Explanations Explanations can be thought of as answers to why-questions Explanations can be thought of as answers to why-questions They aim at helping.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biology, Biologists, and Society What is science? Science is a way of knowing based on experimental or observational evidence and its interpretation. Science.
Advertisements

Active Reading: “Scientific Processes”
 To explain the NATURAL WORLD and how it got to be the way it is.  NOT merely to collect “facts” or describe.  Natural here means empirically sensible—that.
The Challenges of Darwinism. Dear Mr Darwin….. Imagine you are a 19 th century Christian who believes Darwin has it all wrong. Write a letter to him in.
The results of repeated observations and/or experiments concerning a naturally occurring event (phenomenon) are reasonably the same when performed and.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
A2 Ethics How to assess arguments and theories. Aims  To discuss various methods of assessing arguments and theories  To apply these methods to some.
Phil 148 Explanations. Inferences to the Best Explanation. IBE is also known as ‘abductive reasoning’ It is the kind of reasoning (not deduction) that.
Best Practice Precepts [... next] Arguments Arguments Possibility of the Impossible Possibility of the Impossible Belief, Truth, and Reality Belief, Truth,
EXPLANATION Inference to the best explanation, another inductive inference Explanations versus arguments:  Arguments give us reasons to think something.
Criteria of Adequacy Testability Scope Fruitfulness Conservatism
Hume’s Problem of Induction. Most of our beliefs about the world have been formed from inductive inference. (e.g., all of science, folk physics/psych)
Philosophy 223 Relativism and Egoism. Remember This Slide? Ethical reflection on the dictates of morality can address these sorts of issues in at least.
Social Cognition AP Psychology.
Saving the Date vs. Coherence Reflections on fossils and scientific method.
Human Evolution Session I Matter-Universe A multidisciplinary anthropic focus.
Chapter Two SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN BUSINESS
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Explaining Behavior.
Assessing cognitive models What is the aim of cognitive modelling? To try and reproduce, using equations or similar, the mechanism that people are using.
Scientific Thinking - 1 A. It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. B. A hypothesis is scientific.
Developing Ideas for Research and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
Scientific method - 1 Scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena and acquiring new knowledge, as well as for correcting and.
Bio 204 Introduction to Evolution, Ecology, and Biodiversity Alejandro Acevedo Janice Lapsansky Winter 2005.
Science and Engineering Practices
The Role of Theories, Laws, Hypotheses, and Models
What is science? Matt Jarvis. What is science? The word ‘science’ From the Latin Scire meaning ‘to know’ The subject matter of all science is the natural.
CHAPTER FIVE: THE SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE P H I L O S O P H Y A Text with Readings ELEVENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z.
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Introduction to Earth Science Doing Science.  Scientific method – a systemic approach to answering questions about the natural world  Sufficient observation.
Section 2: Science as a Process
Philosophy of science in a nutshell Kareem Khalifa Middlebury College Department of Philosophy.
Biology, Biologists, and Society What is science? Science is a way of knowing based on experimental or observational evidence and its interpretation. Science.
Chapter 13 Science and Hypothesis.  Modern science has had a profound impact on our lives— mostly for the better.  The laws and principles of science.
Belief Mode and Design Mode Both are Important but Design Mode is the Mode of Idea Improvement Belief mode: Arguing, gathering and weighing evidence, accepting,
1.3: Scientific Thinking & Processes Key concept: Science is a way of thinking, questioning, and gathering evidence.
Evolution Vs Intelligent Design G-d Versus Science.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
How to Write an Essay for a History Class
WHY ARE YOU HERE? Yes ….. You! IB SEHS STUDENTS?.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
IE241: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. We said before that estimation of parameters was one of the two major areas of statistics. Now let’s turn to.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Biological Science.
COSEE California Communicating Ocean Sciences Session 2: The Nature of Science.
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Chapter 27: Hypotheses, Explanations, and Inference to the Best Explanation.
Philosophical Aspects of Science Soraj Hongladarom Department of Philosophy Faculty of Arts.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
What kinds of things are we certain about?. Mathematical and logical truths.
Theories and Hypotheses. Assumptions of science A true physical universe exists Order through cause and effect, the connections can be discovered Knowledge.
Psychofunctionalism. Analytic Functionalism Analytic functionalism holds that the meaning of a mental-state term is determined by a set of platitudes–
Eliminative materialism
Transient Unterdetermination and the Miracle Argument Paul Hoyningen-Huene Leibniz Universität Hannover Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science (ZEWW)
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. THEORIES ARE THE SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which.
False Assumptions 2012/03/25/false-assumptions-lesson/
Chapter 1 What is Biology? 1.1 Science and the Natural World.
Anomalistic Psychology
Occam's razor: states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference to any.
Strong and Weak Emergence, by David Chalmers  Weak emergence involves “epistemic emergence.”  On this view, we can deduce, at least in principle, the.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Part 4 Reading Critically
Writing Scientific Reports
Section 2: Science as a Process
How Do You Teach Students to Think Well?
How Do We Teach and Assess Critical Thinking Skills?
Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior
Unit 1 – Foundations of Reason and Logic
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Philosophy of Science: What Skeptics Need to Know
Presentation transcript:

