINO now on the market; –c.f. global EW fits at LEP, ZFITTER, TOPAZ0 etc. Point m 0 m 1/2 A 0 tan( ) sign( ) LHC Point SPS1a Parameter Expected precision (300 fb -1 ) m 0 2% m 1/2 0.6% tan( ) 9% A 0 16%

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 20 SUSY Dark Matter Baer et al. hep-ph/ LEP 2 No REWSB LHC Point 5: >5 error (300 fb -1 ) p = pb p = pb p =10 -9 pb Can use parameter measurements for many purposes, e.g. estimate LSP Dark Matter properties (e.g. for 300 fb -1, SPS1a) – h 2 = –log 10 ( p /pb) = SPS1a: >5 error (300 fb -1 ) Micromegas 1.1 (Belanger et al.) + ISASUGRA 7.69 ATLAS 300 fb -1 Preliminary p ATLAS 300 fb -1 Preliminary DarkSUSY (Gondolo et al.) + ISASUGRA 7.69 h 2

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 21 SUSY Dark Matter SUSY (e.g. mSUGRA) parameter space strongly constrained by cosmology (e.g. WMAP satellite) data. mSUGRA A 0 =0, tan( ) = 10, >0 'Bulk' region: t- channel slepton exchange - LSP mostly Bino. 'Bread and Butter' region for LHC Expts. 'Focus point' region: significant h component to LSP enhances annihilation to gauge bosons ~ Ellis et al. hep-ph/ l l lRlR ~ ~ ~ 1 /Z/h 1 ~ ~ ~ Disfavoured by BR (b s ) = ( ) (CLEO, BELLE) Favoured by g -2 (E821) Assuming = (26 10) from SUSY ( 2 ) h (WMAP) Slepton Co- annihilation region: LSP ~ pure Bino. Small slepton-LSP mass difference makes measurements difficult. Also 'rapid annihilation funnel' at Higgs pole at high tan(

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 22 Coannihilation Models Small slepton-neutralino mass difference gives soft leptons from decay –Low electron/muon/tau energy thresholds crucial. At high tan( ) stau decay channel dominates. –Need to be able to ID soft taus (good jet rejection). Study just started within ATLAS examining signatures of these models. Study point chosen within coannihilation region : –m 0 =70 GeV; m 1/2 =350 GeV; A 0 =0; tanß=10 ; μ>0 Same model to be used for ATLAS DC2 SUSY study (see later). lq q l g ~ q ~ lRlR ~ ~ ~ pp

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 23 Coannihilation Signatures E T miss >300 GeV 2 OSSF leptons P T >10 GeV >1 jet with P T >150 GeV OSSF-OSOF subtraction applied E T miss >300 GeV 1 tau P T >40 GeV;1 tau P T <25 GeV >1 jet with P T >100 GeV SS tau subtraction Chosen model point has very rich phenomenology. Decays of 0 2 to both l L and l R kinematically allowed. –Double dilepton invariant mass edge structure; –Edges expected at 57 GeV and 101 GeV Stau decay channels enhanced –Soft tau signatures; –Edge expected at 79 GeV; –Less clear due to poor tau visible energy resolution. ATLAS Preliminary 100 fb -1 ~ ~ ~

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 24 Super-LHC Proposal to increase sqrt(s) to 28 TeV, luminosity to cm -2 s -1 after initial running (14 TeV, L max = cm -2 s -1 ). Significant impact on detector performance, esp. tracking, electronics etc. Increased luminosity improves discovery reach by ~ 300 GeV. Increased sqrt(s) (less easy technologically) more useful: 800 GeV improvement. Needs further study. CMS A 0 = 0; tan =10; >0

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 25 ATLAS: DC1 SUSY Challenge First attempt at large-scale simulation of SUSY signals in ATLAS ( events: ~5 fb -1 ) in early Tested Geant3 simulation and ATHENA (C++) reconstruction software framework thoroughly. UK sites contributed 40% of initial event sample. No b-tag With b-tag llj endpoint ATLAS SUSY Mass Scale Dijet m T2 distribution ll endpoint Modified LHCC Point 5: m 0 =100 GeV; m 1/2 =300 GeV; A 0 =300 GeV; tanß=6 ; μ>0 Preliminary

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 26 ATLAS has just embarked on DC2 (main production over summer). SUSY Working Group goals: –To validate complete ATLAS simulation and reconstruction software chain using physics objects in SUSY events (jets, taus, leptons etc.); –To carry out sample physics analyses for well-motivated SUSY models using fully simulated data. Models to be studied include: –DC1 point (for validation of Geant4 sim. + new reconstruction tools); –New coannihilation point (rich in signatures). Activity just started (open call for volunteers + phone meeting so far). UK interest so far from Cambridge, RHUL and Sheffield. More volunteers very welcome! (please see me for details) Similar activity within CMS (DC04, PRS SUSY/BSM WG) – aim to scan parameter space and perform detailed studies with specific models in preparation for Physics TDR (late 2005). Contact Luc Pape if interested. Data Challenge Activities

UKHEP Forum, April 2004 Dan Tovey 27 Supersummary The LHC will be THE PLACE to search for, and hopefully study, SUSY from 2007 onwards. SUSY searches will commence on Day 1 of LHC operation. Big challenge for discovery will be understanding systematics. Many studies of exclusive channels already performed. Massive scope for further work! ATLAS and CMS currently focusing on Data Challenges. Significant UK involvement already. Please get involved – this is a great opportunity for the UK to exploit its hardware investment.