Explanations Explanations can be thought of as answers to why-questions Explanations can be thought of as answers to why-questions They aim at helping us to understand some range of data They aim at helping us to understand some range of data The exact nature of an explanation will differ based on its subject: mathematical, physical, psychological, etc. The exact nature of an explanation will differ based on its subject: mathematical, physical, psychological, etc.

Inference to the Best Explanation IBE arguments typically appeal to theories: sets of concepts, ideas, and hypotheses intended to offer an explanation. (Theories are NOT mere opinions or speculation.) IBE arguments typically appeal to theories: sets of concepts, ideas, and hypotheses intended to offer an explanation. (Theories are NOT mere opinions or speculation.) IBE arguments are based on the ideas of verisimilitude (approximate truth) and corroboration (provisional support). IBE arguments are based on the ideas of verisimilitude (approximate truth) and corroboration (provisional support). The strategy of IBE arguments is to argue that some hypothesis or theory possesses verisimilitude because it is the best available explanation for some range of data. The strategy of IBE arguments is to argue that some hypothesis or theory possesses verisimilitude because it is the best available explanation for some range of data. IBE arguments are the primary form of reasoning used in the sciences IBE arguments are the primary form of reasoning used in the sciences

Evaluating Explanations Explanations are typically evaluated in comparison to an alternative. The only time this is not the case is when one makes a case that the explanation offered is the only available explanation. Explanations are to be rejected only in light of a better alternative. Explanations are typically evaluated in comparison to an alternative. The only time this is not the case is when one makes a case that the explanation offered is the only available explanation. Explanations are to be rejected only in light of a better alternative. Alternatives are not always explicitly laid out— sometimes the competitor is assumed. Alternatives are not always explicitly laid out— sometimes the competitor is assumed. There is no single standard or feature used for judging competing explanations; rather, there are several “virtues” that can make an explanation superior to its competitors. There is no single standard or feature used for judging competing explanations; rather, there are several “virtues” that can make an explanation superior to its competitors.

Simplicity Occam’s Razor: do not multiply entities beyond necessity; i.e. do not appeal to unnecessary elements in offering explanations. Occam’s Razor: do not multiply entities beyond necessity; i.e. do not appeal to unnecessary elements in offering explanations. This can involve: (1) number of entities, (2) number of fundamental kinds of entities, (3) number of non- reducible properties, (4) number of non-reducible laws, and (5) computational simplicity This can involve: (1) number of entities, (2) number of fundamental kinds of entities, (3) number of non- reducible properties, (4) number of non-reducible laws, and (5) computational simplicity Why? These elements increase the likelihood that the explanation is in fact false. Failure story: Gremlins. Why? These elements increase the likelihood that the explanation is in fact false. Failure story: Gremlins. Success Story: Copernicus’ Heliocentric solar system Success Story: Copernicus’ Heliocentric solar system

Explanatory Scope Judgment regarding how much of the data is explained by the theory in question. Explanations that do well here explain data that their opposing theories can’t. Judgment regarding how much of the data is explained by the theory in question. Explanations that do well here explain data that their opposing theories can’t. Success Story #1: Psychoanalysis Success Story #1: Psychoanalysis Success Story #2: Evolution Success Story #2: Evolution

Explanatory Depth This is a judgment of the explanation’s ability to account for the specific details and mechanisms involved in the data This is a judgment of the explanation’s ability to account for the specific details and mechanisms involved in the data Failure Story: AIDS is God’s punishment for homosexuality Failure Story: AIDS is God’s punishment for homosexuality Success Story: Relativity Theory and Mercury’s orbit Success Story: Relativity Theory and Mercury’s orbit

Unification Good theories will tend to show how ranges of data originally thought distinct are really results of the same mechanisms Good theories will tend to show how ranges of data originally thought distinct are really results of the same mechanisms Success Story #1: Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation Success Story #1: Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation Success Story #2: Evolution Success Story #2: Evolution Main concern is to avoid spurious unification— unification that is ad hoc and lacks explanatory depth. (Failure story: Theological determinism) Main concern is to avoid spurious unification— unification that is ad hoc and lacks explanatory depth. (Failure story: Theological determinism)

Predictive Novelty Good theories will tend to be predictively (and retrodictively) accurate. Good theories will tend to be predictively (and retrodictively) accurate. More important still is predictive novelty—the ability to make predictions that competitor theories don’t, which turn out to be true. More important still is predictive novelty—the ability to make predictions that competitor theories don’t, which turn out to be true. Success Story: Relativity Theory Success Story: Relativity Theory Predictive failures do not guarantee a bad theory—there may be many reasons why predictions fail (reliance on false background assumptions, poor experimental design, etc.). However, repeated predictive failures (esp. novel predictions) should lower our confidence in the adequacy of a theory. Predictive failures do not guarantee a bad theory—there may be many reasons why predictions fail (reliance on false background assumptions, poor experimental design, etc.). However, repeated predictive failures (esp. novel predictions) should lower our confidence in the adequacy of a theory.

Fecundity Good explanations will tend to open up further avenues for research Good explanations will tend to open up further avenues for research Success/Failure Story: Evolution vs. “Scientific” Creationism Success/Failure Story: Evolution vs. “Scientific” Creationism Success Story: Neuroscience Success Story: Neuroscience Failure Story?: Paul Churchland on “Folk Psychology” Failure Story?: Paul Churchland on “Folk Psychology”

Fit (or Coherence) Coherence with what we already know; improves understanding by minimizing belief revision Coherence with what we already know; improves understanding by minimizing belief revision Weak Fit if it is consistent with what we already have justification for believing; Strong Fit if it is implied by what we already have justification for believing Weak Fit if it is consistent with what we already have justification for believing; Strong Fit if it is implied by what we already have justification for believing Narrow Fit if it coheres with what the individual is justified in believing; Wide Fit if it coheres with the justified belief of a community Narrow Fit if it coheres with what the individual is justified in believing; Wide Fit if it coheres with the justified belief of a community Peripheral Fit if it coheres with less central beliefs; Central Fit if it coheres with foundational beliefs. Peripheral Fit if it coheres with less central beliefs; Central Fit if it coheres with foundational beliefs. All of these are a matter of degree: the closer to Strong, Wide and Central Fit, the better. All of these are a matter of degree: the closer to Strong, Wide and Central Fit, the better.

Examples Arthur Butz’ “Emigration” theory: the 6 million “missing” Jews from Europe were not actually killed, but rather were forcibly emigrated to other nations Arthur Butz’ “Emigration” theory: the 6 million “missing” Jews from Europe were not actually killed, but rather were forcibly emigrated to other nations Sociobiology: human social behavior is governed by innate biological drives Sociobiology: human social behavior is governed by innate biological drives